Kirby D. P.
Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2015
- Messages
- 393
Look forward to it. Maybe a new thread?
I’m a bit gun-shy about starting new threads unnecessarily. Often administrators think I’m planning on being deliberately combative.
So, what do I make ofChristianity after “all” my studies? First I’ll mention what I think about the OT. I know skeptical atheists are fond of saying absolutely nothing in the Bible is factually accurate. That is just not true. The Book of Daniel recounts demonstrable facts concerning the Babylonian exile of the Hebrews. But, much of the OT is pure myth. (Again, earlier in this thread I pointed out that myth is not the same as lies, but neither is it the same as demonstrable fact.) Take the Exodus. The Bible claims the Jews wandered for forty years along a route which, if it were hiked, should take a healthy person about a week. And, long as you keep the sea on your left, it’s impossible to get lost.
Of course, the reason for 40 years of wandering is to allow the generation of all those who were slaves to die off. I find estimates of the population of the Exodus range between 2.4 million and 6 million. There are not 2.4-6 MILLION Bronze Age Hebrew graves in the Sinai. There’s plenty of magic described all over the Bible. It does not mention a magical disappearance of the remains of the millions of those people. The Exodus is important myth, among my favorite, with much to teach. But it is pure myth.
I find no reason I should consider the four Gospels as anything other than myth. They all cover many of the same teachings, plus each offers special wisdom justifying their canonization. Was Jesus a myth? Yes. So was George Washington. George Washington was ALSO a real person. It is said Washington was very tall and could throw a stone across the Potomac. Both of these are part of his myth. But the real person could not throw a stone across the Potomac. The only accounts of Jesus’ resurrection are in the same single document, or are based upon those accounts. Those accounts are definitely evidence for the Resurrection. I just don’t happen to consider them very compelling evidence for an actual Resurrection. In my opinion, the Resurrection is an example of myth (which, again, does NOT mean i claim it is a LIE.).
As for Jesus’ teachings, SOMEBODY came up with them. Were they all composed by one person named Jesus? Sure. It’s reasonable enough to accept until proven otherwise. I am much more concerned with the content of those teachings than with who invented them.
There are aspects of Jesus’ ministry which I find wonderful. And some I do not. I’m happy to pick through those, but, if experience is any guide, you’ll be more interested in the other two points of my perspective.
First, I ask you consider we both have access to the same scripture. I’ll admit I am not so expert in theology or Biblical studies as you, but then please accept I am as well-studied as some sincerely religious Christians. Two convictions I cannot “believe”my way out of (though I am truly happy to be convinced) are:
1. I see nothing in the Holy Scriptures to convince me, or so much as lead me to suspect, there was anything in any way supernatural about Jesus.
2. “ “ “ superhuman about Jesus.
I should point out I view these as two entirely separate reasons not to believe.
I do not WANT to remain unconvinced. All I WANT is to know, the best way I can, how the world really works. I’ll face any God or gods or godlessness on the straight and level the moment I accept that state of nature. For the moment, my operating hypothesis is “Nature exists without any supernatural involvement.”
I’m happy to discuss what I find disagreeable about the notion of salvation by way of Christ’s sacrifice. Or discuss why I am not swayed by the supernatural claims in scripture. But, be advised, I am neither afraid of utter extermination when I die, nor of suffering eternal punishment for reasons that are not just. And I don’t consider a lack of faith in an absence of convincing evidence worthy of being punished.
Sorry. I hope that didn’t rattle on to long.