What you seem to be saying is that what is true about our world and circumstance can be determined by who is talking about it, similar to the multiverse theory.
I can't say it's true but much scripture seems to imply something similar to that.
Couple that with the observer effect and throw in a placebo effect.
It's up to me to decide what actually works in life.So my personal reality is unique to myself.I live in a common reality with you and the rest of the world but at the end of the day it's what works that counts.
I don't believe in Santa but he is a reality in many young persons.
He is real to the parents who spend money to reinforce his reality.
He is real to the toy store owners and the proof is in the profit.
He is real to the toy and game manufacturers.
Sometimes when all logical approaches fail the only choices left are illogical ones.I was agnostic at one time because I like being right.
How can you be wrong by saying "I don't know"?Saying there is a God is taking an unprovable position.Saying there is no God is also taking an unprovable position.
"What the book says is true!"
"How do you know that?"
"Because it says so in the book!"
I never said what the book says is true.
I said I believe in an invisible creator(the word invisible is optional).
I didn't give the reason that I believe,I got the idea that for the things I posted from scripture.I studied that scripture and came to the conclusion that if scripture were true then those things would apply.
So let me get this straight: You posit, in post # 37 of this thread, "Yes I believe in an invisible creator. I got this idea from scripture.", when I point out that this, eh, reasoning is identical to that of ,say, a devout Muslim, you retort by saying "If we were in [sic] a Muslim forum I would expect proof from Muslim scripture."
If I was replying in a secular forum I would have not said it.
I was posting to those that hold scripture to be truth.
If I were in a Muslim forum I would quote from the Koran.
If I went to a forum discussing the spaghetti monster I would only use known accepted spaghetti scripture to derive conclusions.
I can talk about spaghetti models,multiverses,quantum effects,observer effect,placebo effect,nocebo effect and dark matter..ect.Not that those things are proven or would be proof of a creator but we can at least have an interesting conversation.
Not only does TCH claim to know that an invisible deity exists,
This seems to be your main issue.
I suppose I should have played it safe and said"I believe that if scripture is truth then these things would apply."
Originally Posted by Thiscrosshurts
If we were in a Muslim forum I would expect proof from Muslim scripture.
If I was in a science oriented forum I would expect scientific evidence.
If I went to an Atheist forum to talk about nothing then I would offer nothing as my proof.I would simply talk down to each member like atheists do.I would let them all know I had done more research about nothing than them.
And maybe try to convince them my nothing is the true nothing.
The name of the forum is Talkjesus.That should be a clue that you can expect people to talk about Jesus.If there is a sight called talknothing then I would go there if I had the urge to talk about nothing.
Aww cmon,that was just a little humor from the cross.Besides I'm just being what you expect me to be.