Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

The End Times Controversy

no matter how much you cry ignorance or slander!

I cry ignorance because you support none of your words, as if they themselves were scripture. I cry slander because of the hatred expressed in a "christian" forum, though I'm starting to see under the mask, now.

Btw, coconut, what did you say earlier?

Are you working for the kingdom to come or against it.
This is a question you need to answer, not us.

No matter how many times this entire community cries "HERETIC", that doesn't make it true. Only the scripture can vindicate or refute a belief. You guys, apparently, prefer to base yourselves on modern chruch doctrine and world events. If you relied on scripture, you wouldn't mind, or have a problem with, examining my posts and refuting them scripturally, logically and politely.

Unfortunately, most people here have declined to show much logic, scripture or love. Guys, stop attacking me and read the scriptures alone.
 
Last edited:
ezekiel 38v14-19

Gee, I don’t know, exactly. But, I’d have to say that it would be in that generation, according to Christ and Paul. As to how, I’ve not studied that, yet.

daniel 2v44
44 "In the time of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it be left to another people. It will crush all those kingdoms and bring them to an end, but it will itself endure forever.

A Kingdom that will endure forever and always is left to God’s people (2 Peter 1:11, Luke 21:22)? This sounds like the Kingdom of God, to be brought forth at Christ’s return.

revelation 20v1-3

1And I saw an angel coming down out of heaven, having the key to the Abyss and holding in his hand a great chain. 2He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil, or Satan, and bound him for a thousand years. 3He threw him into the Abyss, and locked and sealed it over him, to keep him from deceiving the nations anymore until the thousand years were ended. After that, he must be set free for a short time.

Many people see the binding of the dragon as relating to Christ’s death on the Cross. While Christ’s death bound Satan for a time, he would be released for a short time, supposedly during the last few years before the Parousia to incite the falling away of many Christians before the consummation of Christ’s judgment. I’ve not settled on this, though. I usually have trouble with prophetic books, since they take so much interpretation and knowledge of the scriptures that I’ve not yet acquired. I don’t understand significance of the millennium, yet.

john 5v 28,29
28Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,
29And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
The resurrection was to be fulfilled at Christ’s Parousia (1 Thessalonians 4). Christ’s Parousia was to occur before that generation had passed away (Matt. 10, 16, 23-25). Indeed, they were living in the “last days” (Acts 2:8 ff.) and Christ would not tarry (Hebrews 10:37).

I think Paul gives an excellent explanation of the resurrection. Look at 1 Corinthians 15.

One interesting point, in the Old Testament, the Hebrew word “sheol”, which means “unseen”, was rendered grave (along with “hell” and “the pit”). It was often used simply to refer to death, as well as national judgments. I don’t know how relevant this is to the Greek New Testament, but it’s an interesting sidenote.

revelation 21v3,4
3And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
4And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
This is just like John 5.
Jeremiah 31:31-33 - 31Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
32Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
33But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
There are only two covenants with Israel. The first one was with the carnal nation, but the second (Romans 1:16; 2; 8-11) one would be with the New Israel of the gentiles and the Jews (Galatians 3:28; Colossians 3:11). Also, look at Luke 17:21.

Since the Old Covenant was still in force before Christ’s Parousia (Hebrews 8:13), they were looking for the New Covenant, which is briefly described by Jeremiah above, which would come within that generation, soon, in a very little while.

Hmm, I hope that’s clear. I have to go, but if you’d like further elaboration, ask some questions. Let me know your thoughts, sparky.

I still need to do lots of study, especially on the Old Testament prophecies. It’s lots of fun.

God bless
-Bill
 
Shaggy, I am ready to ban you. No, not because you are against my belief - but because you do not speak TRUTH plainly as GOD told us.

Prove it from scripture and tell me where I'm wrong in what I've spoken. Refute my interpretation of the scriptures and tell me how I should interpret them. Please don't just scream, "You're wrong! HERETIC!!!" That's really all most of you people have been doing. I really don't enjoy it.

Are you seroius or just plain lost? I think the one who needs to back themselves up with Scripture is YOU. Show me then if we live in the new jerusalem, where is Jesus in front of us, why does sin still exist? So on and so on, why?

Be very careful with your next reply. Being a member at Talk Jesus is a privelage and the Word of GOD is a pure gift of life. Don't misuse use with your "own" interpretation. That's filthy disgusting.
 
Chad said:
Show me then if we live in the new jerusalem, where is Jesus in front of us, why does sin still exist? So on and so on, why?
You know, Shaggy has quoted about 50 verses and explained how they support an AD 70 return quite clearly, I believe. And it's not really debating scripture when you just ask stuff like "So why isn't Jesus standing in front of me, and why hasn't he made sin dissapear?" You're supposed to give us a scripture and say, "What about this?"
 
Chad said:
Shaggy, I am ready to ban you. No, not because you are against my belief - but because you do not speak TRUTH plainly as GOD told us.

I believe that Christ was God incarnate, and nailed to the tree as the sacrificial lamb to pay the penalty for our sins. I believe that Christ was resurrected by God over the death of Adam, and given a new body, a heavenly body. I also believe that, just as according to his teaching, he returned within that generation on the apostate, carnal nation of Israel. Now, we are the chosen people, the New Israel, because whoever is in Christ is a son of Abraham, according to promise and that to him will be the glory in the church through all ages.

I know we disagree on the timing of his return, but is there anything else there you find unscriptural? What I've just said here seems to me to be the basic Christian faith and worldview as taught in the Bible.

Are you seroius or just plain lost? I think the one who needs to back themselves up with Scripture is YOU.

Chad, if nothing else, please listen to this statement, for your own good. If you believe someone is misguided with reference to the scriptures, you must also provide evidence to support your position. That necessity is called the "burden of proof", and it rests on both parties.

Chad, tell me scripturally. Why aren't we living in the Kingdom of God? Where does my method of interpretation fail?

Show me then if we live in the new jerusalem, where is Jesus in front of us, why does sin still exist? So on and so on, why?

Shall I copy and paste my posts? I've done my best to convey the scriptural basis for preterism.

Be very careful with your next reply. Being a member at Talk Jesus is a privelage and the Word of GOD is a pure gift of life. Don't misuse use with your "own" interpretation. That's filthy disgusting.

Ever since coming here, I've tried to contribute scriptural understanding to the forum in a polite and helpful way. Ever since that "intellectual revolution", as I call it, when I learned that there were other beliefs about scripture than the ones I'd simply accepted by tradition (except for salvation by Christ alone, which is the foundation of Christianity), I've done my best to allow the scriptures and God to guide my study of the scriptures. What do they truly say?

There is no "my interpretation". There is only what the original authors intended to say to whome they were writing, the original audience. Understanding God's true message, rather than "Paul's letters to the United States", is the basis for my understanding of scripture. It's context.

Context (according to merriam webster)
1 : the parts of a discourse that surround a word or passage and can throw light on its meaning
2 : the interrelated conditions in which something exists or occurs

I'm always careful to speak politely (though sometimes my patience wears thin, unfortunately). However, if you will ask me not to put forth as true an interpretation of the scriptures as I can muster, or none at all , I will refuse.

Here is my scriptural support, my arguments. They are all found in my posts, though I've left out my comments on the "heresy chorus" simply because those articles didn't have anything to do with the thread.

This is my page 1 reply to Adstar

The greatest basis for preterism, in my opinion, are the time statements contained in the New Testament, including Christ's predictions and promises, which continually place the fulfillment of those prophecies in the context of the first century. For example...

Matthew 10:23 - "But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come."

Matthew 16:28 - "Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

Matthew 24:34 - "Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled."

Matthew 26:64 - "Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, 'Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.'"

...and very emphatic is...
Hebrews 10:37 - "For yet a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry."

There are more, but I won't post five pages of text here. David Green did a nice compilation, though (101 Preterist Time Indicators)


This is my page 1 reply to FellowServant.

(note: Sometimes I use capitals. I'm not yelling, it's just for emphasis.)

Fellowservant said:
Be come where? to meet them? Also Christ does a little prophesying here as well..preterist are reading a literal and spiritual book, and taking to much of these prophecies literal.

Hmm, so then Christ, when speaking to his disciples in a simple and straightforward manner, was speaking in a convoluted, spiritual manner. There is nothing that suggests that Christ was speaking figuratively, or symbolically.

He made simple, specific predictions. Why did he mean something different than what he said for no apparent reason?

However, when the book of Revelation (a book presented in a vision of prophecy) speaks of a thousand year reign along with Micheal physically binding a giant dragon, along with a giant city floating out of heaven and landing on the earth, it MUST be physical and literal. Perhaps it is not me who has mistaken spiritual and physical (or literal and symbolic/figurative) language.

preterist are reading a literal and spiritual book, and taking to much of these prophecies literal.

Are spiritual things not literal, or even, not real? Why not give some evidence that Christ was not speaking plainly to his disciples?

Context?.. In the book of Psalms, did King David really have his hands and his feet pierced? Did they really cast lots for his garments? Sometimes prophecy needs to be taken out of context. And that is a fact.

What?!

Context (according to merriam webster)
1 : the parts of a discourse that surround a word or passage and can throw light on its meaning
2 : the interrelated conditions in which something exists or occurs

So, sometimes, in order to understand prophecy, we must disregard that which may give up insight into its meaning. That's not a fact, but nonsense. The ONLY way to discern prophecy is through SCRIPTURE: it's CONTEXT with reference to SCRIPTURE! CONTEXT determins whether a passage is literal or figurative or symbolic and spiritual or physical, NOT the reader's preconceived understanding.

If you take it out of its context, you are simply making stuff up. Why not give the Word of God, written, more credibility than personal theology?

Likely fulfilled on the day of Pentecost...(coming of the kingdom with power) there i is a spiritual kingdom and a literal kingdom of Christ. One is in us now, Christ in you the HOPE of GLORY (ie) the kingdom of God in you... the other is when Jesus Christ and the saint's will rule the WORLD with a ROD of IRON...and that is yet to come.

Are you saying that there isn't really a spiritual kingdom of God, that it's just some kind of metaphor? Provide scriptural proof that there are two kingdoms of God, I've only heard of one: THE kingdom of God.

Matthew 16
24Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
25For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it.
26For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
27For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
28Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

This is not a description of pentecost, but of Christ's parousia.

Also dont forget the blessed HOPE of the believer Tit 2:13, Where is your resurrected body, if Christ has returned to rule the WORLD with a rod of iron?

Well let's look to 1 Corinthians 15 for an excellent explaination.

42So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:
43It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power:
44It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.
45And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.
46Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
47The first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven.
48As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.
49And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.
50Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.

So, if spiritual things are not "literal", then the resurrection is not "literal". However, the resurrection is a literal resurrection, but a spiritual one, the resurrection of the spirit in Christ.

What generation? the one hes talking about, the Hearafter one...this has not happened yet. Hearafter means the future, how long? only God knows that answer.

Did you happen to read the CONTEXT of that verse before posting? I didn't find the word "hereafter" applied to generation in that text. He did say "this generation", which, in the most plain and simple terms, would refer to "this generation", or the generation of people that were listening to him as he spoke those words.

So Pilate and the rest SEEN him, but we can't?

Ah, here's a good question. I'd like to make a note here about interpretation of Christ's prophecies.

1. We know that, at the time it was spoken, Christ was 100% correct in everything he said. Therefore, we know that "the chief priests, and elders, and all the council" or Ciaphas, the high priest, DID see Christ coming on the clouds in glory in power. Do you believe Christ was wrong?

2. Therefore, because of the question you raise (they saw him, why can't we?) and an apparent discrepency, we must take to the scriptures to find out what these words meant to the ORIGINAL AUDIENCE, something called "audience relevance".

Let's look at the references to prophetic clouds in the Old Testament (he's done it before). It was a symbol of God coming upon nations or people in judgement.

Look at Isaiah 19:1, Psalm 18:7-15, and Micah 1:3-4. What significance did clouds have to the Jews (especially the high priest and council, who were well familiar with the Old Testament writings).

They meant JUDGEMENT! Not a physical visit from above. It makes sense, also in light of Matthew 23 and Christ's curse on that generation.

Remember what Peter said 2Pe 3:8, one day with the lord is as a thousand years. And why did he say it?

Is it because time has no meaning to him, because he has no conception of a "generation" or "For yet a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry"? This statement is not God's excuse for a two millennia non-fulfillment, but a promise of faithfulness.

because God is trying to save as many of us as possible. I wouldn't be saved right now if that were not true. And this goes for all the saints who are living today.

That would be accurate if Christ's parousia was an end of the physical world, but it isn't. The church of that time was anticipating the acceptance of Christ by all those Jews and Gentiles before the judgement on the apostate Jewish state. Men are still being saved because the gates of Jerusalem will never close.

2 Peter 3:9 - "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."

How do men count slackness? Is forty years a long time? Yes, it seems like a very long time to a man, especially one under persecution from Jewish and Roman authorities.

Thank goodness that Christ was right, that some would live to see the fulfillment of their hope and that he would not leave them as a false prophet.

Don't take the blessed hope away from the saints..if you dont want to offend

Tit 2:13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;

Why claim that Christ has deferred the hope in which all Christians rely. I've not taken the blessed hope, but proclaimed its FULFILLMENT!
Futurist theology has robbed Christians of the hope of Christ by saying that he has not fulfilled his promise, leaving many only with an unfulfilled promise and unfulfilled prophecy.

It is true...
Hope deferred maketh the heart sick: but when the desire cometh, it is a tree of life. - Proverbs 13:12


This is my page 2 reply...to several people.


Cults base most of their theology on the isolation of various passages in the Scriptures, and Preterists are no exception. Matthew 16:28 and Matthew 24:34 are the favorite verses that Full Preterists use to promote their false theology.

They’re the favorite for some, though I also like…
Matt. 3:2,7,10,12, 4:17, 10:7,23, 12:32, 16:27, 21:40-45, 26:64,
Mark 1:15, 12:9,12, 13:30,
Luke 3:7, 10:9,11, 20:15-19, 21:32, 23:28-30, 24:21,
John 14:18-22, 21:22, Acts 2:16-18, 17:31, 24:15,25,
Romans 4:23-24, 8:13,18, 13:11-12, 16:20,
1 Corinthians 7:29,31, 10:11, 15:51-52, 16:22,
Ephesians 1:21,
Philippians 4:5,
Colossians 1:6,23 (compare Matt. 24:14), 2:16-17,
1 Thessalonians 4:15-17, 5:4, 23,
II Thessalonians 1:6-7,
1 Timothy 4:8, 6:14, 19,
II Timothy 4:1, 6:14 (compare Jude 1:17-19)
Hebrews 1:1-2, 14, 2:5, 6:5, 7-8, 8:13, 9:8-11, 26, 10:1, 25, 27, 10:37, 13:14,
James 2:12, 5:1-3, 7-8
1 Peter 1:6, 20, 4:5,7,17, 5:1
II Peter 1:19, 2:3, 3:3-7, 10-12,
1 John 2:8, 17-18 (compare Matt. 24:23-24), 4:3
Jude 1:4,14-15, 17-19
Revelation 1:1, 2:25, 3:10,11, 18:24 (compare Matt. 23:35-36; Luke 11:50-51), 22:6,7,10 (compare Daniel 8:26),12, and 20

You can more easily view these passages here

Upon what do you base your belief that Christ has not fulfilled his promises and that all these NT writings were wrong, a weak interpretation of 2 Peter 3?

In Matthew 16:28, Jesus said: "Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom." Regarding this verse, Preterists boldly take the position that Jesus was emphasizing that some of them would still be alive and witness His Second Coming.

What’s so bold about taking the scripture at it’s word?

However, this is not what Jesus was saying! In this verse, Jesus was referring to His transfiguration, which would take place six days later (Matthew 17:1-5). On that day, He took Peter, James and John. It was then that they beheld His glory and His majesty, when His face shone like the sun. Peter, who was there, indicates in 2Peter 1:16-18 that, at this holy mount, they witnessed the "power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ" as follows:

Only “some” of them would survive six days?

"For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and COMING OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty. (17) For he received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. (18) And this voice which came from heaven we heard, WHEN WE WERE WITH HIM IN THE HOLY MOUNT."

Let’s look at a more thorough recording of the transfiguration.
1And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart,
---Again, only some of them would survive the following week? That’s redundant to say the least.
2And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.
3And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him.
4Then answered Peter, and said unto Jesus, Lord, it is good for us to be here: if thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.
5While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him.
6And when the disciples heard it, they fell on their face, and were sore afraid.
7And Jesus came and touched them, and said, Arise, and be not afraid.
8And when they had lifted up their eyes, they saw no man, save Jesus only.
Let’s make a comparison.

Prediction: Matthew 16:27-28
27For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
28Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.
Ok, so the Son would come in the glory of his Father with his angels and bring judgment. Some of his audience would not die before this happened.
Your fulfillment: Christ went with them up to the mountain and was transfigured, displaying his glory.

Problems:
1. Christ didn’t go anywhere. If he didn’t go, he couldn’t come.
2. no angels here
3. no judgment here
4. If you’ll reread that little passage, you’ll see that the author uses the transfiguration as proof of Christ’s (then) future return in power.

16For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.

---In Paul’s words, they are not deceived to believe in Christ’s return because they saw Christ in his glory. While this is an obvious testament to Christ’s deity, how is it a fulfillment of his coming in judgment?
The true fulfillment: 1 Thessalonians 1:7-9 –
7And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,
--Coming from heaven with his angels with…
8In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:
9Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power
--judgement
When you demonstrate this clear connection to the Full Preterist, they will argue with you. Well, can you blame them? 2Peter 1:16-18 refutes one of their strongest arguments.

First of all, it doesn’t even come close. In fact, Paul validates my view of the transfiguration (that it repudiated Christ’s parousia to the apostles) by presenting it as proof of Christ’s (then) future return.

When they begin to argue, just turn and walk away.


You have completely missed the point of civil discourse. You present the support for your beliefs and I present the support for mine. The audience (whoever reads or listens to the discourse) decides for or against either viewpoint.

Why are you telling people to make claims about scripture and then run away from the discussion?

Because they are not arguing with you, they are attempting to refute the Scriptures. Tell them to take it up with Peter on Judgment Day.

Talk about indoctrination, do you really think you’re so Biblically sound as to refer to your own interpretation as scripture itself?

Full Preterism is an empty doctrine, which offers no hope of a better life and a better future. It tears away at God's promise to the world of everlasting peace and tranquility that will be accomplished at Jesus' Second Coming.

Actually, futurism takes away that peace from Christians by indoctrinating them to believe that the gospel is destined to be defeated, with no hope for improvement in this world. Futurism relies on a physical escape which will not come. Preterism holds that God’s grace is established and that we reign in victory over sin and death.

Hope deferred maketh the heart sick: but when the desire cometh, it is a tree of life. – Proverbs 13:12

He didn't do a very good job establishing world peace where nation would not lift up sword against nation (Isaiah 2:1-4, Isaiah 11:9-10, Ezekiel 37:24-26 and Micah 4:3).

It can never be said that I put forth Christ as a failure.

Sincerely and In Christ,

There’s one thing I’d like to say. It comes from Matthew 7:1-5...
1Judge not, that ye be not judged.
2For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
3And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
4Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
5Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.

Show some love, please. After all, what shall the Lord say of you of castigating his children as blasphemers? I shall not speculate.

"But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness. And their word will eat as doth canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; Who concerning the truth have erred, saying the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some" (2 Timothy 2:16-18). Hymenaus, the first preterist, was "delivered unto Satan" for blasphemy (1 Timothy 1:20).

When was this written? I’d say Phil and Hymen jumped the gun. On a side note, if the apostles had taught the Christians a physical resurrection, would it not be easily refuted? Would not Paul have made mention of their err?

The Christians at that time had not yet been delivered from the persecution of the Jews and the Romans. Hymen and Phil were cut off for denying the promise of the Lord’s coming and his judgment on the ungodly (saying that it was passed). I deny no such thing. Hymen and Phil were wrong.

I must ask, with all due respect, is this article plagiarized? I think I’ve seen it before.

Now that was the Holy Ghost speaking !

It’s not the work of the Lord to castigate believers. If you want the Holy Spirit’s words, go to scripture.

If that is the case as you say, How come my Aunt, and Grandparents have died? Not to mention both of my baby brothers??

In Christ’s words from John 11:

25Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
26And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

Do you believe this?

I get sick, my family gets sick, and people run around worshipping satan?

The Bible never speaks of an annihilation of all evil, though it shall be judged and most surely will never enter the New Jerusalem, the Kingdom of God, the Church.

Revelation 21
25And the gates of it shall not be shut at all by day: for there shall be no night there.
26And they shall bring the glory and honour of the nations into it.
27And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.

When Christ returns there will be a new heaven and a new earth and it will be more than just spiritual,

Alright people, is there something wrong with spiritual things? Do yall think they just don’t exist? This is very perplexing to me.

Hebrews 9
2A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man.
3For every high priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices: wherefore it is of necessity that this man have somewhat also to offer.
4For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according to the law:

---Now, probably the biggest misunderstanding is 2 Peter 3. Let’s look at part of the passage in particular.

10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

---The word elements here it translated from the Greek stoicheion, which means rudiments, or basic principles. It is also used in

Galatians 4:3 - 3Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world:

4:9 - 9But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage?

Colossians 2:8 - 8Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

2:20 - 20Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,

---So you see, “elements” does not refer to the physical ground and globe, but to the rudiments of the world, the Old Covenant system.

Will there be a destruction of the literal heavens and earth? Let’s look at an example of what this would’ve meant to the early Jewish Christian.

2 Samuel 22:7-12 - 7In my distress I called upon the LORD, and cried to my God: and he did hear my voice out of his temple, and my cry did enter into his ears.
8Then the earth shook and trembled; the foundations of heaven moved and shook, because he was wroth.
9There went up a smoke out of his nostrils, and fire out of his mouth devoured: coals were kindled by it.
10He bowed the heavens also, and came down; and darkness was under his feet.
11And he rode upon a cherub, and did fly: and he was seen upon the wings of the wind.
12And he made darkness pavilions round about him, dark waters, and thick clouds of the skies.

Isaiah 51:16 - And I have put my words in thy mouth, and I have covered thee in the shadow of mine hand, that I may plant the heavens, and lay the foundations of the earth, and say unto Zion, Thou art my people.

Did God literally plant the heavens and lay the foundations of the earth here? Surely not.

In the prophecy against the nations…

Isaiah 34:4 – And all the host of heaven shall be dissolved, and the heavens shall be rolled together as a scroll: and all their host shall fall down, as the leaf falleth off from the vine, and as a falling fig from the fig tree.
against Babylon…

Isaiah 13:10,13 - 10For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine.
13Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the LORD of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger.

---Do you see the resemblance? Indeed…

Genesis 8:21 - And the LORD smelled a sweet savour; and the LORD said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done.

Psalm 104:5 - Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever.

It is clear that God did not intend upon destroying the old “heavens and earth”, but establishing a new order. The shaking and destruction of the heavens and earth (along with the symbol of "clouds) was a figure of the destruction of a people or an order.

we will be in glorified and resurrected bodies living with the Lord forever.

Again, I point to 1 Corinthians 15, as Paul describes the resurrection as a spiritual one, not a physical one. It’s very clear.

Now if you are talking about Christ's millenial reign then Yes we are in that

If you have no problem with a spiritual fulfillment of the thousand year reign (I assume, if you believe that it is now in effect), what’s the problem with a spiritual fulfillment of the New Jerusalem.

But as to this being the new Jerusalem spoke of in Revelation then no.
So explain more clearly what you mean.

It is spiritual.
Luke 17:20-21 - 20And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:
21Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

Hebrews 9:11-14 - 11But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building [ktisis: also translated creation, that which is created];
12Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.
13For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh:
14How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?

Will God dwell physically on earth?

Isaiah 66:1 - 1Thus saith the LORD, The heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool: where is the house that ye build unto me? and where is the place of my rest?

Jim Wade wrote an interesting article on this. http://www.eschatology101.com/pre-millennial_rebellion.htm

One thing I must say is that scripture cannot be refuted or reinterpreted based on a conception of non-fulfillment. We must change our understanding of scripture if it conflicts with its clear declarations. To attempt to do so is simply denial of the Word of God. These are things which must be considered. Scripture speaks, loudly. Do not simply deny it for tradition.

Aliright, that's all I'm going to comment on, today. I'll reply to Soldier of God's newest post.

In the meantime, I don't think any of you have addressed my assertions themselves. I've seen a few personal attacks, with only impotent reasoning and support. I've also seen an attempt to refute my words on a perception of non-fulfillment (though I have no problem with questions on my interpretation for fulfillment), on which I've already given my thoughts.

Please, if you want to discuss this, address my words. Don't insult me with name-calling. I've replied to most of your questions and issues with preterism with extreme politeness and love. Now then, I'd like you to answer some of my questions.

(1.) How can you refute Christ's promises (e.g. Matthew 3:2, 10:23, 16:28, 24:34, Luke ) and the apostles assertions (Hebrews 10:37, Acts 2:16-21, Romans 16:20, Luke 21:22, Colossians 1:6, 23 compare Matthew 24:14 & Revelation 14:6-7)?

(2.) Many futurists portray modern, carnal Israel as still a special, chosen people.
How do we separate that which God has joined together? Romans 8:28-29, 10:12, Galatians 3:28-29, Colossians 3:11

Also, look through Romans 8-11 for Paul's view of the "New Israel" encompassing those (Jew and Gentile) who have the circumcision of the heart (some cut off, others grafted in, Romans 9). Ephesians 2:14-16, 19, 1 Corinthians 12:13

(3.) taken from the article Questions for Questions for Dispensationalists,
Premillennialists, and Other Futurists
by Daniel T. Silvestri


By what legitimate means do we perceive some Biblical statements as literal and others as symbolic?

It is very interesting to observe the collection of scriptural verses that many perceive as "literal" while others are "symbolic". How is this determined? What guidelines are used? Is it arbitrary? Some examples of verses that many interpret as literal would include: "and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory" (Mat. 24:30); "this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven" (Acts 1:11); "And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth" (Rev. 19:21); "And so all Israel shall be saved" (Rom. 11:26). These verses are interpreted in the plainest, most usual, typical sense of words in the earthly objectively observable literal meaning. However, the following verses are NOT usually interpreted in the same literal sense: "Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come" (Mat. 10:23); "There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom (Mat. 16:28). "This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled" (Mat. 24:34); "For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled (Luke 21:22). What exactly is the determining factor that renders the first collection of verses ‘literal’ and the latter set of verses ‘symbolic’?

(4.) Why, instead of changing the conception of fulfillment to conform to scripture, is there an attempt to reinterpret scripture to conform to the traditional conception of fulfillment?

(5.) Was Christ mistaken?

Whew! I put very much time and thought into this reply that it should simply display scripture and loving reason.

I trust that yall will do the same for me.
[So far, I have been mistaken.]


This is my page 3 reply to Gloria.


Luke 17:20-21 - 20And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:
21Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

The New Jerusalem is spiritual, it is the Kingdom of God. The Scriptures do not teach the annihilation of all evil, but they do say that evil will not enter the New Jerusalem, the Kingdom of God.

we can see there is no way we are living in New Jerusalem

This is an exegetical fallacy, applying our perception of the world to our interpretation of scripture. The scriptures must guide our understanding of the world, not the other way around.

There are more...

God bless
-Bill
 
I"m in a bit of a rush right now between many tasks I'm doing here, but quickly please explain to me this one thing and I will respond after.

Do you believe that right now we live in the "new jerusalem". Do you believe also that the second coming of Christ (as spoken in Revelations) has already occurred?
 
This is probably the most clear and scripture intensive of all of them.

This is my page 4 reply to sparky

Hi sparky, sorry I didn't reply sooner. I guess I got distracted. Don't worry, you've not been forgotten. After all, I did say that I'd answer yalls questions, to the best of my ability.

Ok,im gently massaging my brain whilst trying to understand all these posts.Until this thread i had never heard of a preterist.Am i right in thinking their veiw is that all bible prophecy has been fulfilled?

Yeah, I know it’s a lot to consume. Take your time, so that you should come to a full understanding and will not be mislead or unjustly biased for or against it. Scripture alone holds the answers.

You’re right in saying that preterists believe that all Biblical prophecy is fulfilled. There are partial-preterists, such as R.C. Sproul and Hank Hannigraff (sp?) that believe AD 70 did have major prophetic significance as far as Christ’s judgment on Jerusalem (the apostate, carnal nation of Israel), but also believe in a future second coming. However, I feel that these men must account for the same things that futurism must account for, Christ’s and the apostles’ teaching on the nature and timing of his Parousia.

If this is the case here are some scriptures that im pretty sure have not seen fulfillment yet:

Ok, I’ll see what I can do. Even though I’m sure I can’t wrap up every detail, I hope I can help to enhance your understanding of preterist thought.

Keep in mind, however, there aren’t two preterists in America that agree on everything. Every one is different, so be sure to become familiar with a person’s views before trying to debate. Now, let’s get down to business (I’ll be using the KJV). :shade:

1 Thessalonians 5:3

3For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

This is a huge topic and is related to every other aspect of the Parousia. Therefore, I will spend a considerable amount of time on it. Sorry if this means I won't be able to finish with your question sooner, but I think it's necessary.

Well, let’s establish who “they” is referring to. Most of Christ’s prediction on judgment in the New Testament revolved around the (carnal) nation of Israel, with Jerusalem at its head. In my studies, I’ve only found predictions of Christ coming in judgment on those people of that generation.

Let’s look at a few of the “judgment” verses and how they relate to the second coming. There are more, but these are the most telling, in my opinion.

In Christ’s speech to the disciples, he makes this statement.

Matthew 10:13-15 - 13And if the house be worthy, let your peace come upon it: but if it be not worthy, let your peace return to you.
14And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
15Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.

Now, the disciples’ instructions were to only go to the cities of Israel in their ministry. Thus, in the Day of Judgment, whoever rejected the message of Christ in the cities of Israel would meet their doom in even a more terrific way than Sodom and Gomorrah. This is the earliest, more emphatic statement of Christ’s judgment on the nation of Israel. This is Christ’s simple promise.

Let’s move on, and keep this verse in mind as we proceed.


The whole chapter of Matthew 23 is blatant in Christ’s condemnation of the leaders of the old covenant Jewish economy, but I’d like to look specifically at the culmination of his words at that time.

30And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.
31Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.
32Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.
33Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
34Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:
35That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
36Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.
37O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
38Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
39For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

Christ’s words are simple, they need no additional commentary but from other scriptures.

1And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.
2And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
3And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?

Christ has only moments ago finished proclaiming that the house of Israel would be left desolate and he makes a stunning prophecy.

2And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

This is especially interesting in light of his prediction.

36Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.

So, his judgment would come upon the Jews of that generation. Their house would be left unto them desolate, their standing with God cast down, and their temple would be destroyed.

It is not acceptable to separate these speeches simply according to the chapter. They are continuous and undivided.

In response to Christ’s proclamation, that “verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.”, they ask “when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?”

I’ll skip ahead a bit, but you should go back and read through Matthew 23, 24 and 25 for more extensive context on Christ’s words.

29Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

As I’ve noted before, this apocalyptic language was common in God’s prophetic judgment on nations and peoples of the Old Testament. Look at Isaiah 13:10, 13 for a good example. I’ve cited others above.

Continuing…

34Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
35Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
36But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.

This generation shall not pass. Note that this is given in exactly the same way as his earlier statement, “all these things shall come upon this generation”.

37But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
38For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,
39And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
40Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
41Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
42Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.
This is a very interesting passage. We must ask ourselves, what happened in the days of Noah? He tells us in verse 38.
I’d like to make a comparison here. In the days of Noah, God cut off the wicked from among the just, sparing Noah and taking the evil men.
I’d like to point out the striking similarity of this portion of the discourse with both the parable of the tares and the wheat (Matthew 13:24-30) and the parable of the drag-net (13:47-50). It is clear that Christ intended upon cutting off the wicked from the good, the unrepentant Jews from the true Jews of the circumcision of the Heart (Romans 2).
43But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up.
44Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.
Compare 2 Peter
3Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
4And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.

This is the reason for the Jewish persecution of the Christians, because Christ had not fulfilled his judgment on that generation. That's exactly what his coming would mean, judgment and the desolation of the house of Israel. His judgment had not yet occured, so the Jews continued their persecution of the Christians, filling up the measure of their fathers. These scoffers were the Jews.

Back to Matthew 24...

46Blessed is that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing.

47Verily I say unto you, That he shall make him ruler over all his goods.

48But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming;

49And shall begin to smite his fellowservants, and to eat and drink with the drunken;

50The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of,

51And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

This is obvious, in light of Christ's previous statements of judgment. Who else could be spoken of here but God's wicked servants, the apostate carnal Jews, and God's good servants, the church, the children of Abraham according to promise?

The parables in the opening of chapter 25 are simply an illustration of what Christ has already said. He would come to bless the faithful servants and destroy the unfaithful ones. I won't go into these in depth, but you should examine them.

In Ciaphas' examination of Christ, we see the final declaration of judgment from our Lord's lips.

59Now the chief priests, and elders, and all the council, sought false witness against Jesus, to put him to death;

60But found none: yea, though many false witnesses came, yet found they none. At the last came two false witnesses,

61And said, This fellow said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days.

62And the high priest arose, and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee?

63But Jesus held his peace, And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God.

64Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

This is perfectly relevent to the last three chapters. Not only would Christ bring judgment on that generation, on the unfaithful Jews guilty of persecuting his Church, but Ciaphas himself would see Christ coming on the clouds of heaven.

Jim Wade wrote an interesting article on this subject. If you want to, you can read it here

Now, with reference to the last days, I think I should mention Revelation. Just as old Israel was the object of Christ's judgment, so was it witnessed in John's revelation.

Let's look at the Harlot, for a moment.

Turn to Revelation 11 and 17-18. I will merely point out some noteworthy similarities since I don't have the time for a thorough exegetical analysis, right now.

The most prominent and obvious are...
Israel was often referred to as the wife of God (Jeremiah 2:2, 3:14, Isaiah 54:5) and also unfaithful (Jeremiah 3:20, Hosea 1:2, Ezekiel 6:9, Ezekiel 16, Isaiah 50:1), for she behaved as a prostitute (Jeremiah 3:1-2). Especially clear is
Isaiah 1:21 - How is the faithful city become an harlot!

She fills herself with the blood of the prophets and the saints. (Rev. 16:6, 17:6, 18:20, 24; compare with Matt. 23:37 and Acts 7:52)

She is the Great City where the Lord was crucified (11:8). The Great City is used clearly for Jerusalem. It's use in later chapters (17:18, 18:10, 16, 19, 21) makes it clear that the ***** represents Jerusalem, the mother and capital of Israel and, as the temple dwelt there, a symbol of Israel's favor with God.

Note, also, the reference in 11:8 -
And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

I find it interesting that John refers to sodom and egypt here, both which came under catastrphic judgment for their rebellion against God and rejecting his prophets. How much more would Jerusalem (the Jews) come under judgment for rejecting and killing the very son of God, their Lord himself?

At first glance (this is just my opinion), this reference seems to convey the symbolism of Sodom's immorality and Egypts Idolatry (note also, Matthew 10:13-15). This is clearer in the description of the Harlot, in chapters 17-18.

Now, going back to the original verse...

1 Thessalonians 5:3 - For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

...we see that the author refers to those Jews who participated in the persecution of the church. Destruction would come suddenly on them and they would be consumed (Matt. 24:38-41).

So, in answer to your question, I believe this verse was fulfilled with the destruction of Jerusalem and in God's judgment on the apostate Jews at AD 70. That’s when the temple was destroyed and when the Great City, the Harlot, was destroyed.

I hope this has been thought provoking. I've done my best to put forth a clear, relevent, reasonable and honest affirmation of scripture. If you wish to discuss this further, let me know.

I'll end this, for now, and examine the rest of the scriptures you cited. Verily, there are some reading this who shall not taste death before I reply.


This is my page 5 reply to sparky.


ezekiel 38v14-19

Gee, I don’t know, exactly. But, I’d have to say that it would be in that generation, according to Christ and Paul. As to how, I’ve not studied that, yet.

daniel 2v44
44 "In the time of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it be left to another people. It will crush all those kingdoms and bring them to an end, but it will itself endure forever.

A Kingdom that will endure forever and always is left to God’s people (2 Peter 1:11, Luke 21:22)? This sounds like the Kingdom of God, to be brought forth at Christ’s return.

revelation 20v1-3

1And I saw an angel coming down out of heaven, having the key to the Abyss and holding in his hand a great chain. 2He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil, or Satan, and bound him for a thousand years. 3He threw him into the Abyss, and locked and sealed it over him, to keep him from deceiving the nations anymore until the thousand years were ended. After that, he must be set free for a short time.

Many people see the binding of the dragon as relating to Christ’s death on the Cross. While Christ’s death bound Satan for a time, he would be released for a short time, supposedly during the last few years before the Parousia to incite the falling away of many Christians before the consummation of Christ’s judgment. I’ve not settled on this, though. I usually have trouble with prophetic books, since they take so much interpretation and knowledge of the scriptures that I’ve not yet acquired. I don’t understand significance of the millennium, yet.

john 5v 28,29
28Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,
29And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
The resurrection was to be fulfilled at Christ’s Parousia (1 Thessalonians 4). Christ’s Parousia was to occur before that generation had passed away (Matt. 10, 16, 23-25). Indeed, they were living in the “last days” (Acts 2:8 ff.) and Christ would not tarry (Hebrews 10:37).

I think Paul gives an excellent explanation of the resurrection. Look at 1 Corinthians 15.

One interesting point, in the Old Testament, the Hebrew word “sheol”, which means “unseen”, was rendered grave (along with “hell” and “the pit”). It was often used simply to refer to death, as well as national judgments. I don’t know how relevant this is to the Greek New Testament, but it’s an interesting sidenote.

revelation 21v3,4
3And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
4And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
This is just like John 5.
Jeremiah 31:31-33 - 31Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
32Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
33But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
There are only two covenants with Israel. The first one was with the carnal nation, but the second (Romans 1:16; 2; 8-11) one would be with the New Israel of the gentiles and the Jews (Galatians 3:28; Colossians 3:11). Also, look at Luke 17:21.

Since the Old Covenant was still in force before Christ’s Parousia (Hebrews 8:13), they were looking for the New Covenant, which is briefly described by Jeremiah above, which would come within that generation, soon, in a very little while.

Hmm, I hope that’s clear. I have to go, but if you’d like further elaboration, ask some questions. Let me know your thoughts, sparky.

I still need to do lots of study, especially on the Old Testament prophecies. It’s lots of fun.

[One thing that I find interesting regarding the Old Testament prophecies of Israel is Galatians 3:28 -

28There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.]


There, in my opinion, is my most significant support. The base of my arguments is scripture. Refute them from scripture.

Again, these are just my old posts. Didn't you read them before calling me a heretic? Are you considering banning me without even knowing what I believe and why?

scripture alone...

God bless
-Bill
 
Chad said:
I"m in a bit of a rush right now between many tasks I'm doing here, but quickly please explain to me this one thing and I will respond after.

Take your time. I'd rather a convincing, scriptural response than a hastey cut-down.

Do you believe that right now we live in the "new jerusalem". Do you believe also that the second coming of Christ (as spoken in Revelations) has already occurred?

Yes, that's correct. I believe that the New Jerusalem is a symbol of the Church, and that the second coming of Christ was for the judgment of that wicked generation and the glorification of the Church.

Oh yeah, I really don't mind admitting I'm wrong. It's obviously happened before, or else I would be agreeing with you right now. If you can prove to me from scripture where my interpretation is inadequate, I will heed your words (but moreover, the words of scripture).
 
Last edited:
Soldier of God said:
Preterism is repetition. Memorizing The same things to defend this belief. Well trained.(brainwashed). Did I say that? Ninja Monkey do you speak truth because you believe what he says? His(shaggys) scripture choice are Gods words interpreted shaggys way.

Prove your propaganda. That's all I'm going to say.
 
Shaggy . Your walking a real thin line in your revelation's to begin with . Do not call others oppinions propaganda . The End . Mike
 
Your walking a real thin line in your revelation's to begin with .

What do you mean by "your revelation's"? I'm not sure I understand. What line am I walking?

Propaganda:
2 : the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person
3 : ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause; also : a public action having such an effect

Propaganda is often unsubstantiated (in this case, as well) assertions intended to cause damage or bias against an institution, idea or person. That's exactly what Soldier of God is putting forth. It's simply insulting, really.

God bless
-Bill
 
I have a question, If all prophecy was fulfilled and Jesus did return in 70AD , why did John the Apostle write the book of Revelation( the apocalypse of John the devine)Between 95-97AD? John was senticed to Patmos under Domitian's reign, not Nero's. There is no mention of the contrary for the first thre centuries. There is no historical evidence to support the book of Revelation, to have been written at any earlier date. My resources are; the writtings of Iranaeus, Eusebius, Clement of Alexandria and Origen.
 
Revelation's [ Word of truth revealed by the Holy Spirit ] That's what I mean . Bring other's who stand with you and your revelation's . At least three . Many here have dissagreed with you . Bring three who see the same as you , or you are out of line . God is not giving you a hotline to the mystery's hidden in the word . Please confirm what you are saying . In the counsel of many there is wisdom . Mike :confused:
 
Thanks for the sources.

I havn't looked into the dating of Revelation. I've heard it claimed that it was written around AD 95 and that it was written just a few years prior to the siege of Jerusalem, but I've not studied the ongoing debate.

For myself, whether it was written before or after the siege of Jerusalem doesn't change the message of scripture. The time-statements from Christ and the apostles are evidence enough that the time was near, within that generation. As Ed Stevens put it, "They are vaid promises and are not invalidated by opinions about the dating of this last book of the Bible."

Since I can't really answer for this, I'm happy to concede your point until I gain some knowledge on the matter. Do you know where I could go to learn about the arguments for the AD 90 date?

I've heard that Ken Gentry gives a good argument for the pre-AD70 date, in his book Before Jerusalem Fell, and also John Robertson, in Redating the New Testament. That's what I hear. I havn't read them, though.

Thanks for the reply.

God bless
-Bill
 
May I ask why your concerned about what John, Ed or Ken say? How about strictly and only what GOD says? You say its all about Scripture, yet you mention what man says about Scripture, their views of the Revelations.

I am happy that you choose now to investigate because the ground you walk on comes from GOD and GOD has spoken, Scripture.

Try www.biblegateway.com for study resources. Also, www.studylight.org
 
I find Bible Gateway to be very useful. Strong's Concordance is also a great resource. :)

May I ask why your concerned about what John, Ed or Ken say? How about strictly and only what GOD says? You say its all about Scripture, yet you mention what man says about Scripture, their views of the Revelations.

I defer to others who are more knowledgeable than I when I'm not familiar with the topic. I conceded jiggyfly's point, and it's perfectly reasonable to mention men who hold opposing views to the AD 90 date. Just perhaps, someone might like to look at an opinion on that particular topic other than your own.

Are you saying that you never reference other scholars in a discussion that cannot be verified purely by scripture?

It's just like when I cited other people's articles in my replies (you didn't object to those). They can make the point better and more clearly than I, especially in this para-scriptural subject.

Oh, and I quoted Ed because I feel that he stated my point just perfectly.

By the way...

WAKE UP AND LOOK OUTISDE THE ROCK YOU LIVE UNDER!

God's word alone?

Just a reminder, don't forget to look at those arguments you asked for (on page 6). I even went all through the thread and picked them out for you. You can't rightfully accuse me of ignoring scripture.

I'd like to note, again, that I have very, very little evidence that anyone (particularly those in the "heresy chorus") posting here has read anything I've written after they realized I'm a preterist.

God bless
-Bill
 
Your last line said it Shaggy. Your a preterist. So how is it that ALL or "anyone" has not read everything you posted yet realized your a preterist? It was clearly obvious. Keep in mind this site is a not a debate forum or made for agruments sake. It is a Jesus Christ = TRUTH as told in Scripture community.

Yes, GOD's word alone. What could top this off? Nothing indeed. GOD is creator and the Lord has spoken through Scripture. I'm not one to go around giving myself a label like for example mormon, preterist, jehovah's witness, etc. I'm simply a Christian. That's plain and simple. I believe in Scripture, plain and simple.

I reference scholars who go by Truth alone and not "someone might like to look at an opinion on that particular topic other than your own". I know what I know of the Word of GOD, and I may mention scholars who I'm 100% positive are all about Truth alone, not "off" with their own ideas of what Scripture is and/or means.

Do you understand? This site is strictly Jesus. Not our opinions, not any scholars opinions. I don't fall for that whatsoever, nor will I welcome it to my site. I welcome with open arms those who come to seek Truth, not tamper with it nor question it.
 
Shaggy . Sometimes you just have to trust the Holy Spirit . You again have tried to mock Chad by using a quote . Chad is trying to keep this site a Holy Spirit friendly site , and I know that he has given you every chance to try to understand you . Unfortunately , Chad is the one who has to make the calls on banning people . That has given him a bad reputation from others without all the facts . You have used quotes and sarcasm when anyone makes a different point against you and I am sure you will dig up a way to mock jiggy too . Chad will not get the bad rep this time . Your spirit makes my skin crawl , and if you look back over this thread , you have pretty much been talking to yourself . One more chance to end this topic . You are unfruitful to the rest of the site . Mike
 
A few big major problems for a Preterist....


1Jo 3:2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

1Co 13:10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.
1Co 13:11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
1Co 13:12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.


Phi 3:11 If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.
Phi 3:12 Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which also am apprehended of Christ Jesus.


The complete perfection of the saints will only come at the resurrection, when we will no longer see darkly through that glass...but face to face, and see Christ as he is. Full Preterist must make the claim that we are fully perfected, if we are living in the New Jerusalem. Every way you look at it, their teaching does'nt fit... or work...or edify the Body of Christ.


Now the resurrection of the body...


Joh 20:26 And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them: then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace be unto you.
Joh 20:27 Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.
Joh 20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.


Luk 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.


Preterist claim that we are resurrected into spirit form, scripture says otherwise. It will be a spiritual body, but not unseen...it will have "flesh and bones". Notice above... Christ says flesh and bones, and not flesh and blood. Why? Because "flesh and blood" CANNOT enter the kingdom of God. Jesus Christ entered heaven, with a flesh and bones body...and will return the same way.

Act 1:11 Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.

Rev 11:11 And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them.
Rev 11:12 And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them.

Yes, their enemies will see them resurrected...

Mat 27:52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
Mat 27:53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

Preterist say that the resurrection of the body is not a visible one...hmm, tell that to the ones who seen these people! Jesus was also seen..so will the two witnesses of the book of revelation be seen. God will give us new visible immortal bodys...just like the one Jesus Christ has.

Phi 3:21 Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.


Mat 22:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.
Mat 22:30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.

Preterist who say we are in the New Jerusalem take the angel part away from the believer in the above passage...why? Because we still marry and are given in marriage. So they do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.



Now just a little from the Book of Revelation...and i mean a little, Preterist dump at least 85% of this book down the drain. You will notice they dont use it much... GodZilla is not going to come up out of the sea, and the dragons are symbolic. Anyway, i use a verse... then i elaborate just a little on that verse...


Rev 22:2 In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.

The nations of the world will be healed, by the leaves of the tree of life.


Rev 22:3 And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him:

No more curse? In the book of Genesis, Adam and Eve were cursed and cast out of the garden of Eden... in the end, this curse will be gone. Again, Preterist who say we are in the New Jerusalem keep this curse on us.


Rev 22:4 And they shall see his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads.


I like this one, they the saints, will see his face. And will have the name of God in their foreheads... Same thing here, Preterist saying we are in the New Jerusalem, take away from the saints their ability to see Jesus Christ, when we get to the New Jerusalem. Remember the song, Oh i want to see him, and look apon his face?


Rev 22:5 And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever.

No night? No need for a light or the sun? Yes the lord will be the light of this place...and the saints will reign for ever and ever.


Rev 22:6 And he said unto me, These sayings are faithful and true:

These sayings are faithful and true? Yes the lord said them, when the lord says faithful and true, he means it...


I could go on and on...with the promises of God to his People. But a full Preterist ignors every one of these promises of God Almighty, and says NO... we will not see them or him.



Below we see more Promises of God that a full Preterist might call private interpretation. Or this is all spiritual... Is this not sad?


Rev 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
Rev 21:2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
Rev 21:3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God iswith men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
Rev 21:4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
Rev 21:5 And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.
Rev 21:6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
Rev 21:7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.


Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

According to Preterist, evil will NOT be fully destroyed or punished in the lake of fire...the above verse says otherwise.



And of coarse we have the warning not to add or take away from the words of the prophecy of this book. Preterist ignore this warning, by saying we are living in the New Jerusalem in a corruptible body, and by takeing away the promises of God from the book. The word plainly says (flesh and blood) cannot enter the kingdom of God. And these promises are faithful and true...


Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and [from] the things which are written in this book.


So what would Jesus Christ say to a Preterist? Same thing he said to the Sadducees... they do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.

So edify one another with these words...

This took me a few hours to put together, but i felt it was Gods will to show the ones looking on... these passages.

God bless all
 
BROTHERSINARMST4G, it's one thing to make a statement. Proving it is another matter. In all respect, as I'm sure that you're a respectable person...

1. Chad can defend his own statements and beliefs.
2. If you want to accuse me of something, prove it with specific evidence.

I will not be intimidated by anyone.

Until you prove what you say and what you believe with evidence, you have no point in saying these things about me.

God bless
-Bill
 
Back
Top