Amen! Supreme Court rules Christian foster agency can't be forced to place kids with same-sex couples

[BunnyOnion]

They finally got one decision right!

Supreme Court rules Christian foster agency can't be forced to place kids with same-sex couples

The U S Supreme Court has ruled that the city of Philadelphia can t exclude a Catholic charity from its foster program because the organization won t place children with same-sex couples in ...

www.christianpost.com

 

[JerryfromMass]

They finally got one decision right!

Supreme Court rules Christian foster agency can't be forced to place kids with same-sex couples

The U S Supreme Court has ruled that the city of Philadelphia can t exclude a Catholic charity from its foster program because the organization won t place children with same-sex couples in ...

www.christianpost.com

Unfortunately, in that same decision they affirmed the right of lgbtq's to adopt vulnerable children. Great decision for religious freedom. We need more 9-0 decisions affirming the rights of the faithful bakers and photographers and cartographers et alia.

 

[BunnyOnion]

Unfortunately, in that same decision they affirmed the right of lgbtq's to adopt vulnerable children. Great decision for religious freedom. We need more 9-0 decisions affirming the rights of the faithful bakers and photographers and cartographers et alia.

Where is the vulnerable children part in their decision?

 

[JerryfromMass]

Where is the vulnerable children part in their decision?

Did you read it: all of it?

 

[JerryfromMass]

Where is the vulnerable children part in their decision?

God created marriage for His pleasure and for His puposes, and that is: one man with one woman. Same-sex unions are not Biblical marriages; they are something else. Do you affirm same-sex couples perverting the word of God by calling their union a marriage? Any child put into a same-sex environment will eventually be perverted into believing same-sex relationships are perfectly fine. More people exchange the truth of God's word for lies every day, as in: girls can be boys, men can be girls, dogs can be women, and birds can be frogs. God is not the author of confusion, but He will send a strong delusion in the end times so that you will have no excuse if you are running with and believing the lies of mankind.

The scotus decision did nothing to prevent same-sex couples from adopting vulnerable children. The perverts are not losing, they're winning, which means Satan is getting more and more souls to join him in hell.

 

[Sue D.]

I was just reading the 'ruling' Trying to understand exactly what was being said. Upon reading it again and again -- Still not sure what I'm reading. Is that ruling good or bad? On One hand it sounds good, on another hand it doesn't.

 

[JerryfromMass]

I was just reading the 'ruling' Trying to understand exactly what was being said. Upon reading it again and again -- Still not sure what I'm reading. Is that ruling good or bad? On One hand it sounds good, on another hand it doesn't.

It's a good ruling for those of faith. It doesn't stop lgbtq from adopting from purely secular agencies, which is bad.

 

[BunnyOnion]

I was just reading the 'ruling' Trying to understand exactly what was being said. Upon reading it again and again -- Still not sure what I'm reading. Is that ruling good or bad? On One hand it sounds good, on another hand it doesn't.

The decision in Fulton vs. the City of Philadelphia insures the city government of Philadelphia has no authority nor recourse against the Catholic adoption agency of Philadelphia for their refusal to permit LGBTQ person's from singing up to be foster or adoptive parents.
It is a victory for all religious social services that provide adoption or foster care services in Pennsylvania.

Further, this decision in the Philadelphia case sets a precedent. This means other religious social services agencies in America may also refuse LGBTQ person's applications to adopt or foster .

However, because America's federal and state governments are secular, the decision in the Philadelphia case cannot extend to give those same rights to bar LGBTQ person's adopting or fostering children who are in non-religious, secular,state, social service agencies. Nor can private agencies discriminate in that way because though private, when licensed by the state they are then in commerce with the state. And this means they are not able to discriminate .

 

[JerryfromMass]

The decision in Fulton vs. the City of Philadelphia insures the city government of Philadelphia has no authority nor recourse against the Catholic adoption agency of Philadelphia for their refusal to permit LGBTQ person's from singing up to be foster or adoptive parents.
It is a victory for all religious social services that provide adoption or foster care services in Pennsylvania.

Further, this decision in the Philadelphia case sets a precedent. This means other religious social services agencies in America may also refuse LGBTQ person's applications to adopt or foster .

However, because America's federal and state governments are secular, the decision in the Philadelphia case cannot extend to give those same rights to bar LGBTQ person's adopting or fostering children who are in non-religious, secular,state, social service agencies. Nor can private agencies discriminate in that way because though private, when licensed by the state they are then in commerce with the state. And this means they are not able to discriminate .

There is good discrimination and there is bad discrimination.

Bad = denying a fundamental right based on skin tone.

Good = denying harmful activity based on the Word of God.

Marriage is created by God, and is one man and one woman. Man perverts God's marriage when man says marriage is Neal and Bob. Perverts.

 

[BunnyOnion]

There is good discrimination and there is bad discrimination.

Bad = denying a fundamental right based on skin tone.

Good = denying harmful activity based on the Word of God.

Marriage is created by God, and is one man and one woman. Man perverts God's marriage when man says marriage is Neal and Bob. Perverts.

True. However, American secular governance is not a Theocracy. Therefore, the law cannot show partiality for Christian values in law that would violate non-Christians civil rights. Nor show bias for Christians through the letter of the law .

Furthermore, we know that marriage in the eyes of God is between one woman and one man.
Therefore, in point of fact homosexuals entering into state licensed marriage are not married in the eyes of God. They are married according to the laws of man.

 

[PloughBoy]

True. However, American secular governance is not a Theocracy. Therefore, the law cannot show partiality for Christian values in law that would violate non-Christians civil rights. Nor show bias for Christians through the letter of the law .

Furthermore, we know that marriage in the eyes of God is between one woman and one man.
Therefore, in point of fact homosexuals entering into state licensed marriage are not married in the eyes of God. They are married according to the laws of man.

And is it not the Judgment of GOD upon them, that has made them have a desirer for the same sex attraction? Romans chapter 1.

 

[JerryfromMass]

True. However, American secular governance is not a Theocracy. Therefore, the law cannot show partiality for Christian values in law that would violate non-Christians civil rights. Nor show bias for Christians through the letter of the law .

Furthermore, we know that marriage in the eyes of God is between one woman and one man.
Therefore, in point of fact homosexuals entering into state licensed marriage are not married in the eyes of God. They are married according to the laws of man.

The law is always partial. We imprison murderers and let free those that kill in self defense. We punish bakers with conscientous objections to baking gay themed products, even though there are dozens of bskers that will.

When society devolves into what leftists "democrats" are pushing, i.e., no police, no prisons, no military, no borders, no cost colleges, no designated bathrooms for girls and boys, no fathers at the head of families, etc., then their idea of utopia is anarchy; then is there no partiality. It'll be a free-for-sll.

 

[BunnyOnion]

And is it not the Judgment of GOD upon them, that has made them have a desirer for the same sex attraction? Romans chapter 1.

No.
That they are that without repentance and God abandoned them ,and all obstinate unrepentant sinners , to their carnality that they prefer to his righteousness.

 

[PloughBoy]

No.
That they are that without repentance and God abandoned them ,and all obstinate unrepentant sinners , to their carnality that they prefer to his righteousness.