Hi Born Again 2004,
I know that's a very common interpretation, but I do not find it credible. "Born of water" is a referent to water baptism - a baptism of repentance taught both by John and Jesus. "Born of the Spirit" is a referent to fire baptism - a baptism of the Holy Spirit as described in Acts 2, Acts 10, Acts 19, etc.
But since every living person gets born, it would be redundant and even somewhat petty for Jesus to be talking about the common physical birth of a baby. In saying Born of water, Jesus didn't mean common physical birth. That's what got Nicodemus confused. There's a parallel here. Think through this with me....
Every living baby is born of water and spirit, where the word spirit means BREATH. If a newborn doesn't breath it's stillborn - dead. Allow me to clarify...
And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath (SPIRIT) of life; and man became a living soul.
(Genesis 2:7 KJV)
Physical birth entails two elements - the waters of birth, and the spirit (breath) of breathing.
Jesus used these two elements of physical birth as a metaphor - the waters of birth to be contrasted with the waters of baptism for repentance, and the newborn's BREATH (spirit) to be contrasted with being born
of the spirit - the flames of fire baptism for empowerment :
For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence.
(Acts 1:5 KJV)
But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.
(Acts 1:8 KJV)
My apologies if my premise isn't crystal clear. It's a bit late, and I might need to polish up my presentation on this matter.
Thanks,
Rhema