........Continued from last post
their outer appearance but they have always been of the same essential
character.
Firstly the Beast was Rome and the False prophet was Emperor worship. But
that passed. Then there came Islam, Atheism, the New Age, Secularism, and
so on. The reformers regarded Catholicism as the false prophet and visa
versa. Today we cast another wary eye at Islam. All had one thing in common
they were against the true God and the true people of God.
Even Jesus is described in different forms but we recognise Him as the same
One in all dimensions. 'Jesus Christ' is introduced to us in chapter one, and
we immediately, and correctly, recognise the man of the Gospels.
But we understand that he is also the alpha and omega, the first and the last,
the wounded Lamb, a great and mighty angel, the rider on the white horse,
and the light of the city. He re-occurs throughout the story in a different word
pictures but we understand that he is the same person.
There has always been a perception of the thousand year reign of Christ and the binding of Satan.
To some generations it was purely spiritual because there was no historical
evidence for it. Satan was at least bound from them as individual believers
and their life was pure.
To others it was only a hope of a better day to come.
When persecution was lifted in the early 4th century and Christianity became
the official religion of Rome, it was seen as the dawning of the Reign of Christ
through His church, and to some extent for a short period, no doubt, it was.
Although each generation can gain meaning from the text it does not detract that in all these things there will be a final and terminal meaning as sure as there was a first and inaugural meaning.
There will be the final Beast, the final false Prophet, the final appearing of Christ, the actual reign of Christ. But while we approach those events with increasing speed the Book of Revelation still places its vistas before us and the text means Something to us now.
This is all so important. We cannot read revelation as belonging only to the past. Neither can we read it as belonging entirely to the future. It cannot be read as a chronological record of the history of this age, neither can it be simply spiritualised into illustrations that can be applied to any situation. The story moves from one dimension to another and the author tells us most of the time exactly in which dimension we are.
Finally it is a Revelation of Jesus Christ.
It is not a revelation of any portion of history, evil, Satan, the tribulation, the millennium, or even heaven. It is a revelation of Jesus Christ. We are meant to know something about Him which is not so obvious and is easily obscured by the chaos of the world in which we are called upon to be witnesses. We are ultimately concerned with what the book tells us about Jesus. If we are side-tracked to some other theme, we have lost the plot and need to return to the main subject.
-------------------------------------
I would welcome a discussion, in love and unity, on the whole book, but it appears the thread you have given your interpretation on is your monopoly on truth - I say that in the kindest way and will readily and humbly seek your forgiveness if that is not so.
Your brother in Him
David