By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Did Satan bring One or Two gangs of fallen angels from heaven when he became evil and decided to ruin GOD's plan??
read the book of enoch, as well as jubilees and jashur.Did Satan bring One or Two gangs of fallen angels from heaven when he became evil and decided to ruin GOD's plan??
Although Gregg Davidson is a smart man, and likes to get people thinking, I don't think he's the one to listen to on subjects of bible truth. He believes in evolution and thinks man and animals come from the same lines? You really should consider your sourcesfor a non spiritual rational explanation of the nephilim..
11 pages, pretty simple stuff. non global flood, and God taking from the "dust" of the earth (early non spiritual humans) and breathing a living soul into adam and eve.. much prior to 20,000 years ago. they weren't supposed to mix with others, but did anyways.
did you have something to add to the conversation?Although Gregg Davidson is a smart man, and likes to get people thinking, I don't think he's the one to listen to on subjects of bible truth. He believes in evolution and thinks man and animals come from the same lines? You really should consider your sources
I made my point.did you have something to add to the conversation?
In truth, Sue, the book of Enoch was a part of the bible until about 800 AD when the romanist church pushed to have it removed...Why? It puts 'lie' to the romanist doctrines. It proves them wrong@ Peter1 the Book of Enoch is not part of the Canon of Scripture. There was but one revolt in heaven. Lucifer and about a third of the angels rebelled and were thrown out of heaven to this earth. Became satan and the demonic world.
In truth, it was not. There is no indication whatsoever that the book of Enoch had ever been considered canon by anyone in the Christian Church.In truth, Sue, the book of Enoch was a part of the bible until about 800 AD when the romanist church pushed to have it removed...Why? It puts 'lie' to the romanist doctrines. It proves them wrong
He probably means that it was included with the bible, even with the king james bible at one time. Not as canon, but important enough to be printed with the bible. And there is a few christian groups that consider it canon, but they are just 2 groups that I know of, and not large groups either.In truth, it was not. There is no indication whatsoever that the book of Enoch had ever been considered canon by anyone in the Christian Church.
But which book of Enoch? 1st, 2nd, or 3rd Enoch?
You are quite welcome to show me any list of books where Enoch is deemed to be canonical, but I'll be surprised if you actually find one.
Kindly,
Rhema
Sorry Brad, the Book of Enoch was never in the King James Bible, even that from 1611.He probably means that it was included with the bible, even with the king james bible at one time
There is no Bible I know of where the book of Enoch is ever printed therein.Not as canon, but important enough to be printed with the bible.
Yes, the Tewahedo churches, but I doubt anyone here would consider them more than cults.a few christian groups that consider it cano
I have a copy of the kj bible with the apocrypha which used to include Enoch. Its not in the copy I have though. The Beta Israel jews use it as canon although they arent christians, they have the same background as christians. The Ethiopian orthodox church and the Eritrean orthodox church do include it in their canon. Some early church fathers considered it scripture and significant, to include Athenagoras, Clement of Alexandria, Irenaeus, and Tertullian. But the later church fathers rejected it around the 3rd or 4th century. Copies of it were found amoung the dead sea scrolls as well.Sorry Brad, the Book of Enoch was never in the King James Bible, even that from 1611.
1611 KJV ORIGINAL BOOK NAMES
1611 KJV Original Book Names from the 1611 King James Bible Onlinewww.kingjamesbibleonline.org
It was never even in the Septuagint.
There is no Bible I know of where the book of Enoch is ever printed therein.
Yes, the Tewahedo churches, but I doubt anyone here would consider them more than cults.
Kindly,
Rhema
Because the book of Enoch was never in any valid published copy of the KJV.I have a copy of the kj bible with the apocrypha which used to include Enoch. Its not in the copy I have though.
And the Jews who have the Kabbalah as canon? Should we now be reading the Kabbalah?The Beta Israel jews use it as canon although they arent christians,
As I said, those are the Tewahedo. How are they not a cult?The Ethiopian orthodox church and the Eritrean orthodox church do include it in their canon
SOURCE please.Some early church fathers considered it scripture and significant, to include Athenagoras, Clement of Alexandria, Irenaeus, and Tertullian.
SOURCE please (for the claim that church fathers rejected it). Which letter or document of any church father states this?But the later church fathers rejected it around the 3rd or 4th century.
Eleven Aramaic-language fragments of the Book of Enoch were found in cave 4 of Qumran in 1948.Copies of it were found amoung the dead sea scrolls as well.