Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Amos Chapter 8:11-12 Bibles are supernaturally altered.

Why is it no one is claiming the Hebrew and Aramaic copies are changing?

I have heard of this weird stuff for a long time...
 
I woke up to this around a year and a half ago and completely agree @Godbehonored .

It's disturbing to see people denying such in your face proof, and so many have replaced Jesus with the bible as the authority.
 
I woke up to this around a year and a half ago and completely agree @Godbehonored .

It's disturbing to see people denying such in your face proof, and so many have replaced Jesus with the bible as the authority.

This has happened because of generations of brainwashing of the churchgoers by the synagogue of Satan in charge of mainstream theology.

Tell a lie enough times and people will believe it.
 
I'm glad you brought this up, because I have wondered it too. I've wondered about if it was the date of the publication. Even in the same translation but different centuries, and even in the same translation but different publishers. Sometimes though, things seem to change and I do wonder if the scripture actually changed in heaven and then in the earth.

I reread that chapter in Amos and what caught my eye was in Amos 8:14.

14 They that swear by the sin of Samaria, and say, Thy god, O Dan, liveth; and, The manner of Beersheba liveth; even they shall fall, and never rise up again.

It made me think of that in Revelation the tribe of Dan is mysteriously missing from the tribes of Israel Revelation 7:5-8. Instead it lists Joseph twice as Joseph and Manasseh in verses 6 and 8. Manasseh is Joseph's son (Manasseh and Ephraim), so to list it that way is redundant and it gives the exclusion of Dan.

People have wondered if this was a mistake or intentional, but there is no clear explanation that I have heard. Mostly people say Dan sinned and went extinct, but that seems like an exaggeration to me.
 
People have wondered if this was a mistake or intentional, but there is no clear explanation that I have heard. Mostly people say Dan sinned and went extinct, but that seems like an exaggeration to me.

Isa 40:8; The grass withers, the flower fades, But the word of our God stands forever.
1Pet 1:25; BUT THE WORD OF THE LORD ENDURES FOREVER." And this is the word which was preached to you.

 
Isa 40:8; The grass withers, the flower fades, But the word of our God stands forever.
1Pet 1:25; BUT THE WORD OF THE LORD ENDURES FOREVER." And this is the word which was preached to you.


From the link you posted in the first paragraph, the author states what he is saying is just speculation.
The absence of Dan in the list of tribes in Revelation 7 is a source of much interest among Bible students. The text itself offers no explanation, but we can speculate based on some analysis.

Is this what you are speculating? That Dan was the only tribe of Israel to go extinct for its sins? Or is it a mistake unintentional or deliberate?
 
That Dan was the only tribe of Israel to go extinct for its sins? Or is it a mistake unintentional or deliberate?

Well first, nobody said they were extinct. Simply not included in the 144,000.
Second, God does nothing by accident.
 
Back
Top