Boanerges
Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2009
- Messages
- 3,892
Bro Boanerges , im not saying KJV is perfect but these so called errors u posted seem to be in entirely different league than the errors in NIV.
I dont think the way KJV translators had to make decision which english word to use was errous. you have to choose some english word and english doesnt have as cleaver words as greek/hebrew and they chosed ones which made it sensible , regarding the context.
I am in no way attacking the KJV. I am simply pointing out that though we can certainly prove human error in any translation God can and will use what He has allowed to be here now.
The purpose of the NIV was to give an easy to understand (and accurate according to early manuscripts) version which indeed written on about a 10th grade reading level. There seems to be an obvious need for that.
About the KJV:
What about pasting together different manuscripts were verses were missing in the original?
Don't get me wrong, I like the King James (yes it is still my favorite), but seems no more anointed than others in the (currently) 10 or so I have spent time in.
I believe that if it speaks to you that is wonderful.
I also believe that since the KJV wasn't written until the 17th century there earlier works on could consider as preeminent,.
I also believe that one could easily argue that the Textus Recptus bears the marks of editing by Erasmus in that it contains material found in no other Greek manuscripts.
If you try you can dizzy yourself contemplating every aspect of how we arrived at our current translations-
or you can simply trust God to speak to you through that which He allows to find it's way into your hand.
In conclusion- I know several people who had a born again experience while studying the NIV. If God moves in and through it I personally am quite satisfied.