Repeating yourself will not make you suddenly become correct. I previously showed you scripture that you have chosen to ignore because you can't give up your personal philosophy aka Trinity. See below the points I previously raised when you claimed Jesus is the fleshly version of God.
"
God is not a man, that he should lie;
neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? (
Numbers 23:19 -- King James Version)
Numbers 23:19—"God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?"—is sometimes cited to argue that Jesus cannot be God in flesh because the verse emphasizes that God is not a man. In this passage, the phrase "the son of man" is used to contrast the immutable and trustworthy nature of God with human fallibility. It highlights that, unlike humans who may need to change or repent, God's promises and actions are unchanging and reliable.
However, when Jesus uses the title "Son of Man" in the New Testament, such as in Matthew 8:20 and John 3:13, He is adopting a term with deep theological significance, connecting to Old Testament prophecy, particularly Daniel 7:13-14. In this context, "Son of Man" signifies both His genuine humanity and His divine authority as the prophesied Messiah, who is given an everlasting kingdom. While, Numbers 23:19 uses "son of man" to emphasize human limitations and God's divine distinctiveness, Jesus’ use of the term highlights His unique role as both fully human and fully divine.
While Numbers 23:19 underscores the difference between divine and human nature, it does not negate the New Testament understanding of Jesus as God in flesh. Instead, it reinforces the consistency of God's character and the fulfillment of divine promises through Jesus, who embodies both the divine and human aspects of God’s redemptive plan.
Jesus' disciples of the First Century and many other people saw Jesus face to face. Jehovah told Moses at
Exodus 33:20: "
You cannot see my face, for no man can see me and live." If Jesus were God manifest in the flesh, everyone that saw his face would have died.
The claim that seeing Jesus face to face contradicts His identity as God manifest in the flesh based on Exodus 33:20, which states, "You cannot see my face, for no man can see me and live," requires careful theological consideration. In this verse, Jehovah is expressing the idea that His full, unmediated glory is beyond human capacity to endure. The context of Exodus 33:20 indicates that God's essence, in its absolute divine form, is too overwhelming for humans to behold directly without experiencing death.
In contrast, the New Testament presents Jesus as the incarnate Word, the fullness of God revealed in human form. In John 1:14, it is written, "And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us," indicating that Jesus, while fully divine, took on a human nature that allowed for His divine presence to be approachable and visible to people. The incarnation means that Jesus, in His earthly ministry, manifested God's divine nature through a human body, which was adapted to human perception and interaction.
