B-A-C
Loyal
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 11,079
Pets.
Pets are a good thing. I've had pets in my life. 7 dogs over the years.
A few parrots, a few hamsters, and a number of tropical fish. I also raised
horses for a short time. Pets are good companions, and for the most part they
are loyal. They rarely betray you or lie to you.
Pets aren't really mentioned too much in the Bible. Of course there are shepherds
and sheep, In 2 Sam 12:3-4; Nathan uses a story of a pet lamb to show David his sin.
I've noticed lately pets are now accepted many places they weren't a few years ago.
I've seen pets in restaurants, banks, on airplanes, in nice hotels, and even in movie
theaters. I suppose there is nothing wrong with this if the pets are well enough behaved.
But I saw an interesting statistic that says more money is spent on pets (this doesn't
include farm livestock) than on orphans and the homeless. Is this true? Have pets become
more important to us as a society than humans? I work with a guy who is a Hindu from India.
We passed a Petco store a few days ago. We went inside, there were people getting perms, shampoo's,
manicures, and even dental work for their pets. One lady was (somewhat boastfully) saying she
just spent $2,500 on a "day spa" for her dog. My friend was amazed by this. he said they have no Petco stores there. Poverty is so high, most people would be embarrassed to spend that kind of money on a pet.
I suppose there's nothing wrong with indulging our pets sometimes.
But a lot of my step-daughters friends are in their 30's now. None of them have children, but
all of them have pets. I was listening to a conversation a few weeks ago about how children
are messy, expensive, time consuming, misbehaving, and take a long time to potty train.
Pets are "so much easier and cheaper". Have we really gotten to the point that cheap and easy
is what determines our family choices?
This has been on my mind for a while, but a story in today's paper about a rich woman who
died and left 7 million dollars to her cats was interesting. She has 3 children, none of them
got any inheritance from her (according to the article). Maybe her children were ungrateful brats,
I don't know. But even so... to put our pets before our children... just seems... wrong.
If you have a pet, that's great. I'm not discouraging that at all. I think God created some
of them to be our companions. But I wonder if we as a society have started putting more value
and priorities on our pets, than on people. In some cases our own families, but in many cases,
simply the homeless, orphans and widows in our communities.
The ancient Egyptians worshiped cats as gods. We need to be careful our pets do not become our idols.
Pets are a good thing. I've had pets in my life. 7 dogs over the years.
A few parrots, a few hamsters, and a number of tropical fish. I also raised
horses for a short time. Pets are good companions, and for the most part they
are loyal. They rarely betray you or lie to you.
Pets aren't really mentioned too much in the Bible. Of course there are shepherds
and sheep, In 2 Sam 12:3-4; Nathan uses a story of a pet lamb to show David his sin.
I've noticed lately pets are now accepted many places they weren't a few years ago.
I've seen pets in restaurants, banks, on airplanes, in nice hotels, and even in movie
theaters. I suppose there is nothing wrong with this if the pets are well enough behaved.
But I saw an interesting statistic that says more money is spent on pets (this doesn't
include farm livestock) than on orphans and the homeless. Is this true? Have pets become
more important to us as a society than humans? I work with a guy who is a Hindu from India.
We passed a Petco store a few days ago. We went inside, there were people getting perms, shampoo's,
manicures, and even dental work for their pets. One lady was (somewhat boastfully) saying she
just spent $2,500 on a "day spa" for her dog. My friend was amazed by this. he said they have no Petco stores there. Poverty is so high, most people would be embarrassed to spend that kind of money on a pet.
I suppose there's nothing wrong with indulging our pets sometimes.
But a lot of my step-daughters friends are in their 30's now. None of them have children, but
all of them have pets. I was listening to a conversation a few weeks ago about how children
are messy, expensive, time consuming, misbehaving, and take a long time to potty train.
Pets are "so much easier and cheaper". Have we really gotten to the point that cheap and easy
is what determines our family choices?
This has been on my mind for a while, but a story in today's paper about a rich woman who
died and left 7 million dollars to her cats was interesting. She has 3 children, none of them
got any inheritance from her (according to the article). Maybe her children were ungrateful brats,
I don't know. But even so... to put our pets before our children... just seems... wrong.
If you have a pet, that's great. I'm not discouraging that at all. I think God created some
of them to be our companions. But I wonder if we as a society have started putting more value
and priorities on our pets, than on people. In some cases our own families, but in many cases,
simply the homeless, orphans and widows in our communities.
The ancient Egyptians worshiped cats as gods. We need to be careful our pets do not become our idols.