Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

True biblical Christianity

@JesusIs4Me thanks for sharing and God bless you, I understand now why you said you are "embarrassed", but dont be it is actually a great testimony of learning and growing in Christ. Praise be to Jesus
 
Hi there!

Thanks for asking...

I am just a guy who tries to do what the Bible says....

I don't like labels....because they tend to be imperfect, and mislead others.

Sure, I'm a Christian (i.e., a disciple of Jesus, the Messiah).

You wrote: " Is that why you said Christians have to obey Torah?"

My response: Christians should obey Torah because:

1. Torah is not abolished or terminated or canceled.
2. Torah passes directly into the New Covenant (Jer. 31:33; Heb. 8:10; 10:15-16).
3. Jesus taught Torah (Mt. 4:4; 5:19; 22:37; 23:2-3,23,34).
4. Jesus promised eternal life to those who obey Torah (Lk. 10:25-28).
5. Jesus gave great warnings against those who disobey Torah (Mt. 5:19-20; 7:21-23; 13:41-42).
6. Jesus applied these Torah-obedient teachings to all disciples of all nations (Mt. 28:19-20).
7. The Apostles also obeyed and taught Torah (e.g., Paul, Peter, James, John, Stephen, etc.)
8. The Prophets require Torah (and the prophets are not abolished).
9. The Psalms require Torah (and the Psalms are not abolished).
10. The Proverbs require Torah (and the Proverbs are not abolished).

You wrote: "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind."

My response: Yes! Jesus APPLIES Dt. 6 to YOU! (Mt. 22:37).

And HOW does the context of Dt. 6 confirm that we should express this love for God (as required by Jesus)?

Answer: Through obedience to ALL Torah commands (Dt. 6:25).

You wrote: "Keep these two laws and all the other laws of Torah are taken care of."

My response: Because if you love God (according to Dt. 6), then you WILL obey all other Torah commands (Dt. 6:25). So, they are "taken care of" because we WILL obey all the rest of Torah, IF we properly express Torah-obedient love as required by Jesus.

You wrote: "That leaves us two laws to obey, not six hundred or so."

My response: NOTHING in Dt. 6 states that you can ignore the rest of Torah. In fact, Dt. 6 requires obedience to ALL Torah (Dt. 6:25). Thus, you've contradicted the very context of Dt. 6 which Jesus applies to YOU in Mt. 22:37.

And, who said there are "six hundred or so" commands?

I don't trust Maimonides' count....unless you can explain why Dt. 4:15 (for example) doesn't show up in his list.

Anyway....hope that explains why my commitment to Biblical Scripture leads me to these conclusions...

Why would you oppose Torah-obedience, given all these Biblical considerations?

blessings...
All right....Jesus said the only law we are locked into are the two I stated above, and if we keep these two laws we keep all of the law. I'm happy with that. If you want to try to keep all of the Old Covenant law..Have at it...Just remember that the law is not of faith, That which is not of faith is sin, and if you live by the law you must keep ALL of the law or you are guilty of breaking all of the law. Your choice and I, for one, do not judge.
 
Anyway....hope that explains why my commitment to Biblical Scripture leads me to these conclusions...

Why would you oppose Torah-obedience, given all these Biblical considerations?

blessings...

Did you in your commitment to Bible scripture, understand why Jesus said that His disciples were guiltless for what the Jews were seeking to condemn them for ...... as profaning the sabbath day?

Matthew 12:1At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn and to eat. 2 But when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto him, Behold, thy disciples do that which is not lawful to do upon the sabbath day. 3 But he said unto them, Have ye not read what David did, when he was an hungred, and they that were with him; 4 How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the shewbread, which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests? 5 Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless? 6 But I say unto you, That in this place is one greater than the temple. 7 But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless.

If you cannot figure it out, may I suggest you surrender from keeping your commitment to Biblical scripture and instead ask Jesus at that throne of grace for His wisdom to help you understand His words in Matthew 12:1-7 above in the KJV?
 
@JesusIs4Me --- you're right - I Did have those two situations mixed up -- it Was the Etheopian eunich who wanted to be baptized -- no one was needing to tell him to,
 
@bibleguy -- you confuse me a bit -- the Torah only consists of the 1st five books of the Bible. Do you consider the Torah to be The Bible? Why not call it all God's Word / Scripture Rather than refer to it as the Torah.

Most of the passages you listed were referring to the entire Bible -- not simply the 1st five books.

Deuteronomy 6:25 is speaking to the Children of Israel.

As for trying to obey all the Law -- why do you feel a Need to? That would be considered a 'good work' and Ephesians 2 says Not of works -- that salvation is by God's grace -- a gift to mankind. By grace through faith. Not of ourselves, it is a gift from God.
 
All right....Jesus said the only law we are locked into are the two I stated above, and if we keep these two laws we keep all of the law. I'm happy with that. If you want to try to keep all of the Old Covenant law..Have at it...Just remember that the law is not of faith, That which is not of faith is sin, and if you live by the law you must keep ALL of the law or you are guilty of breaking all of the law. Your choice and I, for one, do not judge.

Hi there!

Looks like you just ignored the Scripture I've set before you....

You wrote: "Jesus said the only law we are locked into are the two I stated above..."

My response: Wrong! Mt. 5:19 applies even the SMALLEST of Torah commands to you.

And, Jesus applies Dt. 6 to YOU! (Mt. 22:37). AND, the context of Dt. 6 confirms that we properly express love for God through obedience to ALL Torah commands (Dt. 6:25), NOT merely the two you like.

You wrote: "and if we keep these two laws we keep all of the law."

My response: But YOU choose to use those "two laws" as an excuse to IGNORE "all of the law"....that's the complete OPPOSITE of Jesus' commands!

Remember? Jesus applies even the SMALLEST of Torah commands to you (Mt. 5:19), lest you be at risk of being called LEAST in the forthcoming kingdom (Mt. 5:19).

Please STOP contradicting Mt. 5:19.

You wrote: " I'm happy with that."

My response: You should be SAD! Jesus never said the two commands are an excuse to ignore the rest of God's commands!

Rather, the two commands ENTAIL your subsequent obedience to all the rest of God's commands. Otherwise you've contradicted Mt. 5:19!

You wrote: "If you want to try to keep all of the Old Covenant law..Have at it..."

My response: NEW Covenant law is TORAH! (see "Torah" in Jer. 31:33; Heb. 8:10; 10:15-16). Why do you oppose the TORAH of the New Covenant in which you participate?

And again, JESUS commands Torah! (applying Dt. 6 to YOU!)

Jesus never said: "Hey guys, obey Dt. 6:4-5, BUT be SURE to flatly contradict the context of Dt. 6!"

Thus, the CONTEXT of Dt. 6 is applied to YOU in Mt. 22:37.

The CONTEXT of Dt. 6 confirms that ALL Torah (Dt. 6:25) should be obeyed...not merely the "two commands" while the rest are ignored and contradicted.

You wrote: "Just remember that the law is not of faith, That which is not of faith is sin, "

My response: Wow! Then YOU better STOP obeying the LAW of Lev. 19:18....because hey....the "law is not of faith", but is "sin", right?

And hey! You better STOP obeying Dt. 6:4-5...because hey...."the law is not of faith", but is "sin", right?

In other words, your position is internally inconsistent.

You tell me to disobey TORAH because "it is not of faith" but is "sin"....yet YOU insist that TORAH should still be obeyed (in Lev. 19:18 and Dt. 6:4-5).

That's a flat-out contradiction in your theology.

You better fix it!

You wrote: "and if you live by the law you must keep ALL of the law or you are guilty of breaking all of the law. "

My response: So Jesus was just joking in Mt. 5:19? Of course not!

And OF COURSE any sin (i.e., any violation of the law) is bad.....ALL THE MORE REASON to NOT disobey any Torah!

Remember? TORAH passes directly into the NEW Covenant! (Jer 31:33; Heb. 8:10; 10:15-16).

How can you oppose the very TORAH of the New Covenant?

Please get back to the Bible....ALL the Bible (2 Ti. 3:16 includes TORAH!), not just the parts you like.

blessings...
 
Yes, when an infant. How about you?


thanks for answering Bible guy I have not and never plan on doing it.

Blessings to you brother


1 Corinthians 7:17-20
Only let each person lead the life that the Lord has assigned to him, and to which God has called him. This is my rule in all the churches. Was anyone at the time of his call already circumcised? Let him not seek to remove the marks of circumcision. Was anyone at the time of his call uncircumcised? Let him not seek circumcision. For neither circumcision counts for anything nor uncircumcision, but keeping the commandments of God. Each one should remain in the condition in which he was called.
 
Did you in your commitment to Bible scripture, understand why Jesus said that His disciples were guiltless for what the Jews were seeking to condemn them for ...... as profaning the sabbath day?

Matthew 12:1At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn and to eat. 2 But when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto him, Behold, thy disciples do that which is not lawful to do upon the sabbath day. 3 But he said unto them, Have ye not read what David did, when he was an hungred, and they that were with him; 4 How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the shewbread, which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests? 5 Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless? 6 But I say unto you, That in this place is one greater than the temple. 7 But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless.

If you cannot figure it out, may I suggest you surrender from keeping your commitment to Biblical scripture and instead ask Jesus at that throne of grace for His wisdom to help you understand His words in Matthew 12:1-7 above in the KJV?

Hi there!

Thanks for the comment.

Now, Mt. 12 merely confirms the HIERARCHY within Torah laws.

So, a law in Torah can be broken, ONLY if another law in Torah is of GREATER precedence.

Can we thus use Mt. 12 to contradict Torah whenever we like?

Of course not!

Jesus COMMANDED Torah (Mt. 5:19; 22:37; 23:2-3,23,34).

Jesus promised greatness to those who obey even the smallest of Torah commands, teaching others to do the same (Mt. 5:19).

Jesus promised you would be LEAST if you disobey even the smallest of Torah commands, teachings others to do the same (Mt. 5:19).

Jesus promised ETERNAL LIFE to those who obey Torah (Lk. 10:25-28).

Jesus gave GREAT WARNINGS against those who disobey Torah (Mt. 5:19-20; 13:41-42).

Jesus even warned RELIGIOUS PEOPLE (who worked in His name) that their Torah-disobedience would cause them to be cast away (Mt. 7:21-23).

Jesus inaugurated the New Covenant (Lk. 22:20) in which TORAH (Jer. 31:33; Heb. 8:10; 10:15-16) is foundational.

So please stop using Mt. 12 as an excuse to ignore the Torah teachings of Jesus which He applies to ALL disciples of ALL nations (Mt. 28:19-20).

You wrote: "...may I suggest you surrender from keeping your commitment to Biblical scripture..."

My response: Do you seriously propose that we "surrender" from a commitment to Biblical Scripture?

With all due respect....I rebuke you! (2 Ti. 4:2)

Let ALL SCRIPTURE (2 Ti. 3:16) REBUKE and CORRECT and TRAIN your behavior.

Thus, TORAH should rebuke and correct and train your behavior.


You wrote: "...ask Jesus at that throne of grace for His wisdom to help you understand His words...

My response: Jesus commands Torah (Mt. 5:19-20; 22:37; 23:2-3,23,34).

Grace continues to extend to those who obey Torah (Ex. 33:13).

Torah-obedience is wisdom (Dt. 4:5-6).

Torah is "His words" (Dt. 1:3; 5:27-33; etc.)

So why would you expect to receive any answer other than a TORAH-OBEDIENT answer to prayer?

After all, the Psalms ARE prayers (Ps. 72:20), and Paul commands we uphold the Psalms (Eph. 5:19; Col. 3:16), and the Psalms UPHOLD Torah (Ps. 1; 19; 119; etc.)

Your opposition to Biblical Scripture is tantamount to opposition to God Himself.

And why KJV? That's a REALLY outdated version! Go straight to the source (Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic). That's better.

Please get back to the Bible...

Thank you....

blessings to you....
 
thanks for answering Bible guy I have not and never plan on doing it.

Blessings to you brother


1 Corinthians 7:17-20
Only let each person lead the life that the Lord has assigned to him, and to which God has called him. This is my rule in all the churches. Was anyone at the time of his call already circumcised? Let him not seek to remove the marks of circumcision. Was anyone at the time of his call uncircumcised? Let him not seek circumcision. For neither circumcision counts for anything nor uncircumcision, but keeping the commandments of God. Each one should remain in the condition in which he was called.

You are quite right.

Adult-male-gentile-converts are evidently not commanded in Scripture to be circumcised.

INFANT males (8-days old), however, ARE commanded to be circumcised.

Paul never opposed Lev. 12:3. After all, Lev. 12:3 is clearly a command of God, and Paul said we should keep God's commands (1 Cor. 7:19).

Thus, as we (the people of God) return to obey Lev. 12:3, we will evidently no longer find ourselves with uncircumcised males among us, given the future prophecy in Eze. 44:9 which appears to suggest that the people of God will not have any uncircumcised males among them who partake in sanctuary activities at that time.

blessings...
 
Hi there!

Thanks for the comment.

Now, Mt. 12 merely confirms the HIERARCHY within Torah laws.

So, a law in Torah can be broken, ONLY if another law in Torah is of GREATER precedence.

Can we thus use Mt. 12 to contradict Torah whenever we like?

What were the disciples doing? Were they not doing whatever they like because they were hungry? Surely they could "fast" until the next day, right? It is not like they were going to die.

The you have Jesus being with them; He could have multiplied whatever food that was left so they would not have to if for whatever the reason, the sabbath came nigh unto them and it was too late to collect for food being evening for the beginning of the next day; the sabbath day.

God's commandment was to not gather anything on the sabbath day. They were to prepare meals before that sabbath day. Also required in keeping the sabbath day is to execute any Jew not keeping the sabbath day.

So what were the disciples doing? How can you say they were not contradicting the Torah whenever they like?

Why would Jesus defend them in the manner that He did, saying One greater than the Temple was here; being He is with them for why they are guiltless?

Isn't our bodies the temples of the Holy Spirit now? ( 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 KJV ) Isn't Jesus Christ in us ( 2 Corinthians 13:5 KJV ) and is with us always ( Matthew 28:20 KJV )?

So how can you say that we cannot contradict the Torah whenever we want when by our faith in Him being in us & with us always, it is His righteousness apart from the law to His glory for why we are guiltless for profaning the sabbath day?

Is that not the point He was making in declaring that He is Lord of the sabbath for why the sabbath is no longer lord over us in keeping it to justify us in the sight of God?

Are we not to be witnesses of Him by our faith in Him apart from the law that He is bringing us Home by His righteousness which is to His glory or are we to be witnesses of ourselves as under the law in seeking justification & thus salvation by?
 
What were the disciples doing? Were they not doing whatever they like because they were hungry? Surely they could "fast" until the next day, right? It is not like they were going to die.

The you have Jesus being with them; He could have multiplied whatever food that was left so they would not have to if for whatever the reason, the sabbath came nigh unto them and it was too late to collect for food being evening for the beginning of the next day; the sabbath day.

God's commandment was to not gather anything on the sabbath day. They were to prepare meals before that sabbath day. Also required in keeping the sabbath day is to execute any Jew not keeping the sabbath day.

So what were the disciples doing? How can you say they were not contradicting the Torah whenever they like?

Why would Jesus defend them in the manner that He did, saying One greater than the Temple was here; being He is with them for why they are guiltless?

Isn't our bodies the temples of the Holy Spirit now? ( 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 KJV ) Isn't Jesus Christ in us ( 2 Corinthians 13:5 KJV ) and is with us always ( Matthew 28:20 KJV )?

So how can you say that we cannot contradict the Torah whenever we want when by our faith in Him being in us & with us always, it is His righteousness apart from the law to His glory for why we are guiltless for profaning the sabbath day?

Is that not the point He was making in declaring that He is Lord of the sabbath for why the sabbath is no longer lord over us in keeping it to justify us in the sight of God?

Are we not to be witnesses of Him by our faith in Him apart from the law that He is bringing us Home by His righteousness which is to His glory or are we to be witnesses of ourselves as under the law in seeking justification & thus salvation by?

Hi there!

"So what were the disciples doing?"

They were obviously following the Messiah's lead, and implementing the hierarchical understanding of Torah modeled by Jesus.

"How can you say they were not contradicting the Torah whenever they like?"

Jesus never disobeyed Torah (otherwise He would be a sinner!)

And, Jesus' disciples IMITATED that Torah-obedience (Lk. 6:40).

So of course Jesus and His disciples obeyed and taught Torah.

Remember? (Mt. 5:19-20; 7:21-23; 13:41-42; 22:37; 23:2-3,23,34; Lk. 10:25-28).

"Why would Jesus defend them in the manner that He did, saying One greater than the Temple was here; being He is with them for why they are guiltless? "

My response: Jesus is obviously modeling the hierarchical understanding of Torah, as likewise exhibited by the Torah-obedient King David.

"Isn't our bodies the temples of the Holy Spirit now? "

Of COURSE that is a true figure of speech.

Does the LITERAL temple cease to exist or function? Of course not!

Paul CONDONES a sacrifice-laden vow to prove he walks "orderly according to the law" (Ac. 21).

THOUSANDS of 1st-century believers are ZEALOUS for all Torah (Ac. 21), thus including zeal for temple sacrifices.

Many believers were even animal-sacrificing priests at the LITERAL temple! (Ac. 6:7).

Jesus comes to RESTORE animal sacrifices "as in the days of old, as in former years" (Mal. 3).

So, metaphorical spiritual applications do not negate or contradict the LITERAL content upon which the metaphor is based.

" Isn't Jesus Christ in us ( 2 Corinthians 13:5 KJV ) and is with us always ( Matthew 28:20 KJV )?"

Of course! And that very Jesus teaches us to obey Torah.

"...it is His righteousness apart from the law to His glory for why we are guiltless for profaning the sabbath day? "

Which "righteousness" are you talking about?

Sure, we are righteous by faith apart from law (Rom. 3:28).

BUT! We are also expected to DO works of Torah-obedient righteousness so as to enter the forthcoming kingdom (Mt. 5:20).

Again, righteousness is something we DO (1 Jn. 2:29; 3:7).

If you do not DO righteousness, then you are a child of the devil (1 Jn. 3:10).

Thus, we are righteous by faith...but we should ALSO grow in faithful obedience to Torah (even Sabbath Torah!)

"Is that not the point He was making in declaring that He is Lord of the sabbath for why the sabbath is no longer lord over us in keeping it to justify us in the sight of God? "

My response: The Sabbath was NEVER "lord over us".

But, it is still true that we are justified by doing the law (Rom. 2:13).

"Are we not to be witnesses of Him by our faith in Him apart from the law that He is bringing us Home by His righteousness which is to His glory or are we to be witnesses of ourselves as under the law in seeking justification & thus salvation by? "

Both! JESUS is our righteousness. AND, we should DO Torah-obedient works of righteousness.

JESUS is our salvation. AND, those who obey Torah have eternal life (Lk. 10:25-28).

Why would you oppose the very TORAH (Jer. 31:33) of the New Covenant in which you participate?

Jesus and the apostles obeyed Torah and taught others to do the same.

Why would you oppose this Biblical consideration?

blessings...
 
Hi there!

"So what were the disciples doing?"

They were obviously following the Messiah's lead, and implementing the hierarchical understanding of Torah modeled by Jesus.

From reading Matthew 12:1-7, I do not see how it was obvious to them in following the Messiah's lead to profane the sabbath that particular day.

"How can you say they were not contradicting the Torah whenever they like?"

Jesus never disobeyed Torah (otherwise He would be a sinner!)

Healing on the sabbath? Is that not God working on the sabbath? Maybe it is not about Jesus would never sin on the sabbath but about the truth that He is Lord of the sabbath and not the other way around.

And, Jesus' disciples IMITATED that Torah-obedience (Lk. 6:40).

Stating that is hardly proof that His disciples did it, let alone all of them, since Judas Iscariot was never a believer in the first place, and yet he was given the same power of the Holy Ghost as the rest of His disciples in Matthew 10th chapter.

I point out that God requires those who keep the sabbath to provide for their meals prior to sabbath so no work is involved on the sabbath. So I am not seeing this event in Matthew 12:1-7 as imitation of Torah-obedience.

So of course Jesus and His disciples obeyed and taught Torah.

Remember? (Mt. 5:19-20; 7:21-23; 13:41-42; 22:37; 23:2-3,23,34; Lk. 10:25-28).

Actually, Jesus has been declaring in that Sermon on the Mount how things will change from the old way of doing things to the new; as in the difference between the Old Covenant to the New Covenant. One example of seeing that is in Matthew 5:33-37 KJV Jesus spoke of how people of old times performed their oath and then expounded on denouncing that old way by saying for believers not to swear at all which is a common practice to adding to that oath in declaring the seriousness of the one making the oath that he will do it as in finish it; because in Matthew 5:36 KJV we cannot make one hair white or black; meaning we cannot do God's work in us or to look to ourselves by the deed of the law in making us be good or to do good.

If you had any doubts regarding what the Sermon on the Mount was really all about; Jesus gave a simple answer here to a question that had nothing to do with being Torah-obeidence.

John 6:28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? 29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

That, brother, is what Jesus was saying in the Sermon on the Mount. Believe in Him as your Saviour that you are saved for simply believing in Him : and then believe in Him as your Good Shepherd that He will help you to follow Him in laying aside every weight & sin in running that race for the high prize of our calling in being received by Him as a vessel unto honor in His House at the pre great trib rapture event which is to attend the Supper in His honor and to His glory.

"Why would Jesus defend them in the manner that He did, saying One greater than the Temple was here; being He is with them for why they are guiltless? "

My response: Jesus is obviously modeling the hierarchical understanding of Torah, as likewise exhibited by the Torah-obedient King David.

Again, I do not see any model of hierarchical understanding of the Torah when Jesus was citing 2 incidents in the O.T. where He admitted that they had profaned the sabbath day BUT because they were in the Temple, was why they were guiltless. Jesus did not say that they did NOT profaned the sabbath BUT did confirmed that they DID profaned the sabbath along with WHY & HOW they were guiltless because they were in the Temple.

That goes to point for His defense towards His disciples. That means even if the Pharisees's accusations were true and that His disciples were PROFANING the sabbath day, they were guiltless because Jesus was with them.

"Isn't our bodies the temples of the Holy Spirit now? "

Of COURSE that is a true figure of speech.

Does the LITERAL temple cease to exist or function? Of course not!

If 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 KJV cites our bodies as the temples of the Holy Spirit; and 1 Corinthians 3:16-17 KJV cites the destruction of that temple of the Holy Spirit for defiling that said temple, meaning our bodies incurs physical death, then I would say that the reference is more than just figuratively but literally as to where His Presence dwells now as opposed to how He used to dwell in the Old Covenant as in at the Temple in Jerusalem. It is because of the New Covenant, believers will know the real Holy Spirit by Him dwelling in us as promised at our salvation ( John 14:16-17 KJV ) is why and how believers can discern that spirit outside of us in the worship place as NOT the Holy Spirit, but the spirit of the antichrist; 1 John 4:3-4 KJV .

Paul CONDONES a sacrifice-laden vow to prove he walks "orderly according to the law" (Ac. 21).

Don't accept every spoon fed verse without reading it in context, brother. That is how cults are formed by taking verses out of context to enforce their erroneous beliefs.

Acts 21:20 And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law: 21 And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs. 22 What is it therefore? the multitude must needs come together: for they will hear that thou art come. 23 Do therefore this that we say to thee: We have four men which have a vow on them; 24 Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law. 25 As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication. 26 Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.

Please read that in context and see how Gentiles were not to observe the Torah when this question in verses 20-21 was brought to Paul's attention.

Why did Paul did it as under the law?

1 Corinthians 9:20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law; 21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law. 22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some. 23 And this I do for the gospel's sake, that I might be partaker thereof with you.

So the time that Paul spent under that vow, it was for missionary outreach to those Jews that were under that same vow. Paul understood the law's requirement to finish the vow and not have it undone.

Nowadays, believers make open ended vows; boastful vows of love and devotion and commitment not only to each other but to the Lord, but they can never finish the vows. Since love is not boastful and making boasts of what you will do tomorrow is of evil James 4:13-17 KJV since God cannot help you finish your vows in according to His words in Numbers 30:2 KJV and Ecclesiastes 5:4-6 KJV , then we need His forgiveness for making foolish vows that we cannot finish but to rest in His New Covenant to us that He will finish His work in us ( Philippians 1:6 KJV ) as well as helping us to do good since love is a fruit of the Spirit as He shall amply supply us with the love we need thru the Holy Spirit in us for abiding in Him; Philippians 1:11 KJV That means we ask for forgiveness for trying to do His work in us by the deeds of the law and rest in Him that He will finish His work in us by faith in Jesus Christ as the author & finisher of our faith and that race.

THOUSANDS of 1st-century believers are ZEALOUS for all Torah (Ac. 21), thus including zeal for temple sacrifices.

Many believers were even animal-sacrificing priests at the LITERAL temple! (Ac. 6:7).

Jesus comes to RESTORE animal sacrifices "as in the days of old, as in former years" (Mal. 3).

So, metaphorical spiritual applications do not negate or contradict the LITERAL content upon which the metaphor is based.

" Isn't Jesus Christ in us ( 2 Corinthians 13:5 KJV ) and is with us always ( Matthew 28:20 KJV )?"

Of course! And that very Jesus teaches us to obey Torah.

"...it is His righteousness apart from the law to His glory for why we are guiltless for profaning the sabbath day? "

Which "righteousness" are you talking about?

Sure, we are righteous by faith apart from law (Rom. 3:28).

BUT! We are also expected to DO works of Torah-obedient righteousness so as to enter the forthcoming kingdom (Mt. 5:20).

Again, righteousness is something we DO (1 Jn. 2:29; 3:7).

If you do not DO righteousness, then you are a child of the devil (1 Jn. 3:10).

Thus, we are righteous by faith...but we should ALSO grow in faithful obedience to Torah (even Sabbath Torah!)

"Is that not the point He was making in declaring that He is Lord of the sabbath for why the sabbath is no longer lord over us in keeping it to justify us in the sight of God? "

My response: The Sabbath was NEVER "lord over us".

But, it is still true that we are justified by doing the law (Rom. 2:13).

"Are we not to be witnesses of Him by our faith in Him apart from the law that He is bringing us Home by His righteousness which is to His glory or are we to be witnesses of ourselves as under the law in seeking justification & thus salvation by? "

Both! JESUS is our righteousness. AND, we should DO Torah-obedient works of righteousness.

JESUS is our salvation. AND, those who obey Torah have eternal life (Lk. 10:25-28).

Why would you oppose the very TORAH (Jer. 31:33) of the New Covenant in which you participate?

Jesus and the apostles obeyed Torah and taught others to do the same.

Why would you oppose this Biblical consideration?

blessings...

You do recite your belief as heavy on the Torah, but I do not believe you are reading His words in the Sermon on the Mount with His wisdom because of what someone else had taught you.

If believers were Torah obedient, then every believer would be circumcised and yet you will have a problem when reading the Book of Galatians in its entirety.

Galatians 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. 2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. 3 For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. 5 For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. 6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love. 7 Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth? 8 This persuasion cometh not of him that calleth you. 9 A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.

Galatians 3:1O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? 4 Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain. 5 He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. 7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. 8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. 9 So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.

Try reading the scripture asking Jesus Christ for help in seeing the truth in His words for why "the Torah" has never been cited in any epistles of Paul to the churches and yet we can read Paul's words in speaking against certain things of the Torah from doing so.
 
From reading Matthew 12:1-7, I do not see how it was obvious to them in following the Messiah's lead to profane the sabbath that particular day.



Healing on the sabbath? Is that not God working on the sabbath? Maybe it is not about Jesus would never sin on the sabbath but about the truth that He is Lord of the sabbath and not the other way around.



Stating that is hardly proof that His disciples did it, let alone all of them, since Judas Iscariot was never a believer in the first place, and yet he was given the same power of the Holy Ghost as the rest of His disciples in Matthew 10th chapter.

I point out that God requires those who keep the sabbath to provide for their meals prior to sabbath so no work is involved on the sabbath. So I am not seeing this event in Matthew 12:1-7 as imitation of Torah-obedience.



Actually, Jesus has been declaring in that Sermon on the Mount how things will change from the old way of doing things to the new; as in the difference between the Old Covenant to the New Covenant. One example of seeing that is in Matthew 5:33-37 KJV Jesus spoke of how people of old times performed their oath and then expounded on denouncing that old way by saying for believers not to swear at all which is a common practice to adding to that oath in declaring the seriousness of the one making the oath that he will do it as in finish it; because in Matthew 5:36 KJV we cannot make one hair white or black; meaning we cannot do God's work in us or to look to ourselves by the deed of the law in making us be good or to do good.

If you had any doubts regarding what the Sermon on the Mount was really all about; Jesus gave a simple answer here to a question that had nothing to do with being Torah-obeidence.

John 6:28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? 29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

That, brother, is what Jesus was saying in the Sermon on the Mount. Believe in Him as your Saviour that you are saved for simply believing in Him : and then believe in Him as your Good Shepherd that He will help you to follow Him in laying aside every weight & sin in running that race for the high prize of our calling in being received by Him as a vessel unto honor in His House at the pre great trib rapture event which is to attend the Supper in His honor and to His glory.



Again, I do not see any model of hierarchical understanding of the Torah when Jesus was citing 2 incidents in the O.T. where He admitted that they had profaned the sabbath day BUT because they were in the Temple, was why they were guiltless. Jesus did not say that they did NOT profaned the sabbath BUT did confirmed that they DID profaned the sabbath along with WHY & HOW they were guiltless because they were in the Temple.

That goes to point for His defense towards His disciples. That means even if the Pharisees's accusations were true and that His disciples were PROFANING the sabbath day, they were guiltless because Jesus was with them.



If 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 KJV cites our bodies as the temples of the Holy Spirit; and 1 Corinthians 3:16-17 KJV cites the destruction of that temple of the Holy Spirit for defiling that said temple, meaning our bodies incurs physical death, then I would say that the reference is more than just figuratively but literally as to where His Presence dwells now as opposed to how He used to dwell in the Old Covenant as in at the Temple in Jerusalem. It is because of the New Covenant, believers will know the real Holy Spirit by Him dwelling in us as promised at our salvation ( John 14:16-17 KJV ) is why and how believers can discern that spirit outside of us in the worship place as NOT the Holy Spirit, but the spirit of the antichrist; 1 John 4:3-4 KJV .



Don't accept every spoon fed verse without reading it in context, brother. That is how cults are formed by taking verses out of context to enforce their erroneous beliefs.

Acts 21:20 And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law: 21 And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs. 22 What is it therefore? the multitude must needs come together: for they will hear that thou art come. 23 Do therefore this that we say to thee: We have four men which have a vow on them; 24 Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law. 25 As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication. 26 Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.

Please read that in context and see how Gentiles were not to observe the Torah when this question in verses 20-21 was brought to Paul's attention.

Why did Paul did it as under the law?

1 Corinthians 9:20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law; 21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law. 22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some. 23 And this I do for the gospel's sake, that I might be partaker thereof with you.

So the time that Paul spent under that vow, it was for missionary outreach to those Jews that were under that same vow. Paul understood the law's requirement to finish the vow and not have it undone.

Nowadays, believers make open ended vows; boastful vows of love and devotion and commitment not only to each other but to the Lord, but they can never finish the vows. Since love is not boastful and making boasts of what you will do tomorrow is of evil James 4:13-17 KJV since God cannot help you finish your vows in according to His words in Numbers 30:2 KJV and Ecclesiastes 5:4-6 KJV , then we need His forgiveness for making foolish vows that we cannot finish but to rest in His New Covenant to us that He will finish His work in us ( Philippians 1:6 KJV ) as well as helping us to do good since love is a fruit of the Spirit as He shall amply supply us with the love we need thru the Holy Spirit in us for abiding in Him; Philippians 1:11 KJV That means we ask for forgiveness for trying to do His work in us by the deeds of the law and rest in Him that He will finish His work in us by faith in Jesus Christ as the author & finisher of our faith and that race.



You do recite your belief as heavy on the Torah, but I do not believe you are reading His words in the Sermon on the Mount with His wisdom because of what someone else had taught you.

If believers were Torah obedient, then every believer would be circumcised and yet you will have a problem when reading the Book of Galatians in its entirety.

Galatians 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. 2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. 3 For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. 5 For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. 6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love. 7 Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth? 8 This persuasion cometh not of him that calleth you. 9 A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.

Galatians 3:1O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? 4 Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain. 5 He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. 7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. 8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. 9 So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.

Try reading the scripture asking Jesus Christ for help in seeing the truth in His words for why "the Torah" has never been cited in any epistles of Paul to the churches and yet we can read Paul's words in speaking against certain things of the Torah from doing so.


Hello!

Thank you for the response...I do appreciate your thoughtful comments.

You wrote: "From reading Matthew 12:1-7, I do not see how it was obvious to them in following the Messiah's lead to profane the sabbath that particular day."

My response: Jesus confirmed that when Sabbath instructions are not strictly followed, then the Sabbath is technically being profaned (Gr. "
βεβηλόω", Mt. 12:5). So, even though harvesting food may (in general) be considered to be forbidden work on the Sabbath, Jesus maintained that his disciples were innocent (Mt. 12:7).

Thus, Jesus was leading his disciples to discern that Torah instructions can be disobeyed, IF a higher Torah principle overrides (and justifies) that disobedience, in which case their is no guilt in the disobedience, because a higher Torah principle was obeyed all along.

That's the point of Jesus' example in Mt. 12:3-4. Eating food to insure ongoing LIFE is a HIGHER Torah principle than the general regulations regarding priestly food restrictions.

Food sustains LIFE in Mt. 12:3-4; and LIFE is the overriding motivation of Torah as confirmed in Dt. 30:19; 32:47. That's why it's ok for David to use the Torah principle of LIFE to override the Torah instructions regarding priestly food restrictions.

That's also the point of Jesus' example in Mt. 12:5. Performing the Torah-sanctioned work of priestly duties is a HIGHER Torah principle than the general Torah prohibition against work on the Sabbath. That's why it's ok for priests to use the Torah-sanctioned requirements for priestly work to override the Torah instructions prohibiting work on the Sabbath.

And that's why it's ok for Jesus' disciples to harvest a bit of grain to sustain life for hungry people while passing through a field. Again why? Because the Torah principle of LIFE overrides the general Torah prohibition against Sabbath work.

And Jesus led his disciples into that very field (Mt. 12:1) knowing that all of these things would occur.

That's why it's true to claim that the disciples were following the Messiah's lead to profane the sabbath that particular day.


You wrote: "Healing on the sabbath? Is that not God working on the sabbath?"

My response: General Torah prohibitions against work on the Sabbath have noted Torah-sanctioned exceptions, as even Jesus points out in Mt. 12, as I just discussed above here in this post.

And in all these cases, Torah was UPHELD and OBEYED all along; that's why David and the priests and the disciples were all innocent. Torah was obeyed all along, by properly identifying the hierarchical structure of Torah principles.

Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath. Jesus is the One who gives Torah to Israel (and thus to you!) Jesus is the One who affirms that general Sabbath regulations sometimes have Torah-sanctioned exceptions.

So, Jesus obviously has the authority to permit His disciples to eat grain on the Sabbath, so long as such eating is in obedience to higher Torah principles (which it is!)

Is Jesus sinning (or leading his disciples to sin) in disobedience of Torah? No! HIGHER Torah principles are OBEYED in all these cases (David; priests; disciples eating grain on Sabbath).

And, since overriding higher Torah principles were obeyed in all these cases, there is no sin or guilt. AND, Torah remains in force all the while.

You wrote: "Stating that is hardly proof that His disciples did it..."

My response: Of COURSE Jesus' disciples knew they should be walking in obedience to Torah!

Jesus COMMANDED Torah (Mt. 5:19-20; 22:37; 23:2-3,23,34) with the promise of eternal life to those who obey (Lk. 10:25-28), and with great warnings against those who disobey Torah (Mt.5 :19-20; 7:21-23; 13:41-42).

Rabbis taught Torah. Disciples of rabbis obeyed Torah (1 Jn. 2:6; Lk. 6:40). That's the culture and context of 1st-century Judaism, as confirmed likewise in Scripture.

Sure, Judas Iscariot disobeyed....but that's not proof that Jesus did not teach His disciples to obey Torah.


You wrote: "I point out that God requires those who keep the sabbath to provide for their meals prior to sabbath so no work is involved on the sabbath. So I am not seeing this event in Matthew 12:1-7 as imitation of Torah-obedience."

My response: I already showed you (above in this post) how Mt. 12 is consistent with the Torah-obedience that Jesus modeled and required.


You wrote: "Actually, Jesus has been declaring in that Sermon on the Mount how things will change from the old way of doing things to the new; as in the difference between the Old Covenant to the New Covenant."

My response: To the contrary! Jesus expect you to obey even the SMALLEST of Torah commands (and teach others to do the same) so as to attain greatness in the forthcoming kingdom (Mt. 5:19).

AND, if you disobey even the smallest of Torah commands (and teach others to do the same), then you are at risk of becoming LEAST in the forthcoming kingdom (Mt. 5:19).

AND, if you do not exhibit Torah-obedience greater than that of the Pharisees, then you will NOT inherit the forthcoming kingdom (Mt. 5:20).

AND, not a single letter of Torah passes away until EVERYTHING is accomplished (Mt. 5:18). And guess what? Dt. 30:1-8 is NOT yet accomplished! Thus, every letter of Torah is still in force.

Thus, the Sermon on the Mount OVERWHELMINGLY confirms the perpetuity of Torah.

Moreover, TORAH passes directly into the NEW Covenant (see "TORAH", in Jer. 31:33; cited in Heb. 8:10; 10:15-16). So let's not pretend that Torah is no longer in force.


Now, Mt. 5:33-37 does not contradict Torah! It merely confirms that you should not make vows in the name of "heaven", the "throne of God", "earth", "Jerusalem", or your "head". This is PERFECTLY consistent with Torah. After all, Torah does NOT require that anyone make vows in the name of "heaven", the "throne of God", "earth", "Jerusalem", or your "head".

Jesus confirms that it's better to let your "yes" be "yes" and your "no" be "no", rather than to operate under the evil presumption that a man's statements are trustworthy only if they have been sworn in the name of "heaven", the "throne of God", "earth", "Jerusalem", or your "head". That's why Jesus identifies this evil presumption as "evil" (Mt. 5:37). Again, this is PERFECTLY consistent with Torah.


You wrote: "This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent."

My response: Great! BELIEVE in Jesus! And by the way, this entails that you should OBEY His commands. AND, Jesus commands Torah (Mt. 5:19-20; 22:37; 23:2-3,23,34).

Jesus never stated (or implied) that it's ok to "believe" Jesus and simultaneously IGNORE His commands to obey Torah!


You wrote: "...He will help you to follow Him in laying aside every weight & sin..."

My response: AWESOME! Please lay aside every SIN. And, Torah-disobedience is sin (Rom. 3:20; 7:7; 1 Jn. 3:4). Thus, we should lay aside Torah-disobedience. Thus, we should OBEY Torah. Indeed!


You wrote: "Again, I do not see any model of hierarchical understanding of the Torah when Jesus was citing 2 incidents in the O.T. where He admitted that they had profaned the sabbath day BUT because they were in the Temple, was why they were guiltless."

My response: They were not guiltless merely "because they were in the Temple".

There were guiltless because they obeyed a HIGHER Torah principle while profaning the Sabbath. This confirms that Torah conflicts must be resolved by properly identifying the correct hierarchical relationship of distinct Torah requirements.

They were guiltless because they obeyed Torah principles all along. And, those who obey Torah are not guilty of violating it!


You wrote: "Jesus did not say that they did NOT profaned the sabbath BUT did confirmed that they DID profaned the sabbath along with WHY & HOW they were guiltless because they were in the Temple."

My response: Wrong. Jesus did not say they were guiltless merely "because they were in the temple".


You wrote: "That means even if the Pharisees's accusations were true and that His disciples were PROFANING the sabbath day, they were guiltless because Jesus was with them."

My response: You are close! The disciples were not guiltless merely "because Jesus was with them".

After all, Jesus was with Judas Iscariot, BUT Judas was an evil and rebellious sinner in many ways even while being "with" Jesus.

So, a disciple was not guiltless merely "because Jesus was with them".

Rather, it's because Jesus (who has the AUTHORITY to give proper Torah interpretations) was explaining that his disciples can profane the Sabbath so long as a higher Torah principle is being obeyed all along.

That's the point of bringing up David. That's the point of bringing up the priests. In both cases, a HIGHER Torah principle was being obeyed, and THAT is why the lower Torah principle was permitted to be disobeyed.

And, Torah principles were honored and obeyed in all three cases (David, priests, disciples eating grain).

And HOW do we know that the disciples were respecting the proper hierarchical understanding of Torah principles when eating grain on the Sabbath? Because JESUS has the authority to give us definitive Torah interpretations with full divine authority. THAT is how we know that it was ok (i.e., it was Torah-compliant) for the disciples to profane the Sabbath by picking and eating some grain on the Sabbath.


You wrote: "...then I would say that the reference is more than just figuratively but literally as to where His Presence dwells..."

My response: The term for temple (Heb. "הֵיכָל ") refers to a literal building structure! It does not merely refer to "where His Presence dwells". Thus, you are using the term "temple" incorrectly.

Does your body have literal walls and a literal ceiling and a literal altar and a literal place for sacrificing animals and literal gates? Of course not!

Sure, God LITERALLY dwells in you...but the allusion to "temple" is still a figure of speech. Why? Because your body does not have literal walls, ceiling, altars, etc!

The LITERAL temple which Jesus comes to rebuild (Zec. 6) will have LITERAL animal sacrifices in it (Eze. 40-47) when Jesus fully restores those sacrifices "as in the days of old, as in former years" (Mal. 3).

There's a difference between a LITERAL temple and a physical body!

Don't be afraid of figures of speech. They DO occur in the Bible sometimes!


You wrote: "It is because of the New Covenant, believers will know the real Holy Spirit..."

My response: And what does that very HOLY Spirit testify? That Torah should be obeyed from the heart in the New Covenant! (Heb. 10:15-16).

So it makes no sense for you to oppose the very Torah of the New Covenant in which you participate.


You wrote: "...but the spirit of the antichrist."

My response: The antichrist is bad! The antichrist is anti-Torah (2 Th. 2:3). Thus, it's BAD to oppose Torah-obedience.

Then why do you oppose Torah-obedience?

Looks like you are inadvertently advocating antichrist theology! Please stop.

Christ taught Torah (Mt. 5:19-20; 22:37; 23:2-3,23,34). You oppose Torah (apparently). Thus you (apparently) oppose Christ on this point.

That's bad. Please stop.


You wrote: "Don't accept every spoon fed verse without reading it in context, brother. That is how cults are formed by taking verses out of context to enforce their erroneous beliefs."

My response: Very true! That's why I am showing you, in as much detail as you require, why the position I've set before you is BIBLICAL.


You wrote: "Please read that in context and see how Gentiles were not to observe the Torah when this question in verses 20-21 was brought to Paul's attention."

My response: The phrase "they observe no such thing, save only" (Ac. 21:25) is not even in the Greek Critical Text! That's why it's NOT THERE in, for example, the NASB or ESV.

Let's not rely on questionable textual variants to defend your lawlessness which, as I've already shown, is profoundly unbiblical.

Moreover, Paul told GENTILES to obey God's commands (1 Cor. 7:19) which, of course, are contained in the written Torah of Moses (1 Ki. 2:3).

Paul affirmed the legitimacy of judgements issued by GENTILES who obey Torah (Rom. 2:27).

Paul said GENTILES partake in the New Covenant (1 Cor. 11:25) which, of course, entails that we obey Torah (see "TORAH" in Jer. 31:33; Heb. 8:10; 10:16).

Moreover, the four rules (Ac. 21:25) are merely an entrance requirement for Gentiles, not an exit exam!

The four rules came from Ac. 15. And, NOTHING in Ac. 15 states that Gentiles should NOT grow in faithful obedience to Torah AFTER being saved by the grace of Jesus.

In fact, NOTHING in Ac. 15 states that the Torah-obedient Pharisees (who were believers) should stop obeying Torah.

So, nothing in Ac. 15 or Ac. 21 confirms that any believer should NOT grow in faithful obedience to Torah.

You've simply misunderstood the purpose of the four rules, and you've contradicted the MANY other Biblical considerations I've set before you which confirm that ALL disciples of Jesus should grow in faithful obedience to Torah.


You wrote: "So the time that Paul spent under that vow, it was for missionary outreach to those Jews that were under that same vow. "

My response: Wrong. Paul condoned the vow to prove that the false accusation against him was false!

WHAT was the false accusation? Answer: The false accusation was that Paul supposedly taught some Jews to disobey the Torah of Moses (Ac. 21:21).

Thus, the false accusation is false! Paul condoned a vow to PROVE that the false accusation was false.

Thus, it must be TRUE that Paul did NOT teach Jews to disobey the Torah of Moses.

And, we should imitate Paul and likewise teach believing Jews to NOT disobey Torah (1 Cor. 11:1; Php. 4:9).

AND, Paul taught GENTILES to obey those same commands (as I've already shown you. For example, 1 Cor. 7:19).

Thus, Paul taught Torah to ALL disciples of Jesus.

We should imitate Paul (1 Cor. 11:1; Php. 4:9) and likewise teach ALL disciples of Jesus to obey Torah.


You wrote: "...love is a fruit of the Spirit..."

My response: Yes, And HOW should we love? Jesus applies Dt. 6 to YOU! (Mt. 22:37). And HOW does Dt. 6 confirm that we should express this love for God? Answer: through obedience to ALL Torah commands (Dt. 6:25). Jesus never told us to ignore the very context of the passage in Dt. 6 which He applies to you!

Again, FAITHFULESS (Gr. "pistis", Gal. 5:22-23) is another fruit of the Spirit. And "pistis" is a command from Jesus straight out of the Torah (Mt. 23:23).

Again, PEACE is another fruit of the Spirit. You want Biblical PEACE? Then love (not disobey!) Torah (Ps. 119:165).


You wrote: "That means we ask for forgiveness for trying to do His work in us by the deeds of the law..."

My response: God does GOD's work in us.

We do OUR work too!

Righteousness is something we DO (1 Jn. 2:29; 3:7), or else you are a child of the devil (1 Jn. 3:10).


You wrote: "If believers were Torah obedient, then every believer would be circumcised..."

My response: Wrong again. Torah does not require adult-male-Gentile-convert circumcision. That's why Paul confirms that adult-male-Gentile-circumcision is NOT commanded by God (1 Cor. 7:19).

Rather, Torah requires INFANT circumcision (Lev. 12:3).

Paul never opposed Lev. 12:3.

Lev. 12:3 is Torah. Torah is in the New Covenant (Jer. 31:33; Heb. 8:10; 10:15-16).

Lev. 12:3 is not abolished.

Nothing in Galatians opposes Lev. 12:3.

In fact, Galatians 3:11 applies Hab. 2:4 to YOU! Hab. 2:4 states we live by faithfulness (Heb. "emunah").

And what is this way of "emunah" by which Paul says we should live? TORAH! (see "emunah" in Ps. 119:30,86,138).

Paul opposes FAITHLESS Torah-obedience in Galatians.

Paul does NOT oppose FAITHFUL Torah-obedience.

That's WHY Paul says that faithful Torah-obedience IS the word of faith which he preached (Dt. 30:14 applies Rom. 10:8 to YOU!)


You wrote: "Try reading the scripture asking Jesus Christ for help..."

My response: You mean the "Jesus" who obeyed and commanded Torah, as described in the Scriptures?

John says we should walk as He walked (1 Jn. 2:6), thus we should likewise walk in obedience to Torah.


You wrote: " "the Torah" has never been cited in any epistles of Paul to the churches.."

My response: Now go back and review my responses to you here. You'll see why your claim is false.


You wrote: "we can read Paul's words in speaking against certain things of the Torah..."

My response: Nonsense! Paul NEVER opposed or contradicted Torah!

You've given ZERO evidence to support your claim.

I've given you MUCH evidence to prove Paul taught Torah.

Please review this message in detail.

We have MUCH to discuss here!

blessings...
 
Hello!

Thank you for the response...I do appreciate your thoughtful comments.

You wrote: "From reading Matthew 12:1-7, I do not see how it was obvious to them in following the Messiah's lead to profane the sabbath that particular day."

My response: Jesus confirmed that when Sabbath instructions are not strictly followed, then the Sabbath is technically being profaned (Gr. "
βεβηλόω", Mt. 12:5). So, even though harvesting food may (in general) be considered to be forbidden work on the Sabbath, Jesus maintained that his disciples were innocent (Mt. 12:7).

Thus, Jesus was leading his disciples to discern that Torah instructions can be disobeyed, IF a higher Torah principle overrides (and justifies) that disobedience, in which case their is no guilt in the disobedience, because a higher Torah principle was obeyed all along.

That's the point of Jesus' example in Mt. 12:3-4. Eating food to insure ongoing LIFE is a HIGHER Torah principle than the general regulations regarding priestly food restrictions.

Food sustains LIFE in Mt. 12:3-4; and LIFE is the overriding motivation of Torah as confirmed in Dt. 30:19; 32:47. That's why it's ok for David to use the Torah principle of LIFE to override the Torah instructions regarding priestly food restrictions.

That's also the point of Jesus' example in Mt. 12:5. Performing the Torah-sanctioned work of priestly duties is a HIGHER Torah principle than the general Torah prohibition against work on the Sabbath. That's why it's ok for priests to use the Torah-sanctioned requirements for priestly work to override the Torah instructions prohibiting work on the Sabbath.

And that's why it's ok for Jesus' disciples to harvest a bit of grain to sustain life for hungry people while passing through a field. Again why? Because the Torah principle of LIFE overrides the general Torah prohibition against Sabbath work.

And Jesus led his disciples into that very field (Mt. 12:1) knowing that all of these things would occur.

That's why it's true to claim that the disciples were following the Messiah's lead to profane the sabbath that particular day.

There are three problems with your application:

For using Deuteronomy 30:19 & Deuteronomy 32:47 as a form of higher Torah law in over riding the Torah law for keeping the sabbath day, anyone can claim that "work" for profaning the sabbath day in doing it for life.

Plus; and more importantly, Jesus did not refer to that "higher Torah law" in defending His disciples. He referred to the O.T. saints being in the Temple for why they were guiltless for profaning the sabbath day; not a higher Torah law.

Lastly, His disciples were not in the Temple when the accusation was made against them for profaning the sabbath.

So reread Matthew 12:1-7 as is without reading your beliefs of the Torah into it and let me know when Jesus has lifted your gaze from the Torah law to Himself for why His disciples & all believers are guiltless for profaning the sabbath.
 
There are three problems with your application:

For using Deuteronomy 30:19 & Deuteronomy 32:47 as a form of higher Torah law in over riding the Torah law for keeping the sabbath day, anyone can claim that "work" for profaning the sabbath day in doing it for life.

Plus; and more importantly, Jesus did not refer to that "higher Torah law" in defending His disciples. He referred to the O.T. saints being in the Temple for why they were guiltless for profaning the sabbath day; not a higher Torah law.

Lastly, His disciples were not in the Temple when the accusation was made against them for profaning the sabbath.

So reread Matthew 12:1-7 as is without reading your beliefs of the Torah into it and let me know when Jesus has lifted your gaze from the Torah law to Himself for why His disciples & all believers are guiltless for profaning the sabbath.

Hello,

Thanks for answering so quickly!

You wrote: "anyone can claim that "work" for profaning the sabbath day in doing it for life."

My response: Of course. We have free will. Anyone can claim anything they want to claim.

But that doesn't prove that such claims are true!

That's why we should be very careful to insure that our claims our true.

So where's the problem?

Sure, some people might appeal to "higher Torah law" in an inappropriate way....but that only proves that some people do things inappropriately!

That does NOT prove that it is inappropriate to appeal to higher Torah laws in an APPROPRIATE way.

So you haven't proven that there is any problem with people who PROPERLY appeal to higher Torah laws.


You wrote: "He referred to the O.T. saints being in the Temple for why they were guiltless for profaning the sabbath day; not a higher Torah law."

My response: Wrong. Jesus does NOT state that "being in the temple" is the sole reason for which they were guiltless for profaning the sabbath day. I don't know why you keep saying this. It's not the stated reason in Mt. 12.

You wrote: "Lastly, His disciples were not in the Temple when the accusation was made against them for profaning the sabbath."

My response: True. But "being in the temple" or "not being in the temple" has nothing to do with the reason for which the disciples (who ate some grain) were permitted to profane the Sabbath in that way.

Again, you keep bringing up the "being in the temple" consideration, but it has nothing to do with the case of the disciples who ate grain on Sabbath.


You wrote: "So reread Matthew 12:1-7..."

My response: Yes please! Read Matthew 12 again! The passage does NOT state that "being in the temple" is the sole reason for which the priests were guiltless for profaning the sabbath.

You just keep reading that idea into the text...but it's not there!

Sure, the priests were in the temple. But the text does NOT state that "being in the temple" WAS the reason for which the priests were guiltless.

So please, reread Matthew 12 again for proof.


And, why have you not addressed the many Biblical proofs (from Jesus and Paul) that I've set before you, which confirm that all Christians should grow in faithful obedience to Torah?

Are you unable to defend your position against this Biblical evidence I've set before you?

Ok....blessings to you!
 

Hello

Thanks for answering so quickly!

As God is willing, it can happen.

You wrote: "anyone can claim that "work" for profaning the sabbath day in doing it for life."

My response: Of course. We have free will. Anyone can claim anything they want to claim.

But that doesn't prove that such claims are true!

That's why we should be very careful to insure that our claims our true.

So where's the problem?

Sure, some people might appeal to "higher Torah law" in an inappropriate way....but that only proves that some people do things inappropriately!

That does NOT prove that it is inappropriate to appeal to higher Torah laws in an APPROPRIATE way.

So you haven't proven that there is any problem with people who PROPERLY appeal to higher Torah laws.

Well, if you consider the excuses for why a Jew would work on a sabbath; collecting wood for the fire to cook the meal necessary for their survival etc, and etc. or earning wages on the sabbath because they do not have enough to make ends meet etc and etc. This is the type of thing God gave instructions to prepare the day before the sabbath so they would not have to do that.

So Jesus being God, and He is God, something else is being conveyed here when He was with His disciples long enough to know when to start preparing for their meals for the sabbath before the sabbath day had come, right? Indeed, He could multiply what they had remaining withut having to go into the filed to get corn to eat. You just need to figure out what is really going on here in Matthew 12:1-7 .

You wrote: "He referred to the O.T. saints being in the Temple for why they were guiltless for profaning the sabbath day; not a higher Torah law."

My response: Wrong. Jesus does NOT state that "being in the temple" is the sole reason for which they were guiltless for profaning the sabbath day. I don't know why you keep saying this. It's not the stated reason in Mt. 12.

If you reread again but with His help, you may discern the "connection to the temple" when confronting the accusers of His disciples by citing "One greater than the Temple is here". If He helps you discern what or Who that One is that is greater then the Temple, then you can see why and how the O.T. saints were guiltless for profaning the sabbath to seeing why and how His disciples were guiltless for profaning the sabbath.

You wrote: "Lastly, His disciples were not in the Temple when the accusation was made against them for profaning the sabbath."

My response: True. But "being in the temple" or "not being in the temple" has nothing to do with the reason for which the disciples (who ate some grain) were permitted to profane the Sabbath in that way.

Again, you keep bringing up the "being in the temple" consideration, but it has nothing to do with the case of the disciples who ate grain on Sabbath.

Actually this explains the connection;

Matthew 12:5 Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless? 6 But I say unto you, That in this place is one greater than the temple.

You wrote: "So reread Matthew 12:1-7..."

My response: Yes please! Read Matthew 12 again! The passage does NOT state that "being in the temple" is the sole reason for which the priests were guiltless for profaning the sabbath.

You just keep reading that idea into the text...but it's not there!

Sure, the priests were in the temple. But the text does NOT state that "being in the temple" WAS the reason for which the priests were guiltless.

So please, reread Matthew 12 again for proof.

Maybe I should just ask you to explain the bold underlined portion of Matthew 12:6 in relation to verse 5 for why He said what He did to defend His disciples.

Matthew 12:5 Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless? 6 But I say unto you, That in this place is one greater than the temple.

And, why have you not addressed the many Biblical proofs (from Jesus and Paul) that I've set before you, which confirm that all Christians should grow in faithful obedience to Torah?

Are you unable to defend your position against this Biblical evidence I've set before you?

Ok....blessings to you!

I did by citing an example how you were reading His words wrong and why. If He is willing, I shall share another example again.

Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

Now a law keeper would think the above verses is about keeping the law but no. It is about Jesus Christ fulfilling the law by paying for the wages of sin which is death on the cross as a ransom for many.

Proof of that it is not about keeping the law in how to obtain righteousness by is addressed in the next verse below:

Matthew 12:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

So how can any one break one of the least commandments and teach other so be called "least" and yet still IN the kingdom of heaven? Why is it those who do and teach others shall be called great in that kingdom even share that same kingdom that teach otherwise? Because keeping commandments is not how to obtain salvation by in order to get into the kingdom of heaven, but they will be judged by what they have built on that foundation.

Again Jesus refers to a righteousness that surpasses the righteousness of the scribes and the Pharisees ( law keepers ) thus it cannot be obtained by the scribes and the Pharisees by keeping the law in order to enter into that kingdom of heaven.

20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

So a lot of this disproves being obedient to the Torah as the means of obtaining that righteousness for salvation in order to enter into the kingdom of heaven. It points to another righteousness in order to enter in. Paul says it best.

Romans 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. 20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. 21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; 22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: 23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; 24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: 25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; 26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. 27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. 28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

So can you tell me how to obtain this righteousness as explained by Paul or not?
 
Maybe I'm out of line asking this -- but WHY is the Torah being talked about -- And the Torah is being compared with the New Testament. It's ALL God's Word to mankind.

It's Also true that the Jewish world only accepts the Torah as being true Scripture.
 
Maybe I'm out of line asking this -- but WHY is the Torah being talked about -- And the Torah is being compared with the New Testament. It's ALL God's Word to mankind.

It's Also true that the Jewish world only accepts the Torah as being true Scripture.

It all depends if a believer is looking to the keeping of the law in Torah as a means of justification or obtaining salvation. Then it is a failure on their prart to recognize the salvation in Jesus Christ of the New Covenant.
 
Hello



As God is willing, it can happen.



Well, if you consider the excuses for why a Jew would work on a sabbath; collecting wood for the fire to cook the meal necessary for their survival etc, and etc. or earning wages on the sabbath because they do not have enough to make ends meet etc and etc. This is the type of thing God gave instructions to prepare the day before the sabbath so they would not have to do that.

So Jesus being God, and He is God, something else is being conveyed here when He was with His disciples long enough to know when to start preparing for their meals for the sabbath before the sabbath day had come, right? Indeed, He could multiply what they had remaining withut having to go into the filed to get corn to eat. You just need to figure out what is really going on here in Matthew 12:1-7 .



If you reread again but with His help, you may discern the "connection to the temple" when confronting the accusers of His disciples by citing "One greater than the Temple is here". If He helps you discern what or Who that One is that is greater then the Temple, then you can see why and how the O.T. saints were guiltless for profaning the sabbath to seeing why and how His disciples were guiltless for profaning the sabbath.



Actually this explains the connection;

Matthew 12:5 Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless? 6 But I say unto you, That in this place is one greater than the temple.



Maybe I should just ask you to explain the bold underlined portion of Matthew 12:6 in relation to verse 5 for why He said what He did to defend His disciples.

Matthew 12:5 Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless? 6 But I say unto you, That in this place is one greater than the temple.



I did by citing an example how you were reading His words wrong and why. If He is willing, I shall share another example again.

Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

Now a law keeper would think the above verses is about keeping the law but no. It is about Jesus Christ fulfilling the law by paying for the wages of sin which is death on the cross as a ransom for many.

Proof of that it is not about keeping the law in how to obtain righteousness by is addressed in the next verse below:

Matthew 12:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

So how can any one break one of the least commandments and teach other so be called "least" and yet still IN the kingdom of heaven? Why is it those who do and teach others shall be called great in that kingdom even share that same kingdom that teach otherwise? Because keeping commandments is not how to obtain salvation by in order to get into the kingdom of heaven, but they will be judged by what they have built on that foundation.

Again Jesus refers to a righteousness that surpasses the righteousness of the scribes and the Pharisees ( law keepers ) thus it cannot be obtained by the scribes and the Pharisees by keeping the law in order to enter into that kingdom of heaven.

20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

So a lot of this disproves being obedient to the Torah as the means of obtaining that righteousness for salvation in order to enter into the kingdom of heaven. It points to another righteousness in order to enter in. Paul says it best.

Romans 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. 20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. 21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; 22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: 23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; 24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: 25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; 26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. 27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. 28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

So can you tell me how to obtain this righteousness as explained by Paul or not?

Hi again!

You wrote: "collecting wood for the fire to cook the meal necessary for their survival etc, and etc...."

My response: Defiant disobedience is not the same as appealing to higher Torah laws to save and promote life.

So, was the stoning in Nu. 15:35 due to defiant disobedience? Or due to the appeal to higher Torah laws to save and promote life?

Answer: The reason is not explicitly stated.

Therefore, you have not shown that the man in Nu. 15:35 was stoned due to an appeal to higher Torah laws.

Thus, you have not shown that it is inappropriate to appeal to higher Torah laws in special cases.

Moreover, Mt. 12 confirms that Jesus agrees that appeal to higher Torah laws (thus disobeying lower Torah laws) is appropriate in special cases.


You wrote: "earning wages on the sabbath because they do not have enough to make ends meet etc and etc..."

My response: While in diaspora, "earning wages on the sabbath because they do not have enough to make ends meet" may well be an acceptable reason (by virtue of the need to appeal to higher Torah laws condoning the promotion and sustenance of life) for some believers to be working on Sabbath.

God will judge each person on that issue.

Most believers don't even know the Sabbath is the 7th day of the week! So, most believers are, technically, ignorant...and the Torah makes provision for sins committed in ignorance.

When we all return to the land, Torah will again be obeyed 100% (Dt. 30:1-8). At that time, Levitical priests will be restored to the position of teaching us how to deal with all these issues and special cases. We will no longer be ignorant at that time.

In the meantime, while in diaspora, we try the best we can to grow in faithful obedience to as much Torah as is presently properly observable.

And, for those who KNOW Sabbath is the 7th day, and for those who have no good reason to not abstain from work on the 7th day, well, it's reasonable to suppose that God expects such people to abstain from work on the 7th day.

It's a growth process.

We are all at different stages in the process of identifying who we are (ISRAEL! Jer. 31:31) and how we should live (TORAH! Jer. 31:33)

It took us a LONG time to get to the extremely anti-Torah state in which we believers presently find ourselves....and it's probably not going to change overnight!

But the prophets GUARANTEE that we will repent and return to 100% obedience (e.g., Dt. 30:1-8).


You wrote: "You just need to figure out what is really going on here in Matthew 12:1-7."

My response: I already showed you in detail.

Torah CONFLICTS sometimes occur.

What do we do?

Do we IGNORE Torah and do whatever we like?

No. Jesus NEVER said to ignore Torah.

We appeal to the HIGHER Torah law.

Mt. 12 contains 3 examples of this: 1. David. 2. The priests. 3. The disciples.

That's what is going on in Mt. 12.


You wrote: "If He helps you discern what or Who that One is that is greater then the Temple, then you can see why and how the O.T. saints were guiltless for profaning the sabbath to seeing why and how His disciples were guiltless for profaning the sabbath."

My response: They were not guiltless because they were "in the temple". That's not stated (or implied) in the text.

You have given no reason to suppose that they were guiltless merely because they were in the temple.


You wrote: "Maybe I should just ask you to explain the bold underlined portion of Matthew 12:6 in relation to verse 5 for why He said what He did to defend His disciples."

My response: I already pointed this out to you. Remember? Jesus is much GREATER than the temple. Why? Because Jesus is the One who gave Torah to His people. Thus, Jesus has divine authority to determine how to properly interpret Torah. Thus, Jesus (being much GREATER in authority than anything affiliated with the temple) can show us HOW to properly appeal to higher Torah laws in cases in which we have Torah conflicts.

That's a good explanation of the "bold underline portion" of Mt. 12:6.


You wrote: "Because keeping commandments is not how to obtain salvation by in order to get into the kingdom of heaven, but they will be judged by what they have built on that foundation."

My response: Sure. We are saved by grace through faith.

AND, our measure of Torah-obedience determines our POSITION in the forthcoming kingdom (Mt. 5:19).

AND, if our measure of Torah-obedience is sufficient, we WILL have eternal life (Lk. 10:25-28).

AND, if our measure of Torah-obedience is insufficient, we will NOT inherit the forthcoming kingdom (Mt. 5:20).

Sure, Jesus fulfilled the law (Mt. 5:17), but that doesn't prove that the law is no longer in force!

You can fulfill your marriage covenant today, and the covenant PERSISTS even tomorrow!

"FULFILLED" does not entail "TERMINATED".

And, the Torah IS our marriage covenant with the Lord.

Torah is our ketubah.

Surely you will not oppose your very marriage covenant with God! Right?

And, you quoted Mt. 12:19 incorrectly. You meant to say "Mt. 5:19", not "Mt. 12:19".


You wrote: "Again Jesus refers to a righteousness that surpasses the righteousness of the scribes and the Pharisees ( law keepers ) thus it cannot be obtained by the scribes and the Pharisees by keeping the law in order to enter into that kingdom of heaven."

My response: Wrong! The Pharisees were not "law keepers"....they were people who invented traditions to CONTRADICT and NULLIFY Torah (Mk. 7; Mt. 23).

Jesus was VERY ANGRY at the Pharisees who did NOT keep Torah (Mt. 23; Mk. 7).

Thus, you have misinterpreted Mt. 5:17-20, because you failed to realize that the Pharisees were NOT good "law keepers".

The Pharisees did a terrible job of obeying Torah (Mt. 23; Mk. 7). So, if you simply obey Torah like a normal Torah-obedient person should, then you'll be fine!

NOTHING in Mt. 5:20 states that Torah-obedient righteousness should not be exhibited. Quite the contrary! Mt. 5:20 confirms that Torah-obedient righteousness MUST be exhibited GREATER than the extent to which the Pharisees exhibit Torah-obedient righteousness....otherwise you won't enter the forthcoming kingdom.


You wrote: "So a lot of this disproves being obedient to the Torah as the means of obtaining that righteousness for salvation in order to enter into the kingdom of heaven. It points to another righteousness in order to enter in."

My response: Wrong! NOTHING in Mt. 5:20 points to "another" kind of non-Torah-obedient righteousness. The context of Mt. 5:17-20 clearly refers to obedience to TORAH!

Please stop contradicting the very context of Mt. 5:17-20 which refers to the TORAH and PROPHETS (Mt. 5:17).

Mt. 5:19 doesn't get any clearer: Oppose even the SMALLEST of Torah-commands (and teach others to do the same), and you'll be LEAST in the forthcoming kingdom (or even WORSE! Mt. 7:21-23; 13:41-42).


You wrote: "So can you tell me how to obtain this righteousness as explained by Paul or not?"

My response: Sure! Paul said that RIGHTEOUS people live by FAITH (Gr. "pistis", Gal. 3:11, citing "emunah" in Hab. 2:4).

And WHAT is this way of "emunah" by which Paul says we should live? TORAH! (see "emunah" in Ps. 119:30,86,138).

Remember, Paul told us to OBEY God's commands (1 Cor. 7:19), not ignore them! God's commands are contained in the written Torah of Moses. (1 Ki. 2:3).

Paul APPLIES Torah (Dt. 30:14) to YOU! (Rom. 10:8). Thus, Torah-obedient faithfulness IS THE WORD OF FAITH which Paul preached.

Of course law (without faith) does not save, and does not result in righteousness.

Of course we are righteous APART from faithless law-obedience.

Of COURSE we are not justified by the deeds of the law (apart from faith). Rom. 3:20,28.

BUT, we ARE justified by doing the law (Rom. 2:13), but proper law-obedience is FAITHFUL law-obedience which includes faith in Christ.

And, proper faith is NECESSARILY accompanied by Torah-obedience.

And, proper Torah-obedience is NECESSARILY accompanied by faith.

Paul opposes works without faith.

James opposes faith without works.

So what shall we do?

BOTH! Faith AND works.

What kind of works? Torah-obedient works...just as Jesus and the Apostles likewise obeyed Torah and taught others to do the same, as confirmed throughout the Bible.

So, are you ready to stop disobeying Torah?

Torah is FOUNDATIONAL to the New Covenant! (Jer. 31:33; Heb. 8:10; 10:15-16).

So why on earth would you oppose it?

Ok...happy Thanksgiving!

blessings...
 
Back
Top