N'filim

[Admon Mikha'el]

Genesis 6:4​

4 The N’filim were on the earth in those days, and also afterwards, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them; these were the ancient heroes, men of renown.​

​

And also afterward....Does that mean the N'filim are still on the Earth? Why do churhes not teach on this?​

The flood obviously did not kill all the giants....David killed Goliath after the flood...The Israelites went up against giants when they took Canaan, and there are thirty six tribes of giants mentioned in the bible since the flood...Does that mean that giants still exist....What about other N'filim? Cryptids....that sort of thing

​

 

[Brad Huber]

I personally believe that all land based human/angel crossbreeds died in the flood, but sea based could have survived and crossbreed again, think sirens may have had something to do with it.

 

[GodB4Us]

Genesis 6:4​

4 The N’filim were on the earth in those days, and also afterwards, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them; these were the ancient heroes, men of renown.​

​

And also afterward....Does that mean the N'filim are still on the Earth? Why do churhes not teach on this?​

The flood obviously did not kill all the giants....David killed Goliath after the flood...The Israelites went up against giants when they took Canaan, and there are thirty six tribes of giants mentioned in the bible since the flood...Does that mean that giants still exist....What about other N'filim? Cryptids....that sort of thing

​

Only 8 people were saved by the ark. That means every one on earth is related to Noah & his family.

As for how the giants were on the earth afterwards, it may have been Israelites mixing with foreigners outside of their nations as the lineage of Seth, the sons of God, were mixing with their other offspring's lineage from Adam & Eve.

One can say that because of the sons of God doing that is why the nation of Israel should not marry outside of the nation of Israel, but as it is, the reference of sons of God always refer to the lineage of Seth as the roots of their godly family tree.

 

[GodB4Us]

I personally believe that all land based human/angel crossbreeds died in the flood, but sea based could have survived and crossbreed again, think sirens may have had something to do with it.

One should reconsider that popular belief with His words since angels are not marrying nor given in marriage.

Matthew 22:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.

And we know God would not join any same sex couples for that would be an unholy matrimony and so only man is joining them together in sin. Since God would not participate in any unholy union, then He would not join "sons of God" if they were angels to a woman to have those women be called wives in His words.

And applying the sons of God as referring to angels is dubious when angels are not marry nor given in marriage and if "angels" were really doing that, why would they still be called sons of God as being His angels?

Then they would say well, they are fallen angels that have departed from their former habitations, but again, why would they still be called the sons of God as being His angels still in His words?

Answer; the sons of God were never angels. The 2 times that Satan was among the "sons of God", God pointed out Job because Job was among the sons of God; thus the sons of God.

When we discern when Job had lived, we can discern that the sons of god was how Israel's family tree is traced by bloodline for how they used to be known as the sons of God until Jesus Christ came for how the sons of God are known now.

Is Job included on the Bible Timeline?

Since more scripture accompany the first discernment on when Job had lives, it seems most plausible.

a. Eliphaz refers to the flood as being in the past in Job 22:16
b. Job sacrifices to God as head of his family (a practice of patriarchal times that stopped with Moses) Job 1:5
c. Job's daughters received an inheritance along with his sons Job 42:15 a patriarchal practice that also stopped with Moses
d. Job's wealth is determined by flocks rather than money that is also consistent with patriarchal times Job 1:3, 42:12
e. The kesitah or piece of money mentioned belongs to patriarchal times
f. The musical instruments (organ, harp, and timbrel) are the instruments of early Genesis
g. Job lived long enough to birth two families of ten children and raise them to adulthood then lived another 140 years. He lived at least 200 years and possibly longer. This is consistent with the ages of patriarchs prior to Abraham.

And since the sons of God back then and Israel later on do worship God in His creation, God pointing out how the sons of God did worship Him for laying the foundations of the world, was God telling Job that he should know better since he was one of them. There would be no point referring a time as if the angels were worshiping God when He laid the foundation of the world since Job was not there, but he was there with the sons of God worshiping Him for him to know better in their weekly worship of the Lord.

Proof that sons of God is about Irael's family tree can be seen how their roots goes all the way back to Adam and he was one of the sons of God.

Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Anyway, our salvation in Christ Jesus by believing in Him, even in His name is how we are the sons of God now, and no longer are the sons of God known by blood or Judaism.

John 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

 

[B-A-C]

Then they would say well, they are fallen angels that have departed from their former habitations, but again, why would they still be called the sons of God as being His angels still in His words?

Jude 1:6; And angels who did not keep their own domain, but abandoned their proper abode, He has kept in eternal bonds under darkness for the judgment of the great day,
Jude 1:7; just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire.

King James says these angels committed fornication.

(KJV)
Jude 1:6; And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
Jude 1:7; Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

One has to wonder why the males are are sons of "God", but the females are are called daughters of "men".

(NIV)
Gen 6:2; the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose.
Gen 6:3; Then the LORD said, "My Spirit will not contend with humans forever, for they are mortal; their days will be a hundred and twenty years."
Gen 6:4; The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.

(NASB)
Gen 6:2 that the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose.
Gen 6:3 Then the LORD said, "My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, because he also is flesh; nevertheless his days shall be one hundred and twenty years."
Gen 6:4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.

One also has to consider that humans mating with humans doesn't normally produce giants (Nephilim). But yet the giants came from these marriages.
A theme through the Bible is that humans killed giants. Why would God want them to do this?

 

[Admon Mikha'el]

One should reconsider that popular belief with His words since angels are not marrying nor given in marriage.

Matthew 22:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.

And we know God would not join any same sex couples for that would be an unholy matrimony and so only man is joining them together in sin. Since God would not participate in any unholy union, then He would not join "sons of God" if they were angels to a woman to have those women be called wives in His words.

And applying the sons of God as referring to angels is dubious when angels are not marry nor given in marriage and if "angels" were really doing that, why would they still be called sons of God as being His angels?

Then they would say well, they are fallen angels that have departed from their former habitations, but again, why would they still be called the sons of God as being His angels still in His words?

Answer; the sons of God were never angels. The 2 times that Satan was among the "sons of God", God pointed out Job because Job was among the sons of God; thus the sons of God.

When we discern when Job had lived, we can discern that the sons of god was how Israel's family tree is traced by bloodline for how they used to be known as the sons of God until Jesus Christ came for how the sons of God are known now.

Is Job included on the Bible Timeline?

Since more scripture accompany the first discernment on when Job had lives, it seems most plausible.

a. Eliphaz refers to the flood as being in the past in Job 22:16
b. Job sacrifices to God as head of his family (a practice of patriarchal times that stopped with Moses) Job 1:5
c. Job's daughters received an inheritance along with his sons Job 42:15 a patriarchal practice that also stopped with Moses
d. Job's wealth is determined by flocks rather than money that is also consistent with patriarchal times Job 1:3, 42:12
e. The kesitah or piece of money mentioned belongs to patriarchal times
f. The musical instruments (organ, harp, and timbrel) are the instruments of early Genesis
g. Job lived long enough to birth two families of ten children and raise them to adulthood then lived another 140 years. He lived at least 200 years and possibly longer. This is consistent with the ages of patriarchs prior to Abraham.

And since the sons of God back then and Israel later on do worship God in His creation, God pointing out how the sons of God did worship Him for laying the foundations of the world, was God telling Job that he should know better since he was one of them. There would be no point referring a time as if the angels were worshiping God when He laid the foundation of the world since Job was not there, but he was there with the sons of God worshiping Him for him to know better in their weekly worship of the Lord.

Proof that sons of God is about Irael's family tree can be seen how their roots goes all the way back to Adam and he was one of the sons of God.

Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Anyway, our salvation in Christ Jesus by believing in Him, even in His name is how we are the sons of God now, and no longer are the sons of God known by blood or Judaism.

John 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

If you read the Word, God DID NOT do it...the sons of God did it...the fallen angels....and the bible does not say angels cannot reproduce...It says they do not...
Do you believe the sons of God were the sons of Seth....not possible

 

[GodB4Us]

Jude 1:6; And angels who did not keep their own domain, but abandoned their proper abode, He has kept in eternal bonds under darkness for the judgment of the great day,
Jude 1:7; just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire.

King James says these angels committed fornication.

(KJV)
Jude 1:6; And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
Jude 1:7; Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

The angels ( the fallen ones anyway ) have left Heaven their first estate which is the same as in like manner Sodom & Gomorrha gave themselves over to fornication and going after strange flesh. The fallen angels were not doing what Sodom & Gomorrha did but in like manner left their human state in how God intended for them when they gave themselves over to fornication and going after strange flesh. The fallen angels leaving their first estate is the same thing as Sodom & Gomorrha leaving what God intended for them to live as when they indulged in that sinful lifestyle.

Matthew 22:30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.

That is our futire resurrected state as the first fruits of the resurrection that can never change and so if that can never change then that is how the angels are, because they were not created to marry nor given to marriage to build families. Angels cannot change themselves to suddenly be able to marry and have children, let alone fallen angels be able to do that. There is no macro evolution or the opposite being involved here and so do consider that truth.

If you consider the celestial between the terrestrial, the terrestrial committing fornication & going after strange flesh as leaving abiding in God is the same as the celestial leaving their first abode in Heaven from abiding with God.

One has to wonder why the males are are sons of "God", but the females are are called daughters of "men".

(NIV)
Gen 6:2; the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose.
Gen 6:3; Then the LORD said, "My Spirit will not contend with humans forever, for they are mortal; their days will be a hundred and twenty years."
Gen 6:4; The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.

(NASB)
Gen 6:2 that the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose.
Gen 6:3 Then the LORD said, "My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, because he also is flesh; nevertheless his days shall be one hundred and twenty years."
Gen 6:4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.

Yet the children that these wives bore them were men.

If we consider that Seth replaced Abel and Cain is out there with his own bloodline, Seth being the godly lineage that Israel identifies with as the sons of God, then the sons of God married outside of that godly lineage in marrying the descendent of Cain. I only referred to Cain to illustrate a point about bloodlines separate from Seth's, but it should be known that there were other children besides Cain & Abel from Adam & Eve.

Genesis 5:3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth: 4 And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters: 5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.

Now I believe Adam had begat sons and daughters before Seth too and not just afterwards for how Cain found a wife. This is why Cain was feared for his life because every one alive was related to Abel in some way or capacity to seek revenge on Cain as Eve was the mother of all the living.

Genesis 3:20 And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

One also has to consider that humans mating with humans doesn't normally produce giants (Nephilim). But yet the giants came from these marriages.
A theme through the Bible is that humans killed giants. Why would God want them to do this?

If we note how long the sons of God lived as abiding in Him, and when they started marrying outside of their godly lineage, God shortened the life of man to 120 years.

So sin has a way of shortening people's lives as it drives them away from God and what is good.

As it is the reason God flooded the world is about how man was thinking evil continually, not because of any assumed mingling of angels with mankind. God said the same thing for why He had flooded the world after the flood.

Genesis 6:5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. 6 And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. 7 And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them. 8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord.

Genesis 8:18 And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him: 19 Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark. 20 And Noah builded an altar unto the Lord; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar. 21 And the Lord smelled a sweet savour; and the Lord said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done.

So the idea that God had to flood the world because the devil was polluting the bloodlines so the Christ child could not come is false since there were giants in the earth afterwards.

Were the giants David had faced, were the results of a Jew with a foreign woman? Don't know. We could look at before the flood for the consequences for marrying outside the godly line of Seth, and assume maybe that was the case for Israel for marrying outside the nation of Israel, but it would only be an assumption.

But there can be no assumption when angels cannot marry nor given in marriage for them to be the sons of God.

The Hebrew word for son is "ben" as builder of the family name. Since the sons of God pertains to Israel in the O.T., then the sons of God in the O.T. is referring to their family tree & bloodlines and nothing more, let alone angels.

 

[GodB4Us]

If you read the Word, God DID NOT do it...the sons of God did it...the fallen angels....and the bible does not say angels cannot reproduce...It says they do not...
Do you believe the sons of God were the sons of Seth....not possible

See post #7 above as it is very possible since Adam is the son of God.

Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

 

[Brad Huber]

One should reconsider that popular belief with His words since angels are not marrying nor given in marriage.

Matthew 22:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.

Thats the obediant angels, and I am not speaking of marriage, simple coupling is all.

 

[Brad Huber]

Only 8 people were saved by the ark. That means every one on earth is related to Noah & his family.

As for how the giants were on the earth afterwards, it may have been Israelites mixing with foreigners outside of their nations as the lineage of Seth, the sons of God, were mixing with their other offspring's lineage from Adam & Eve.

One can say that because of the sons of God doing that is why the nation of Israel should not marry outside of the nation of Israel, but as it is, the reference of sons of God always refer to the lineage of Seth as the roots of their godly family tree.

You are making assumption to make your belief more valid, bad idea. Its fine, if you state simply that you think such and such, but its best to not put forward something as more valid than another assumption. Only God knows.

 

[GodB4Us]

Thats the obediant angels, and I am not speaking of marriage, simple coupling is all.

God would not call them wives in His words then, but they were called wives in His words because God had joined them to be called wives in His words. That is why you should reconsider that the sons of God were angels when He would not join them together for the women to be called "wives" to them. And do note also that all children are from the Lord as the fruit of the womb is the reward.

Psalm 127:3 Lo, children are an heritage of the Lord: and the fruit of the womb is his reward.

So there was no diabolical plot to pollute the blood line to prevent the Christ child from coming as some do believe that for why the "sons of God" were mingling with makind for, but sine anels cannot marry for women to be called wives to them, then neither fallen angels would He marry for the women to be called wives to them..

Then one has to wonder why call fallen angels "sons of God" in His words? God would not do that either since it is a term used for Israel's family tree to trace in scripture..

 

[GodB4Us]

You are making assumption to make your belief more valid, bad idea. Its fine, if you state simply that you think such and such, but its best to not put forward something as more valid than another assumption. Only God knows.

Peter believed there were only 8 souls saved at the time of the global flood.

1 Peter 3:20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

Jesus confirmed that Noah and his family were the only survivors as He plainly stated that the flood destroyed them all just as He said the same for those in Sodom.

Luke 17:26 And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. 27 They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all.

28 Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; 29 But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.

So it is not an assumption when it is based in & confirmed in scripture.

 

[Admon Mikha'el]

The angels ( the fallen ones anyway ) have left Heaven their first estate which is the same as in like manner Sodom & Gomorrha gave themselves over to fornication and going after strange flesh. The fallen angels were not doing what Sodom & Gomorrha did but in like manner left their human state in how God intended for them when they gave themselves over to fornication and going after strange flesh. The fallen angels leaving their first estate is the same thing as Sodom & Gomorrha leaving what God intended for them to live as when they indulged in that sinful lifestyle.

Matthew 22:30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.

That is our futire resurrected state as the first fruits of the resurrection that can never change and so if that can never change then that is how the angels are, because they were not created to marry nor given to marriage to build families. Angels cannot change themselves to suddenly be able to marry and have children, let alone fallen angels be able to do that. There is no macro evolution or the opposite being involved here and so do consider that truth.

If you consider the celestial between the terrestrial, the terrestrial committing fornication & going after strange flesh as leaving abiding in God is the same as the celestial leaving their first abode in Heaven from abiding with God.

Yet the children that these wives bore them were men.

If we consider that Seth replaced Abel and Cain is out there with his own bloodline, Seth being the godly lineage that Israel identifies with as the sons of God, then the sons of God married outside of that godly lineage in marrying the descendent of Cain. I only referred to Cain to illustrate a point about bloodlines separate from Seth's, but it should be known that there were other children besides Cain & Abel from Adam & Eve.

Genesis 5:3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth: 4 And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters: 5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.

Now I believe Adam had begat sons and daughters before Seth too and not just afterwards for how Cain found a wife. This is why Cain was feared for his life because every one alive was related to Abel in some way or capacity to seek revenge on Cain as Eve was the mother of all the living.

Genesis 3:20 And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

If we note how long the sons of God lived as abiding in Him, and when they started marrying outside of their godly lineage, God shortened the life of man to 120 years.

So sin has a way of shortening people's lives as it drives them away from God and what is good.

As it is the reason God flooded the world is about how man was thinking evil continually, not because of any assumed mingling of angels with mankind. God said the same thing for why He had flooded the world after the flood.

Genesis 6:5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. 6 And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. 7 And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them. 8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord.

Genesis 8:18 And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him: 19 Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark. 20 And Noah builded an altar unto the Lord; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar. 21 And the Lord smelled a sweet savour; and the Lord said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done.

So the idea that God had to flood the world because the devil was polluting the bloodlines so the Christ child could not come is false since there were giants in the earth afterwards.

Were the giants David had faced, were the results of a Jew with a foreign woman? Don't know. We could look at before the flood for the consequences for marrying outside the godly line of Seth, and assume maybe that was the case for Israel for marrying outside the nation of Israel, but it would only be an assumption.

But there can be no assumption when angels cannot marry nor given in marriage for them to be the sons of God.

The Hebrew word for son is "ben" as builder of the family name. Since the sons of God pertains to Israel in the O.T., then the sons of God in the O.T. is referring to their family tree & bloodlines and nothing more, let alone angels.

Well sir, none of what you say here makes any kind of sense....Have you ever seen two humans mate and produce a giant? Have you ever seen two humans mate and produce another creature? I think not. You must realize that the giants in the bible are not humans with a glandular problem that produces Gigantism....These giants were BIG! We're not talking about Robert Wadlow...he was all human. The giants we see when angels mate with human women grew to 3000 els....... You research and see how tall that is.. They had double rows of teeth. six digits on each hand or foot. and other nasty traits. They were cannibals for the most part. Do you want to know what happened to the Anasazi of the southern United States?
Cain, Able, and Seth were the Sons of Adam...not the sons of God...The bene ha elohim were the ones whom God made....Adam and Eve made Cain Able and Seth..These last three were Bene ha Adam. Not only that but the "Godly line of Seth only lasted seven generations before they started worshiping idols.
Again....The bible says the angels do not marry and are not given in marriage....Show us, please, where the bible says they cannot...

You know? The entire argument for the sons of God in being men in Genesis 6 has no basis whatsoever. That, if I remember correctly was a fabrication by the romanist church...

 

[Admon Mikha'el]

See post #7 above as it is very possible since Adam is the son of God.

Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Yes Adam was a son of God...God made him and breathed life into him...Then Adam produced sons...who were sons of Adam.

 

[Admon Mikha'el]

Thats the obediant angels, and I am not speaking of marriage, simple coupling is all.

The translators wrote "Took wives of all whom they chose" I translate that as "kidnapped and raped" considering all that they chose could well have been married women too....since even married women can be highly desirable.

 

[Admon Mikha'el]

You are making assumption to make your belief more valid, bad idea. Its fine, if you state simply that you think such and such, but its best to not put forward something as more valid than another assumption. Only God knows.

Right Brad...Humans mating with humans produce humans..not giants or other cryptids The reason I asked this question was I hoped to get some intelligent conversation on the subject....Not all the hokum some are sharing. I was hoping for biblical answers not Doctor Seuss

 

[GodB4Us]

Well sir, none of what you say here makes any kind of sense....Have you ever seen two humans mate and produce a giant? Have you ever seen two humans mate and produce another creature? I think not. You must realize that the giants in the bible are not humans with a glandular problem that produces Gigantism....These giants were BIG! We're not talking about Robert Wadlow...he was all human. The giants we see when angels mate with human women grew to 3000 els....... You research and see how tall that is.. They had double rows of teeth. six digits on each hand or foot. and other nasty traits. They were cannibals for the most part. Do you want to know what happened to the Anasazi of the southern United States?
Cain, Able, and Seth were the Sons of Adam...not the sons of God...The bene ha elohim were the ones whom God made....Adam and Eve made Cain Able and Seth..These last three were Bene ha Adam. Not only that but the "Godly line of Seth only lasted three generations before they started worshiping idols.
Again....The bible says the angels do not marry and are not given in marriage....Show us, please, where the bible says they cannot...

Because God did not create them in the first place to multiply for why angels are not marrying nor given in marriage.

You know? The entire argument for the sons of God in being men in Genesis 6 has no basis whatsoever. That, if I remember correctly was a fabrication by the romanist church...

Genesis 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

The results of the union between the sons of God and the daughters of men were still men.... men of renown, but still men... men that are giants but still men.

Top 10 Real-Life Giants From History

 

[GodB4Us]

Yes Adam was a son of God...God made him and breathed life into him...Then Adam produced sons...who were sons of Adam.

But the point of reference for Israel as the sons of God was for tracing their roots in the scripture to the godly lineage of Seth that had replaced Abel.

 

[GodB4Us]

The translators wrote "Took wives of all whom they chose" I translate that as "kidnapped and raped" considering all that they chose could well have been married women too....since even married women can be highly desirable.

In His words? No. When referring to the sons of God in a plural sense as "they" saw the daughters of men and took wives unto themselves as the sons of God did choose... is not taking many wives nor raping them either.

Genesis 6:1And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

 

[GodB4Us]

Right Brad...Humans mating with humans produce humans..not giants or other cryptids The reason I asked this question was I hoped to get some intelligent conversation on the subject....Not all the hokum some are sharing. I was hoping for biblical answers not Doctor Seuss

Regular and average human beings can still produce giants.

Top 10 Real-Life Giants From History