By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Why do you care?What Are you here for.
How white and American can you be? When shown your systemic racism, you accuse that person of racism.
Sue, I'm more white than you could possibly ever be - my biological father was a Nazi General in the SS and my mother was from Scotland.
People who have learned critical thinking skills know how to adjust for their own personal bias. Do you say "Merry Christmas" to your Jewish friends?
I didn't know I needed your approval.
Rhema
What exactly do you mean by a person being 'insular'.
The above ^^^ is rather insular. Think "insulated" or "isolated". The idea of a Chinese New Year never even crossed your mind. Or that there are Christians who for valid reasons do not accept your canon of the scriptures.Well -- I don't happen to know any Jewish people. Have been Baptist all my life.
Key word - "Should be" - in truth, they don't (though they think they do).The emphasis of a church Should be learning / teaching God's Word / Bible.
Ma'am, I can assure you that what you've learned as the gospel from your Baptist church is not what Jesus preached. But our views of what composes the Gospel are so far apart that I'm not sure you could ever understand what we believe, and were our dialogue to be fruitful, I am concerned that it may lead you to despair. And it's not my purpose to bring you anxiety. That's why I've been trying my best to disengage conversation with you. Again, I am not here for tea and crumpets.... sharing gospel unto salvation with all who will listen both locally and in other countries.
Try it... using ONLY Jesus' words. And again, I can assure you that the outcome is quite different from what you believe.Anyone can learn the truth about salvation in their Bible.
That an old person prefers the old ways... imagine my shock !I've been in both kinds of environments and prefer the hymn singing with hymnals.
Why do you have only one pastor?A person should be able to ask the pastor before or after a church service the why's and wherefores of what he's preaching / teaching.
Your profile says Texas. Perhaps it should be updated.I'm now in Missouri at a Baptist church.
I read the Greek text directly - so I can avoid translation bias.The pastor is strong KJV and I'm strong with NKJ.
Look again, you'll find your "1700 something" date to be wrong.it's not the 1611 version that has been used for many years. The one being used is from 1700 something.
bon appétitIt's about lunch time around here so will close for now.
Garee, it is my most ardent hope and prayer that one day you'll make sense.Outward un-redeemed Jewish friend ?
Garee, it is my most ardent hope and prayer that one day you'll make sense.
Godspeed,
Rhema
The dozens of people who have told you this.Thanks, Whose sense?
Sue... that doesn't even make sense. How can one be "biased" toward the language in which God saw fit to publish the teachings of Jesus?Well -+ you are baised toward the original bible languages.
And yet these are the people who created the canon that you follow.You brought up the RCC. The Vatican is not scriptural / nuns aren't either. Lots of what they believe/ teach is not in Bible.
I would suggest you re-read the definition of insular. To be "for" doesn't mean to be "against." I never said nor implied that you were against any culture - just apathetic. Yet I'm sure you are rather against the RCC, no?I'm not against any culture --
Most all Baptists I know in this area (of PA) believe that only Baptists have the truth about salvation and will go to heaven. Is this the case in TX?
Allow me to rephrase - Most all Baptists I know in this area (of PA) believe that only Baptists have the truth about salvation and will go to heaven. Is this the case where you are?I'm now in Missouri at a Baptist church.
What you have been taught as God's Word isn't God's Word. It's that simple.I am curious as to why you are so down on God's Word.
I do hope you mean 1769 as there is no 1786 edition of the King James.My phone is not cooperating very well. The 1786 is just fine.
I'd suggest a laptop for this kind of interaction.My phone is not cooperating very well.
The dozens of people who have told you this.
Godspeed Garee .....
My phone has google on it. As well as FB. The impression you've given is that since you only read the original Greek and Hebrew texts that you are totally correct on everything you say. That's what I meant by saying that you are biased towards that.
You do realize that before there was a KJV there was the Geneva Bible and the Great Bible
..and maybe you also realize that there were a couple of KJV that had problems with them and since them we've had the new KJV and the ESV.
No need to get me a Bible to read. I've got several here with me.
And would you please respond back regarding your comment a person can't be any whiter than you are. Apparently you feel that being white is special...white is no more special than any other color of people.
Will close for now.
In truth, I am certainly more correct ... and I typically don't post on things about which I'm not totally correct. It has been decades since anyone has found a flaw in my work. (It was rather exhilarating.)The impression you've given is that since you only read the original Greek and Hebrew texts that you are totally correct on everything you say. That's what I meant by saying that you are biased towards that.
You forgot the Bishop's Bible, and we shouldn't disrespect John Wycliffe, now should we - even though he used the Latin Vulgate as his source. Of course the Tyndale, Coverdale, Mathew's (and Taverner's revision of Mathew's), preceded the Great Bible. Sue... this is my wheelhouse - I'm a translator.You do realize that before there was a KJV there was the Geneva Bible and the Great Bible
Allow me to suggest the following New Testament (I'll buy one for you if need be):
Then you can compare the Interlinear with the KJV and see the translation problems.Amazon.com
www.amazon.com
And yet none whereby you can compare your several translations to the original text. Truly, you would be shocked.No need to get me a Bible to read. I've got several here with me.
I will not let you bait me. The above quote shows a purposeful twisting of my words, and I'm not the one who is insular.And would you please respond back regarding your comment a person can't be any whiter than you are. Apparently you feel that being white is special...white is no more special than any other color of people.
Thank you for clarifying. However, your stated views on how one is saved doesn't include baptism. So if Presbyterians can be saved, then wouldn't you think Baptism a moot point?I already responded to that.