The Scientific Case Against Evolution - Part 2

[ItinerantLurker]

\
It is not an ideology that is subject to correction and testing.

Yet it is the source of many ideologies, many of which we now recognize as quite flawed.

What it contains is eternal. It is beyond question regarding proof.

"Beyond question"? Really? Could you flesh that out a bit for me?





Lurker

 

[David777]

Hello

You said,

"Yet it is the source of many ideologies, many of which we now recognize as quite flawed."

I agree, the Bible is not responsible for flawed ideas and theologies.

Mankind is doing what mankind does best, generating debate about what mankind does not understand. Inventing stupid ideas and flawed theologies.

By "beyond question" I mean that the Bible records the intervention of God in mankinds history. As such the only way to know whether what the Bible states is true is via revelation or by death. Hence there is no other way of testing the source code.

So ultimately there is no way to test the Bible, thus it is beyond the domain of the intellect.

 

[Zionist]

You said,

"Yet it is the source of many ideologies, many of which we now recognize as quite flawed."

I agree, the Bible is not responsible for flawed ideas and theologies.

Mankind is doing what mankind does best, generating debate about what mankind does not understand. Inventing stupid ideas and flawed theologies.

By "beyond question" I mean that the Bible records the intervention of God in mankinds history. As such the only way to know whether what the Bible states is true is via revelation or by death. Hence there is no other way of testing the source code.

So ultimately there is no way to test the Bible, thus it is beyond the domain of the intellect.

You're wasting your time. I have never seen a person who was opposed to God that was teachable or reachable. People today have become so dumbed down and brainwashed, they respond only in aggression and outright defiance. You can say it once, and you may as well leave it there. There are many people who call themselves Christians, many of which reject what God teaches. They say they love God, but call him a liar, twist his words, and teach things which he is outright against. They are defiant in their ways and will never change.

 

[Fraction]

You're wasting your time. I have never seen a person who was opposed to God that was teachable or reachable. People today have become so dumbed down and brainwashed, they respond only in aggression and outright defiance. You can say it once, and you may as well leave it there. There are many people who call themselves Christians, many of which reject what God teaches. They say they love God, but call him a liar, twist his words, and teach things which he is outright against. They are defiant in their ways and will never change.

Who are you to say these things? Oh, you're the same as me. A sinner who needs Gods grace for eternal life. You are no better than the people you condemn. You accuse others, but you forget that in the eyes of God...you become guilty of it as well. Just saying.

 

[ItinerantLurker]

By "beyond question" I mean that the Bible records the intervention of God in mankinds history. As such the only way to know whether what the Bible states is true is via revelation or by death. Hence there is no other way of testing the source code.

So it's not really "beyond question" more like, "beyond being able to answer that question".




Lurker

 

[ItinerantLurker]

{snip rant}

Your dismembered post is waiting whenever you feel like re-visiting the issues of physics and/or genetics. Enjoy.




Lurker

 

[dannibear]

Your dismembered post is waiting whenever you feel like re-visiting the issues of physics and/or genetics. Enjoy.




Lurker

Isn't this site called talk Jesus?

 

[ItinerantLurker]

Isn't this site called talk Jesus?

Yep, and the title of this thread is "The Scientific Evidence Against Evolution". If you have an issue with discussion of scientific evidence take it up with the OP.




Lurker

 

[dannibear]

Yep, and the title of this thread is "The Scientific Evidence Against Evolution". If you have an issue with discussion of scientific evidence take it up with the OP.




Lurker

Actually sir, I posted a thread similar to ones on here.
What I am wondering is, what is the purpose that you are
posting in this thread? I see you are trying to discuss evolution
as you said here

I see you've strayed into unsupported assertions about abiogenesis. I'm discussing evolution.

and this

Because creationists have this annoying habit of trying to get their pseudoscience put into public science education, among other things.

Your profile says you were born again twenty years ago?

Are you a Christian or someone seeking Jesus Christ?
This thread you are commenting on posts against evolution.
It is pretty common that a believer in Christ doesn't support
evolution. Is there something in your mind telling you that
posting things about evolution will change what everyone
on this site believes? Is there something telling you that arguing
and calling everyone here ignorant will change them either?

Dude. . .are you serious? "Photosynthesis": ever heard of it?

Reality > your assertions.

What a truly amazing display of ignorance.

Kind of rude for someone who says they were born again
twenty years ago. It is really kind of weird to me,
why people think that calling others ignorant and uneducated
will get them to think they way they think.