Rhema
Active
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2021
- Messages
- 3,073
And you have done nothing more than given an uneducated personal opinion. Any deceit is self-evident.You have handled the word deceitfully !
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!And you have done nothing more than given an uneducated personal opinion. Any deceit is self-evident.You have handled the word deceitfully !
There is no discussion, @Christ4Ever. Nothing within BF's thread here has ever amounted to a discussion. It is nothing more than a didactic diatribe (see below).attributing the word deceit to each other is not contributing to this discussion
I have not chosen a "side." I have explained what the language itself overtly states - in both English and Greek - an explanation that any sane, education person would accept. There are not two "sides" to truth. And for some reason you seem to believe that the "righteous" thing to do in any contention is to scold both parties. It's a pretty woke ideology, where everyone gets a participation trophy, and nobody can ever be right because, at the end, Truth - absolute objective Truth doesn't exist. (No wonder our educational system is so messed up - along with the people whom it produces.) Human parents always make this mistake, thinking that peace is the goal, rather than Truth. A peace that serves the parents rather than the children. (Shut The Kids Up, I Just Want Some Peace and Quiet !!) Mediators always make this mistake, thinking that peacemaking automatically produces Truth, believing that compromise is the final goal of Truth. But Peacemakers are NOT blessed when they obliterate Truth.Both of you have chosen sides
The rules of grammar and the definition of words are NOT subject to any one individual's "interpretation." I would ask you read Post #308 - LINK again. It best explains my purposes here.it seems that you perceive the other's writing to be contrary to your own interpretation
Between you two, I agree it has stopped being a discussion a while back, but in the theme of the thread I'm sure there has been some gain by some.There is no discussion, @Christ4Ever. Nothing within BF's thread here has ever amounted to a discussion. It is nothing more than a didactic diatribe (see below).
Sure, you have. You and others who agree with you, would say that you have sided with providing the truth.I have not chosen a "side."
I would agree if that were what I am trying to accomplish. It's more of a referee's action, which is let's keep it clean. What I see is a stubbornness to see/admit that what one believes is incorrect as far as the topic is concerned, which doesn't necessarily mean they are deceivers as you believe them to be, except possible to themselves. Which is something other than intended by you both in the use of "deceit".A peace that serves the parents rather than the children. (Shut The Kids Up, I Just Want Some Peace and Quiet !!) Mediators always make this mistake, thinking that peacemaking automatically produces Truth, believing that compromise is the final goal of Truth. But Peacemakers are NOT blessed when they obliterate Truth.
Yes, you have on more than one occasion, if I may add. And you were gracious enough at that time to refrain from responding in like manner....for the most part.Yes, I've been accused of deceit.
As a fellow poster on this thread, I agree, but as a Moderator if the intent of your word selection had included what you explained above, I might not have responded as I did and would likely have let it pass without comment.Truth be told, I believe that BF is actually a victim of deceit (as defined above). Whether he has been deceived, or whether he has deceived himself, there certainly is deceitfulness going on, since he has continually hidden his supposed 30 years of study about the word δίδωμι by not posting what his claims are based upon. (Bible Hub didn't exist 30 years ago, and even then BF did not care to cite the quote.)
Truth is typically accorded to the specific content of theological assertions, at least within the purvue of this forum. When being taught 10th grade English, would any student debate the "truth" about grammar and definitions of words? I trow not. Who has ever taken a position that the dictionary is not true?Sure, you have. You and others who agree with you, would say that you have sided with providing the truth.
Those posts that have discussed deceit (at least on my part) were not about the topic of this thread, but rather about the rules of grammar and the definitions of words.What I see is a stubbornness to see/admit that what one believes is incorrect as far as the topic is concerned,
Yet I provided my definition of the word deceit, although saying "my" definition is absurd. No one owns the definition of a word. And the definition of that word deceit is "keeping the truth hidden, especially to get an advantage." I would politely suggest that you read through the posts from @Brightfame52 with regards to the word δίδωμι and you would see where said deceit occurs - where the truth regarding the definition and use of the word δίδωμι was kept hidden by my esteemed colleague to gain an advantage for his theological claims.which doesn't necessarily mean they are deceivers as you believe them to be,
Until it became necessary to point out the deceit - that which was hidden being the academic sources for BF's claims about the word δίδωμι. Or personal reasons for that matter (possibly examples even) instead of some vague appeal to 30 years of study.And you were gracious enough at that time to refrain from responding in like manner....for the most part.
When posting, I'm not typically inclined to provide definitions for all the words I use, unless those words come under scrutiny. I use words as I understand their definition, and would think others do the same. If a concern arises, we can always play dueling dictionaries.but as a Moderator if the intent of your word selection had included what you explained above, I might not have responded as I did
Sokay.Thank you for your response to my previous message. No further reply is necessary for this one.