Greetings brother in Christ. It seems to me that we begin in the same place in our thinking regarding the Lord. There are two certainties in this life, sin and its consequence death. Most people know this or at least should, but the real question relates to the nature of life, its origins and its purpose. If we don't deal with this first important question, it follows that everything else will be a conflict of some sorts. The only explanation for a thinking expressing deity or a being like ourselves known to humanity is contained in the first verse of Genesis with the use of the Hebrew term "Elohim" for God. It is only applied in the plural tension to indicate to us the presence of three distinct equal beings whose mutual reciprocal actions between themselves represents a unity in 'thought' and 'will'. If any systems doesn't begin with a thinking expressing concept like the one in Genesis 1:1 it can't begin unless it begins as if Christianity is true. When we say God is love, we are merely identifying the nature of the relationship between the members of the Trinity; a unity of 'thought' and 'will'.
When we try to come to an understanding of the nature of love as it effects us, we must run it through the Christian concept of Genesis 1:1 to see where it fits or doesn't fit. When a man leaves his father and mother and cleaves to his wife, the two become 'one flesh' according to Genesis. What this means, is that the masculine aspect of the male and the feminine aspect of the female are united as one so that the fullness of God is seen in the external world, first by their children, then others that see them also. God is not male or female because these terms relate to things created or made and not things eternal. However God places the man and the woman into the sphere of His thinking influence like a three cord tie. Because God makes us thinking expressing beings like Himself, He also creates a field of thinking influence mostly contained in the Bible.
I will say this, your thoughts and feelings are valid before the God who makes moral motions plausible and acceptable. Gay marriage is also a valid idea but having said that we must differentiate between the gay marriage and the non gay marriage. Firstly the people involved are different and second, the results of the two different marriage unions would also differ. What we have here is the Christian or moralist who argues from his Christian ideology and the gay person who argues from linguistic analysis ideology and the two can never communicate. Linguistics wins a temporary battle until the Christian relativises the linguistics tablet which is very fragile. My point here is, it seems both the Christian and the non Christian have not understood their own ideas about reality because neither begins in Genesis 1:1, but rather they begin with their ideas and bring them to the moral concept, whatever that is.
For the Christian, there are no questions, rather there are only answers for the Christian to apprehend in his or her thinking as opposed to feeling or experience.
God Bless and Strengthen you my brother in arms!
Hona:shade: