Tell me, do you read the bible and come to the conclusion that God loves America? ......... The freedom of religion as a protected right?
The above remark interested me greatly. The US was established as a new experiment in world politics. Up until the the late 18th century there had never been, anywhere, a republican democracy that had as its prime motive the protection of minorities. Christians came to its shores by the thousands from Europe where they had been systematically persecuted, and killed, for their faith, by both the royal houses and the papal antichrist. The reformation had grown stagnant, each subsequent reformer's followers persecuting the ones that had gone before, the Holy Spirit being frustrated in establishing truth after millennia of truth being trampled underfoot.
God however created a new opportunity, where His children could grow in a state where religion and statecraft were kept utterly separated, leaving Christians to grow without impedance.
In a nation that for the first time recognised freedom of religion as a God-given right. A nation that for the first time recognised freedom of conscience as inalienable. What a precious gift this was for the downtrodden and scarred refugees from Europe.
Your statement above suggests that you disagree that freedom of conscience is a right to be cherished, guarded,protected and fought for. Is that the way I understand you?
I hate America and what it stands for. And the God I worship does too. America is evil and always has been. America has always been about freedom for the people, NOT following the Creator who created them. This is not the goal.
Again, if I am reading you correctly and I do believe I am, it seems that you would have it some other way. Tell me. What is the alternative to freedom? If you would have it that Christianity should be the only religion allowed or permissible, tell me, of the tens of thousands of protestant and independent denominations around,which particular branch of Christianity would you suggest? Or perhaps you would have us back into the dark ages where there was only one shop in town? Or maybe you would like it the Saddleback way where doctrine is ignored and they "unite" on the few bits and pieces they find in common? And what of the Jew, the Moslem, and the unbeliever? Or the Mormon or Jehovah Witness? Tell me Gary please, what alternative would you suggest from this brilliant (at least from my perspective from half way round the world) piece of writing by James Madison
Religious Freedom Page: Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, James Madison (1785)?
I wholeheartedly agree with you that within all governments there is corruption. Lots of it, and God certainly hates that. But he also allows even them the freedom of choice to act according to their own conscience.
I would also strongly recommend you take great caution if you would suggest that freedom is good for yourself because 'you are right' but deny freedom to others because 'they are wrong'. That my friend is the way of the antichrist.Demanding freedom for himself until such time as he has gained power, then using the power to deny freedom to others. That is precisely the way Catholicism has inculcated itself into American politics. The only, and I repeat
only way to protect your freedom (be it right or wrong) is to staunchly demand the continuing freedom for
all.
The only association the government ought to ever have with religion is in protecting those who espouse it to practice such freely, and those who would shun it, to do so also with that same freedom.