You have posted your opinion, you have done it in your way. However, not everyone will understand the way you have put it. I have read your "Mixing Grace With The Law" post. Which I'm sure is all the research I require on the subject. However I do not understand all of your opinion. I am a very open minded person, and I love gathering information and opinions. I just want to be able to take yours with 100% knowledge.
Don't talk to me like I have the knowledge you have, which is the tone I get from you. I obviously do not have the knowledge you have currently, I am a baby christian who is learning. I want to do this correctly, because with my faith I give respect as well. Take no offense, I mean none.
I am not asking your posts, I am asking you as brother to brother. A hungry christian to one with knowledge.
I simply believe that my mind/heart/spirit lives under the law of Christ, and my body lives under the law of sin. That in my spirit I am righteous, in my body I am corrupt. However, I still believe that doing some of the things mentioned in the old testament and in the ten commandments are sins. It is no longer I who do them, but my sinful nature that does. (As you can see, I'm focusing on Romans) This is my view. In my spirit I am no longer under the law of sin, but above it because my spirit imbued with the holy spirit is without a doubt righteous.
How do I know? How can I tell? Obviously sin is recognized through the law, so even you can agree that the law does exist. When we are saved, our hearts are removed from the law. We ourselves gain knowledge and are removed from the punishment of our sinful nature. This is done by Faith and directly followed by Grace. In my mind I clearly can see wrong now. I know how to avoid it. I understand that when my sinful nature completes it, that I need help.
The way I am receiving your opinion is when you're saved, there is no sin. The old commandments mean nothing, not even for knowledge. We shouldn't follow them. We shouldn't even care about them.
So it's kind of like saying, as long as we love everyone we can do whatever we want. So if I believe I love my girlfriend, I can lust and have sex with her? Is it justified? I know it won't remove my name from the book of life, but what would god think? If I lay with another man and perform lust with someone of the same sex, It's okay if I love them? So can I do all of that, and not ever have to confess them? All of that stuff is obviously okay and won't get me booted out of heaven or salvation, but is it now justified because the laws have been set aside, because the laws are not a requirement of salvation?
So explain in a simple way. Provide your scriptures, but explain them. I don't need to go here and there, I'm asking you. If you don't want to answer, that's okay. It's only a request.
So it is clear that no one can be made right with God by trying to keep the law. For the Scriptures say, "It is through faith that a righteous person has life." This way of faith is very different from the way of law, which says, "It is through obeying the law that a person has life. But Christ has rescued us from the curse pronounced by the law. When he was hung on the cross, he took upon himself the curse for our wrongdoing. For it is written in the Scriptures, "Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree."
Through Christ Jesus, God has blessed the Gentiles with the same blessing he promised to Abraham, so that we who are believers might receive the promised [fn] Holy Spirit through faith. Dear brothers and sisters, [fn] here's an example from everyday life. Just as no one can set aside or amend an irrevocable agreement, so it is in this case. God gave the promises to Abraham and his child. [fn] And notice that the Scripture doesn't say "to his children, [fn]" as if it meant many descendants. Rather, it says "to his child"—and that, of course, means Christ.
This is what I am trying to say: The agreement God made with Abraham could not be canceled 430 years later when God gave the law to Moses. God would be breaking his promise. For if the inheritance could be received by keeping the law, then it would not be the result of accepting God's promise. But God graciously gave it to Abraham as a promise. Why, then, was the law given? It was given alongside the promise to show people their sins. But the law was designed to last only until the coming of the child who was promised. God gave his law through angels to Moses, who was the mediator between God and the people. Galatians 3:11-19
Let me put it another way. The law was our guardian until Christ came; it protected us until we could be made right with God through faith. And now that the way of faith has come, we no longer need the law as our guardian. Galatians 3:24&25
Fraction, where did you learn about the Law of Moses?