I actually didn't read your post before I replied.
Happy
Sorry. I'm a bit hypersensitive sometimes, and I jumped the gun.
We differ in opinion, I think, about blunt words for biological functions. Since the name of the Lord is not being profaned, nor is the word being used to insult anyone, I don't see a problem. In the proper context, that is. For example, I don't object to "
oh, ---," but I do think there is a big problem with "
you ---!" However, I would not use those words in any context in the presence of *anyone* that I think even *might* be offended. Nor would I use them if it would cause someone to question my Christianity. Like Paul, I'd rather give up my freedom than give the impression I don't love the Lord.
Incidentally, I've also been rebuked for words such as "heck" or "shoot" or "darn" or "gosh." I was told that using substitute words comes from the same spirit, and I might as well be saying the original word. And in one case I can't quite figure out, a man who didn't object at all to the f-bomb had a fit when I became frustrated and interjected, "oh, boogers." To him, that was a dirty word. But the f-bomb wasn't?
What are the opinions here on the substitute words?