Thank you, Nigh. I appreciate you taking the time to respond productively. I think, though, that U2K was referring to the use of the phrase, rather than its origins. To quote him:
"I like to say GOD Bless the whole world, only because GOD is not going to bless one nation and leave the rest out, just wouldnt make sense."
That was the basis of the line of discussion I've been taking: this thread has never strayed from U2K's original point. I agree with you that the phrase was used before the US retaliated to 9/11. I agree that at the time it might have been used in the most peaceable, humble way that you illustrate. When George Bush said it, it was almost certainly with the best of intentions...but since then, its meaning has been altered by the extent to which it has been used, and the *way* in which it has been used.
God Bless America might have started out as a peaceful, humble statement...but it has become inextricably intertwined with American nationalism. If you have a moment, take a read of the Rev. Marie Jones
edited to remove link)
I think she puts it rather better than I have. Hopefully you'll see that I'm not 'bashing' America and never was. For the lazy who don't want to link to the article, two key quotes:
"When you see people waving flags and yelling out car windows, 'God Bless America and all you Muslims go home!'...you have crossed that fine line into fanaticism, intolerance, bigotry and hatred."
And her closing line is in agreement with myself and U2K:
"How about a new bumper sticker: God Bless the Universe?"
The Queen was never the issue - someone tried to make a comparison, implying I was a hypocrit, and I pointed out why a) the comparison didn't work, and b) it wasn't the point I was making in the first place. In response to your own question, I'm not saying that God gives blessing only to those who deserve it, but by his own words, He lends his greatest strength to those in need.
When any person is in need, and asks for God's help, or his blessings, then I have no problem at all. I'm arguing that the current trend in use of God Bless America is not as a request from a position of need, but as a statement of arrogance and implied power.
If that is a conversation that you do not wish to have with me, for whatever reason, then by all means don't continue the discussion. But that *is* what we've been discussing.
Ladybug, I don't want people to submit to anything I say or do. If people read what I've been saying, understand what I'm talking about and disagree, good for them. Equally, it wouldn't surprise me if other find themselves in agreement with me.
I'm not saying that I'm right, agree with me or be damned. I'm raising an issue that a lot of people in America might not even consider to *be* an issue unless they actually thought about it, and one which they probably would never have encountered because you have to look at it as an outsider to understand why its even an issue at all.
I just feel that sticking your fingers in your ears and going 'La! La! La!' is counterproductive. It might prevent you from having to think about a tricky subject, but it doesn't make the subject go away and stop being a problem.
With reference to Jesuslovesu, I don't think the moral high ground lies with the person who says "I'm not having this discussion because its awkward". If he/she had put forward a reasoned argument as to why he/she disagreed (as Nigh has done) and said "That's what I feel, I don't believe you're right, I have nothing more to add" then fine.