What is assembly? When I was in high school, it was a gathering of all students into the gym for some special purpose. Technically, it is a putting together of specific parts in such a way that the result is a whole item according to a set plan. This is true whether it is a tool, a toy, a computer, or a government. Assembly is just a general word, and its precise meaning must be determined by its use in the context in which it is found. This same principal holds true for the Greek language and a general word like EKKLESIA which is translated into English by the words assembly and church.
The regular Greek writings current with the New Testament and the Septuagint OT (GK translation of 200BC) are sources for the general meaning of EKKLESIA. In the New Testament the word is used in its own context and takes on a special meaning peculiar to the NT. But its NT meaning is not foreign to its general meaning; it is just a theological meaning that arises from its use in the NT. What is the Church in the NT? Were it not for the fact that “church” carries with it a theological meaning already and that in its general use it is a little different from “assembly”, it would be the same question as: what is the assembly in the New Testament? What I propose to do in this study is to observe the uses of EKKLESIA in the contexts in which they appear and then assemble a definition of a NT assembly. Biblically, what is a NT Church? That is our question. But paying close attention the Bible word EKKLESIA, and with God’s help, not going beyond the biblical data.
First, what is the general meaning of EKKLESIA? In the Greek city state it was an assembly of the citizens summoned by the city crier convened to make law and determine city matters. Any assembling of the public for decisions in public or city matters was an EKKLESIA. In the NT it is used this way in regard to illegal and legal assemblies (the illegal one being a riot in Ephesus). It has this use because it has in its etymology the ideas of: to call, KALEO, and EK, out of. Any gathering or assembling of a group of people out of a larger mass for some determined public action will readily take this word. A unity of mind and free voluntary agreement underlies the idea of EKKLESIA as well as a corporate (group related) action and policy.
The Hebrew OT word QAHAL is translated by EKKLESIA in the Septuagint Translation in the senses of assembly, congregation, gathering, and coming together of many things: nations, armed companies, people, and governors. QAHAL is translated SYNAGOGEI frequently as well, which generally means collecting, gathering, assembling, convening and bringing together. Synagogue obtained a theological meaning preceding the NT period similar to the English word Church, and because of the Hebrew Ecclesiastical rejection of Jesus Christ as the Messiah and Lamb of God, it becomes significant that it is not applied to saved gatherings of NT believers. Synagogue was too tied to the OT temple its Priesthood, ministry, and services among Hebrews as divided from Gentiles. It with other things was the old wine skins; new wine would not be compatible with it. So then how is EKKLESIA used in the NT?
The FIRST USE is in Matthew 16 where the Heavenly Father reveals to Peter the foundation doctrine of the new covenant: The Son of Man is the Christ (messiah), the Son of the Living God: God the Son incarnate fulfilling the work of the anointed offices of Prophet, Priest, and King, saving sinners and granting them entrance into the kingdom of heaven. Referring to Peter’s confession as “this rock,” Jesus says, “17b Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. 18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my EKKLESIAN; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. 19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” The word translated “I will build” is a word meaning to construct, to build a house, to edify, OIKO house + DOMO build. Christ will construct his assembly using Devine revelation of his person and work in individual living stones as Peter, himself, by his profession, represents. What kind of assembly is this to be? One, it is a struggling prevailing called out group in combat with the rulers of hell (this is the idea of a military company). Gates, though an entrance into a walled city and the weakest structure in its fortifications, is however its most aggressively defended point. Moreover in the Bible times they are the places where government and business were transacted. Principalities, powers, and the rulers of darkness comes to my mind (Eph. 6:12). Two, it is a loosing and binding gathering determining heaven’s policies in matters here on earth. Loosing and binding are simple legal terms for making civil policy and adjudicating disputes (classic city state overtones). Three, the keys are an opening and closing authority, and in Matthews context it is in contrast to the Pharisees and lawyers who shut men out of the kingdom (this authority is the power of the preached gospel).
The next two occurrences are in Matthew 18 and do a lot to illustrate the binding and loosing just mentioned above. Greatness in the kingdom of heaven is humility, vulnerability, and trust in contrast to their opposites (vs. 1-11). True joy is in the salvation of such as these (vs. 12-14). So offences have to be watched out for. Christ continues: “15 Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. 16 But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. 17 And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the EKKLESIA: but if he neglect to hear the EKKLESIAS, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican. 18 Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. 19 Again I say unto you, That if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven. 20 For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.” And the chapter continues on discussing the NT duty of forgiveness. This binding and loosing is a Biblical fact finding and perceptual resolution of disputed offence, kind of like common law. This assembly is any mutually salvation minded bible believing group of three or more with Christ in their midst. Is it a church as we know them? Not necessarily, but it applies to them. It definitely is however a classic juridical assembly of free men who are voluntarily committed to the rule of the Bible. The exclusion of the unrepentant offender is no more than the offenders own refusal of the rule of the Bible involved in the mutual decision. The unbeliever and tax collector part being the equivalent to his act of rejecting the comon rule of life. Unjust or unbiblical findings are not covered in this; that would vitiate the assumption of the presence of Christ in their midst.
So far there is not really any organizational structure evident in these passages. But the presence of Christ, the possessive pronoun “my” in the first passage, the purpose and power of Christ, and the architectural primacy of the builder, makes it extremely clear that the EKKLESIA is viewed in its vital relation to Christ. Without such personal relation there is not the least validity to the claim of NT assembly. Men can not do it; he must do it. Is Christ and the disciples an assembly in the sense we might call a church? They are assembled, they are baptized, yes, but they are assembled to be disciples, learners, and to be agents to the cities in representation of their principal Christ. Christ is their Lord, their master, their rabbi. A school class room is an assembly of students with the teacher as their master. It is an EKKLESIA relationship; I would not call it a biblical Church. How about the statement, “tell it to the EKKLESIA?” Does this not widen the scope? It can, yes, but it does not have to. The disciples and many others were gathered unto Christ. I am sure they gathered with others even in civic gatherings as well as in their synagogues. Whoever were of like mind and of one accord in matters of the lost sheep seeking efforts of the chief shepherd is all that is required here (remember he is still with them here). Though it is marvelously hinted in this text of a presence through absence, it is the rule of the word of God that is the measure of that. The Roman Catholic dogma of popes, keys, last rights, purgatory, and superstructures of vicars of Christ is altogether out of the NT picture. So is a lot of protestant ecclesiology. Equality and voluntary mutual submission to the rule of Christ because of implanted faith in men’s hearts involving the person and work of Christ is what I see here, a simple organic, not a complex formal organization.
But then we have just started, I assume things will build. These occurrences, intriguing as they are, are only 3 out of 115; and it is all before Pentecost, Acts, The Epistles, and Revelations. God willing I will try to continue this study right on through the rest of the passages and I pray He show us marvelous things out of his word. …DGB
The regular Greek writings current with the New Testament and the Septuagint OT (GK translation of 200BC) are sources for the general meaning of EKKLESIA. In the New Testament the word is used in its own context and takes on a special meaning peculiar to the NT. But its NT meaning is not foreign to its general meaning; it is just a theological meaning that arises from its use in the NT. What is the Church in the NT? Were it not for the fact that “church” carries with it a theological meaning already and that in its general use it is a little different from “assembly”, it would be the same question as: what is the assembly in the New Testament? What I propose to do in this study is to observe the uses of EKKLESIA in the contexts in which they appear and then assemble a definition of a NT assembly. Biblically, what is a NT Church? That is our question. But paying close attention the Bible word EKKLESIA, and with God’s help, not going beyond the biblical data.
First, what is the general meaning of EKKLESIA? In the Greek city state it was an assembly of the citizens summoned by the city crier convened to make law and determine city matters. Any assembling of the public for decisions in public or city matters was an EKKLESIA. In the NT it is used this way in regard to illegal and legal assemblies (the illegal one being a riot in Ephesus). It has this use because it has in its etymology the ideas of: to call, KALEO, and EK, out of. Any gathering or assembling of a group of people out of a larger mass for some determined public action will readily take this word. A unity of mind and free voluntary agreement underlies the idea of EKKLESIA as well as a corporate (group related) action and policy.
The Hebrew OT word QAHAL is translated by EKKLESIA in the Septuagint Translation in the senses of assembly, congregation, gathering, and coming together of many things: nations, armed companies, people, and governors. QAHAL is translated SYNAGOGEI frequently as well, which generally means collecting, gathering, assembling, convening and bringing together. Synagogue obtained a theological meaning preceding the NT period similar to the English word Church, and because of the Hebrew Ecclesiastical rejection of Jesus Christ as the Messiah and Lamb of God, it becomes significant that it is not applied to saved gatherings of NT believers. Synagogue was too tied to the OT temple its Priesthood, ministry, and services among Hebrews as divided from Gentiles. It with other things was the old wine skins; new wine would not be compatible with it. So then how is EKKLESIA used in the NT?
The FIRST USE is in Matthew 16 where the Heavenly Father reveals to Peter the foundation doctrine of the new covenant: The Son of Man is the Christ (messiah), the Son of the Living God: God the Son incarnate fulfilling the work of the anointed offices of Prophet, Priest, and King, saving sinners and granting them entrance into the kingdom of heaven. Referring to Peter’s confession as “this rock,” Jesus says, “17b Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. 18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my EKKLESIAN; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. 19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” The word translated “I will build” is a word meaning to construct, to build a house, to edify, OIKO house + DOMO build. Christ will construct his assembly using Devine revelation of his person and work in individual living stones as Peter, himself, by his profession, represents. What kind of assembly is this to be? One, it is a struggling prevailing called out group in combat with the rulers of hell (this is the idea of a military company). Gates, though an entrance into a walled city and the weakest structure in its fortifications, is however its most aggressively defended point. Moreover in the Bible times they are the places where government and business were transacted. Principalities, powers, and the rulers of darkness comes to my mind (Eph. 6:12). Two, it is a loosing and binding gathering determining heaven’s policies in matters here on earth. Loosing and binding are simple legal terms for making civil policy and adjudicating disputes (classic city state overtones). Three, the keys are an opening and closing authority, and in Matthews context it is in contrast to the Pharisees and lawyers who shut men out of the kingdom (this authority is the power of the preached gospel).
The next two occurrences are in Matthew 18 and do a lot to illustrate the binding and loosing just mentioned above. Greatness in the kingdom of heaven is humility, vulnerability, and trust in contrast to their opposites (vs. 1-11). True joy is in the salvation of such as these (vs. 12-14). So offences have to be watched out for. Christ continues: “15 Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. 16 But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. 17 And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the EKKLESIA: but if he neglect to hear the EKKLESIAS, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican. 18 Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. 19 Again I say unto you, That if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven. 20 For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.” And the chapter continues on discussing the NT duty of forgiveness. This binding and loosing is a Biblical fact finding and perceptual resolution of disputed offence, kind of like common law. This assembly is any mutually salvation minded bible believing group of three or more with Christ in their midst. Is it a church as we know them? Not necessarily, but it applies to them. It definitely is however a classic juridical assembly of free men who are voluntarily committed to the rule of the Bible. The exclusion of the unrepentant offender is no more than the offenders own refusal of the rule of the Bible involved in the mutual decision. The unbeliever and tax collector part being the equivalent to his act of rejecting the comon rule of life. Unjust or unbiblical findings are not covered in this; that would vitiate the assumption of the presence of Christ in their midst.
So far there is not really any organizational structure evident in these passages. But the presence of Christ, the possessive pronoun “my” in the first passage, the purpose and power of Christ, and the architectural primacy of the builder, makes it extremely clear that the EKKLESIA is viewed in its vital relation to Christ. Without such personal relation there is not the least validity to the claim of NT assembly. Men can not do it; he must do it. Is Christ and the disciples an assembly in the sense we might call a church? They are assembled, they are baptized, yes, but they are assembled to be disciples, learners, and to be agents to the cities in representation of their principal Christ. Christ is their Lord, their master, their rabbi. A school class room is an assembly of students with the teacher as their master. It is an EKKLESIA relationship; I would not call it a biblical Church. How about the statement, “tell it to the EKKLESIA?” Does this not widen the scope? It can, yes, but it does not have to. The disciples and many others were gathered unto Christ. I am sure they gathered with others even in civic gatherings as well as in their synagogues. Whoever were of like mind and of one accord in matters of the lost sheep seeking efforts of the chief shepherd is all that is required here (remember he is still with them here). Though it is marvelously hinted in this text of a presence through absence, it is the rule of the word of God that is the measure of that. The Roman Catholic dogma of popes, keys, last rights, purgatory, and superstructures of vicars of Christ is altogether out of the NT picture. So is a lot of protestant ecclesiology. Equality and voluntary mutual submission to the rule of Christ because of implanted faith in men’s hearts involving the person and work of Christ is what I see here, a simple organic, not a complex formal organization.
But then we have just started, I assume things will build. These occurrences, intriguing as they are, are only 3 out of 115; and it is all before Pentecost, Acts, The Epistles, and Revelations. God willing I will try to continue this study right on through the rest of the passages and I pray He show us marvelous things out of his word. …DGB
Last edited: