Hekuran
Faithful Brother in Christ
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2008
- Messages
- 3,970
Things go wrong in churches. Jesus gave his disciples principles to follow when the inevitable problems arise.
Matthew 18:
In my experience, most churches - and individuals within churches - do not handle internal conflict well. The tendency I have observed is to turn a blind eye to problems in the name of peace and love, then, when they get too serious to ignore, to respond in a heavy-handed and authoritarian way. It's not always like this, but I've seen it many times.
We have to make a choice in discerning what Jesus means by "listen" in this passage.
If a problem arises, we are to take it to the person involved directly and privately. The hope is that they will listen. Until now I have thought of "listen" in the sense of the other person understanding their fault and accepting my view of things. But I'm now considering it more literally: if the other person is willing to hear me out, then I have won them over. It's not about me proving them wrong, it's about each of us being willing to talk, hear the other and discern together how to respond.
This is not about saying that there isn't right and wrong, more recognising that where there is dischord there is usually a mix of right and wrong, good intentions and misunderstanding on each side.
Reconcilliation and restoration rather than discipline.
Here's the kind of thing we see often in churches: one person sees that others are not executing their responsibilities in the church well - they are late, sloppy or unprepared - so that person steps in and takes over to make sure that everything is done well. After a while they get to feel resentful that everybody looks to them to get things done and nobody else takes proper responsibility.
In the meantime others feel put out that that they have been pushed out of their roles and find that their responsibilities have been taken over. The net result is that everybody is feeling unhappy and resentful. Nobody is totally in the wrong, and nobody is perfectly right. Everybody would like everybody else to be happy.
Listening for reconcilliation in a case like this (by far the more common in churches) is more effective than talking to persuade.
Matthew 18:
“If your brother or sister sins, go and point out their fault, just between the two of you. If they listen to you, you have won them over. But if they will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’ If they still refuse to listen, tell it to the church; and if they refuse to listen even to the church, treat them as you would a pagan or a tax collector.
“Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.
“Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.
In my experience, most churches - and individuals within churches - do not handle internal conflict well. The tendency I have observed is to turn a blind eye to problems in the name of peace and love, then, when they get too serious to ignore, to respond in a heavy-handed and authoritarian way. It's not always like this, but I've seen it many times.
We have to make a choice in discerning what Jesus means by "listen" in this passage.
If a problem arises, we are to take it to the person involved directly and privately. The hope is that they will listen. Until now I have thought of "listen" in the sense of the other person understanding their fault and accepting my view of things. But I'm now considering it more literally: if the other person is willing to hear me out, then I have won them over. It's not about me proving them wrong, it's about each of us being willing to talk, hear the other and discern together how to respond.
This is not about saying that there isn't right and wrong, more recognising that where there is dischord there is usually a mix of right and wrong, good intentions and misunderstanding on each side.
Reconcilliation and restoration rather than discipline.
Here's the kind of thing we see often in churches: one person sees that others are not executing their responsibilities in the church well - they are late, sloppy or unprepared - so that person steps in and takes over to make sure that everything is done well. After a while they get to feel resentful that everybody looks to them to get things done and nobody else takes proper responsibility.
In the meantime others feel put out that that they have been pushed out of their roles and find that their responsibilities have been taken over. The net result is that everybody is feeling unhappy and resentful. Nobody is totally in the wrong, and nobody is perfectly right. Everybody would like everybody else to be happy.
Listening for reconcilliation in a case like this (by far the more common in churches) is more effective than talking to persuade.