Excellent work, Brother-Paul. And make sure , you show them why The Roman Catholic Church conspired to replace the Word; congregation in the work of the 1611 "KJV" to the word "church" with King James who was not a Christian, and why He alone elected the advisory counsel and translators.
For you have done a great work on the word "church". Now put the "Cherry" on top of the cake!
I will aim to add what I am aware of PB, but I also know you are more knowledgeable than I, so ask you to add to or correct as necessary.
Parts of the following are taken from
https://www.beinaberean.org others are from my own studies
King James I of England decided to authorize his own translation of the Bible in 1611. The other versions fell to the Kings disfavour because their footnotes failed to honour the King. To correct this, he gathered fifty-four scholars and gave them fifteen edicts to follow as they translated and published his Authorized Version. This is a greater concern.
The first edict was that they use the Bishop's Bible (which used "congregation") with as few changes as possible.
The third edict specified that, in select places, they were to use the word "church," and not "congregation," in place of ekklesia.
His fourteenth edict stated that they could use the Tyndale, Matthew, Coverdale, the Great Bible (also called the Whitchurch, Cranmer, and Cromwell Bible), and the Geneva versions of the Bible wherever they were closer to their accessible manuscripts.
NOTE ALSO: The King's influence is also seen where the names of the apostle and brother for Jesus were translated as "James" rather than Jacob (Iakobos)
PREV History - no wonder there became so much confusion.
John Wycliffe, of Yorkshire, England, translated the first Bible into English in 1382, not from the original languages, but from the Latin. Therein, Wycliffe translated the Latin word ecclesiam into
chirche (in old English spelling):
Matthew 16:18
And Y seie to thee, that thou art Petre, and on this stoon Y schal bilde my chirche, and the yatis of helle schulen not haue miyt ayens it. (Wycliffe, c1382)
Matthew 16:18 (NKJV) - Current
And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it.
The Latin word is similar to the Greek, but because he did not know Greek, he may have used what was commonly called a religious gathering in his day. More on this later.
Other English translations that followed were:
* Tyndale's Bible (1526) - used "
congregation":
And I saye also vnto the that thou arte Peter: and apon this rocke I wyll bylde my congregacion. And the gates of hell shall not prevayle ageynst it. (Tyndale, c1526)
* Coverdale Bible (1535) - used "
congregation"
* Matthew Bible (1537) - used "
congregation"
* The Great Bible (1539) - used "
congregation"
* Geneva Bible (1560) - used "church"
And I say also vnto thee, that thou art Peter, and vpon this rocke I will builde my Church: and ye gates of hell shall not ouercome it. (Geneva Bible, c1560)
* Bishop's Bible (1568) - used "
congregation":
And I say also vnto thee, that thou art Peter, and vponn this rocke I wyll buylde my congregation: And the gates of hell shall not preuayle agaynst it. (Bishop Bible, c1568)
The word "
congregation," in place of
ekklesia, is a good translation since "
congregation" means "
to gather a flock" and refers to people, not places or institutions.
The flock being the elite, the called out ones.
Other interesting facts...
THE KING JAMES VERSION
The story gets interesting when King James I of England decided to authorize
his own translation of the Bible in 1611. The other versions fell to the Kings disfavour because their footnotes
failed to honour the King (James 1). To correct this, he gathered fifty-four scholars and gave them fifteen edicts to follow as they translated and published his Authorized Version. This is a greater concern.
The first edict was that they use the Bishop's Bible (which used "congregation") with as few changes as possible.
The third edict specified that, in select places, they were to use the word "church," and not "congregation," in place of ekklesia.
His fourteenth edict stated that they could use the Tyndale, Matthew, Coverdale, the Great Bible (also called the Whitchurch, Cranmer, and Cromwell Bible), and the Geneva versions of the Bible wherever they were closer to their accessible manuscripts.
The King's influence is also seen where the names of the apostle and brother for Jesus were translated as "James" rather than Jacob (Iakobos)
Why would the King be so adamant about using a word, "church", that he knew to mean circle rather than using the correct translation?
What do we know about this King?
One detail of his life that history books do not often discuss occurred before he became King James I of England—while he was James VI, King of Scotland.
"On the west wall of the lodgehall used by Lodge Scoon and Perth No. 3 in Perth, Scotland, can be found a mural depicting James VI kneeling at their altar at his initiation. The oldest existing record of the Lodge, called The Mutual Agreement" of 24 December, 1658, records that James was "entered Freemasonry as a Fellowcraft of the Lodge of Scoon" on 15 April, 1601."
On April 15, 1601, King James entered the
secret society of the Freemasons. A cult! In fact, Masons credit him as being the originator of the worldwide system of lodges within present-day Freemasonry. This is the greatest concern.
His version of the Bible became, and still is, the favoured version of Freemasons.
"One of the most important symbols in Freemasonry
is a circle with a dot in the center—part of their motif-the shape that is drawn by the compass.”
Throughout Europe and England, the circle was a significant occult symbol and remains so today. It connotes inclusion or influence, as does that of being surrounded. Many good symbols such as the five-pointed star and the six-pointed Star of David become the occult pentagram, pentacles, and the hexagram
when encircled, and each is used with prominence in
Freemasonry and Witchcraft. Does a circle surrounding these and other symbols place them under the influence of occult powers?
Adherents of the occult believe symbols have power and influence, and especially so when those carrying or connected to the symbol are not aware of it. Would the expression "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" apply to spiritual concerns too? Does ignorance of the law of gravity excuse us of its influence?
Recently, I had occasion to pray with an individual whom Jesus was calling out of a high position within the occult. During our prayers, she asked if we could use a word other than "church" as we prayed. That startled me and when I asked, her reason was that what we refer to as occult covens are referred to as churches by those within occult circles. She wanted to be clear that her prayers referred to the Body of Christ and not to occult churches/covens/circles.
Why do occult organizations such as the Church of Illumination, Church of Scientology, Church of Wicca, Church of Satan, and others embrace the word "church" in their identity? Do they better understand its true meaning and significance? Could it be that we are naive?
John 4:21-24 (NKJV)
21 Jesus said to her, "Woman, believe Me, the hour is coming when you will neither on this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, worship the Father.
22 You worship what you do not know;
we know what we worship, for salvation is of the Jews.
23
But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to worship Him.
24
God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth."
This is why I have listed so much, there is so much confusion created by the RCC, by the links with Constantine from 300 AD, by King James 1 from 1600 AD, through the reformation and fragments denominations.
What is clear, and I have 'tried' to get the message over, sorry if not well enough, is exactly what I have explained, from scripture, in Posts 64, 65, 66 and post 142, best read in that order and concluding here.
The church, the ekklesia, the congregation of called out ones, is the Body of Christ, Our Lord's Church, of which every born again from above believer is part of and is the Body of Christ, it is the born anew, the new creatures, the new creations in Christ Jesus, who are His, these are the ones who 'Worship in Spirit and Truth.
Unsaved souls cannot worship in Spirit and Truth, The Word is Folly to them and they have not received the Holy Spirit of Christ, they are still in sin and the devil is the father of all unsaved souls, whether they go to and join a congregation of believers or not. Only the Saved souls are the spiritual body of Christ, Only our Lord is or could ever be the Head of His Church, the ekklesia.
Shalom