amadeus2
Loyal
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,456
Hello again, old friend!
We can express very well with words what our priorities should be but still when it comes down to a real case we may miss the mark because our heart was misdirected in that moment.
This is the problem with presenting hypothetical situations. The rules (613?) God gave to Moses were black and white yet even in the OT God was looking for something better in a man's heart. This is why we can read the histories of King Saul and King David in scripture and see that both of them committed offences worthy of death under that written law. Yet, David was forgiven his worst transgressions while Saul was rejected by God. There you see the Spirit of Christ in the OT even as you see it when he did not condemn the adulterous woman.
"And Paul also wrote, For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;" Rom 3:23
The examples of people are given to us to show that even people who pleased God made mistakes. We have made mistakes, but does that excuse us to make more mistakes when they can be avoided? I would say not. Jesus did not condemn the adulterous woman, but he did tell her, "...go, and sin no more." John 8:11
The examples of people are there for us, but let us not make them out to be black and white rules that apply in every case as to what is right and what is wrong. Paul also wrote:
"For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves: but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise." II Cor 10:12
Priorities to be sure, ignoring the physical, and the needs of it, is likewise foolish.
We can express very well with words what our priorities should be but still when it comes down to a real case we may miss the mark because our heart was misdirected in that moment.
This is the problem with presenting hypothetical situations. The rules (613?) God gave to Moses were black and white yet even in the OT God was looking for something better in a man's heart. This is why we can read the histories of King Saul and King David in scripture and see that both of them committed offences worthy of death under that written law. Yet, David was forgiven his worst transgressions while Saul was rejected by God. There you see the Spirit of Christ in the OT even as you see it when he did not condemn the adulterous woman.
Why did David eat the showbread? He took that which was holy and profaned it to ease hunger in both himself and his men. And yet God found no fault with him in this. There is some on this thread who cannot understand the teaching of that. The two greatest commandments are to love the Lord AND to love your neighbor as yourself. If you are only trying to do the first, you automatically fail at the first greatest commandment. Martha was also quicker to believe in Christ in the resurrection than was Mary. Would you ignore that?
"And Paul also wrote, For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;" Rom 3:23
The examples of people are given to us to show that even people who pleased God made mistakes. We have made mistakes, but does that excuse us to make more mistakes when they can be avoided? I would say not. Jesus did not condemn the adulterous woman, but he did tell her, "...go, and sin no more." John 8:11
The examples of people are there for us, but let us not make them out to be black and white rules that apply in every case as to what is right and what is wrong. Paul also wrote:
"For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves: but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise." II Cor 10:12