amadeus2, Thank you for the detailed response! I agree and the verses you referenced are a great help to my question.
Yet I'm still left with the question of if financial debt equates sin in a black and white easily determinable fashion.
This is all just my raw thinking so please don't think I am trying to sell some sort of doctrine, just opening conversation.
As amadeus2 mentioned it may not apply to everyone, but I'm not sure how it wouldn't apply. Maybe my logic is incorrect or I am missing some sort of contextual understanding of the following references.
Proverbs 22:7 - "Just as the rich rule the poor, so the borrower is servant to the lender." (NLT)
Matthew 6:24 - "No one can serve two masters. For you will hate one and love the other; you will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money." (NLT)
So lets go down the hypothetical path that my head has gone ahead and constructed. If I am the borrower than I am servant to the lender, or as the NIV translates it, I am slave to the lender. So if I am a slave, than the lender becomes my master and if I cannot server two masters, then being in debt leaves me with the inability to whole fully serve God as my master.
So debt begins leading me away from God into the arms of debt becoming Lord of my life, instead of God, making the debt(or the love of things I cannot afford under my own/God provided means) an Idol. Lets think about this understanding of debt for a moment, is there truly and honestly a good explanation for debt that does not result in Idolatry? I know there are medical debts.. etc that people really don't have control over, but that's not really what I'm talking about here... I'm trying to discuss consumer debt/ anything we have control over buying or not buying. The dictionary definition of Idol is "the worship of idols or excessive devotion to, or reverence for some person or thing"... so the devotion to a person or object is generally known as Idolatry. Can we honestly say that those of us who take on debt are not in some way "devoting" ourselves to the debt, or the possessions we "could not" live without? Even if our devotion is not on an emotional level, we certainly are entering into a binding contract with the lender.
So, if Sin is to "transgress" God or "to step across or go beyond a set boundary or limit" and to hold debt is in my understanding Idolatry...
Ezekiel 23:49 references how God truly feels about Idolatry:
"You will suffer the penalty for your lewdness(obscenity: the trait of behaving in an obscene manner) and bear the consequences of your sins of idolatry. Then you will know that I am the Sovereign Lord.”
Not to mention that Idolatry is part of the Ten Commandments! see Exodus 20.
In conclusion its hard to say that Idolatry is not a sin(transgression), maybe impossible since God is so blatantly clear when referencing it. Yet its easier to say that holding debt is not a sin, because its more of a grey area. Yet I would like to make the argument, at least in my own life, that willfully participating in debt creating actions is in fact a form of Idolatry. It is also a love of money and possessions, not a love of God. In some ways racking up debt even shows that I don't trust in God to provide, I trust the bank a whole lot more than God to come through for me every time I swipe that plastic.
And to finish, unless I am way off in the rough (which I know is very possible...), I'd say at this moment that yeah.. Debt is a black and white transgression against God... therefore a sin.
Some more questions arise if my conclusion about debt is true:
So if Debt is a sin, how the heck are we suppose to live in a modern society without it?
Doesn't our Credit Score (debt score) determine our financial status/ability in the modern world?
Is "good debt" okay? (makes me think of another grey area we struggle with... is oral sex okay as long as we don't go "all the way"?... ... ..)
I don't know everything and don't pretend to... I'm just a young guy trying to figure all this practical stuff out and how God intends for me to live in the world. So I'd like to say again, I am NOT trying to sell a doctrine or anything... just opening the conversation.
Thanks