YOU SAID;- " every Christian has two fathers, God and Satan depending upon how a person chooses to live, determines whose child they are."
"
ALL TRUTH, CAN ONLY BE FOUND
IN MESSIAH YAHSHUA."
His FAITH
in us enables us to believe his Fathers words. IN His anointed dwells his GOD and Fathers
word. His GOD and Fathers
teaching. JONH 7:16-17- Jesus answered them and said, ‘My
teaching is NOT mine, but HIS who sent
(commissioned) me; if any one may will to do HIS will, he shall know concerning the
teaching, whether it is of GOD, or,
I do speak from
myself: JOHN 20:17b- “... I
(Jesus) ascend unto
my Father, and your Father, and to
my GOD, and to your GOD:” PSALMS 33:6- By the
word of Yahweh were the heavens made; and all the
HOST of them (SUN, MOON AND STARS) by the breath of His mouth (spirit).
Truth found ONLY in the Fathers anointed Yahshua
adoni, was replaced with ERROR, stemming from Judeo-Christianity and the traditions of men (synagogue/church) and OUR misunderstanding of what the scriptures teach: The reason being, bible translators give
us their version of the Hebrew, Aramaic & Greek texts, in English, NOT necessarily a literal translation, but their biased opinion of what they believe to be true (mans doctrine). Take the capitalisation of words for instance, which gives the reader a false impression of the authors original intent; Changing word into
Word (Name) or changing devil into
Devil (Name) or changing satan into
Satan (Name) doesn’t help anyone seeking truth: Most people take for granted that the bible they are reading is TRUE and without ERROR. Take the KJV ONLY believers, they insist that their KJV bible is the ONLY bible that is inspired by Yahweh and has NO ERROR. For that statement to be TRUE, that would mean Yahweh’s doctrine/teaching is FALSE and His word is NOT found
in us. The KJV and some other translations that people use,
IS what the authors state it to be, a VERSION and
not a TRANSLATION...
SATAN
Persian dualism, a view of
two Gods (POLYTHEISM) in the cosmos battling for supremacy, was carried out of Persia with the repatriated Hebrew people in the 6th Century BC. A Greek takeover filled the Persian idea of a lesser evil God with all the myth and lore of the Greek pantheon. Greek theology brought us to the
Satan we have in our minds today. What Did The Persians, Greeks, And Pharisees Bring Us? These Pharisees, the most derisional of religious
sawtawns ever, brought their doctrine of Satan to Christianity. A look back at their journey and connections with Persia shows how the Pharisees were raised up by Persian Magi from Farsi. As spiritual children of Persian magicians, the power hungry Pharisees stole the idea of an evil lesser God and forced it into the life of the Jerusalemites under their care. As the group most responsible for guiding religious thought in the centuries after leaving Persia, the Pharisees were able to instruct the masses in the ways of Satan (Demonology/Angelology). The sequel to their epic move was even more subtle, because of the Hellenization of a people which allowed Greek ideas to fill the holes in an oddly unbiblical doctrine of Satan. Voila, Satan was then given to the Christians and we now have the Greeks to thank for that...
Any unbiased scholar will tell us then, that the
Greek word must and be defined by the
Hebrew meaning of the word. Therefore, the Satan in the New Testament is informed by the sawtawn of the Old Testament. That leaves us with some pretty clear conclusions on what a satan and a demon are. Context shows that satan, demons, devils, and unclean spirits are several things, And one of those things is
not an immortal spirit or a super- natural entitie/entities Christendom has suggested they are. We find the satan of the Bible to be; an adverse person, an adverse situation, a physical illness, a mental infirmity, a false teacher of false doctrine, an erroneous belief or false doctrine, a person who is a deceiver, a person who opposes Yahweh’s plan or another person, and yes, even Yahweh Himself is at times the
sawtawn. So we see that Yahshua was indeed tempted in the wilderness, but Yahweh’s spirit
sent Him there to be tested. In the entire ministry of Yahshua, there were
no stronger adversaries than the religious leaders. We see that Yahshua was tested by these satans on many occasions and it was these jealous, pride filled, and tenacious scrutineers who would test the Messiah because they had an obligation to test any figure who appeared on the scene and was said to be a candidate for Messiah. The satan and demon possession of the Gospels was
no more than false doctrines, false teachers, mental illness, physical affliction, adversarial men, and persecuting oppressive government. You could be a satan, I could be a satan, my thinking, my friend, my religion, or my government can be a satan.
QUESTION;- Why does the
noun sawtawn get translated as a
NAME by scholars when translating out of the Hebrew?
Ministers quote Rev 12; about the "war in heaven” and “the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the
Devil, and
Satan...” and insist that “satan” is a “fallen angel.” But, in verse 3 that “satan” has “seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.” That is the SAME seven headed “beast” upon which Mystery Babylon rides in Rev 17; and there it is quite plain — it is a conglomeration of nations! They say the “war” in Rev 12; was fought in Yahweh's “heaven,” but, in verse 1, we find the “woman clothed with the sun,” was, also, in “heaven.” The woman is Israel, and Israel was on the earth, so the “heaven” of Rev 12; is on the earth, also! These 2 facts: (1) The “satan” of Rev 12; is identical to the "kings" (nations) of Rev 17; and (2) the "heaven" of Rev 12; is where Israel is, absolutely rules out Rev 12 as being about any supernatural, omnipresent, immortal fallen angel. The "Satan" of the Churches cannot be found in Rev 12; The truth about "satan" is nothing short of ASTOUNDING. The
Satan of the churches is as real as the
hell of the churches!
1. The title “Lucifer” appears only once in the Bible and it is a mistranslation! Even then, the passage is plainly addressed to a mortal man who is identified and told he is going to die soon! Yet that passage has been used for centuries by “the clergy” to expound about an old archangel called “Lucifer!”
2. “
Devil” is NOT found in the Old Testament at all.
3. “Devils” (plural) is used 4 times and ONLY in reference to idols of wood and stone. It does NOT refer to any “living” IMMORTAL thing.
Rom 16:20; “And the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet
shortly. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen.”
Lk 21:22 “...For these be the days of
vengeance, that
ALL THINGS THAT ARE WRITTEN may be FULFILLED.”
Parousia- presence
The
sign of Messiah’s presence (
parousia) in Matthew 24:3-was
revealed when Yahweh’s Judgement CAME with
vengeance in A D.70, with the destruction of the (made with hands) temple: A vital point, totally ignored today, is that prophecy never implied two comings divided by
millennia. That kind of language is not used by the Hebrew prophets. It should BECOME apparent very quickly that Isaiah did not know of any “second coming”. For it is the day of Yahweh's
vengeance. The year of recompense for the cause of Zion. (Isaiah 34:8) The spirit of Yahweh is upon me; (Yahshua) Because Yahweh has anointed me to preach good tidings to the poor. He (Yahweh) has sent me to heal the broken hearted; To proclaim liberty to the captives; And the opening of the prison to those who are bound.) To proclaim the acceptable year of Yahweh,
AND the (day of
vengeance) of our Yahweh. Indeed Yahweh
has proclaimed to the end of the world, "Say to the daughter of Zion.
SHURELY your (salvation is coming) Behold, His (Yahweh’s) reward is with Him and His (Yahweh’s) work before Him." (Isaiah 62:11) For the (day of
vengeance) is in My (Yahweh’s) heart.
AND the year of My (Yahweh’s) (redeemed has come). (Isaiah 63:4) There is not
ONE distinction between "a coming in
redemption and a coming in
vengeance.” Nowhere do the Hebrew prophets teach a "second coming" to fulfill the rest of the things Yahweh was
unable to fulfill the first time. They saw one short fulfillment period with two phases to it; a suffering humiliation phase and a victorious consummation phase.
In Matthew 26:63-65 we read where Yahshua
promised the High Priest, Caiaphas, that he (Caiaphas) would "see (perceive) the son of man coming on the clouds of heaven.” As a ruler and High Priest of Israel, a fleshly seed of Abraham, who rejected Yahweh’s anointed one, he would see (perceive) Yahshua’s return in
judgment. A fleshly (bodily) return of Yahshua’s presence
(parousia) on the clouds was contrary to the nature of Caiaphas' understanding of the OT prophets. In Biblical language, "clouds" are symbolic of Yahweh's wrath and judgment against the enemies of Yahweh's people. David said that Yahweh delivered him from his enemies while descending on the clouds. (Please read Psalm. 18:3-15). Of course, clouds also speak of Yahweh's majesty, power and divine presence.
In the OT, Yahweh came many times. He CAME on the clouds, with fire, with messengers, in judgment, and "
heaven and
earth" passed away. He CAME when He delivered Israel from Egypt (Exodus 3:8). He CAME in the fall of Babylon (Isaiah 13-14). He CAME in the fall of Edom (Isaiah 34). He CAME with the destruction of Egypt at the hands of the Assyrians (Isaiah 19-20). He CAME with fire and the shout when He defeated the Assyrians as they besieged Jerusalem (Isaiah 30, 37). Each of these events showed the COMINGS of Yahweh. They were manifestations of the majesty and glory of Yahweh in judgment. They manifested Yahweh's sovereignty and justice (Isaiah 26:9). The fulfillment of His predictions to "come" showed Him to be the true ONE (Isaiah 41:21f). When Yahweh used the means of a
nation or
people to carry out a judgment, He was said to, come on the clouds. The Day of Yahweh was tumultuous, frightening and awesome. But Yahweh did not visibly appear. It is clear that Yahshua’s presence
parousia was to involve clouds (Matthew 24:30; 26:64; Mark 13:26; 14:62; Luke 21:27). let us look at some OT passages that would help us to understand the NT.
Exodus 16:10 – It came about as Aaron spoke to the whole congregation of the sons of Israel, that they looked toward the wilderness, and behold, the glory of Yahweh appeared in the cloud.
Exodus 19:9 – Yahweh said to Moses, "Behold, I will come to you in a thick cloud, so that the people may hear when I speak with you and may also
believe in you forever." Then Moses told the words to the people of Yahweh.
Exodus 34:5 – Yahweh descended in the cloud and stood there with him as he called upon the name of Yahweh.
Leviticus 16:2 – Yahweh said to Moses: "Tell your brother Aaron that he shall not enter at any time into the holy place inside the veil, before the mercy seat which is on the ark, or he will die; for I will appear in the cloud over the mercy seat.”
Numbers 11:25 – Then Yahweh came down in the cloud and spoke to him... NOTE: that in several of these passages, Yahweh is said to have;-
come,
descended,
came down, and
appeared. This is language similar to that which Yahshua used in reference to His own presence
parousia.
QUESTION: Was the “body” of Yahweh/Yahshua seen at these times or was it just that the cloud signified the presence of Yahweh/Yahshua ?
Were these manifestations of Yahweh/Yahshua
bodily and
physical ? The ANSWER is obvious.
* Please consider the PDF Link titled.... Angels & Demons;
https://benwilliamslibrary.com/pdfs/Angels_Demons.pdf
JOHN 1:1- IN the beginning was the
Word, and the
Word was with God, and the
Word was God. KJV
When Paul and Barnabas were at Lystra (in Asia Minor) spreading the Good News of Messiah’s Reign, Paul healed a lame man. Witnesses began shouting: "The gods are come down to us in the likeness of men. And they called Barnabas,
Zeus, and Paul,
Mercury, because he was the lead spokesman (Gk.
logos)".Acts 14:11-12 Wait a minute! I thought Yahshua was
The Logos: JOHN 1:1 Because of these basic errors in theology, churches have twisted, mistranslated and misread the first chapter of the Gospel of John for centuries: The churches misread John 1:1 to say:- “In the beginning was
Jesus, and
Jesus was with God, and
Jesus was God.” Church people who have heard it read this way
over and
over have come to accept it. How ever, that is NOT what this verse says. The correct rendering is: "In the beginning was the communication (the
logos). And the communication was regarding God. And God was the communication" (i.e., God was expressing Himself ). Some may say, “Yes, but Jesus is the Word: the
Logos” However, as you can see, that is not what this verse says. You cannot find the word
Jesus there. Rather, it says that God was the logos. “
Logos ” means communication. In fact, a few verses later (vs 14) it says that the communication (
logos) BECAME FLESH. In other words, in due time God finalized his communication with man by expressing Himself in flesh... through his Son. Yahshua was the image of his Father expressed in flesh. "Who being the light of his glory and the express image of his essence, sat down on the right of the Majesty on high;" The real question of John 1:1 is this:
Who or
what, is “the
logos?” Genesis 1:1 clearly tells us that Yahweh, ALONE, existed in “the beginning.” Therefore, it was Yahweh who communicated to man in “the beginning.” That communication to Adam was the first “
logos.” It was God’s word. His law. "And Yahweh God commanded Adam..." Gen. 2:16 It is a fact that the term “
logos” was used for
God,
Yahshua and
Paul. This makes perfect sense because the word
“
logos ” means communication. Paul was called “
the logos” in Acts 14:1. God’s
logos came first in the form of law commands to Adam. Later, when Yahshua came upon the scene, God’s
logos (communication) took on the form of flesh. That came NOT in the beginning but AFTERWARD! Don’t
misread it. Yahweh communicates to mortal man. In Hebrews 1:1-2 we read: "God (Yahweh) who at sundry times and in divers manners SPOKE in time past to the fathers
by the prophets, Has in THESE last days SPOKEN (communicated) to us
by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, through whom also He fulfilled the ages...” God spoke (communicated) to Adam and to the prophets. But NOW He speaks (communicates) through His Son, Yahshua. Paul, too, spoke as Yahshua’s
logos. In the beginning Yahweh spoke. Later his word came via his prophets. Yahshua was, of course, his greatest
Logos. Men communicate with each other by way of symbols, words, pictures, or sign language. These symbols communicate ideas and thoughts. God, like wise, revealed Himself by communication using symbols that were understandable to men. Yahshua is the ultimate symbol: the best
logos God could give us. God reveals Himself to man in three ways: (1) By spirit: He inspires people. (2) By his word: the Scriptures. (3) By his Son, Yahshua Messiah: our Reigning King.
NO argument can be built for plurality in the
El from the plural ending of
Elohim God;
Moses, who is a
single person, is called
Elohim/God in Ex. 7:1; The
Messiah who is a
single person is called Elohim/God in Heb. 1:8; King
David who is called
Elohim/God he too is a
single person in Ps. 45:6;
NOTE: That the Greek version of the Old Testament and the New Testament always render the word God by
theos which is a singular, NOT plural, word: In Judges 8:33; 16:23-24, a
single idol is called
Elohim. In 1 Kings 11:33
Ashtoreth, the goddess of the Zidonians,
Chemosh, the god of the Moabites, and
Milcom, the god of the Ammonites, are
each designated
Elohim, though
each was a
single god. Furthermore,
Abraham is called lord, where a plural form,
adonim lords, is used in Gen. 24:9-10;
Potiphar is called the
adonim masters of Joseph, Gen. 39:2, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20; and the lords of Joseph in Genesis 39:16 and 40:7;
Joseph is called the man who is the lords
adonim of the land and the lords of the country, Gen. 42:30, 33;
Other examples of a plural ending with singular meaning may be found in Num. 25:1-5; Deut. 4:7; 1 Sam. 4:5-8; 1 Kings 11:5; 2 Kings 1:2; 19:37.
In Messiah's Love
