Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Satan’s Prime Target and focus….Israel? Or the Church??

No Hype ... I believe you did not address my question regarding what you said about the doctrines of Historicism and Preterism.

Do you still believe that Historicism AND Preterism believe the pope to be the Antichrist?

Yes, I know of quite a few from both of those two sides of the fence that believe the office of the pope is the Antichrist. And both movements strongly use an overlap of past history to try and prove that (just look at brakelite's posts about it). Also, I was raised in a Christian denomination that held strongly to the tenets of Preterist thought from men. Even today in many mainstream Protestant Churches they believe the pope is the Antichrist.
 
Last edited:
Eddie B, Hi. To my mind the woman of Rev.12 is not Israel, nor Mary, as some suppose, but she represents God's people throughout all ages. Ever since Eden the promise of a Saviour was the hope of God's people. Here is a brief historicist account of Revel.12.
The beautiful woman of Revelation 12 is revealed in direct contrast with the ***** of Revelation 17,18. As the ***** represents a global church that by her adulterous relationship with the state is accounted an apostate church, so the woman of Revelation 12 through her having given birth to the Saviour and willing to suffer persecution rather than compromise truth, this OT church and NT church is accounted righteous. If you like, you may describe her as being God's people, or even the Jews, both OT and spiritual NT, but either way, I put it to you that she is representative of God's true children, just as the ***** is representative of apostasy.

Throughout time God's people had longed for their Deliverer. They looked for their Messiah, and every Jewish woman had hopes that she might be the one that would bring Him forth. And yes, the One who would rule all nations with the rod of iron is Jesus.

After giving birth, the church was persecuted and had to escape into the wilderness. Persecuted first by the Jews, then by pagan Rome, and finally by papal Rome, she survived through faith and cleaving to the truth. Just before the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70ad, Christians settled in the cities of Syria and Antioch became the first real centre of evangelical Christianity. From there missionary endeavours spread the gospel far and wide. However, opposition and persecution attended their efforts, and history reveals that there has never been a time when true fully consecrated sons and daughters of God who were willing to surrender their lives to their Saviour and 'go into all nations teaching whatsoever He commanded them" did so without exciting the wrath of Satan.

That which was 'spewed 'from the mouth are the false doctrines of the false church, Babylon.

well I am not sure I agree with that because it leaves out some of the passages "meat". I have pointed out some below.
I think the woman in chapter 12 is Isreal because verse 6 The woman fled into the wilderness to a place prepared for her by God, where she might be taken care of for 1,260 days. And now if we look to matt 24 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) 16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains: (Fleeing into the mountains is "in the wilderness" as in rev. 12:6)
this speaks to a specific time and action, not a reference thru-out history. Also in prophecy a woman represents a church. A good example of this is the bride of Christ. The mystery Babylon woman is the church of the enemy. there is evidence that this church does and has existed "behind the scenes" for a while now and is working for this passage in the bible to come to pass. Evidence you can readily find online is from speeches of every president since Reagan... they have every one spoken of a new world order.
also as to what you said what spewed from the mouth of the dragon/beast is false doctrines of a false church.... that doesn't explain the second half of that passage which says the earth helped her and opened up and swallowed the flood. how would the earth help swallow up false doctrines?

Edit: You said something about historicist view. I do not even know what that means, but I will tell you I dont look for any view/teaching to teach me anything about the bible. i read the bible to teach me about the bible. And I ask God to reveal it to me. Now I am not saying I am the ultimate authority on what the bible says, God has even corrected me about scriptures telling me "and thats not what that means" but, I am skeptic when it comes to a teaching on the bible other than Jesus is the son of God, bore Gods wrath and was crucified to pay for mans sins and then three days later was risen from the dead. I think if you examine what i posted above open mindedly you will find holes in the historicist view. And if you dont thats cool to. God Bless.
 
Last edited:
NoHype,

I am surprised by your claim that some (or many?) preterists believe the office of the pope to be the Antichrist as all that I am familiar with claim Nero to be the 666 beast or some other entity from the very distant past.

Can you provide any current (or recent) preterists by name, as my son-in-law pastors a conservative Reformed preterist church and he is unaware of your claim.

Naturally, all historicists claim the papacy to be the 666 beast.
Just as all futurists claim he is yet future.

That is the luxury of futurism ... it can make all its future predictions of what is "going to happen" , and until (if ever) it comes to pass, how can it be proved wrong?

Whereas preterism and historicism have to rely upon scripture and historical events and historical evidence to support their claim of "what has happened".

It was Sir Isaac Newton (super student of prophecy) that said we are not to become prophets, but rather to recognize the event when it comes to pass.
 
NoHype,

I am surprised by your claim that some (or many?) preterists believe the office of the pope to be the Antichrist as all that I am familiar with claim Nero to be the 666 beast or some other entity from the very distant past.

Can you provide any current (or recent) preterists by name, as my son-in-law pastors a conservative Reformed preterist church and he is unaware of your claim.

Naturally, all historicists claim the papacy to be the 666 beast.
Just as all futurists claim he is yet future.

That is the luxury of futurism ... it can make all its future predictions of what is "going to happen" , and until (if ever) it comes to pass, how can it be proved wrong?

Whereas preterism and historicism have to rely upon scripture and historical events and historical evidence to support their claim of "what has happened".

It was Sir Isaac Newton (super student of prophecy) that said we are not to become prophets, but rather to recognize the event when it comes to pass.

I guess I'm speaking of others I have conversed with that 'claimed' to be partial preterists which align with the historicist views that the office of the pope is the antichrist. Now if you want to be classical with categories, I'm aware the founders of Preterist doctrine and main schools of it do not hold to that, but that antichrist is no single entity or person. In these days no one can simply place everyone in one sole category of Preterist, Historicist, or Futurist belief, for there's been no reliable topographics done on that that I know of.

But I know this, the Church I was raised in spoke out against the office of the pope equating it with antichrist while also teaching that most of the Revelation events were past history. Nor did they hold to any pre-trib rapture of The Church.

And that is 'how' I see similar associations between the schools of Preterism and Historicism. It is not a vaild enough reason to claim the papal office as following the "spirit of antichrist" while rejecting the little idea that there is no singular antichrist person.

Concerning your statement about prophecy, you mean to tell me none of the early Church fathers made the mistake of assuming a prophecy was fulfilled when it was not? You mean the school of Preterism is not making a mistake by disregarding Christ's Revelation being about the times just prior to His return and thereafter?
 
Last edited:
Are you under the impression that I am a preterist? ... I am not.

You may be aware that there are two forms of preterism ... full and partial.
I believe both are in error.
 
The Bible says that anti Christ will be against all religions, and set themself up as God. Like Pharaoh of Egypt. The anti Christ will be atheist and dictator. Clearly, the Pope is not in this category as he does not oppose God or religion or set himself up to be worshipped as god.
 
James 1523 ... you said in part "The Bible says that anti Christ will be against all forms of worship ... ... "

Would you please provide a passage that states that "anti Christ will be against all forms of worship.
My memory is not what it once was.

You then went on to say ... "Clearly the Pope is not in this category as he does not oppose God or religion or set himself up to be worshiped as God."

I suggest you study papal history. You are in for a shocking revelation.
 
Well, it seems that this thread has taken a left turn somewhat, and while I understand the natural progression, the "Antichrist" wasn't meant to be the topic when I started this out. What I was challenging was the modern idea that the nation of Israel has become the focus of the devil's malevolence and hatred in these last days, a focus which is quite out of kilter with what can be seen in the past of his purpose and direction. Revelation says of the final act before the second coming that
Rev. 12:17 the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
However, there is a definite connection between what prophecy informs us of the actions and intent of the Antichrist, and the OPs theme.
The question I guess to be asked and decided is 'who is the woman'? A key text in understanding the devil's (and therefore the Antichrist's) intentions, is "so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God." Futurism speaks of treaties between the Antichrist and Israel, and the breaking of which after 3 1/2 years brings about war. In the middle of this period, (or at the beginning or at the end depending on ones view) the church disappears leaving the world to a period of trouble culminating with the second coming. Now Satan we are told by several NT writers and Jesus Himself uses deception as his chief weapon of choice in these last days. So Israel is undoubtedly deceived by the Antichrist in order for them to enthrone him on some form of temple throne (according to futurism) but how is this a threat to God's people? If this interpretation of prophecy is correct, how is it possible for even the most uneducated mis-informed disinterested Christian in the church to be deceived when such an event will scream out "hey look at me...I am the antichrist and I demand you worship me!" Who on earth (apart from Israel of all people) is going to be fooled by that??? There is no deception involved at all! It is so in your face that not even the most secular eskimo in northern Alaska with but the most rudimentary understanding of prophecy could not miss.

I contend folks that futurism itself is a major component of last days deception!! The entire Christian church is so focused on Israel and the Middle East they are deaf, dumb, and blind to the real threat...that the Antichrist is already seated on the throne in the temple (the Christian church)...fully one third of the earths population worships her* now...and the invitation has gone forth and being accepted by millions more.

* Revel. 17:4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:
5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

Do you hear it? Can you hear the call? Can you hear Mother calling you home?

Just 200 years ago the Roman CatholicSee was the most distrusted institution on the planet. After over fifteen hundred years of persecution, war, and the deaths of millions of men, women, and children over matters of conscience, 'Mother' is now wooing home her harlot daughters and they are coming home. Do you hear the call? No longer is the RCC to be feared but today is now accepted, admired, and her leader even touted as the future leader of the New World Order!!
Now folks, that is deception.
Such a turn about in attitude by Protestants is the result of the greatest scam, the most cleverly promoted and longest advertising campaign in this worlds history. It started with the council of Trent and has continued for 400 years. It is called the counter-reformation, and it has been an unqualified success.
 
Are you under the impression that I am a preterist? ... I am not.

You may be aware that there are two forms of preterism ... full and partial.
I believe both are in error.

No, I'm under no such impression. I really don't even care about those theological category ideas, they're nothing but shackles and tethers that can get one away from understanding in God's Word as written.

But what I do care about regarding that is how those ideas are used to blind brethren away from the Biblical times and seasons for the end of this world, which happens to be coming upon our present generation.

I believe the sincere Bible student must learn to think beyond those theological ideas of partial and full preterism, historicism, and futurism. Each one has traps.
 
The question I guess to be asked and decided is 'who is the woman'? A key text in understanding the devil's (and therefore the Antichrist's) intentions, is "so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God."

Knowing the answer to that shouldn't be that difficult brother, not if we stay in God's Word as written. See Gen.37 about Joseph's two dreams concerning his eleven brethren and his mother and father.

Paul didn't come outright and say it in 2 Thess.2, but that man of sin, son of perdition, is the devil himself, coming to earth in the last days to do that. Those who have yet to understand God's Word about Satan's original rebellion of old will miss that. The very first sin began with Satan in coveting God's Throne when God created him as an anointed cherub to guard His Throne, and that 2 Thess.2:2-3 event is directly related to it.

Futurism speaks of treaties between the Antichrist and Israel, and the breaking of which after 3 1/2 years brings about war. In the middle of this period, (or at the beginning or at the end depending on ones view) the church disappears leaving the world to a period of trouble culminating with the second coming.

That's not correct. The early Church fathers in the 1st and 2nd centuries understood and held to the idea of a singular Antichrist to come at the end of this world, and his ending sacrifices and setting up the abomination of desolation in Jerusalem per Daniel's final "one week" prophecy, just as written in the Book of Daniel and in Matthew 24. The doctrine of Futurism came much later, in the 15th - 16th centuries, as also was the pre-trib secret rapture theory in the 1830's.

So it is a terrible error to equate any and all Bible prophecy about future events as belonging to the doctrine of Futurism.

Pre-tribber's belief about the Daniel events is actually what the early Church fathers also believed. What pre-tribbers hold to that is false which the early Church fathers did not believe, is the idea of a pre-tribulational secret rapture. The early Church fathers held to a post-tribulational gathering of the Church at Christ's second coming after the tribulation, and that is what is actually written in Scripture.


Now Satan we are told by several NT writers and Jesus Himself uses deception as his chief weapon of choice in these last days. So Israel is undoubtedly deceived by the Antichrist in order for them to enthrone him on some form of temple throne (according to futurism) but how is this a threat to God's people? If this interpretation of prophecy is correct, how is it possible for even the most uneducated mis-informed disinterested Christian in the church to be deceived when such an event will scream out "hey look at me...I am the antichrist and I demand you worship me!" Who on earth (apart from Israel of all people) is going to be fooled by that??? There is no deception involved at all! It is so in your face that not even the most secular eskimo in northern Alaska with but the most rudimentary understanding of prophecy could not miss.

The answer to that is simple also. The unbelieving Jews in Jerusalem will agree with the Antichrist not because they will know he is Antichrist. How could you not understand that? They are awaiting the return of The Messiah, and that's who the Antichrist is coming to portray, and who they will believe he is. Many deceived Christian brethren will also believe that along with those orthodox Jews, which is what Paul's falling away idea in 2 Thess.2 is about. They will think he is Jesus.


I contend folks that futurism itself is a major component of last days deception!!

It's one... of the main deceptions, but not the only one for the end. I don't know of any orthodox Jew that believes they will be secretly raptured by Christ.

When you link men's doctrine of "futurism" with Bible prophecy that the early Church fathers saw as future for the end of this world, you're promoting a fib. But in regard to the pre-trib secret rapture doctrine of 1830's forward, you are right. So I will contend all day with you on that point.


The entire Christian church is so focused on Israel and the Middle East they are deaf, dumb, and blind to the real threat...that the Antichrist is already seated on the throne in the temple (the Christian church)...fully one third of the earths population worships her* now...and the invitation has gone forth and being accepted by millions more.

Ah..., so you believe the Christian Church is offsprung from the Antichrist? That thinking suggest you are not a Christian. Am I wrong in that?
 
Knowing the answer to that shouldn't be that difficult brother, not if we stay in God's Word as written. See Gen.37 about Joseph's two dreams concerning his eleven brethren and his mother and father.
I appreciate the parallels but there is a subtle but essential difference between interpretations; the woman I know in Catholic circles is Mary...very litertalist. In most Protestant or evangelical belief the woman is the nation of Israel. I believe somewhat differently. I believe the woman represents God's people throughout all ages. From Eden to the second coming. Revelation 12 actually covers that entire time-frame. Remember, I give this very brief commentary from an historicist perspective...that is a continuing historical narrative.
Vs. 1-2
Throughout the Bible a pure “woman” is a symbol of God’s true church while a harlot represents a corrupt church. Hosea 1:2; Ezekiel 16; 2 Corinthians 11:2.

She is said to be “clothed with the sun,” the glory of the gospel of Christ, and have “the moon under her feet,” the reflected glory of Christ as foreshadowed in the Old Testament sanctuary services and rituals. John 8:12; Colossians 2:11-17. The “crown of twelve stars” represents the twelve apostles. The woman who gives birth to Messiah represents the true church through its entire history—from Adam and the Jewish nation to the Christian Church.

Vs 3-6
The “great red dragon” is identified in verse 9 as Satan. However, he routinely uses others to persecute, deceive and destroy. Genesis 3:1-13. The “seven heads of ten horns and seven crowns” represents the nations or governments which Satan has used to persecute God’s people. See also Daniel 7:7; Revelation 13:1-5; 17:3, 7-12. In verse 4 we see an attempt to destroy Jesus at His birth, and can identify Pagan Rome in the person of King Herod as the agency Satan is working through. Matthew 2:13-18. In verse 6 the dragon forces the woman to flee into the wilderness for 1,260 years, the time when Papal Rome is in power persecuting God’s faithful church. Even though he uses others as his agents, the dragon is Satan.
The dragon casts a “third part of the stars of heaven…to the earth.” This represents the angels who joined Lucifer in his rebellion, and were cast out of Heaven with him. Revelation 12:7-9.

To “rule all nations with a rod of iron” references Psalm 2:9. This means that Christ will be victorious over His enemies. After His resurrection He was “caught up unto God.”
Vs 7-9
There is a great deal of opinion concerning this war, and when it took/takes place. I am of the school that believes it took place in the distant past, before creation, or not long after. By the time Adam and Eve were tempted, Satan was on the earth, but had no dominion. Adam's surrender gave the devil dominion, thus he was able lawfully to offer it to Christ at the temptation in the wilderness.
Here we are brought back in time to the very beginning of the current ongoing war between Christ and Satan when Lucifer, the foremost angel in Heaven, fostered rebellion and was expelled. Now he fights against Christ by attacking His people, His truth and His character. 1 Peter 5:8.

It is said that Satan “deceiveth the whole world.” Satan has effectively substituted truth with lies on many points including: the character of God, creation, His law, the Sabbath, the state of the dead and the way of salvation, to name just a few. Huge numbers of people, including many Christians, have been deceived into believing and supporting these lies. The only way to keep from being deceived is to have a firm grounding in Bible truth and a solid relationship with Jesus. The popularity and widespread acceptance of a doctrine does not mean that it is true.
Vs 10-12
The event of the death, resurrection, and enthronement of Jesus constitutes the decisive battle of the great controversy. It was at the cross that Satan was defeated (John 12:31-32; Luke 10:17-19). The proclamation goes forth: “Now the salvation and power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ have come, for the accuser of our brethren has been thrown down.” Satan is the “accuser of the brethren.” Zechariah 3:1. He presents to us and to God every sin, mistake and character flaw as a reason that we should belong to him as his rightful prey, but “the blood of the lamb” “cleanseth us from all sin.” 1 John 1:7. His “blood,” His strength and righteousness and sacrifice, joined to the “word of their testimony,” is powerful to overcome Satan. Our personal knowledge and love of Jesus binds us to Christ and His saving power. Our advocate says to Satan, “The Lord rebuke thee. Is not this a brand plucked out of the fire?” Zechariah 3:2.
Christ’s faithful people “loved not their lives unto the death.” They would rather die than dishonor Him. They love Jesus more than the trivial pleasures to be gleaned from a few decades of mortal existence. With Jesus as their Shepherd they do not fear the devil’s “great wrath.”
Vs 13-17
Here is where those who are intent on events in Israel and the Middle East go astray. These verses state clearly where Satan's focus lies....with the church. After Calvary Satan did not seek his vengeance against the nation of Israel, they were his allies, not his enemy. The church was his target, and Satan continued to use Israel and her apostate rulers to persecute Christ's followers. By the time pagan Rome sacked and destroyed Jerusalem and its temple, the Christians had gone. This event was not inspired of the devil to destroy God's people: they had already gone to such places as Antioch in response to Jewish persecutions. After the church dispersed throughout the world taking the gospel with them, persecution continued to follow them wherever they went. In Rome occupied territories, pagan Rome killed many. In the east, Zoroastrianism became a bitter enemy.
The church was forced to flee to the uninhabited “wilderness: for “a time, and times, and a half a time,” the 1,260 year period of Papal domination. Millions of Christians were martyred during this time because they chose to obey the Bible instead of the decrees of Popes and church councils. The mountains of Europe and the wilds of Africa and Asia became their refuge, and the new land of America seemed divinely ordained as a stronghold of religious freedom.
Paul didn't come outright and say it in 2 Thess.2, but that man of sin, son of perdition, is the devil himself, coming to earth in the last days to do that. Those who have yet to understand God's Word about Satan's original rebellion of old will miss that. The very first sin began with Satan in coveting God's Throne when God created him as an anointed cherub to guard His Throne, and that 2 Thess.2:2-3 event is directly related to it.
While I agree that Satan's ambitions extended even to God's throne, and that he also is set to deceive the world by impersonating Christ, I do not agree that 2 Thess. 2:3,4 is a reference to Satan, but to the Antichrist, which/who is a separate entity.


Isa 14:12-14 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, that didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God; and I will also sit upon the mount of congregation, in the uttermost parts of the north; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds;
I will be like the Most High.
Here we have a revelation into the heart and mind of Satan. We are here given insight into his most cherished ambition, to be like God, therefore to receive the worship, adoration and fidelity of his subjects. If anyone has doubt as to whether Satan still cherishes this particular ambition, one need look no further than the temptation of Christ in order to confirm this. Satan offered Jesus all the kingdoms of the earth and their glory, if only Jesus would fall down and worship him. Imagine, the Creator worshiping His creation!!! Although Satan failed in that particular exercise, he has not failed when it comes to enticing man to worship him. I am not speaking here of those who are involved in the occult, or in Satanic rites. No, no. I am speaking of people who consider themselves Christians, those who sincerely believe and are convinced they are worshiping God. Allow me to explain.
Satan can not enter the church of course and introduce himself and make a polite request that the congregation worship him. He knows that will not work; we know that will not work; such an attempt would be met with a less than favourable response. Therefore, in order to gain the advantage over those who believe in God, he must use deception. The apostle Paul alluded to this very thing when he wrote: 2 Thess. 2:3-10.

Reading to this point, one might think that Satan has competition. Someone else vying for the adoration of man. But let us read further;….. Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish, because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

“Whose coming is after the working of Satan!!?” Not competition, not even Satan himself, but his own child! Here is Satan’s baby. Here is that creation of his which enters the church and in his place accepts man’s worship by proclaiming himself God, but it is in fact Satan who receives the ultimate glory.

Satan could not himself enter the church, but he could very easily use someone else to do that for him, and through him, receive the worship he desires. By misrepresenting God, and introducing a counterfeit God and a counterfeit religion to worship that God, Satan has deceived millions. Allow me to make a point regarding deception, using counterfeit money as an example. People are not deceived into believing that it is acceptable in the eyes of the authorities to use counterfeit money. The deception operates by way of blinding the people that it is a counterfeit. It is fake, but they believe it to be real. It is the same with religion. Satan would deceive very few into thinking that it is acceptable to God for man to worship Satan. But he has had resounding success in deceiving many into thinking they are worshiping God, when in fact they are worshiping Satan.
How does this work? Jesus explained it very clearly throughout His ministry, warning us repeatedly of false Christs and false prophets. Important to notice that if there be a false Christ then his followers must be false Christians. The expression ‘antichrist’ means that precisely; one who stands in the place of Christ”. Therefore the followers of antichrist must also be professing Christians, the antichrist being the counterfeit of the true Christ, and his followers deceived into believing they are worshiping the true.

Jesus alluded to this very thing here; Matt. 15:9. But in vain do they worship Me, teaching for commandments the doctrines of men.

Notice here that Jesus was not saying these people were not worshiping, they were just not worshiping Him!

Most would be also familiar with the following; Matthew 7:21-23 Not every one that saith unto Me Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? And in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from Me, ye that work iniquity.

Now if Jesus didn’t know them, it would be fairly safe to conclude that they didn’t know Him. They were doing all manner of religious stuff, including one would presume worship, but it certainly wasn’t Jesus they were worshiping, even though they believed it was, and when they came face to face with Him, called Him Lord!!!!

So who was it they were worshiping? Let us look at Romans 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey…


According to this text, we are servants to whoever we obey. Regardless of our profession, it is in our acts that we define who we worship. As Jesus said, in vain do they worship Him, when they obey the commandments of men which override the commandments and doctrines of God. And later, as we just saw, only those who do the will of the Father will be entering the kingdom of heaven. How eternally important is doctrine! How essential it is to understand truth!!! How critical it is that we be absolutely assured that what teachings we follow are based on sound Biblical truth rather than the teachings, interpretations, or traditions of man.

Doctrine is an integral part of worship. Jesus is here telling us that the creator of the doctrine is the object of our worship, regardless of the intent, sincere or otherwise, of the worshiper. It is through false doctrine that Satan has deceived millions into believing they are worshiping God when in fact they are worshiping him. It is through false teaching- doctrines that are the invention of Satan and taught by man, that Satan has established his counterfeit God, and his counterfeit religion of worshiping that god.
The book of Revelation reveals this to us clearly.
The true things of God have Satanic counterparts. There is a false trinity; the dragon, sea-beast (antichrist) and false prophet. This false trinity has a false message (Revel 16:13) – a counterfeit of the true 3 angels messages of Revel. 14:6-12. The false trinity is associated with a false city, Babylon. This city, like the New Jerusalem, has a river, and is called ‘great’. (18:10). The antichrist himself is a counterfeit Christ.
Jesus proclaimed His threefold ministry in Matthew 12:6,41,42. He proclaimed Himself as the ultimate Priest, Prophet, and King, and rightly so. However, there is an entity living upon the earth as we speak who also claims, falsely, these very same prerogatives, and claims them to be his universal right.

  • By claiming to be the sole arbiter and interpreter of scripture, by claiming the power to forgive sin, by claiming universal authority in religious matters, (thus subverting Christ’s ministry of High priest);
  • by claiming the power to change God’s times and laws,and claiming the sole right to speak upon the earth as God’s representative, and claiming the right to judge who does or does not enter the kingdom of God, (thus subverting role as Prophet),
  • by claiming the right and seeking secular authority over all the earth,(thus subverting Christ’s role as King).... the Roman Catholic Church has indeed “opposed and exalted himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped, so that he as God sits in the temple of God, (the church), showing himself that he is God.”
The messages themselves also have parallels. Both the true and the false are designed to gather people together to their makers; the false to Satan,(Revel. 16:14), the true to Jesus (Revel. 14:7). Both are also designed to go to all mankind (Revel 14:6; 16:14.) It is no coincidence that the true message, that of Revel. 14:6-12, is focused on worshiping God, the Creator of all things. Right throughout the book of Revelation, we are confronted by worship. In particular we see in Rev. 13 several references to the deceptive practices of the antichrist and the false prophet, through whom Satan deceives the whole world, resulting in false worship. In contrast, the true worshipers are described as those who keep God’s commandments. (Revel. 12: 17; 14:12.) To claim as some have recently in this forum, that the Antichrist is against worship is a gross error. See how neatly all this falls in with Jesus declaration that those who enter heaven must be obeying God, doing the will of the Father. Elsewhere Jesus said “If ye love Me, keep My commandments.”

With this in mind, and remembering Romans 6:16, the big question is, and the one we must all ask ourselves if we are to have any assurance of eternal life, is, whose commandments are they which I am surrendered to? Who am I obeying? Many hold the word of God as the authority in religious matters. Others, a combination of scripture and tradition, and others, the church. Many churches today don’t even teach doctrine any more, as they think because it tends to divide, then they must avoid it. Mega churches have been built on this premise. If they don’t study doctrine however how can they discern the real from the false? Doctrine matters. Our eternal destiny hinges on our correct understanding of Biblical truth. Of course the RCC teaches that they have the inherent right to decide what true doctrine is and what is false, by referring to the traditions handed down from the church fathers. Those traditions however, Sunday sacredness being the prime example, are in direct contradiction to the revealed word of God as shown in scripture. Truth is progressive. It builds on foundations already established, but nowhere must it contradict what God has previously been pleased to reveal to His people through His word. An example of one surrendering to false teaching and suffering as a result is found in 1 Kings 13:1-34. Believing the lie brought to him by a false prophet did not excuse the unnamed man of God from Judea for his disobedience.
The teachings of churches, ecclesiastical institutions such as seminaries and Bible colleges, or church councils be they great or small, are valid only in as much as they agree with scripture. All else is vain.



That's not correct.
Yes, it is correct. It is precisely what futurism teaches, albeit with a great deal more detail. (Read the "Left Behind" series.)
The early Church fathers in the 1st and 2nd centuries understood and held to the idea of a singular Antichrist to come at the end of this world, and his ending sacrifices and setting up the abomination of desolation in Jerusalem per Daniel's final "one week" prophecy, just as written in the Book of Daniel and in Matthew 24. The doctrine of Futurism came much later, in the 15th - 16th centuries, as also was the pre-trib secret rapture theory in the 1830's.
One must remember though NH that those same 'church fathers' you speak of thought the end of the world would be in their lifetime. They had no idea of what form the Antichrist would take, but the early church was often found in prayer asking God to allow the pagan Roman rule to remain because they knew pagan Rome was the restrainer holding back the dreaded Antichrist.
And as history reveals, as pagan Rome faded away, the Antichrist, the institution of the RCC, rose to power.

Pre-tribber's belief about the Daniel events is actually what the early Church fathers also believed. What pre-tribbers hold to that is false which the early Church fathers did not believe, is the idea of a pre-tribulational secret rapture. The early Church fathers held to a post-tribulational gathering of the Church at Christ's second coming after the tribulation, and that is what is actually written in Scripture.
No argument there NH



The answer to that is simple also. The unbelieving Jews in Jerusalem will agree with the Antichrist not because they will know he is Antichrist. How could you not understand that? They are awaiting the return of The Messiah, and that's who the Antichrist is coming to portray, and who they will believe he is. Many deceived Christian brethren will also believe that along with those orthodox Jews, which is what Paul's falling away idea in 2 Thess.2 is about. They will think he is Jesus.
Where you err NH is in equating Satan's impersonation of Christ with the rise of the Antichrist. They are separate entities...the former yet to take place, the latter having been around for 1500 years.




When you link men's doctrine of "futurism" with Bible prophecy that the early Church fathers saw as future for the end of this world, you're promoting a fib. But in regard to the pre-trib secret rapture doctrine of 1830's forward, you are right. So I will contend all day with you on that point.
I am not making any such link...in fact I am in agreement with you. The futurism I speak of had its roots in the counter-reformation.



Ah..., so you believe the Christian Church is offsprung from the Antichrist? That thinking suggest you are not a Christian. Am I wrong in that?
Not quite sure where you are coming from here? The apostate Christian church is the Antichrist. And Babylon the Great Mother of Harlots is a combination of the Antichrist (the RCC) and all her apostate daughters (the mainline reformation churches who no longer hold to the reformed doctrines) who have rejoined her in her adulterous relationship with the kings of the earth.
 
Jesuit scholar: Francisco Ribera (1537-1591), from Salamanca, Spain.
Ribera was a brilliant student who specialized in Latin, Greek and Hebrew. He received a doctorate in theology from the University of Salamanca and joined the Jesuit Order in 1570 when he was just 33 years old.
Before I analyze Ribera’s methods of prophetic interpretation we must underline that the Early Church fathers (not the New Testament writers!!) had certain futuristic elements in their eschatology. They almost unanimously believed that the “restrainer”
of II Thessalonians 2 was the Roman Empire. They also believed that as soon as the Empire fell apart, a literal evil individual would arise to rule the world for three and a half literal years.
In all fairness to these Church Fathers, we must remember two things:
•The early church fathers did not expect the history of the world to last another 2000 years. They believed that the coming of Christ was in the foreseeable future
•Prophecy is usually not understood in its fullness until the times of fulfillment. Jesus Himself
explained to the disciples: “And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.” (John 14:29).
The Gospels reveal that the disciples misunderstood and misapplied Bible prophecy before the resurrection. But when these prophecies were fulfilled, their hearts burned within them as Jesus opened unto them the Scriptures (Luke 24:32).History proves, beyond any doubt that the meaning of the prophecies becomes clearer as the time of fulfillment draws near (II Peter 1:19).
The Early Church Fathers lived in the time of the fourth beast (Rome). The Empire had not yet crumbled into ten kingdoms. The little horn had not yet arisen. The best they could do was guess about the identity of the Antichrist.
But the Protestant Reformers did not need to guess. They had the benefit of looking back at over one thousand years of church history. They saw, with their own eyes, what the early church fathers did not.
By the time of the Reformation, the Roman Empire had crumbled into ten kingdoms and an evil spiritual empire (Papal Rome) had risen among these kingdoms to rule over them. Thus, the Reformers had the benefit of historical hindsight to help them identify the little horn, the Man of Sin, the Beast, the Harlot and the Abomination of Desolation.
Now, back to Ribera. This Jesuit scholar capitalized on the incomplete views of the early church fathers. In 1590 he published a 500-page commentary on the Apocalypse where he expounded upon the prophecies of Revelation using the literalistic hermeneutic of futurism.
The main tenets of Ribera’s eschatology are “ascribed to a literal three and a half years reign of an infidel Antichrist, who would bitterly oppose and blaspheme the saints just before the second advent. He taught that Antichrist would be a single individual, who would rebuild the temple in Jerusalem, abolish the Christian religion, deny Christ, be received by the Jews, pretend to be God, and conquer the world—and all in this brief space of three and one-half years!”

Ribera was a brilliant researcher and writer but not an outstanding lecturer. Furthermore, his life was cut short when he died at the early age of 54. Ribera’s views therefore needed a shrewd and articulate champion to carry his message beyond the realm of
academia. The champion was found and his name was Cardinal Robert Bellarmine (1542-1621).
Bellarmine was an Italian Cardinal and also one of the ablest Jesuit apologists. He was a powerful speaker and lectured to large audiences. Bellarmine picked up where Ribera left off. In fact, Bellarmine made it his life mission to spread the literalistic hermeneutic of futurismwith unabated passion.
“He insisted that the prophecies concerning Antichrist in Daniel, Paul, and John, had no application to the papal power. This formed the third part of his Disputationes de Controversiis Christianae Fidei Adversus Huius Temporis Haereticos
[Polemic Lectures Concerning the Disputed Points of Christian Belief Against the Heretics of this Time], published between 1581 and 1593. This was the most detailed apology of the Catholic faith ever produced, and became the arsenal for all future defenders and expositors. It called forth a host of counter-writings from Protestant leaders, who considered him their greatest adversary.”

Though the basics of Bellarmine’s prophetic views were identical to Ribera’s, he fine-tuned and amplified many of the details. And he crusaded in favor of the literalistic futurist view and against the Protestants with an evangelistic zeal worthy of admiration!
Bellarmine was an expert at turning the Reformers against themselves. For example, he wondered why Luther, who taught that his views were based on Scripture alone, doubted that the book of Revelation belonged in the Bible canon. By way of contrast, Bellarmine came across as the defender of the book of Revelation as part of the New Testament canon. Bellarmine also took painstaking efforts to document the fact that the Reformers could not even agree among themselves as to when the prophetic periods began and ended. For example, some Protestants dated the beginning of the dominion of the Antichrist from the fall of Rome (400 A. D.). Others dated it to 600 A. D., when Pope Gregory the Great took the papal throne, and still others dated it to somewhere between 200 and 773, 1,000, or even 1.200. Bellarmine contended that if the Reformers could not agree
on the time period of Antichrist’s dominion, neither could they be trusted toidentify who he was.
Bellarmine also made painstaking efforts to document that the Early Church Fathers (not the New Testament writers!!) believed that the Antichrist would be an individual who would rule for a literal three and a half year period. In this way he tried to prove that his view was the original belief of the early church. He also documented that each of the Reformers interpreted the symbols of Daniel and differently. In this way he worked to undermine their views regarding the identity of the Antichrist.
In chapter five of his work, Bellarmine employed a key argument which would later be picked up by Protestants. There, Bellarmine rewrote history, saying that the Roman Empire had never been divided according to the specifications of the prophecy of Daniel 7 and therefore, Antichrist could not have come yet. According to Bellarmine, the complete desolation of the Roman Empire must come before the advent of the Antichrist, and this desolation had not yet taken place. Later on we will see that a host of
Protestant writers picked up this argument and “ran with it.”
The essence of Bellarmine’s argument is that the Papacy cannot be the Antichrist for three reasons:
•The Antichrist prophecies call for an individual but the papacy is a system.
•The time periods must be literal but the papacy has existed for centuries.
•Antichrist will sit in the Jerusalem Temple, but the popes are ruling in Rome.
“For all Catholics think thus that the Antichrist will be one certain man; but all heretics teach. . . . that Antichrist is expressly declared to be not a single person, but an individual throne or absolute kingdom, and apostate seat of those who rule over the church.”
“Antichrist will not reign except for three years and a half. But the Pope has now reigned spiritually in the church more than 1500 years; nor can anyone be pointed out who has been accepted for Antichrist, who has ruled exactly three and one half years; therefore the Pope is not Antichrist. Then the Antichrist has not yet come.
“The Pope is not antichrist since indeed his throne is not in Jerusalem, nor in the temple of Solomon; surely it is credible that from the year 600, no Roman pontiff has ever been in Jerusalem.”
Thus it is clear that Bellarmine applied a stringent literalistic hermeneutic in his exposition of the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation.
This literalistic hermeneutic has been picked up by conservative Protestants and taken to ridiculous extremes.
 
You are to be commended for your research ... particularly about Ribera and Bellarmine.

To suggest that the Church of Rome is not a true Christian church flies like a lead balloon among many Protestants today ... but this is not surprising to you I am sure.

From your writings, I was surprised that No Hype wondered as to whether you were a Christian ... I did not understand his reasoning.
 
I appreciate the parallels but there is a subtle but essential difference between interpretations; the woman I know in Catholic circles is Mary...very litertalist. In most Protestant or evangelical belief the woman is the nation of Israel. I believe somewhat differently. I believe the woman represents God's people throughout all ages. From Eden to the second coming. Revelation 12 actually covers that entire time-frame. Remember, I give this very brief commentary from an historicist perspective...that is a continuing historical narrative.


Rev 12:1
1 And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:
(KJV)


Gen 37:9
9 And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me.
(KJV)

Pretty obvious the Rev.12 "woman" is being given as a symbol for Israel. The Rev.12:1-5 section of Scripture serves as a quick Bible summary, from the time God ordained Israel before the foundation of this world to the time of Christ's future reign over all nations with a rod of iron.

So who all does that Israel represent in that Rev.12 chapter? That's easy, but only for those who have done both their Old Testament and New Testament Bible study.

God scattered the majority of the seed of Israel, with the ten lost tribes losing their name and heritage as Israel, scattered among the Gentiles. God made Ephraim the head tribe over the ten tribes of Israel, and upon him God's Birthright fell from his father Joseph who had this dream of Gen.37 (1 Chron.5). Per God's prophecy about Ephraim, his seed was to become "a multitude of nations" (Gen.48). So somewhere in the world, Ephraim as head over the ten lost tribes became literally "a multitude of nations", and that's where God's Birthright promises to Israel can be found. I believe that to be the Christian West, the nations that turned to The Gospel as a majority after the passion of Christ.

Therefore, the believers on Christ of both the scattered seed of Israel and of the Gentiles, have together become Christ's Church. In this the unbelieving orthodox Jews are left out today.

Rev.12:6 forward is primarily about God's protections upon Christ's Church of both believing seed of Israel and believing Gentiles. That specifically is who that dragon is coming to make war with, to try and deceive. That is not about the orthodox unbelieving Jews simply because they are already deceived and in that dragon's hand; their spiritual eyes won't be opened until Christ's return.
 
Jesuit scholar: Francisco Ribera (1537-1591), from Salamanca, Spain.

Before I analyze Ribera’s methods of prophetic interpretation we must underline that the Early Church fathers (not the New Testament writers!!) had certain futuristic elements in their eschatology. They almost unanimously believed that the “restrainer”
of II Thessalonians 2 was the Roman Empire. They also believed that as soon as the Empire fell apart, a literal evil individual would arise to rule the world for three and a half literal years.

Partially true. Not all of them believed that.


In all fairness to these Church Fathers, we must remember two things:
•The early church fathers did not expect the history of the world to last another 2000 years. They believed that the coming of Christ was in the foreseeable future

Somewhat true.

•Prophecy is usually not understood in its fullness until the times of fulfillment.

Not always true. Not all Bible prophecy is so vague that no one can understand it before it happens...

Isa 42:9
9 Behold, the former things are come to pass, and new things do I declare: before they spring forth I tell you of them.
(KJV)

I have no doubts that Christ's Apostles rightly understood future prophecy, simply because Christ was directly in their presence to make sure they understood. When they didn't understand something they asked Him, and He explained it in full, just as He did with the parable of the tares of Matt.13, which if that parable is not understood the majority of Christ's parables won't be grasped.


The Early Church Fathers lived in the time of the fourth beast (Rome). The Empire had not yet crumbled into ten kingdoms. The little horn had not yet arisen. The best they could do was guess about the identity of the Antichrist.

The idea that the pagan Roman empire crumbled into ten kingdoms under Papal rule is hype and myth, a doctrine of men.

But the Protestant Reformers did not need to guess. They had the benefit of looking back at over one thousand years of church history. They saw, with their own eyes, what the early church fathers did not.

Because of the Protestant rebellion against the Catholic Church and the persecutions the Reformers suffered because of that outward rebellion, that is mainly how they came to believe the office of the pope as the Antichrist. Until that rebellion, they (like Martin Luther) had tried before to institute reforms within the Catholic Church, not wanting to be separate from it nor the pope. So what you've said about their reason being a thousand years of church history is untrue and just hype.


By the time of the Reformation, the Roman Empire had crumbled into ten kingdoms and an evil spiritual empire (Papal Rome) had risen among these kingdoms to rule over them.

Once again, that idea is just hype and not true. The Papal states the pope ruled over from 7th century to the 19th century were related to the geographical lands in Italy and some immediate areas outside Italy, not ten nations or separate kingdoms. So, no need to repeat that supposition as if that were true; it is not.


Thus, the Reformers had the benefit of historical hindsight to help them identify the little horn, the Man of Sin, the Beast, the Harlot and the Abomination of Desolation.

The Reformers were mistaken on those things, just as men's doctrines of Historicism are too about all that. And one the largest proofs of what I say on that is how the Books of Daniel and Christ's Olivet Discourse in Matthew declare the abomination of desolation event will involve Jerusalem, not Rome. So the theories of men you're following can't even understand the Daniel and Olivet prophecies well enough to keep them in the right earthly hemisphere they were ordained for per God's Word!
 
Rev 12:1
1 And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:
(KJV)


Gen 37:9
9 And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me.
(KJV)

Pretty obvious the Rev.12 "woman" is being given as a symbol for Israel. The Rev.12:1-5 section of Scripture serves as a quick Bible summary, from the time God ordained Israel before the foundation of this world to the time of Christ's future reign over all nations with a rod of iron.

So who all does that Israel represent in that Rev.12 chapter? That's easy, but only for those who have done both their Old Testament and New Testament Bible study.

God scattered the majority of the seed of Israel, with the ten lost tribes losing their name and heritage as Israel, scattered among the Gentiles. God made Ephraim the head tribe over the ten tribes of Israel, and upon him God's Birthright fell from his father Joseph who had this dream of Gen.37 (1 Chron.5). Per God's prophecy about Ephraim, his seed was to become "a multitude of nations" (Gen.48). So somewhere in the world, Ephraim as head over the ten lost tribes became literally "a multitude of nations", and that's where God's Birthright promises to Israel can be found. I believe that to be the Christian West, the nations that turned to The Gospel as a majority after the passion of Christ.

Therefore, the believers on Christ of both the scattered seed of Israel and of the Gentiles, have together become Christ's Church. In this the unbelieving orthodox Jews are left out today.

Rev.12:6 forward is primarily about God's protections upon Christ's Church of both believing seed of Israel and believing Gentiles. That specifically is who that dragon is coming to make war with, to try and deceive. That is not about the orthodox unbelieving Jews simply because they are already deceived and in that dragon's hand; their spiritual eyes won't be opened until Christ's return.
I tried to find where I had posted this before so I could provide a link, but to no avail. So I will offer it again in case you may find it interesting.

Who is true Israel? Is it the physical nation fighting for its existence in the Middle East, or is it the spiritual entity we know as the church. And if its the church, which one?
The name “Israel” first appears in the Bible in Genesis 32:28 After a night of wrestling with the heavenly visitor (who I personally believe to be Christ Himself) Jacob prevails in his efforts and his name is changed from Jacob, the deceiver or supplanter, to Israel, meaning he will rule. Jacob has prevailed with God and overcome.
At the time of this event, Jacob was reluctant to face Esau after 20 years of exile and was quite simply terrified of him. His former deception of his father and claim to be Esau was now playing on his conscience and he desired God’s blessing and forgiveness before proceeding. So the ‘Angel’ asks Jacob his name, to which he truthfully replies ‘my name is Jacob’. In this he was confessing his guilt, and God then knew he was a changed man, so gave him a new name that celebrated so to speak his victory over sin, self and his night of wrestling in prayer, the ‘Angel’ saying “for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.”
Israel, as a name therefore represents spiritual victory over sin.


This is significant as it tells us God’s purpose for His people. That is, to live in victory over sin, to show forth God’s true character to the world.
In Exod 4:22,23 Moses is instructed on how he is to speak to Pharaoh in order that Israel’s descendants may be freed from slavery. God says to Moses “and thou shalt say unto Pharaoh ‘Thus saith the Lord,Israel is My son, my firstborn and I say unto thee let My son go to serve me…”
This is the first time Israel is used in a corporate sense for the entire nation. Before it applied only to an individual, but here we see it being applied to his descendants. First to a victorious man, then to his people.
Did Israel live up to that name? What was God trying to accomplish in establishing Israel in the first place? Was it not that He would have a people to represent Him on the earth? Before God had His champions, but all failed. Sin interposed and no longer was any of God’s chosen able to fulfill the true destiny that God intended for them. Adam failed over appetite. So did Noah. Abraham also, but God was determined to establish a people after His own heart and show the gentiles His law, His mercy and grace and power. Interesting that Adam, Noah, and Israel all failed on points of appetite. (Gen 9:20,21; Exodus 16:27-29.)
It wasn’t until Jesus came on the scene in person that the title “Israel” in it’s truest spiritual sense and power could be rightly bestowed. And Mathew in particular showed this time and time again how Jesus was the fulfillment of the OT prophecies which may have originally applied to the nation, but now, according to Mathew’s inspired writings, applied in fact to Jesus. Examples are Hosea 11:1 ; Isaiah 41:8,42:1-3 .


Paul followed the same idea and reasoning by paralleling Col 1:15 with Ex 4:22, Gal 3:16 with Isaiah 41:8 and elsewhere.
Jesus Himself proclaimed Himself as the true vine, in fulfilment of Ps 80:8 which applied to the nation.
So now the mantle and authority once bestowed upon the nation has been given to Jesus. Jesus is the essence of true Israel. He only has the right to bear the name for He only has prevailed with sin and overcome. Jesus walked over the same ground that Israel walked, but came through victorious. In His temptations in the wilderness, it was appetite that came under particular scrutiny.
What Paul does in Romans and other writers in the NT however is extend that idea and show how the name Israel also now applies to Jesus’ descendants, just as it did to Jacob’s descendants. Peter also showed this when he compared the church to Exodus 19:6.(1 Peter 2:9).
So as Paul says, immediately after saying that Jesus is the ‘seed’ of Abraham, Gentile converts in Galatia were now also Abraham’s seed because they are Christ’s. They are also heirs according to the promise.
This is not ‘replacement ‘ theology. It is merely a revelation of who true Israel always was and who Israel is now. It is those people, of whatever nation kindred tongue and people, who by faith in the mercy grace and power of God overcome sin and receive Christ’s righteousness and forgiveness as a gift and are willing to share that gift with the lost. True Israel was always exclusively those who “as princes had power with God and men and prevailed”.
Thus the unfulfilled covenant that Jeremiah speaks of and repeated in hebrews, “I will place My laws in their hearts and in their minds I will write them” applies to the church, not a resurgent nation. All Israel will be saved, but the descendants of Jesus, not flesh and blood descendants of Jacob.
And the prophecies that most believe apply to the nation, apply to the church. For example, Armageddon is not the world arrayed against the nation of Israel, but the unsaved world (those who have accepted the mark) arrayed against the remnant who have refused the mark, and are under the sentence of death. Those who keep the commandments of God, (and thus have gained that victory over sin) and have the faith of Jesus. Rev.12:17; 14:12.
 
Paul didn't come outright and say it in 2 Thess.2, but that man of sin, son of perdition, is the devil himself, coming to earth in the last days to do that. Those who have yet to understand God's Word about Satan's original rebellion of old will miss that.
the reference to the "son of perdition" (22 Thess 2:3. Only in one other place is there such a title used, and that is in direct reference to Judas (John 17:12).. Now it is interesting that Paul is here comparing the character of Antichrist to that of Judas. Judas was a traitor. He was an insider who who professed loyalty to the truth, did all the right religious stuff, hung with the right crowd (for the most part), was utterly sincere in his beliefs, but throughout the whole span of his relationship with the Lord, did not know Him!!! Now the same characteristics are not attributed to the Antichrist in modern thinking, yet this is precisely what Paul was suggesting. Antichrist therefore is a religious, even Christian, entity. One that professes the truth, says all the right things, does a heap of good stuff, gives to the poor etc, but bottom line is it is bereft of truth. It is a counterfiet. Like Judas, looks like, sounds like, the real thing. Deception folks. What Jesus and Paul warned us repeatedly of throughout scripture. Deception. False prophets, false Christs.
 
At the time of this event, Jacob was reluctant to face Esau after 20 years of exile and was quite simply terrified of him. His former deception of his father and claim to be Esau was now playing on his conscience and he desired God’s blessing and forgiveness before proceeding. So the ‘Angel’ asks Jacob his name, to which he truthfully replies ‘my name is Jacob’. In this he was confessing his guilt, and God then knew he was a changed man, so gave him a new name that celebrated so to speak his victory over sin, self and his night of wrestling in prayer, the ‘Angel’ saying “for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.”

You've missed some things in the OT history and prophets on that...

Gen 25:21-23
21 And Isaac intreated the LORD for his wife, because she was barren: and the LORD was intreated of him, and Rebekah his wife conceived.
22 And the children struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, why am I thus? And she went to inquire of the LORD.
23 And the LORD said unto her, "Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger."
(KJV)

That reveals God had chosen Jacob over Esau all along, even before the two children were born in Rebekah's womb. Malachi 1 gives the same picture, God hated Esau, but loved Jacob. Apostle Paul brings this up again in Rom.9, because it's about the election of seed.

So did Jacob and his mother truly commit a sin by having Jacob go into his near-blind father Isaac to receive firstborn Esau's blessing? According to God no, because His Birthright was pre-ordained to go to Jacob in the first place. And to prove that it was really his from the beginning, Esau treated it like wares that could be traded or sold, profaning it.

And this was no simple Birthright I speak of, like just involving immediate family things. It was God's Birthright He first gave through Abraham, and it included care of The Gospel of Jesus Christ. On a deeper spiritual note that is in essence what Esau profaned by his trading it for a simple bowl of food. And Esau's later actions in trying to get the blessing anyway after Isaac had given it to Jacob also shows Esau was not righteous or trustworthy.


Israel, as a name therefore represents spiritual victory over sin.

Yep, the name actually represents God's Salvation through His Son Jesus Christ, and not any other. This is why God's Birthright continued to Joseph, and then to his two sons Ephraim and Manasseh, per 1 Chronicles 5. That's where it stopped and still is today. The problem for many, even for a lot of the Biblically learned is, they don't have a clue how it was fulfilled with Ephraim, especially involving The Gospel of Jesus Christ and the "multitude of nations" prophecy Jacob said about his grandson Ephraim (Gen.48). God actually first gave the "company of nations" about Jacob's seed first, in Gen.35:11, which is how it was linked to the promise God first gave through Abraham, then to Isaac, then to Jacob.
 
Yes, it is correct. It is precisely what futurism teaches, albeit with a great deal more detail. (Read the "Left Behind" series.) One must remember though NH that those same 'church fathers' you speak of thought the end of the world would be in their lifetime. They had no idea of what form the Antichrist would take, but the early church was often found in prayer asking God to allow the pagan Roman rule to remain because they knew pagan Rome was the restrainer holding back the dreaded Antichrist.

Maybe I should have said what your previous-post's statement about Futurism is only 'partially' true, for here was my answer which I don't think you fully read...

"The early Church fathers in the 1st and 2nd centuries understood and held to the idea of a singular Antichrist to come at the end of this world, and his ending sacrifices and setting up the abomination of desolation in Jerusalem per Daniel's final "one week" prophecy, just as written in the Book of Daniel and in Matt.24. The doctrine of Futurism came much later, in the 15th - 16th centuries, as also was the pre-trib secret rapture theory in the 1830's."


Thus the idea of a singular coming Antichrist figure was... a doctrine of the early Church fathers. It can easily be found in their writings.

Thus it is wrong to try and equate the idea of singular Antichrist figure coming with the much later theological doctrine called Futurism which began in the 19th century.

In 1 John 2:18, Apostle John is covering both ideas, the idea of a specific Antichrist figure that is to come that they had already heard was coming, and then a new idea he showed there that there were "many antichrists" already at work.

You also said this about the early Church fathers which I cannot agree with based on their writings...

"They had no idea of what form the Antichrist would take...".

That's certainly not true at all. It was some men's doctrines that later decided there was no singular antichrist figure written, which of course is not true. Many of the early Church fathers were well acquainted with the prophecies in the Book of Daniel about a coming false one to Jerusalem for the end to sit in a temple in Jerusalem and proclaim himself as God (like Irenaeus for one).

Irenaeus (189 A.D.):
"y means of the events which shall occur in the time of the Antichrist it is shown that he, being an apostate and a robber, is anxious to be adored as God, and that although a mere slave, he wishes to be proclaimed as king. For he, being endued with all the power of the devil, shall not come as a righteous king nor as a legitimate king in subjection to God, but as an impious, unjust, and lawless one . . . setting aside idols to persuade [men] that he himself is God, raising himself up as the only idol. . . . Moreover [Paul] has also pointed out this which I have shown in many ways: that the temple in Jerusalem was made by the direction of the true God. For the apostle himself, speaking in his own person, distinctly called it the temple of God [2 Thess. 2:4] . . . in which the enemy shall sit, endeavoring to show himself as Christ." (Against Heresies 5:25:1-2 [A.D. 189])

"But when this Antichrist shall have devastated all things in this world, he will reign for three years and six months and will sit in the temple at Jerusalem; and then the Lord will come from heaven in the clouds, in the glory of the Father, sending this man and those who follow him into the lake of fire" (ibid., 5:30:4).


Hippolytus (200 A.D.):
"Now as our Lord Jesus Christ, who is also God, was prophesied of under the figure of a lion, on account of his royalty and glory, in the same way have the scriptures also beforehand spoken of Antichrist as a lion, on account of his tyranny and violence. For the deceiver seeks to liken himself in all things to the Son of God. Christ is a lion, so Antichrist is also a lion. Christ is a king, so Antichrist is also a king. The Savior was manifested as a lamb, so he too in like manner will appear as a lamb without; within he is a wolf. The Savior came into the world in the circumcision [i.e., the Jewish race], and he will come in the same manner. . . . The Savior raised up and showed his holy flesh like a temple, and he will raise a temple of stone in Jerusalem" (The Antichrist 6 [A.D. 200]).

Hippolytus (217 A.D.)
"Above all, moreover, he will love the nation of the Jews. And with all these [Jews] he will work signs and terrible wonders, false wonders and not true, in order to deceive his impious equals. . . . And after that he will build the temple in Jerusalem and will restore it again speedily and give it over to the Jews" (Discourse on the End of the World 23-25 [A.D. 217]).

Tertullian (210 A.D.):
"[T]he man of sin, the son of perdition, who must first be revealed before the Lord comes, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshipped; and who is to sit in the temple of God and boast himself as being God. . . . According indeed to our view, he is Antichrist; as it is taught us in both the ancient and the new prophecies, and by the apostle John, who says that ‘already many false prophets have gone out into the world,’ the forerunners of Antichrist, who deny that Christ is come in the flesh, and do not acknowledge Jesus, meaning in God the Creator" (Against Marcion 5:16 [A.D. 210]).

Cyprian Of Carthage (253 A.D.):
"If they [the heretics] desire peace, let them lay aside their arms. If they make atonement, why do they threaten? Or if they threaten, let them know that they are not feared by God’s priests. For even Antichrist, when he shall begin to come, will not enter into the Church [even though] he threatens; neither shall we yield to his arms and violence, [though] he declares that he will destroy us if we resist" (Letters 69[70]:3 [A.D. 253]).

Amazing that those early Church fathers well... understood the coming Antichrist as a certain person that will exalt himself in place of Christ Jesus, and that he will not... enter into Christ's Church. Just so happens that correct per the Bible prophecies about the coming false one Apostle Paul spoke of, for it will be in a temple in Jerusalem where he will sit and exalt himself, not Rome, not New York, etc.
 
Last edited:
The thing is NoHype that there is no scripture anywhere prophesying specifically of a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem, unless you transfer the first rebuild to a future date. That idea of a future rebuild is made up to suit the erroneous theory of what this thread is all about...the misguided focus on Israel, whose "house is desolate" , leaving the church, the instrument or vessel by which God is promulgating the gospel, playing second fiddle as far as an enemy status of the devil. (Although thinking about that, compared with the troubles in the Middle East and the troubles currently within the church, one can be forgiven for thinking that the devil is focused on Israel and ignoring the church. But I think that is more to do with the current lifestyles of church members. If Christians began to live the godly lives that is intended for them, persecution would break out tomorrow.)
The last week of Daniel's 70 week prophecy is another misunderstood aspect leading to the "Israel" mindset. It is presumption on the part of readers to
  • decapitate the final week from the other 69, and
  • to make what is the greatest Messianic prophecy in scripture and turn it into an "antichrist" prophecy in verse 27.
Thus to make everything 'fit', a temple needs to be rebuilt...the sacrifices reinstated...a 'covenant' or peace treaty signed...a breaking of that treaty after 3 1/2 years...all 'hype'.
 
Back
Top