<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w
unctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w
ontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--> Hello David,
You mentioned Luke 21 and the
days of vengeance. You are likely aware that David Chilton, a partial preterist wrote a book by that title, and at one time it was available free on line.
We may not agree with some partial preterist conclusions, but I have found them to be quite an intellectual group, and definitely not dummies when it comes to historical events and the Bible.
You noted Luke 21 verse 23 … But woe to those who are pregnant and to those who are nursing babies in those days! … …
It was Josephus that had told us that things were so bad, being surrounded by the invading armies for so long that mothers were boiling their own babies for food! After reading Josephus’ account about the Jews being surrounded, I don’t know which would have been “worse”, that event or the holocaust? Both horrible … genocide.
As an aside, my pastor son-in-law was reading some history about Jerusalem some time after its AD70 destruction, and it stated that a traveler would not have recognized that a temple had ever existed, it was so overgrown and desolate … “these things which you see –the days will come in which not one stone shall be left upon another that shall not be thrown down.”
Yes David, Matthew 24 is more complex. Did Jesus return at that time with great power as claimed by the full and partial preterists, did every eye (at that time) see him?
After my time of study and interest in eschatology, I have come to the conclusion that where learned theologians cannot agree on certain subjects … who am I to offer an opinion.
One thing I have learned (from participating on discussion boards) is that for the following subjects, I believe it is near fruitless to arrive anywhere near an agreement. It is my experience to avoid discussions about:
The “great tribulation” and its timing in regard to other events.
The “rapture” and its timing, and the controversial views about the millennium.
My personal subjects of interest have involved the following:
The two witnesses of Rev 11 … and the two unusual witnesses found in the Hebrew “Shema” … Deut 6:4
David the musician and composer being “the key” to some points of prophecy. Rev 3:7
David’s “new song” in his Psalm 144.
The unusual “new song” of the 144 thousands, that only they understand.
The “song” of the victors (of understanding) over the image, mark and number of the beast being that of Moses and the Lamb. Rev 15:3
There are some unusual things about Moses’ songs in the Hebrew OT
I followed the EEC/EU events of the “Revived Roman Empire” noted in Daniel, and it
did become ten, and the “little horn” diverse from the others, did rise up
among them as noted by Daniel, and
not in addition to them as some prophecy pundits predict. And this little horn definitely was very “diverse” from the other ten.
Sir Isaac Newton told us not to become prophets, but to recognize the event when it comes to pass … I believe those two events did come to pass, but our “watchmen on the wall” were looking in the wrong direction.
As preterists and futurists, they look to the past and to the future, but did not observe the “present” happening of that event.
Another subject of interest for me is John 21 regarding the 153 fish and why it is “peter” (the one Jesus called “Satan”) that is associated with the counting of the 153.
It was the distinguished professor JA Emerton that stated that this number (153) may be solved by gematria … similar to the numbering of the 666 beast of Revelation.
Well David, I haven’t been much help regarding your question about “when”.
PS
David, in an earlier conversation, you stated something to the effect that a pope as the religious False Prophet being a bizarre proposition!
I know that prophecy is not your strong suit but it does hold an interest for you. Please go on the internet and key in … "a pope as false prophet”.
Yes, there will be some nut cases on those (15) pages, but it has not been an uncommon claim among some Protestant students of prophecy.
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026"/> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit"> <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1"/> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->