KingJ
Active
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2015
- Messages
- 4,562
At the time that Adam and Eve ate the forbidden fruit, they became aware of their nakedness. They received the knowledge of good and evil.
Gen 3:11 And he said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from?
Gen 3:22 The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil.
As such, a popular argument from Christians to all when witnessing, is the matter of our conscience convicting us of what is evil, IE sin. IE We all feel the need to repent of our sins.
Now this is a good argument for a Christian to raise in discussion they have with the unsaved. It is a discussion of something that should be common knowledge. Unlike a belief of Jesus being Lord and faith in Him being necessary for salvation.
However, at certain times in history. Times like Sodom and the Flood. The knowledge of what is good and evil evolved in the direction of evil being called good. This makes for an interesting and sometimes annoying discussion with the unsaved. There was a time when we would all agree that X was evil and punishment of Y was fair and reasonable. Today however, X is accepted, any punishment taboo and any opposition can land up getting you in prison .
This truly annoys me. When people lose their moral compass it becomes difficult to preach on the need for repentance of sin.
We are in the end times and another catastrophic end of age event is on the horizon. So, how do we still pursue this line of reasoning in order to get people to see the need to repent? I feel we have no choice but to move down the line with the evil. Now, don't get me wrong. I am not stating that we approve of sin, we just grasp that their moral compass is further down the hill then ours.
As such, we need to evolve our 'preaching' to be effective. We need to avoid getting 'caught up' in a debate on matters they do not see as evil. There will be sins they do agree are evil and we need to focus on those. All those that are still living, are living because God is convinced that they are not yet sold out to a love of what is evil. God has consistently, throughout scripture spared His wrath to the absolutely last minute. We are not witnessing to the devil. The devil would debate every single evil act being sinful or not.
Example of how preaching needs to evolve:
Fifty years ago, Sin A, B and C are evil. All agree. Some repent, some don't.
Today, Sin A and B are evil but not C. Focus A and B. Do not get held up with C. Move on, agree to disagree. Mention that God considers everything. C will only be an item of contention as a result of upbringing and media's influence. It could be that some are less accountable for C over others. But make no mistake, when someone repents and they receive the power of God in their lives. They will grasp that A, B and C are sins that upset God. Let's leave C, to God and the Holy Spirit.
Gen 3:11 And he said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from?
Gen 3:22 The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil.
As such, a popular argument from Christians to all when witnessing, is the matter of our conscience convicting us of what is evil, IE sin. IE We all feel the need to repent of our sins.
Now this is a good argument for a Christian to raise in discussion they have with the unsaved. It is a discussion of something that should be common knowledge. Unlike a belief of Jesus being Lord and faith in Him being necessary for salvation.
However, at certain times in history. Times like Sodom and the Flood. The knowledge of what is good and evil evolved in the direction of evil being called good. This makes for an interesting and sometimes annoying discussion with the unsaved. There was a time when we would all agree that X was evil and punishment of Y was fair and reasonable. Today however, X is accepted, any punishment taboo and any opposition can land up getting you in prison .
This truly annoys me. When people lose their moral compass it becomes difficult to preach on the need for repentance of sin.
We are in the end times and another catastrophic end of age event is on the horizon. So, how do we still pursue this line of reasoning in order to get people to see the need to repent? I feel we have no choice but to move down the line with the evil. Now, don't get me wrong. I am not stating that we approve of sin, we just grasp that their moral compass is further down the hill then ours.
As such, we need to evolve our 'preaching' to be effective. We need to avoid getting 'caught up' in a debate on matters they do not see as evil. There will be sins they do agree are evil and we need to focus on those. All those that are still living, are living because God is convinced that they are not yet sold out to a love of what is evil. God has consistently, throughout scripture spared His wrath to the absolutely last minute. We are not witnessing to the devil. The devil would debate every single evil act being sinful or not.
Example of how preaching needs to evolve:
Fifty years ago, Sin A, B and C are evil. All agree. Some repent, some don't.
Today, Sin A and B are evil but not C. Focus A and B. Do not get held up with C. Move on, agree to disagree. Mention that God considers everything. C will only be an item of contention as a result of upbringing and media's influence. It could be that some are less accountable for C over others. But make no mistake, when someone repents and they receive the power of God in their lives. They will grasp that A, B and C are sins that upset God. Let's leave C, to God and the Holy Spirit.