Victor Van Heerden
Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2018
- Messages
- 252
He believed God was good and had one hell of a reason for asking what He did.
Do some research on this. Abraham was not morally repulsed by Gods command to sacrifice his son . “Take your son, your only son—yes, Isaac, whom you love so much—and go to the land of Moriah. Go and sacrifice him as a burnt offering on one of the mountains, which I will show you.” Genesis 22:2
Hebrews 11:17 “It was by faith that Abraham offered Isaac as a sacrifice when God was testing him. Abraham, who had received God’s promises, was ready to sacrifice his only son, Isaac…”
Why was Abraham not morally repulsed because it was common practise.
Ex 22:29-30 we read:
“You shall not delay to offer from the fullness of your harvest and from the outflow of your presses. The first-born of your sons you shall give to me. You shall do likewise with your oxen and with your sheep: seven days it shall be with its dam; on the eighth day you shall give it to me.”
Ezekiel 20:25-26 "' Moreover I gave them statutes that were not good and ordinances by which they could not have life; and I defiled them through their very gifts in making them offer by fire all their first-born, that I might horrify them; I did it that they might know that I am the LORD.”
Abraham was not morally repulsed by the command itself and there is no command against this practice. ( Genesis 22). In fact the sacrifice of Jesus the Son of God has redeemed all of mankind. He was our substitute the "Lamb of God, spotless, without blemish". God demanded continual blood sacrificial offerings in the OT. In the NT Jesus is the last and complete blood offerings to God. Without the shedding of blood there is no remission from sin.
Heb 9:22 "And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission."[/BIBLE][/BIBLE]