Is the Bible a revelation from God? This is now become the greatest and most pressing of all questions.
We may at once dismiss the quibble that the Scriptures admittedly contain a revelation. Is the sacred volume no better than a lottery bag from which blanks and prizes are to be drawn at random, with no power of distinguishing between them till the day when the discovery must come too late!
And in the present phase of the question it is no less a quibble to urge that passages, and even books, may have been added in error to the Canon.
We refuse to surrender Holy Writ to the tender mercies of those who approach it with the ignorance of pagans and the animus of apostates. But for the purpose of the present controversy we might consent to strike out everything on which enlightened criticism has cast the shadow of a doubt.
This, however, would only clear the way for the real question at issue, which is not as to the authenticity of one portion or another, but as to the character and value of what is admittedly authentic.
We are now far beyond discussing rival theories of inspiration; what concerns us is to consider whether the holy writings are what they claim to be, "the oracles of God."
(Sir Robt. Anderson, The Coming Prince, Chapter 1)
Sir Robert Anderson, wrote the book "The Coming Prince"....In his day he was the head of "Scotland Yard" the English equivalent at that time, to F.B.I. in the U.S.of A.......Robert Anderson had the brains to write this, taking Daniels prophecy and working out to the very day, the very hour of the moons shining, the crucifixion of Jesus. Thereby proving, and demonstrating that the bible is indeed the god of books......the book of God. The very "oracles of God"
A book for the student.
We may at once dismiss the quibble that the Scriptures admittedly contain a revelation. Is the sacred volume no better than a lottery bag from which blanks and prizes are to be drawn at random, with no power of distinguishing between them till the day when the discovery must come too late!
And in the present phase of the question it is no less a quibble to urge that passages, and even books, may have been added in error to the Canon.
We refuse to surrender Holy Writ to the tender mercies of those who approach it with the ignorance of pagans and the animus of apostates. But for the purpose of the present controversy we might consent to strike out everything on which enlightened criticism has cast the shadow of a doubt.
This, however, would only clear the way for the real question at issue, which is not as to the authenticity of one portion or another, but as to the character and value of what is admittedly authentic.
We are now far beyond discussing rival theories of inspiration; what concerns us is to consider whether the holy writings are what they claim to be, "the oracles of God."
(Sir Robt. Anderson, The Coming Prince, Chapter 1)
Sir Robert Anderson, wrote the book "The Coming Prince"....In his day he was the head of "Scotland Yard" the English equivalent at that time, to F.B.I. in the U.S.of A.......Robert Anderson had the brains to write this, taking Daniels prophecy and working out to the very day, the very hour of the moons shining, the crucifixion of Jesus. Thereby proving, and demonstrating that the bible is indeed the god of books......the book of God. The very "oracles of God"
A book for the student.
