Hiswillbedone
Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2018
- Messages
- 76
This seems like an interesting discussion. It basically boils down to salvation by works and salvation by grace?
Correct me if I am wrong, but that seems to be the general spirit of this discussion.
If salvation is in question, then it makes sense to go to the author of our salvation... which is Jesus. If we start and finish there, then I think we can come to a united decision on what the truth is, however, if we hold onto what we believe in, even though it is contrary to what Jesus said, then we are playing with fire.
From what I can read, there is a lot of discussion going back and forth about what it means to receive salvation. One side says its free and there is nothing we can do to 'earn' salvation. This I believe is true, however, this idea falls when the same people that believe this, will then go and tell you, "what you must DO is Accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior and be baptized in water in order to receive salvation". Pause. So is it free, or do I have to say a prayer asking Jesus into my heart in order to receive salvation? Does this not constitute work in the minds of the people that holds such a stance? Food for thought.
The other side is saying what me must do is obey Jesus to the best of our ability in order to not only be saved, but maintain our salvation. This, I also believe is true, however, this argument can still fall if the people preaching it becomes self-righteous about their works and think this is what really saves us. That is not true, what saves us is the sacrifice that Jesus paid on the cross. How we respond to this, is what makes all the difference. I'll elaborate more on that in a second.
Now what we must do is find the balance between both approaches, and find the truth. After all, that is what we are looking for... right?
Does Jesus say all we have to do is say a prayer asking Jesus into our heart to be saved?
The simple answer is no. No where in the four gospels does Jesus say that all we have to do is accept Jesus into our heart to be saved. The only thing close to this can be found in an epistle of Paul (NOTE: Though Paul is in the bible, He is still fallible, so if there seems to be a contradiction in what Paul says and what Jesus says, then I will side with Jesus. I think I have better chances when I stand before God if I do that) in Romans 10:9," That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved." This is commonly referred to as the Romans road. This appears to support the idea that all we have to do is confess Jesus into our heart, and this is the only work that constitutes salvation (I know people may think this shouldn't be considered a "work", but I think this is only because of the biases that these people want to hold onto. The question has to be: Can I still be saved without saying this prayer? If the answer is no, then it is still salvation by works, if not, then the answer has to be yes, which will put a BIG hole in the theology of salvation by grace. Food For Thought.). With all scriptures, it is important to look at the context, of not only the passage, but the historically as well. When Paul wrote this letter to the church in Rome, it was still governed by Rome and their soldiers. They made believing in Jesus as the son of God and his Resurrection illegal to proclaim/preach. Therefore, anyone who followed this command of Paul would be either jailed/killed for doing that. This, IMO, would be all that someone would need to do if questioned whether or not they believed in Jesus, in order prove to Jesus that they did believe in Him. There was very real consequences for doing this.
Today, however, there isn't such a consequence for confessing Jesus with our mouth (unless we go to radical muslim countries. This, however, isn't the case for most of us who live in the 1st world), so the same method of salvation wouldn't be valid. Anybody could fake it without ever producing the fruit that a real person saved in Christ would have showed back in Paul's day (i.e. being a martry or jailed for confessing Jesus). I conclude: This is an isolated passage that can be used to prove the side of 'saved by grace' but after examining it, it doesn't hold when put into context and compared to the rest of what Jesus taught. Therefore, it is an isolated passage in scripture that people build whole doctrines on to support their man made doctrine.
The other passage of scripture, probably the more reliable one to Paul's, is John 3:16. We all know what it says so I won't bother quoting it (excuse my laziness). The main part to focus on is the word "believe". If believing in Jesus is what we must do in order to be saved, then what does the word "believe" mean in context? There are only two options: 1) someone believes in Jesus; that He was real, He died on the cross and rose again, and that He was generally a nice fella... respectable. 2) we believe in everything that He stood for, which includes His teachings that He spend most of His ministry preaching (including the various miracles).
Option 1) How does God know that we believe in His son? In other words, what must someone do in order for God to say, "Yes this is a believer in my son?" One would say," all those that confess Jesus as Lord are the ones that truly believe Jesus." Is that what you think? What does Jesus say, Luke 6:46," Why do you call me, Lord, Lord, yet you don't do the things that I say." It seems clear that just professing Jesus as Lord isn't what He considers to be someone that believes in Him. Maybe this is only an isolated passage, I can hear you say? Does Jesus say this somewhere else? Great question! He does in, "Matthew 7:21," Not everyone (this word 'everyone' is important, because many will say 'Jesus was referring ONLY to the false prophets'. This word however seems to reply to EVERYONE, not a select group) saying to me Lord, Lord, will enter (in other words, "just because they call Jesus Lord, doesn't mean they are saved) into the Kingdom of Heaven, but only those that DO the Will (which implies a work to be done) of my Father will Enter therein." Pause. There is a new variable to consider. I know people, stay with me, I am wrapping it up soon. What is the Will of Jesus' Father? In John 6:40 Jesus says,"For my Father's will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life." Oh Dear! Looks like we went full circle! We are back where we started: What does it mean to believe in Jesus? Which brings me to Option 2.
Option 2) Does obeying the person we SAY we believe in show evidence of faith in said person? Imagine you were in a room and someone said there was a bomb about to explode in 10 seconds. How will you determine who believed those words and who didn't? Simple question isn't it... whoever left the room BELIEVED in the words of the one who brought the message, and whoever didn't leave the room, didn't believe the words of said person.
This my friends, is the answer... If we say that we believe in Jesus, then that will naturally cause us to obey everything that Jesus taught us to do, if we don't believe in Jesus, then we will fight tooth in nail NOT to obey His teachings. If belief is what saves us, then works it inseparable from salvation. At least, according to Jesus.
Just to be clear, I do agree that no amount of works can earn us salvation, however, if we use that as justification NOT to obey Jesus' teachings to the best of our ability, then that is where you are living in a 'false grace' doctrine made up by the devil and his children to lead people away from Jesus.
Very briefly I will touch on the topic of the greatest commandments. If those are the only two commands that we have to follow, then doesn't that mean that we still HAVE to follow them (therefore we must try to do works)? It seems that the argument is that these are the only two we have to obey, while we disregard the other teachings, as if Jesus just said these things for no reason? That is what someone has to believe if they say,"we only have to follow these two commandments ",which implies we must not follow the rest of what Jesus taught. I think by following what Jesus taught, IS, the only away to obey these two commandments. After all, the Son of God came to this world to show us how we should live. Doesn't it make sense that He would be the example we should follow if we want to truly love God and our Neighbor?
I will pose a challenge out to both sides. Which side is willing to obey Jesus above all else? Whether you believe it will save you or it won't really doesn't matter.
If you love this person Jesus for dying on the cross for you, and He asked you to pick up your own cross and follow Him... Then are you willing to do that? Are you willing to leave house, fathers, mothers, sisters, brothers, children, and give up your own life for the sake of the gospel? I think the answer to this last question is what will determine those who believe in Jesus as our Lord and saviour who died on the cross for us and rose on the third day, from those that don't.
In peace and love
Correct me if I am wrong, but that seems to be the general spirit of this discussion.
If salvation is in question, then it makes sense to go to the author of our salvation... which is Jesus. If we start and finish there, then I think we can come to a united decision on what the truth is, however, if we hold onto what we believe in, even though it is contrary to what Jesus said, then we are playing with fire.
From what I can read, there is a lot of discussion going back and forth about what it means to receive salvation. One side says its free and there is nothing we can do to 'earn' salvation. This I believe is true, however, this idea falls when the same people that believe this, will then go and tell you, "what you must DO is Accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior and be baptized in water in order to receive salvation". Pause. So is it free, or do I have to say a prayer asking Jesus into my heart in order to receive salvation? Does this not constitute work in the minds of the people that holds such a stance? Food for thought.
The other side is saying what me must do is obey Jesus to the best of our ability in order to not only be saved, but maintain our salvation. This, I also believe is true, however, this argument can still fall if the people preaching it becomes self-righteous about their works and think this is what really saves us. That is not true, what saves us is the sacrifice that Jesus paid on the cross. How we respond to this, is what makes all the difference. I'll elaborate more on that in a second.
Now what we must do is find the balance between both approaches, and find the truth. After all, that is what we are looking for... right?
Does Jesus say all we have to do is say a prayer asking Jesus into our heart to be saved?
The simple answer is no. No where in the four gospels does Jesus say that all we have to do is accept Jesus into our heart to be saved. The only thing close to this can be found in an epistle of Paul (NOTE: Though Paul is in the bible, He is still fallible, so if there seems to be a contradiction in what Paul says and what Jesus says, then I will side with Jesus. I think I have better chances when I stand before God if I do that) in Romans 10:9," That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved." This is commonly referred to as the Romans road. This appears to support the idea that all we have to do is confess Jesus into our heart, and this is the only work that constitutes salvation (I know people may think this shouldn't be considered a "work", but I think this is only because of the biases that these people want to hold onto. The question has to be: Can I still be saved without saying this prayer? If the answer is no, then it is still salvation by works, if not, then the answer has to be yes, which will put a BIG hole in the theology of salvation by grace. Food For Thought.). With all scriptures, it is important to look at the context, of not only the passage, but the historically as well. When Paul wrote this letter to the church in Rome, it was still governed by Rome and their soldiers. They made believing in Jesus as the son of God and his Resurrection illegal to proclaim/preach. Therefore, anyone who followed this command of Paul would be either jailed/killed for doing that. This, IMO, would be all that someone would need to do if questioned whether or not they believed in Jesus, in order prove to Jesus that they did believe in Him. There was very real consequences for doing this.
Today, however, there isn't such a consequence for confessing Jesus with our mouth (unless we go to radical muslim countries. This, however, isn't the case for most of us who live in the 1st world), so the same method of salvation wouldn't be valid. Anybody could fake it without ever producing the fruit that a real person saved in Christ would have showed back in Paul's day (i.e. being a martry or jailed for confessing Jesus). I conclude: This is an isolated passage that can be used to prove the side of 'saved by grace' but after examining it, it doesn't hold when put into context and compared to the rest of what Jesus taught. Therefore, it is an isolated passage in scripture that people build whole doctrines on to support their man made doctrine.
The other passage of scripture, probably the more reliable one to Paul's, is John 3:16. We all know what it says so I won't bother quoting it (excuse my laziness). The main part to focus on is the word "believe". If believing in Jesus is what we must do in order to be saved, then what does the word "believe" mean in context? There are only two options: 1) someone believes in Jesus; that He was real, He died on the cross and rose again, and that He was generally a nice fella... respectable. 2) we believe in everything that He stood for, which includes His teachings that He spend most of His ministry preaching (including the various miracles).
Option 1) How does God know that we believe in His son? In other words, what must someone do in order for God to say, "Yes this is a believer in my son?" One would say," all those that confess Jesus as Lord are the ones that truly believe Jesus." Is that what you think? What does Jesus say, Luke 6:46," Why do you call me, Lord, Lord, yet you don't do the things that I say." It seems clear that just professing Jesus as Lord isn't what He considers to be someone that believes in Him. Maybe this is only an isolated passage, I can hear you say? Does Jesus say this somewhere else? Great question! He does in, "Matthew 7:21," Not everyone (this word 'everyone' is important, because many will say 'Jesus was referring ONLY to the false prophets'. This word however seems to reply to EVERYONE, not a select group) saying to me Lord, Lord, will enter (in other words, "just because they call Jesus Lord, doesn't mean they are saved) into the Kingdom of Heaven, but only those that DO the Will (which implies a work to be done) of my Father will Enter therein." Pause. There is a new variable to consider. I know people, stay with me, I am wrapping it up soon. What is the Will of Jesus' Father? In John 6:40 Jesus says,"For my Father's will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life." Oh Dear! Looks like we went full circle! We are back where we started: What does it mean to believe in Jesus? Which brings me to Option 2.
Option 2) Does obeying the person we SAY we believe in show evidence of faith in said person? Imagine you were in a room and someone said there was a bomb about to explode in 10 seconds. How will you determine who believed those words and who didn't? Simple question isn't it... whoever left the room BELIEVED in the words of the one who brought the message, and whoever didn't leave the room, didn't believe the words of said person.
This my friends, is the answer... If we say that we believe in Jesus, then that will naturally cause us to obey everything that Jesus taught us to do, if we don't believe in Jesus, then we will fight tooth in nail NOT to obey His teachings. If belief is what saves us, then works it inseparable from salvation. At least, according to Jesus.
Just to be clear, I do agree that no amount of works can earn us salvation, however, if we use that as justification NOT to obey Jesus' teachings to the best of our ability, then that is where you are living in a 'false grace' doctrine made up by the devil and his children to lead people away from Jesus.
Very briefly I will touch on the topic of the greatest commandments. If those are the only two commands that we have to follow, then doesn't that mean that we still HAVE to follow them (therefore we must try to do works)? It seems that the argument is that these are the only two we have to obey, while we disregard the other teachings, as if Jesus just said these things for no reason? That is what someone has to believe if they say,"we only have to follow these two commandments ",which implies we must not follow the rest of what Jesus taught. I think by following what Jesus taught, IS, the only away to obey these two commandments. After all, the Son of God came to this world to show us how we should live. Doesn't it make sense that He would be the example we should follow if we want to truly love God and our Neighbor?
I will pose a challenge out to both sides. Which side is willing to obey Jesus above all else? Whether you believe it will save you or it won't really doesn't matter.
If you love this person Jesus for dying on the cross for you, and He asked you to pick up your own cross and follow Him... Then are you willing to do that? Are you willing to leave house, fathers, mothers, sisters, brothers, children, and give up your own life for the sake of the gospel? I think the answer to this last question is what will determine those who believe in Jesus as our Lord and saviour who died on the cross for us and rose on the third day, from those that don't.
In peace and love