Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

On Literalizing Revelation 11 - the Two Witnesses

tulsa 2011

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
354
On Literalng Revelation 11 - the Two Witnesses

Revelation Chapter eleven should be understood as what it is. It is written in the language of metaphor, and the knowledge it gives comes from the metaphoric meaning. Making the prophecy literal makes it into a fable. Paul warns about getting into fables in I Timothy 1: 4, I Timothy 3: 7, II Timothy 4: 4 and in Titus 1: 14. Making the prophecy of Revelation 11 literal rejects the knowledge it offers. "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee..." Hosea 4: 6 Often, the prophecy of the Two Witnesses is literalized as being two Old Testament characters, such as Moses and Elijah, and sometimes it is made literal by saying the Two Witnesses are two nations in history.

Verse 8, on their dead bodies lying in the street of the great city spiritually called Sodom and Egypt where our Lord was crucified, can be used as a starting point for understanding what this language of metaphor is saying and in grasping the knowledge it provides to us..

The tradition of men called dispensationalism and Christian Zionism has, in the last hundred years or more, been an important source of the literal "hermeneutic," or system of interpretation. "Hermenetiocs" is connected with the pagan god Hermes, who was the messenger who brought the word from Zeus. There were also the rules of interpretation of Old Testament scripture by Talmudic Judaism.

On realapologetics.org

Jamin Hubner says about dispensationalism that: "Despite the revisions and
“improvements,” one thing hadn’t changed: it was still a system based
on man-made rules of Bible interpretation. It still made a sharp
distinction between Israel and the Church. And it still stressed a
literalist hermeneutic. These presuppositions didn’t come without
problems."

A "hermenutic," is, in the dictionary definition, "a method or
principle of interpretation." It is a word used by Christian
seminary professors and their students. On
The Liminality of Hermes and the Meaning of Hermeneutics they say
"hermeneia--can be traced back to the god Hermes...hermeneutics, as
the art of understanding and of textual exegesis, does stand under the
sign of Hermes. Hermes is the messenger who brings the word from Zeus
(God); thus, the early modern use of the term hermeneutics was in
relation to methods of interpreting holy scripture."

Hubner says "It’s very common to read or hear dispensationalists talk
about a “literal interpretation” of the Bible..."

On realapologetics.org

they quote C. I. Scofield, the first classical American dispensationalist, as saying "[Prophecy is] the ground of absolute literalness.[5] Jerusalem is always Jerusalem, Israel always Israel, Zion always Zion…Prophecies may never be spiritualized, but are always literal.[6]"

In 1936, Lewis S. Chafer, a classical dispensationalist who founded the Dallas Theological Seminary, defined Scofield's literalism as "The outstanding characteristic of the dispensationalist is ... that he believes every statement of the Bible and gives to it the plain, natural meaning its words imply."

From: L. S. Chafer, ‘Dispensationalism,’ Bibliotheca Sacra, 93, October (1936), pp410, 417.

Charles C. Ryrie says "This distinction between Israel and the church is born out of a system of hermeneutics that is usually called literal interpretation. Therefore, the second aspect of the sine qua non of dispensationalism is the matter of historical-grammatical hermeneutics. The word literal is perhaps not as good as either the word normal or plain, but in any case it is interpretation that does not spiritualize or allegorize as nondispensational interpretation often does. The spiritualizing may be practiced to a lesser or greater degree, but its presence in a system of interpretation is indicative of a nondispensational approach."

From: Dispensationalism. Charles C. Ryrie. Moody Press, Chicago. 1995.

The literalist interpretation of end time Bible prophecy leads to the fables described by Paul. The birds of Babylon who have roosted in the Christian tree (Daniel 4: 10-12, Revelation 18: 2), and have taken over many denominations since the late 19th century, have been teaching fables about end time prophecy.

In the metaphor of the grain of mustard seed which grows big, the birds of the air come and lodge in its branches. A mustard seed does not become a tree, so this represents an unnatural entity which grows large - which are the false doctrines of the false prophets. The birds of the air in Matthew 13: 31-32 - the parable of the mustard seed - are the false prophets who are under the fallen angels.

In the parable of Matthew 13: 31-32, the small mustard seed grows much bigger than a mustard seed should get. It is Babylon as New Covenant Israel in false doctrines. The mustard seed can be seen as the spiritual seed planted by Christ when he transformed Old Covenant Israel. But the seed was corrupted and diverted away by the army of false prophets from what the seed was intended to become. When the original seed was corrupted, the true Gospel was replaced by another Gospel. The true Gospel, the absolute truth of the word of God, was attacked by the dialectic process and compromised into a false Gospel which is a counterfeit. The counterfeit is the corruption of the original mustard seed so that the corrupted plant grew into a huge thing on the earth.

But the word of God remains. The dialectic process of arguing against it from the viewpoint of a man made counterfeit has not overcome the absolute truth of word of God, not has it replaced the real Christ with another Jesus (II Corinthians 11: 4). The real Christ is "...the way, the truth, and the life." John 14: 6. If you do not have the truth, the Gospel, you do not have the real Christ.

Revelation 11: 1-2 says "Then there was given me a measuring rod like a staff; and someone said, "Get up and measure the temple of God and the altar, and those who worship in it.
2. "Leave out the court which is outside the temple and do not measure it, for it has been given to the nations; and they will tread under foot the holy city for forty-two months." Remember that Stephen in Acts 7: 48 says "Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet." And Paul in I Corinthians 3: 16-17 teaches that "Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are."

Those who claim to be Christians and claim that Christ has begun to be formed in them would, under the New Covenant, be the temple of God, if they really were in Christ Jesus. So, when Revelation 11: 1-2 talks about measuring the temple of God, it is those who claim to be in Christ and to be Christians who are being looked at, or measured. What the people who claim to be in Christ call the capital C proper noun Church is what is being measured or examined.

Then, Revelation 11: 3-6 says "And I will grant authority to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy for twelve hundred and sixty days, clothed in sackcloth. These are the two olive trees and the two lampstands that stand before the Lord of the earth. And if anyone wants to harm them, fire flows out of their mouth and devours their enemies; so if anyone wants to harm them, he must be killed in this way. These have the power to shut up the sky, so that rain will not fall during the days of their prophesying; and they have power over the waters to turn them into blood, and to strike the earth with every plague, as often as they desire." This is describing early Christians, calling them the Two Witnesses, as having spiritual power.

The "Church" in 2014 does not have that spiritual power. In the parable of Matthew 5: 13 and Luke 14: 34, about the salt of the church loosing its savour, it turns out to be about a loss of cognitive clarity or intelligence, which, for the church, is loss of its spiritual intelligence and strength. Savour is from moraino, and from moros, Strong's number 3474, "dull or stupid...blockhead."

Daniel 12: 7 says "...when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished." It does not say that the end will come when the holy people are scattered, but when the power of the holy people is scattered. How do you scatter a power? Scattering a power diminishes that power. So, when the spiritual power of those claiming to belong to God is scattered, or diminished, then the end is near. For example, the people claiming to be of God - the church - now has little influence over the morals of the society. Either the preachers no longer strongly preach the truth about the Gospel and also about the righteousness of God, or they go through the motions of doing so, but the church has no spiritual power and so cannot influence society.

The Two Witnesses are not literally two guys from the Old Covenant. They represent Christians. As being in principle two parts, they could be Gentiles and Jews, as in the very early Christian groups, and they can be men and women. They can be young and old.

Revelation 11: 7-11 says "And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.
8. And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.
9. And they of the people and kindreds and tongues and nations shall see their dead bodies three days and an half, and shall not suffer their dead bodies to be put in graves.
10. And they that dwell upon the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send gifts one to another; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelt on the earth.
11. And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them."

This is all heavily metaphoric, in part because it talks about their bodies lying in the city which is spiritually called Sodom and Egypt, where Christ was crucified.

"And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified." Revelation 11: 8 The great city, Jerusalem, is called Sodom and Egypt. And calling Jerusalem Sodom and Egypt provides knowledge to those who have ears to hear.

Sodom was the place that God destroyed in Genesis 19 because of their homosexuality, their pride and failure to help the poor. Ezekiel 16: 49-50 says "Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good." A surveillance society that still has some "fullness
of bread" but drives members of the society into homelessness and then persecutes them for being homeless sounds like Sodom. The present day surveillance society now allows same sex marriages in some states. In America homosexuality and lesbianism has been politically correct among many for some decades.

Egypt in Genesis and Exodus is the place where the people of God were held captive.

"For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all." Galatians 4: 25-26 Literal and physical Jerusalem, representing a clinging to Old Covenant doctrines and practices, is said to be in bondage.

So, calling the Jerusalem which now Sodom and Egypt is giving us knowledge about the spiritual condition of the metaphoric place where the dead bodies of the Two Witnesses lie. The spiritual state of this Jerusalem is not good. It is death. The Jerusalem in Galatians 4: 26 which is free of bondage and is above, is the mother of us all, is spiritual life. The metaphoric Two Witnesses died in the metaphoric city of Jerusalem which is in bondage to false doctrines, and is spiritually dead. The Two Witnesses did not die in Old Covenant literal Jerusalem. They died in a metaphoric place of the New Covenant which Revelation 11: 8 calls Sodom and Egypt where our Lord was crucified. Its the organization which has been leavened (Luke 13: 18-21, I Corinthians 5: 6, Galatians 5: 11, Matthew 16: 6, 11) by the many false prophets of Matthew 24: 11 and II Peter 2: 1-3.

Revelation 11: 7 says "And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them." We might come to the conclusion that their testimony is that of the remnant as in Revelation 12: 17 - who have the testimony of Jesus. "And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ."

Sometime, at some point in time, the Two Witnesses as the people of God, did have the testimony of Jesus Christ. But the beast out of the bottomless pit inspiring the many false prophets - the birds of Babylon in the Christian tree - caused them to lose their testimony of Christ, and they were spiritually killed.

The knowledge given in Revelation 11: 7-11 is not that the Two Witnesses as two Old Covenant literal men are brought back to life in New Covenant times, then physically killed again, and then resurrected. This literal view does not provide us with the knowledge that some in false doctrines who are spiritually dead will be brought to spiritual life by the Holy Spirit. That some will be brought to life after being spiritually dead in Babylon is consistent with Revelation 18: 4, where God calls those in Babylon who are his people out of it. The fact that there is a call out of Babylon implies that some will be brought to spiritual life and will come out of spiritual death in Babylon.
Edit/Delete Message
 
Scripture in God's Word can contain symbolism while also things meant literally. Even in that Rev.11:8 verse the facts of Sodom and Egypt representing areas of falseness is in the literal sense while being applied to Jerusalem metaphorically.

Just because something is used as a metaphor does not mean it has no literal meaning behind it. If the symbols in a metaphor had no literal meaning itself then how would we even understand? That's why God's Word uses figures of speech, metaphor, and allegory to make His Word 'easier'... to understand, not more difficult. Those who make metaphors and allegory difficult obviously God has not given them to understand, so they have to make up something instead, which is comparable to putting perfume on a hog to try and hide its stink.

Looking at the metaphors, symbols, and figures of speech in God's Word is similar to the saying that still waters run deep, which is to say that when the mind is at peace there's less ripples in the pond that block out seeing the bottom. There, that's a figure of speech I just used; how hard was it to understand? Each peoples in their own language uses metaphors and figures of speech daily to converse with. So why should the same thing be so difficult for so many within God's Word since The LORD uses the same kind of thing in His Word?

With the two witnesses mentioned in Rev.11, literal time periods and areas are being given, even with the idea of the nations seeing their two dead bodies lay in the street, which points to the technical advances in today's world only developed through satellite technology with TV and cable. Just because God uses the metaphors of Sodom and Egypt to describe Jerusalem in that time doesn't mean those two witnesses are a metaphor also. Thinking that is to totally jump outside the usage of that Rev.11:8 spiritual metaphor about Jerusalem and the two literal witnesses that will prophecy there for 1260 days and then be killed. Metaphors aren't killed, real people are.

And no one yet knows who those two men will be. That they will be Enoch and Elijah is only speculation, because they both did not die a flesh death.
 
And no one yet knows who those two men will be. That they will be Enoch and Elijah is only speculation, because they both did not die a flesh death.

It is not a mystery, it is revealed in Scripture. It is Moses and Elijah:
See Malachi 4:5, Matt 17:11, 2 Kings 1:10-12, Matt 17:1-3
Moses is symbolic for the law, Elijah is symbolic for the prophets.

The key to realizing who they are is found by what they are capable of doing:

Revelation 114 These are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth. 5 And if anyone wants to harm them, fire proceeds from their mouth and devours their enemies. And if anyone wants to harm them, he must be killed in this manner. 6 These have power to shut heaven, so that no rain falls in the days of their prophecy; and they have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to strike the earth with all plagues, as often as they desire.

Elijah was the one capable of shutting heaven, so that no rain would fall, and calling down fire from heaven, Moses was the one with power to turn water to blood and strike the earth with plagues.

Matt 18:16 , two witnesses are used to establish every word

God's two witnesses are the law and the prophets.

God hid Moses's body and took Elijah up into Heaven so that they may appear with Christ on the mount of transfiguration and so they could be the two witnesses in the tribulation.

The law and the prophets testify about Christ - John 5:39
 
Last edited:
cleardot.gif

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/<wbr>Two_witnesses

"Early Christians, such as Tertullian, Irenaeus, and Hippolytus of Rome, have concluded that the two witnesses would be Enoch and Elijah, prophets who did not die because God "took" them. Others have proposed Moses as one of the witnesses, for his ability to turn water into blood and the power to plague the earth....The two witnesses have been interpreted as representing the Church or a similar concept. The 1599 Geneva Study Bible has asserted that the two witnesses are the exclusive purvue of the church. Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary on the Whole Bible gives one church interpretation as consisting of believing Jews and that of the Gentiles. John Wesley in his commentary on Revelation 11 suggests a more spiritual, almost ambiguous, application. John Gill's Exposition of the Bible interprets the two witnesses as the true Church in counterdistinction to the antichrist system of Roman Catholicism. Ross Taylor's Verse by Verse Commentary on Revelation clearly defines the Church as the "two olive trees and the two lampstands."

"Similarly, the two witnesses have been identified as Israel and the Christian Church. The number two has been associated with the witness of Israel to the Gentile nations during the 70th Week of Daniel's prophecy. The olive tree in the Scripture signifies Israel. The "witness of the Church" is signified by the two lampstands, whose identity was disclosed by the seven golden lampstands (i.e., candlesticks) revealed in Revelation 2-3 as the "churches." Revelation 2:1 refers to the churches as golden lampstands."

"It has also been proposed that the two witnesses are the witnessing church, because Jesus sent out his disciples "two by two."

The 1599 Geneva Study Bible and John Gill did not have the knowledge available to us now in 2014 - that the falling away from the truth in the church - the many ekklesias, or many congregations - has been going on for some decades. They did not have the perspective now possible on the translation problem in the English translations after that of William Tyndale, who consistently translated ekklesia as congregation in his 1525 English New Testament from the Greek Textus Receptus. We can now see that the early Calvinist Theodore Beza made a mistake in maintaining the authority of the church that the Catholics developed and translating ekklesia as church, a word which had an ambiguous history and meaning, such as a pagan lord's house, or the pagan Greek enchantress circe.

Along with the falling away of the church and the perspective now available on the translation of ekklesia into church by Beza and most other English translations after him, there is the awareness now that the the word church from ekklesia must maintain the original meaning of the Greek word ekklesia as meeting, assembly or congregation. It is the meeting - actually many meetings in various places - of Israel reborn in Christ (John 3: 1-7), the spiritual house of I Peter 2: 5, the Israel of God (Galatians 6: 16), and the Gentiles who were aliens to the commonwealth of Israel are brought close to it by the blood of Christ (Ephesians 2: 12-13). "As he saith also in O-see, I will call them my people,which were not my people: and her beloved, which was not beloved." Romans 9:25 "I will say to them which were not my people, Thou art my people; and they shall say, Thou art my God." Hosea 2: 23

God calls the Gentiles to be his people Israel, but it is an Israel reborn in Jesus Christ, fulfilling II Kings 21: 13, Isaiah 29: 16 and Jeremiah 18: 1-6 in turning Jerusalem upside down and God re-creating Israel. In turning Israel upside down, God made that which is spiritual dominant over the physical of Old Covenant Israel. Under the Old Covenant that which was in the physical - blood lines from Abraham, circumcision, a literal temple building, animal sacrifice - stood for what was to become the spiritual after Christ. But the majority under the Old Covenant did not want their religion turned upside down.

When Paul came to Thessalonica, "...the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason, and sought to bring them out to the people. And when they found them not, they drew Jason and certain brethren unto the rulers of the city, crying, These that have turned the world upside down are come hither also." Acts 17: 5-6

The Jews who did not believe said Paul and his crew had turned the world upside down. Paul turned their world upside down.

So, the view of John Gill on the two witnesses - that they are not two literal individuals who oppose the one man anti-Christ and are killed in the flesh by him - but are the church, can be corrected by our view in 2014 to be not the collective ekklesias, or congregations, which are now in apostasy. The Two Witnesses who testify of Jesus Christ are given spiritual life in Revelation 11: 11 by the "Spirit of life from God" as Israel reborn in Christ after they are spiritually "killed" by the beast out of the bottomless pit, who inspires the huge number of false prophets..

Gill says "I will give to my two witnesses to prophesy", and the latter, "I will give in command to my two witnesses that they may prophesy"; the sense is, that Christ will give to them a mission and commission, sufficient authority, all needful gifts and grace, courage and presence of mind to preach his Gospel, to hold forth his word, and bear a testimony for him during the whole time of the apostasy, even."

Revelation 12: 17 says the dragon goes to make war with the woman and the remnant of her seed, who have the testimony of Jesus Christ. The remnant of Israel has the testimony of Jesus Christ.
 
Last edited:
It is not a mystery, it is revealed in Scripture. It is Moses and Elijah:
See Malachi 4:5, Matt 17:11, 2 Kings 1:10-12, Matt 17:1-3
Moses is symbolic for the law, Elijah is symbolic for the prophets.

The key to realizing who they are is found by what they are capable of doing:

Revelation 114 These are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth. 5 And if anyone wants to harm them, fire proceeds from their mouth and devours their enemies. And if anyone wants to harm them, he must be killed in this manner. 6 These have power to shut heaven, so that no rain falls in the days of their prophecy; and they have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to strike the earth with all plagues, as often as they desire.

Elijah was the one capable of shutting heaven, so that no rain would fall, and calling down fire from heaven, Moses was the one with power to turn water to blood and strike the earth with plagues.

Matt 18:16 , two witnesses are used to establish every word

God's two witnesses are the law and the prophets.

God hid Moses's body and took Elijah up into Heaven so that they may appear with Christ on the mount of transfiguration and so they could be the two witnesses in the tribulation.

The law and the prophets testify about Christ - John 5:39

Couldn't be Moses because he technically did... die. Per Hebrews 9:27 we are assigned to die only once, and then the judgment. Our best speculation can only be Enoch and Elijah, or two totally different people that are born in the latter days.

Based on the Rev.11 prophecy about God's two witnesses, it also includes the symbol of "two candlesticks", which like Tulsa showed above points back to the seven Churches in Rev.2 & 3. There was only 2 of those seven Churches which Christ had no rebuke for, the Smyrna and Philadelphia Churches. Those represent Christ's very elect, for His prophecy for the end includes His servants that are not deceived giving a Testimony for Him against the beast and its followers by The Holy Spirit.

So the Rev.11 account is pointing to two literal witnesses (2 men) and to two Churches ("two candlesticks") that represent Christ's elect that will be delivered up to councils and synagogues to give a Witness for Christ, i.e., the two men in Jerusalem for the end, and the two candlesticks (Christ's elect) among the nations.

The commission of the two witnesses follows the Bible patterns of miracles that God worked through Moses and Elijah.
 
Last edited:
Couldn't be Moses because he technically did... die. Per Hebrews 9:27 we are assigned to die only once, and then the judgment. Our best speculation can only be Enoch and Elijah, or two totally different people that are born in the latter days.

Based on the Rev.11 prophecy about God's two witnesses, it also includes the symbol of "two candlesticks", which like Tulsa showed above points back to the seven Churches in Rev.2 & 3. There was only 2 of those seven Churches which Christ had no rebuke for, the Smyrna and Philadelphia Churches. Those represent Christ's very elect, for His prophecy for the end includes His servants that are not deceived giving a Testimony for Him against the beast and its followers by The Holy Spirit.

So the Rev.11 account is pointing to two literal witnesses (2 men) and to two Churches ("two candlesticks") that represent Christ's elect that will be delivered up to councils and synagogues to give a Witness for Christ, i.e., the two men in Jerusalem for the end, and the two candlesticks (Christ's elect) among the nations.

The commission of the two witnesses follows the Bible patterns of miracles that God worked through Moses and Elijah.

He died, but aren't you forgetting that Moses was one of the ones who spoke with Christ, Matt 17:3, showing that he was very much alive.

Compared to Moses and Elijah, Enoch, is a rather obscure figure in bible prophecy and is not referred to (much , or at all) in the New Testament. Enoch is the predecessor of Noah and Abraham as ones who walk with God.

Moses and Elijah symbolize the law and the prophets which are God's two witnesses, Enoch does not.

Revelation 11:4 says the two men are the two candlesticks and two olive trees. Not two men plus two churches, this idea is false. Although the churches are the witnesses during the church age, the two men replace the churches as the witnesses during the last 3 and half years.
 
"Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD: And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse." Malachi 4: 5-6

If dispensationalists, or Christian Zionists, were consistent in applying their literal "hermeneutic," from the pagan god Hermes, they would insist that the prophecy of Malachi 4: 5-6 is about the literal Elijah being brought back to life.

Matthew 11: 13-15 says "For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.
And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear."

Matthew 17: 9-13 says "And as they came down from the mountain, Jesus charged them, saying, Tell the vision to no man, until the Son of man be risen again from the dead.
10. And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias must first come?
11. And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.
12. But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them.
13. Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist."

Then Luke 1: 17 says of John the Baptist that "And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord."

Malachi 4: 5-6, on sending Elijah, was not fulfilled in a literal way, as the Christian Zionists would insist - if they were consistent in their "hermenutic."

Remember that Elijah, or Elias, as well as Moses, were members of a small remnant of Old Covenant Israel, who appear in Hebrews Chapter 11 as having faith. The spiritual condition or spiritual power of this small remnant cannot be attributed to "All Israel," where Israel is the majority of those in physical or Old Covenant Israel - the broad way of Matthew 7: 13-14. There is a similarity between Elijah, who God gave powers to, such as calling fire down from heaven under the Old Covenant, and what is said of the Two Witnesses in Revelation 11: 3 - "and I will give power unto my two witnesses."

But in Luke 9: 51-56: "And it came to pass, when the time was come that he should be received up, he stedfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem,
52. And sent messengers before his face: and they went, and entered into a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him.
53. And they did not receive him, because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem.
54. And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did?
55. But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
56. For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village."

In transforming Old Covenant or physical Israel to spiritual Israel reborn in him, Christ made some large changes. He said in John 10: 10 " I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly." While Elijah was given the power to kill people by calling fire down from heaven, when Christ came, he did away with that power, and gave his disciples power to heal diseases and raise some from the dead. In rejecting the turning of Israel upside down, Old Covenant Israel, which was Talmudic Judaism, remained in the spiritual condition in which the physical is dominant, and as part of this spiritual condition physical Israel physically killed those they did not agree with.

Again, II Kings 21: 13, Isaiah 29: 16 and Jeremiah 18: 1-6 predicted that God would turn Jerusalem, or physical Israel, upside down. Turning physical Israel upside down meant that God changed Israel into a spiritual house, seen in I Peter 2: 5-9, where that which is spiritual reigns over that which is physical. Literalizing prophecies in the Book of Revelation is going back to Old Covenant Israel where the physical was dominant over the spiritual. However, there were literal prophecies fulfilled in Christ's appearing. That Malachi 4: 5-6, on the re-appearing of Elijah, was to be fulfilled in a spiritual way and not in a literal way is part of this change from the physical to the spiritual. Likewise, the fulfillment of the Two Witnesses of Revelation 11 is to be fulfilled in a spiritual way and not in a physical or literal way.
 
He died, but aren't you forgetting that Moses was one of the ones who spoke with Christ, Matt 17:3, showing that he was very much alive.

And Jesus showed in Luke 16 that Abraham is very much alive in the heavenly also. So why not Abraham? It's because like Hebrews 9 says, it is appointed for men only once to die. Moses died and Abraham died. And God's two witnesses that will appear in Jerusalem will die only once. Nothing more to it.
 
"Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD: And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse." Malachi 4: 5-6

If dispensationalists, or Christian Zionists, were consistent in applying their literal "hermeneutic," from the pagan god Hermes, they would insist that the prophecy of Malachi 4: 5-6 is about the literal Elijah being brought back to life.

Matthew 11: 13-15 says "For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.
And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear."

Matthew 17: 9-13 says "And as they came down from the mountain, Jesus charged them, saying, Tell the vision to no man, until the Son of man be risen again from the dead.
10. And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias must first come?
11. And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.
12. But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them.
13. Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist."

Then Luke 1: 17 says of John the Baptist that "And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord."

Malachi 4: 5-6, on sending Elijah, was not fulfilled in a literal way, as the Christian Zionists would insist - if they were consistent in their "hermenutic."

Remember that Elijah, or Elias, as well as Moses, were members of a small remnant of Old Covenant Israel, who appear in Hebrews Chapter 11 as having faith. The spiritual condition or spiritual power of this small remnant cannot be attributed to "All Israel," where Israel is the majority of those in physical or Old Covenant Israel - the broad way of Matthew 7: 13-14. There is a similarity between Elijah, who God gave powers to, such as calling fire down from heaven under the Old Covenant, and what is said of the Two Witnesses in Revelation 11: 3 - "and I will give power unto my two witnesses."

But in Luke 9: 51-56: "And it came to pass, when the time was come that he should be received up, he stedfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem,
52. And sent messengers before his face: and they went, and entered into a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him.
53. And they did not receive him, because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem.
54. And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did?
55. But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
56. For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village."

In transforming Old Covenant or physical Israel to spiritual Israel reborn in him, Christ made some large changes. He said in John 10: 10 " I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly." While Elijah was given the power to kill people by calling fire down from heaven, when Christ came, he did away with that power, and gave his disciples power to heal diseases and raise some from the dead. In rejecting the turning of Israel upside down, Old Covenant Israel, which was Talmudic Judaism, remained in the spiritual condition in which the physical is dominant, and as part of this spiritual condition physical Israel physically killed those they did not agree with.

Again, II Kings 21: 13, Isaiah 29: 16 and Jeremiah 18: 1-6 predicted that God would turn Jerusalem, or physical Israel, upside down. Turning physical Israel upside down meant that God changed Israel into a spiritual house, seen in I Peter 2: 5-9, where that which is spiritual reigns over that which is physical. Literalizing prophecies in the Book of Revelation is going back to Old Covenant Israel where the physical was dominant over the spiritual. However, there were literal prophecies fulfilled in Christ's appearing. That Malachi 4: 5-6, on the re-appearing of Elijah, was to be fulfilled in a spiritual way and not in a literal way is part of this change from the physical to the spiritual. Likewise, the fulfillment of the Two Witnesses of Revelation 11 is to be fulfilled in a spiritual way and not in a physical or literal way.

You have just spiritualized away the Rev.11 prophecy about God's two witnesses as if it will never happen. Those will be two men that will prophesy in Jerusalem against the beast, and the beast that ascends from the bottomless pit will kill them as written, leaving their dead bodies laying the in street for three and one half days also as written. When we are given specifics like that, we cannot spiritualize it away.
 
And Jesus showed in Luke 16 that Abraham is very much alive in the heavenly also. So why not Abraham? It's because like Hebrews 9 says, it is appointed for men only once to die. Moses died and Abraham died. And God's two witnesses that will appear in Jerusalem will die only once. Nothing more to it.

There is no hard and fast rule that says a person can die only once. Lazarus for example, died once, Jesus resurrected him and then Lazarus died again. There is one example of someone dying twice.

If you think it is Enoch, then what does Enoch represent in bible prophecy? Moses is a much weightier and important figure than Enoch and is the better match for Elijah, representing the law and the prophets.
 
It is not a mystery, it is revealed in Scripture. It is Moses and Elijah:
See Malachi 4:5, Matt 17:11
Hello James.

Regarding post #3.

You said;

'See Malachi 4:5', in relation to the arrival of Elijah before the day of the Lord.

How do you interpret the following verse by Jesus, talking about John the Baptist.

Matthew 11:14
And if you are willing to accept it, John himself is Elijah who was to come.

I was under the impression that Elijah had already come and gone.

Matthew 17:12

12 but I say to you that Elijah already came, and they did not recognize him, but did to
him whatever they wished.

There are two verses that confirm that Elijah has arrived already.
 
On http://www.realapologetics.<wbr>org/blog/...lism/#_ftnref3

they quote C. I. Scofield, the first classical American dispensationalist, as saying "[Prophecy is] the ground of absolute literalness.[5] Jerusalem is always Jerusalem, Israel always Israel, Zion always Zion…Prophecies may never be spiritualized, but are always literal.[6]"

In 1936, Lewis S. Chafer, a classical dispensationalist who founded the Dallas Theological Seminary, defined Scofield's literalism as "The outstanding characteristic of the dispensationalist is ... that he believes every statement of the Bible and gives to it the plain, natural meaning its words imply."

From: L. S. Chafer, ‘Dispensationalism,’ Bibliotheca Sacra, 93, October (1936), pp410, 417.

Charles C. Ryrie says "This distinction between Israel and the church is born out of a system of hermeneutics that is usually called literal interpretation. Therefore, the second aspect of the sine qua non of dispensationalism is the matter of historical-grammatical hermeneutics. The word literal is perhaps not as good as either the word normal or plain, but in any case it is interpretation that does not spiritualize or allegorize as nondispensational interpretation often does. The spiritualizing may be practiced to a lesser or greater degree, but its presence in a system of interpretation is indicative of a nondispensational approach."

From: Dispensationalism. Charles C. Ryrie. Moody Press, Chicago. 1995.

But scripture says: "All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them:" Matthew 13: 34:

"I have also spoken by the prophets, and I have multiplied visions, and used similitudes, by the ministry of the prophets." Hosea 12: 10

The Two Witnesses of Revelation 11 is not the only New Testament prophecy which is made literal by the dispensatrionalists. Making New Testament prophecy literal <cite>is a systemic trait of dispensationalism, following C.I. Scofield quoted above.

I John 2: 18 - there were then many antichrists - and I John 4: 3 - that the spirit of anti-Christ is saying that Christ did not come in the flesh - are scriptures that dispensationalists make into a literal one man anti-Christ figure who is to appear after the dispensationalist church is raptured off the earth.

Paul's metaphoric prophecy in II Thessalonians 2: 3-4, that the Day of the Lord will not come until there is a falling away, the man of sin - anthropos tes amartias - is revealed who exalts himself and sits in the temple of God, is made into a literal one man, usually the same anti-Christ figure who they say will desecrate a rebuilt temple in literal Jerusalem. Stephen in Acts 7: 48, and Paul in I Corinthians 3: 16-17 and 6: 19 teach as New Testament doctrine that God no longer dwells in literal temples and that the believers are now God's temple.

Then we come to Revelation 7: 1-9, on the sealing of the 144,000 before the four winds are loosed on earth, where these people are said there to be from the twelve tribes of Israel. The dispensationalists insist all the 144,000 are therefore Jews, contrary to what Paul says in Romans 2: 17-29, that those who are outward Jews in the flesh only are no longer real Jews, but that those who are Jews inwardly by the Spirit, are now the real Jews, and he explains in Galatians 3: 3-29 that literal, physical descent from Abraham has been replaced by spiritual descent from Abraham, and that there is no distinction between Jew and Gentile and all in Christ are the seed of Abraham. Paul supports the teaching of Romans 2: 17-29 in Romans 9: 6-8, that "they are not all Israel, which are of Israel," and the children of the flesh, those of the Old Covenant, without Christ, are not the children of God.

There are some other prophecies of the New Testament in partial metaphoric language, such as II Peter 2: 1-3, which dispensationalism as a tradition of men would not - if it consistently interpreted all New Testament verses in a literal way - fully accept as metaphor.

"
</cite>But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. . And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not."

"Make merchandise of you" is from the Greek εμπορευσονται, emporeusontai, future tense, middle voice and indicative mode, from the word empori, word traders, or merchants, used in Revelation 18: 23, etc. This is a metaphor, and to make it literal severely weakens the metaphoric meaning. The New International Version has for II Peter 2: 3, "In their greed these teachers will exploit you with fabricated
stories." The metaphoric making merchandise of you means these false prophets will change you, not just exploit you. People are not merchandise and making a person into merchandise means reducing him. It means that the false prophets can reduce a person spiritually, down to the level of the natural man of I Corinthians 2: 14, who is unable to receive the things of the Spirit. The literal mindset would not be able to hear this metaphor.

<cite class="_fd"></cite>
 
Last edited:
Malachi 4:5-6
5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:
6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.

We are not told who the second witness will be.
 
There is no hard and fast rule that says a person can die only once. Lazarus for example, died once, Jesus resurrected him and then Lazarus died again. There is one example of someone dying twice.

If you think it is Enoch, then what does Enoch represent in bible prophecy? Moses is a much weightier and important figure than Enoch and is the better match for Elijah, representing the law and the prophets.

Hebrews 9:27.
 
Hello James.

Regarding post #3.

You said;

'See Malachi 4:5', in relation to the arrival of Elijah before the day of the Lord.

How do you interpret the following verse by Jesus, talking about John the Baptist.

Matthew 11:14
And if you are willing to accept it, John himself is Elijah who was to come.

I was under the impression that Elijah had already come and gone.

Matthew 17:12

12 but I say to you that Elijah already came, and they did not recognize him, but did to
him whatever they wished.

There are two verses that confirm that Elijah has arrived already.

Matt 11:14 means John came in the spirit and power of Elijah, to no exclusion of a future coming of Elijah himself. Luke 1:17 And he will go on before the Lord, in the spirit and power of Elijah,...

Matt 17:12 means John in the spirit and power of Elijah.
 
Last edited:
The Two Witnesses of Revelation 11 is not the only New Testament prophecy which is made literal by the dispensatrionalists. Making New Testament prophecy literal <cite>is a systemic trait of dispensationalism, following C.I. Scofield quoted above.

I John 2: 18 - there were then many antichrists - and I John 4: 3 - that the spirit of anti-Christ is saying that Christ did not come in the flesh - are scriptures that dispensationalists make into a literal one man anti-Christ figure who is to appear after the dispensationalist church is raptured off the earth.

Paul's metaphoric prophecy in II Thessalonians 2: 3-4, that the Day of the Lord will not come until there is a falling away, the man of sin - anthropos tes amartias - is revealed who exalts himself and sits in the temple of God, is made into a literal one man, usually the same anti-Christ figure who they say will desecrate a rebuilt temple in literal Jerusalem. Stephen in Acts 7: 48, and Paul in I Corinthians 3: 16-17 and 6: 19 teach as New Testament doctrine that God no longer dwells in literal temples and that the believers are now God's temple.
</cite>
<cite class="_fd"></cite>

In reality it's a lot of Dispensationalists that believe there is no single antichrist figure. The reason is because our Lord Jesus and His Apostles revealed that the second coming and gathering of the Church won't happen until the antichrist comes first, so they want to make the antichrist to mean only a multitude of people that are against Christ, and say that prophecy has already been fulfilled today, when it has not been. It's an attempt to change the order of events for Christ's coming and gathering of His Church, because our Lord Jesus and His Apostles made it very clear that the Church is not gathered until after the Antichrist/pseudo-Christ has come first to deceive as many as he will.

You should read about the antichrist matter from the early Church fathers, like Ireneus and Hippolytus who had a disciple heritage from Apostle John. They interpreted 2 Thess.2:3-4 to be about a singular antichrist figure coming to play God, sitting in a temple in Jerusalem, which is what Apostle Paul actually wrote there. And those early Church fathers existed way before any dispensationalist movement which only began with John Darby in 1830's Great Britain in conjunction with his secret pre-trib rapture idea.

The interpretation of no singular antichrist figure is actually a later movement than Darby and Scofield's era, with many modern Dispensationalists today having latched onto that idea also. The early Church fathers did not have that idea at all though.

It is easy to prove our Lord Jesus and His Apostles warned of BOTH a singular coming antichrist figure, and the idea of his followers as the many antichrists directly from Bible Scripture. It is the specific warnings within the Book of Daniel, our Lord Jesus' Olivet Discourse of Matthew 24 and Mark 13, Apostle Paul's Epistles of 2 Thessalonians 2 and 2 Corinthians 11, Apostle John in 1 John 2, and in final Christ's warnings through Apostle John in Revelation 9 through 17 with Revelation 13 specifically.


To the Brethren in Christ Jesus here:


Be forewarned about that teaching of no coming singular antichrist figure that's going around today. The specific deception for the very end of days prior to our Lord Jesus' return is the coming of a false one to Jerusalem to sit in a rebuilt temple as king and proclaim himself as God and His Christ, working great signs and wonders in order to cause the majority of the world to believe it. This is the great warning for the end by our Lord Jesus and His Apostles in The New Testament which our Lord Jesus included the prophecies about that false one from the Book of Daniel. The early Church fathers in majority wrote of this warning for the end also.

Why today are some in the Church today trying to dump that warning of a coming singular antichrist figure coming to play God? It is so men's doctrines can supplant God's Word on it instead, thus insuring many will be deceived by that coming singular Antichrist for the end of this world.

Lot of those in the Churches pushing that idea are deceived about where and who that 'no single antichrist' originated from. It could only come from one of the many antichrists who follow the coming Antichrist/pseudo-Christ figure that will sit in Jerusalem in a future temple proclaiming himself as God, just as Apostle Paul taught in 2 Thess.2:3-4. I can guarantee you, their next teaching when that false messiah/Antichrist figure appears in Jerusalem, will be telling you that is our Lord Jesus having arrived. It will not be our Lord Jesus Christ. It will be the pseudo-Christ our Lord Jesus warned us of in Matt.24:23-26, and the false one Paul warned about in 2 Thess.2:3-4.

Many non-Dispensationalists are also on that idea today that there is no coming singular Antichrist figure. Why would they be on that false idea? It's because of men's doctrines again, like Preterism and Historicism, doctrines which the early Church fathers didn't have either. Some of those are being told Christ's Kingdom is already essentially established on earth today, and it's only a matter of time until the various factions in the world believe on our Lord Jesus. In other words, they think Christ's Salvation has already fully manifested today, with no need for a literal second coming of our Lord Jesus. One in Christ Jesus should easily be able to smell the NWO working behind that kind of thinking today with those.

Then there's those involved in Christian Mysticism which interpret The Bible most of the time in some mystical spiritual sense, which is against God's Holy Writ by The Holy Spirit. Like I have said before, when our Heavenly Father uses symbology, metaphor, allegory, parable, etc., it is always about some literal event, the reason for that kind of expression being to make it easier for us to understand. Mysticism is from the ancient pagan 'mystery schools' of old, and it is still active among some Churches today because of the 1st and 2nd century creeping in of Neoplatonist Gnostics who tried to join ancient Greek philosophy and Christian doctrine from The Bible together. Spots in our feasts those are, and they will have their reward when Christ returns.
 
Back
Top