Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

UN backed “legal” recommendations seem to back sex with minors.

Joined
Apr 30, 2022
Messages
1,570

From the article…quote)
“A shocking report issued by international legal experts with the backing of the United Nationsappears to open the floodgates to normalize sex with minors.

"Sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law," the Geneva-based International Commission of Jurists wrote in March with an assist from UNAIDS and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.”

We all saw this coming, supporting pedophiles. How low can the left go?
 
Worth reading the actual document, not just what Tucker Carlson says a social media influencer says about it

Yes, it is word for word what I posted above, notice the highlighted part below from their document…

PRINCIPLE 16 – CONSENSUAL SEXUAL CONDUCT
Consensual sexual conduct, irrespective of the type of sexual activity, the sex/ gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression of the people involved or their marital status, may not be criminalized in any circumstances. Consensual same-sex, as well as consensual different-sex sexual relations, or consensual sexual relations with or between trans, non-binary and other gender- diverse people, or outside marriage – whether pre-marital or extramarital – may, therefore, never be criminalized.
With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage.
Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law.”

Now Notice what I quoted from the article in the OP….
Quote…"
Sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law," the Geneva-based International Commission of Jurists wrote in March with an assist from UNAIDS and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.”( end quote)
 
The age of consent varies from place to place. In South Korea, for example, it's 20. The text allows for the possibility that people under the legal age of consent in fact have the capacity to give consent to sexual activity.
 
The age of consent varies from place to place. In South Korea, for example, it's 20. The text allows for the possibility that people under the legal age of consent in fact have the capacity to give consent to sexual activity.
So anyone under the “legal age” would be fair game to them. A 5 year old is under the legal age, are they also fair game? Anyone having sex with under age children is called a rapist, a child molester, or a pedophile.

This is what they want to legalize, which is just another sin the left wants to “legalize”.

Men legalizing sin is called lawlessness.
 
So anyone under the “legal age” would be fair game to them. A 5 year old is under the legal age, are they also fair game? Anyone having sex with under age children is called a rapist, a child molester, or a pedophile.

This is what they want to legalize, which is just another sin the left wants to “legalize”.

Men legalizing sin is called lawlessness.
That's not what the document says.
 
That's not what the document says.

PRINCIPLE 16 – CONSENSUAL SEXUAL CONDUCT Consensual sexual conduct, irrespective of the type of sexual activity, the sex/ gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression of the people involved or their marital status, may not be criminalized in any circumstances. Consensual same-sex, as well as consensual different-sex sexual relations, or consensual sexual relations with or between trans, non-binary and other genderdiverse people, or outside marriage – whether pre-marital or extramarital – may, therefore, never be criminalized. With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage.

"any" prescribed minimum age of consent. "must be" applied in a non-discriminatory manner.

Enforcement "may not be linked to" ... "age of consent" .. to marriage.

It looks like as long as the 2 and 3 years olds consent to marriage, it's all good.

Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of 23 THE 8 MARCH PRINCIPLES FOR A HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH TO CRIMINAL LAW PROSCRIBING CONDUCT ASSOCIATED WITH SEX, REPRODUCTION, DRUG USE, HIV, HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them. Pursuant to their evolving capacities and progressive autonomy, persons under 18 years of age should participate in decisions affecting them, with due regard to their age, maturity and best interests, and with specific attention to non-discrimination guarantees.

Anyone under 18 can make their own decisions about sex, across the board in every country. I do note the part of the sentence that says "with due regard to their age, maturity and best interests".

But there is no specific minimum age mentioned here. Who determines their maturity? Who determines their best interests?

I see principle 17 also legalizes prostitution ( even in a "public place" ) across the board everywhere in every country.
 
"any" prescribed minimum age of consent. "must be" applied in a non-discriminatory manner.

Enforcement "may not be linked to" ... "age of consent" .. to marriage.

It looks like as long as the 2 and 3 years olds consent to marriage, it's all good.



Anyone under 18 can make their own decisions about sex, across the board in every country. I do note the part of the sentence that says "with due regard to their age, maturity and best interests".

But there is no specific minimum age mentioned here. Who determines their maturity? Who determines their best interests?

I see principle 17 also legalizes prostitution ( even in a "public place" ) across the board everywhere in every country.
So anyone under the “legal age” would be fair game to them. A 5 year old is under the legal age, are they also fair game? Anyone having sex with under age children is called a rapist, a child molester, or a pedophile.

This is what they want to legalize, which is just another sin the left wants to “legalize”.

Men legalizing sin is called lawlessness.
I don't know whether you are deliberately misreading it. No, obviously a 5 year old is not able to grant consent. But a 19 year old in South Korea probably can and it's a poor use of the law to criminalise unnecessarily.
 
I don't know whether you are deliberately misreading it. No, obviously a 5 year old is not able to grant consent. But a 19 year old in South Korea probably can and it's a poor use of the law to criminalise unnecessarily.
No, I know what they are trying to do. They are trying to say age limit does not matter, it is only consent that matters.
 

From the article…quote)
“A shocking report issued by international legal experts with the backing of the United Nationsappears to open the floodgates to normalize sex with minors.

"Sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law," the Geneva-based International Commission of Jurists wrote in March with an assist from UNAIDS and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.”

We all saw this coming, supporting pedophiles. How low can the left go?
It wouldn't surprise me if the names in Jeffrey Epstein's client list are these same people.
 

From the article…quote)
“A shocking report issued by international legal experts with the backing of the United Nationsappears to open the floodgates to normalize sex with minors.

"Sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law," the Geneva-based International Commission of Jurists wrote in March with an assist from UNAIDS and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.”

We all saw this coming, supporting pedophiles. How low can the left go?

Ah yes, I heard they were in full support of GOP Senator Moon's bill, All these types are abominable.
 
Back
Top