Shaolin
Active
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2021
- Messages
- 733
Your analogy is not truth about Kenneth Copeland.
What I said pertains to ANY false teacher...Copeland, Hinn, any of them...
What you said is not even an analogy from the scriptures.
Are you really that childish of mind, or are you just rebutting out of emotional disturbance and so you can't think straight? An analogy does not have to be "from the scriptures" in order to be a true analogy. You are digging yourself into a hole that you cannot get out of.
Kenneth Copeland can say things and it help others to get saved.
You comparing him to arsenic on food is ridiculous.
Again...if he teaches false doctrines, then the comparison STANDS...regardless of whether your sensibilities are hurt or not. False doctrines only have two purposes: to keep people from getting saved, and to destroy their relationship with God if they do get saved. Both have the same end result - the lake of fire for the rest of eternity.
According to what you said it would go for you too.
I would say to prove it, but since you don't know what you are talking about, it would just go over your head. I can demonstrate with Scripture anything pertaining to doctrine that I say, and that is something that YOU cannot do.
Try to prove it.
I already have...is that your tactic, trying to get people to beat a dead horse?
Circumcision is the teaching of the Pharisees.
Again, you don't know what you are talking about. In Judaism today there is no Pharisee sect, there is only the Haredi, Dati, Masorti, and the Hiloni. As far as Judaism goes, God gave the rite of circumcision LOOOOONG before the Pharisees even existed. If you are talking about the days of Jesus and Paul, you are off there again (no kidding). As I stated earlier, you don't know what you are talking about and seem to have no real education in the Scriptures that counts for anything.
You don't know that it is what you did? You tried to use arsenic as leaven, and Copeland's doctrinal errors like the immoral sins in 1 Corinthians.
Wrong again, young padowan. I used the analogy of arsenic sprinkled on steak in comparison to false teachers who do teach some truth mixed in with their lies. They will tell you that Jesus is God in the flesh (truth) but then turn around and tell you that when God originally created Eve, He put her sex organ in her right side...then when she sinned, the flesh closed up there and opened up between her legs (Hinn, around 1990 on TBN), and copeland may not go that far, but the prosperity nonsense that he teaches is a false doctrine.
Prove it that I have false teachings.
I know you can't.
Now you sound like a third grader...I already have, just because you reject Biblical truth doesn't mean that you are right (outside of your own mind).
Yes it is. You aren't speaking the truth about me or about anything else.
The name shaolin is that of a Buddhist temple.
Yes...it is, and in my dialogue I did not say anything of the sort that I was buddhist...I gave you the reason why that became one of my nicknames. I have also been called "the white tiger" and "the white ninja," but I am not going to change my screen name just because you are having an episode...
Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words
The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!www.lexico.comShaolin
Pronunciation /ˈʃaʊlɪn/
NOUN
mass noun, usually as modifier
- Any of various styles or schools of Chinese martial arts developed by the monks of the Shaolin Temple, a Buddhist monastery in China.
Yes...and you demonstrate that you either don't know how to do responsible research, or you only find in your 'research' what you want to use against a person without looking at the whole enchalada.
Those monks who practiced the martial arts were not buddhist, they were patriots learning the MA's in order to fight against the invading Huns. While there were buddhist monks at the two Shoalin temples, not everyone who lived at those temples were buddhist monks. The buddhist monks themselves seldom learned the kung fu styles secretly taught at their temples, but they allowed them to be taught because, again, they were patriots.
Nice try...again...
..