- Joined
- Feb 9, 2004
- Messages
- 17,078
By now you have probably heard the media claim religious, pro-family organizations—like Focus on the Family—are waging a "war against women." What's the evidence for that, you ask? It's our strong opposition to the new federal mandate requiring all employers to offer possible abortion-causing drugs, contraception and sterilization to female employees—regardless of our deeply held religious beliefs about the sanctity of human life.
It's a common talking point, used by abortion advocates and echoed by their friends in the media: Somehow, defending the religious freedom of millions of believers across the country constitutes an attack on women's rights.
To that I say: Nonsense. The new federal healthcare law poses a real and serious danger to religious liberty rights as it forces employers—regardless of religious affiliation—to compromise deeply held beliefs or fork over a hefty fine for refusing to comply with the mandate. This means that religious organizations, such as Christian schools, radio stations, and even pro-life groups dedicated to saving preborn babies' lives must offer employees possible abortifacient drugs as long as they provide healthcare benefits in the employment package.
Watch this week's CitizenLink Report, in which my colleagues Carrie Gordon Earll and Ashley Horne discuss this issue and how women are responding to it.
The "anti-woman" rhetoric, however, isn't resonating so well with women. A recent New York Times/CBS poll found the majority of women (and men) believe all employers—particularly religious ones—should be able to opt out of this mandate. Unfortunately, they also said they think the debate is more about women's health than religious freedom—evidence that we indeed have our work cut out for us as we continue explaining exactly what's at stake with the new healthcare law.
Thank you for your continued prayers for our leaders and for religious freedom to be upheld in our country.
For faith and family,
Tom Minnery
Senior Vice President, Government & Public Policy
Focus On the Family
It's a common talking point, used by abortion advocates and echoed by their friends in the media: Somehow, defending the religious freedom of millions of believers across the country constitutes an attack on women's rights.
To that I say: Nonsense. The new federal healthcare law poses a real and serious danger to religious liberty rights as it forces employers—regardless of religious affiliation—to compromise deeply held beliefs or fork over a hefty fine for refusing to comply with the mandate. This means that religious organizations, such as Christian schools, radio stations, and even pro-life groups dedicated to saving preborn babies' lives must offer employees possible abortifacient drugs as long as they provide healthcare benefits in the employment package.
Watch this week's CitizenLink Report, in which my colleagues Carrie Gordon Earll and Ashley Horne discuss this issue and how women are responding to it.
The "anti-woman" rhetoric, however, isn't resonating so well with women. A recent New York Times/CBS poll found the majority of women (and men) believe all employers—particularly religious ones—should be able to opt out of this mandate. Unfortunately, they also said they think the debate is more about women's health than religious freedom—evidence that we indeed have our work cut out for us as we continue explaining exactly what's at stake with the new healthcare law.
Thank you for your continued prayers for our leaders and for religious freedom to be upheld in our country.
For faith and family,
Tom Minnery
Senior Vice President, Government & Public Policy
Focus On the Family