Our entire life.
But it's a question of moving forward, not an issue of we have X years to "get it right." And my apologies, it would have been better for me to write "Journey
through Sanctification" rather than "into." To one, overcoming alcoholism is the most important thing that God would address in a person's life - to another, that he stop beating his wife. And for some, mistaking a spirit of poverty for holiness would need to be resolved (and quickly at that). For each of us there is a key sin that God would have us overcome in the "Now," and once achieved, to move forward, dealing with the next sin. The question we would ask ourselves is, are we moving forward?
Jesus gave a parable about not moving forward, or not growing in the ways that we as believers are to behave.
He spake also this parable; A certain man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard; and he came and sought fruit thereon, and found none. Then said he unto the dresser of his vineyard, Behold, these three years I come seeking fruit on this fig tree, and find none: cut it down; why cumbereth it the ground? And he answering said unto him, Lord, let it alone this year also, till I shall dig about it, and dung it: And if it bear fruit, well: and if not, then after that thou shalt cut it down.
(Luke 13:6-9 KJV)
A literalist would argue that we have only four years to make progress in dealing with our infirmities - that which we lack in the character of Christ. I would argue that the end comes when we stop trying.
Maybe there are some believers who have progressed to a point where God would indeed have them engage on a global scale. Lester Sumrall comes to mind. And one cannot fault North Point Community Church for having shepherded a program that distributed $8.5 million US dollars in aid to the needy this last year and over 26,000 hours in volunteer service. But for the most part, we need to clean up the mess that is in front of us - the mess within our own personal life - before we could even begin to think about "national sins" (if there actually even is such a thing under the New Covenant). A new proverb I give unto you (maybe "recent" is better, and I shouldn't take credit, but ...) --- Beware the naked man who offers you the shirt off his back.
And well it should. The Sermon on the Mount IS the Gospel of Jesus, and should be the core belief of every disciple. And once these things are established in our lives, we can move on to deal with progressively larger social issues.
Well then one could hardly consider them Christian, now, could one... To me, the word "Christian" is largely worthless. And I would not be surprised that at one point you would think me to not be a Christian, and you may be surprised to find that I might think your Christian foundation has a fatal flaw. But no, the sin of my neighbor, whether individual or collective, does not attach to me.
Well then you should stop beating your wife.... ( I JEST... I jest).
The problem I have with your statement, though, is how should one manage the "we" ?? What should be changed? And then how? Can the "Compassion, Justice and Mercy" of Christ be codified into a statement of behaviour that we should then legislate? To some extent (theft, murder) it is. But the Great Risk is to think that Sanctification can be imposed from without by the tools of a legal system - and BOOM we just turned Jesus into the LAW - a Jesaic Law. Yet from what I understand, the "Compassion, Justice and Mercy" of Christ is to come from an
internal spiritual transformation.
I myself don't need a law telling me not to murder. I don't murder because the spirit of murder is not within me. I don't need a law telling me not to steal. The spirit of theft is not within me. When my spirit within is transformed, I need no external law at all. And it's likely that we agree on much that I'm writing here... However, it's likely that I see God's judgment somewhat differently. The judgement of God is coded into the system. Smoke? -> lung cancer. Drive faster than one's car or one's reflexes can handle? -> death and carnage on the highway. A liter of soda a day? -> diabetes. Living in fear? -> PTSD consequences.
For the locale of California USA, ... fail to manage dead wood adequately? -> massive forest fires started by the poorly designed electrical distribution grid. In other words, God's judgement is already present within the consequences of one's actions.
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
(John 3:18 KJV)
George Carlin once quipped - "Just think about how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of all people are stupider." (And yes, I know he's talking about the mean, but mathematicians should stop destroying the humor.) And this is the problem with socialism - stupid people gain power and destroy society. (Sorry, I'm sliding into political commentary, and so shall try to get back on point.)
No it isn't. You're creating sin where there is none, inventing an eleventh commandment.
Where does God (under the new covenant) ever condemn us with the sin of "Guilt by Association" ?? I would suggest that one be careful about accusing the brethren. You seem to think that the followers of Christ are
of the world if they are merely
in the world.
Rhema
PS: (And I'm one of the few who actually understands Piketty.)
PPS:
And Jabez was more honourable than his brethren: and his mother called his name Jabez, saying, Because I bare him with sorrow. And Jabez called on the God of Israel, saying, Oh that thou wouldest bless me indeed, and enlarge my coast, and that thine hand might be with me, and that thou wouldest keep me from evil, that it may not grieve me! And God granted him that which he requested.
(1 Chronicles 4:9-10 KJV)
I get the impression that you might have some issues with the prosperity and wealth of Jabez.