Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

What is hell?

What's unbiblical is eternal torment. Please explain how I'm misunderstanding Psalm 37.


18 The LORD knoweth the days of the upright:
And their inheritance shall be for ever.
19 They shall not be ashamed in the evil time:
And in the days of famine they shall be satisfied.

20 But the wicked shall perish,


The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Ps 37:18–20.

Please explain to me how I'm misunderstanding, "But the wicked shall perish". What other way can it be understood than the wicked shall perish?

Or, we have John's words.

16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Jn 3:16.

How else can we understand, "should not perish"? Notice John's words. He didn't say that God sent His Son so that those who believe would not suffer eternal torment. Again, just like Psalm 37, the contrast is belief or perish.
Perish is eternal separation from God. The righteous shall not perish because they shall be resurrected and united with Christ. This is talking about resurrection like Christ. The unrighteous on the other hand don't have that, they will die again in the second death. As for John's words, those who do not believe is condemned ALREADY, they are on the broad way toward this fate (Matt. 7:13). That is your misunderstanding.
 
I tell you, ma'am, read the context. The Olivet Discourse is mostly about the siege of Jerusalem in 70AD. Disciples specifically asked when will this catastrophic event happen that will not leave even one stone upon another, and the Lord gave them the answer.
Sir u may Dibble m dabble words I go talk to the Father I'm not like Most sir
There r those who can only see word on a page n they allow them words to strangle themselves because they hear not the Spirit for their own Spirit has not settled down enough to hear Abba speak

I will pray for u
Twistie
 
I tell you, ma'am, read the context. The Olivet Discourse is mostly about the siege of Jerusalem in 70AD. Disciples specifically asked when will this catastrophic event happen that will not leave even one stone upon another, and the Lord gave them the answer.
N to b quite frank thos convo glorify My Abba not at all
Why r yall so concerned with it do you all plan to go or are yall just testing YH

Idk but like I said earlier in this thread idc idc what it is I don't want no separation between me n YH not at all n it's that simple you all argue to cause more division me imma pray for His children just like My Messiah did
Twistie ✌️
 
Sir u may Dibble m dabble words I go talk to the Father I'm not like Most sir
There r those who can only see word on a page n they allow them words to strangle themselves because they hear not the Spirit for their own Spirit has not settled down enough to hear Abba speak

I will pray for u
Twistie
I will pray for you to learn how to properly speak, especially when speaking of the Father.
 
I will pray for you to learn how to properly speak, especially when speaking of the Father.
No u may not have no relationship but He answers me
Your very rude n condescending I can taste your words you know n they r ugly js
You may wanna focus on the high prideful horse Your on cause speaking to people rudely whom u have no idea whom they r is not a smart thing to do js
U definitely wouldn't bring anyone closer to Abba that way
May I ask do u call urself any particular title like Christian or teacher or pastor or what eva the case may b?
TWISTIE
 
No u may not have no relationship but He answers me
Your very rude n condescending I can taste your words you know n they r ugly js
You may wanna focus on the high prideful horse Your own cause speaking to people whom u have no idea whom they r is not a smart thing to do js
U definitely wouldn't bring anyone closer to Abba that way
May I ask do u call urself any particular title like Christian or teacher or pastor or what eva the case may b?
TWISTIE
 
Twiste, i would leave this thread, they are not preaching or edifying "Jesus Christ" in no way what so ever, if they are not Edifying "Christ" and promoting His "Holiness and Sanctification" what then? And got the nerve to condemn John Calvin the man, and perceive him and label him as if he was a devil. There are greener pastures that is honoring your LORD. because you cannot honor him here. but only be involved in that which is displeasing to Your "LORD" he would not like you to keep company in this company at this time. :pensive: This place here is for "WARRIORS" when it is time to move, and not be in a place, where Angels fear to tread. :pensive:

Your brother in Christ, PloughBoy.
Plough I forgot to push the unwatchable button n don't ya know they dragged me back in but i figured out how to unwatch

Yaa me lol

Twistie ✌️
 
You're free to disagree, however, that just makes you wrong. You're not disagreeing with me. You're disagreeing with Jesus and the apostles. They said it ends. Why didn't you address the passages? They're still there. Jesus and the apostles said the aion ends. I could show you many more passages where the aion ends. How many do you need? The real question is why did you just brush these passages aside? How do you expect to find the truth of Scripture if you're brushing aside passages that don't agree with your theology?

Regarding Rev 14:11, look at the context. Those people are alive. You posted,

11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.

The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Re 14:11.

The word translated "worship" is present active. That means they are worshipping. These people are alive. The next verse, 12 verifies this.

12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.

The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Re 14:12.

John says, "here" is the patients of the saint: "here" are they that keep the commandments of God. The word translated "here" means, at that location. The saints are at that location. Is it your contention that the saints are suffering eternal torment in the Lake of Fire? No, these people are alive and worshipping the Beast and the saints are there.

It's things like this that show me that many people who argue this position just use proof texts. If one actually reads the passage in context it's clear that these people are alive. The problem is, people see torment and forever and ever and immediately "assume" their doctrine. Here's something else to consider. Do you really believe there is day and night in this place of eternal torment? If this Lake of Fire is somewhere down in the earth when the ghosts of the dead are tormented, how could there be day and night? Doesn't that require the sun?



Again< you're free to disagree, but you're disagreeing with Scripture. Jude states palinly that what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah was aionios fire or as the English puts it, eternal fire. Well, It's clear beyond any doubt that those two cities are not still burning. It was just them it was also the cities in the plains around them. That would be one massive fire. It would be visible from space. But yet it's not there This shows beyond any doubt that aionios fire is NOT eternal.

No, God didn't say, if you eat of the tree of Good and Evil you will be cast out of my presence. He said Adam would die. What was that death? God explains it Himself; we don't have to guess.

And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life; 18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field; 19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.

The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Ge 3:17–19.

The death Adam would die is returning to the dust.

You avoided the question.

Are God and Paul both wrong? If the wages of sin is eternal torment, then one must answer yes to this question. What say you?

If you disagree, show me where this teaching is found in Scripture. Taking a few passages out of context is not teaching. Where do God, the Prophets, Jesus, or the apostles, layout a teaching showing the consequences of sin.

To answer your question, no I am not a Calvinist.

It's not a question of can He. The question is, does He. Again, what did He say? 'The soul that sins shall die'. He didn't say anything about eternal torment. God could give eternal life to everyone. However, that's not what we find in the Bible. In the Bible eternal life is "only" given to believers.

I never said anything about the statement. You brought it up. However, if that's wicked, how much more so is, accept me or burn forever? Do you think it's better to burn forever than to simply die?

I need to consider a lot of Scripture? I've considered a lot of Scripture on this subject. I've literally studied it for years. Notice, the demons didn't ask if Jesus came to torment them forever. Let's look at what God said through David about the wicked.



Psalm 37

A Psalm of David.

1 Fret not thyself because of evildoers,
Neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity.
2 For they shall soon be cut down like the grass,
And wither as the green herb.


3 Trust in the LORD, and do good;
So shalt thou dwell in the land, and verily thou shalt be fed.
4 Delight thyself also in the LORD;
And he shall give thee the desires of thine heart.

5 Commit thy way unto the LORD;
Trust also in him; and he shall bring it to pass.
6 And he shall bring forth thy righteousness as the light,
And thy judgment as the noonday.

7 Rest in the LORD, and wait patiently for him:
Fret not thyself because of him who prospereth in his way,
Because of the man who bringeth wicked devices to pass.

8 Cease from anger, and forsake wrath:
Fret not thyself in any wise to do evil.
9 For evildoers shall be cut off:
But those that wait upon the LORD, they shall inherit the earth.

10 For yet a little while, and the wicked shall not be:
Yea, thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be.

11 But the meek shall inherit the earth;
And shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace.

12 The wicked plotteth against the just,
And gnasheth upon him with his teeth.
13 The Lord shall laugh at him:
For he seeth that his day is coming.

14 The wicked have drawn out the sword, and have bent their bow,
To cast down the poor and needy,
And to slay such as be of upright conversation.
15 Their sword shall enter into their own heart,
And their bows shall be broken.


16 A little that a righteous man hath
Is better than the riches of many wicked.
17 For the arms of the wicked shall be broken:
But the LORD upholdeth the righteous.

18 The LORD knoweth the days of the upright:
And their inheritance shall be for ever.
19 They shall not be ashamed in the evil time:
And in the days of famine they shall be satisfied.

20 But the wicked shall perish,
And the enemies of the LORD shall be as the fat of lambs:
They shall consume; into smoke shall they consume away.

21 The wicked borroweth, and payeth not again:
But the righteous sheweth mercy, and giveth.
22 For such as be blessed of him shall inherit the earth;
And they that be cursed of him shall be cut off.

23 The steps of a good man are ordered by the LORD:
And he delighteth in his way.
24 Though he fall, he shall not be utterly cast down:
For the LORD upholdeth him with his hand.

25 I have been young, and now am old;
Yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken,
Nor his seed begging bread.
26 He is ever merciful, and lendeth;
And his seed is blessed.

27 Depart from evil, and do good;
And dwell for evermore.
28 For the LORD loveth judgment,
And forsaketh not his saints;

They are preserved for ever:
But the seed of the wicked shall be cut off.
29 The righteous shall inherit the land,
And dwell therein for ever.

30 The mouth of the righteous speaketh wisdom,
And his tongue talketh of judgment.
31 The law of his God is in his heart;
None of his steps shall slide.

32 The wicked watcheth the righteous,
And seeketh to slay him.
33 The LORD will not leave him in his hand,
Nor condemn him when he is judged.

34 Wait on the LORD, and keep his way,
And he shall exalt thee to inherit the land:
When the wicked are cut off, thou shalt see it.

35 I have seen the wicked in great power,
And spreading himself like a green bay tree.
36 Yet he passed away, and, lo, he was not:
Yea, I sought him, but he could not be found.


37 Mark the perfect man, and behold the upright:
For the end of that man is peace.
38 But the transgressors shall be destroyed together:
The end of the wicked shall be cut off.


39 But the salvation of the righteous is of the LORD:
He is their strength in the time of trouble.
40 And the LORD shall help them, and deliver them:
He shall deliver them from the wicked,
And save them, because they trust in him.

The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Ps 37

Just in this one Psalm we see the wicked, cut off, perish, are destroyed, passed away, could not be found, shall not be, and his sword will enter his own heart. In all of those descriptions of what will happen to the wicked, there is no mention of eternal torment. In verse 20 the Hebrew word translated consume means to disappear. The wicked shall disappear, in smoke they shall disappear. That sure sounds like the Lake of Fire to me. They shall be burned up and disappear as smoke.

Seriously, I would urge you forgo your theology and take a serious look at the Scriptures. A theology built on proof texts is a house built on sand. We know what Jesus said about building our house on sand.

You construct your whole belief with a play on the word aion. You overlook many scriptures, fire un quenched, beast and satan tormented day and night. As was the case last time we discussed, you are too hard headed to budge. I tried to appeal to your common sense but it seems pointless with you. Somehow you think ''Accept me or die'' is a statement from a good God, unless it is that you teach He is not good...?

Aion = In early Greek αἰών‎ means 'life' (often in the sense of 'vital force'), 'whole lifetime', 'generation'. It was perhaps through application to the kosmos, the lifetime of which is never-ending, that the word acquired the sense of eternity.

All the translations wrote ''eternal torment''. But you and a select few have the correct translation, seriously?
 
POSIT: I'm special; God understands me. Although He probably may not let others
off; I'm sure God will make an exception for me because I'm not like other people;
I'm different.

REPLY: Unfortunately, the Bible's God can't do that. If He were to make exceptions,

God would be neither equitable, nor honest-- and worse, it would go against His
grain, compromise His integrity, sin against His conscience; and cause Him to lose
the world's respect.

No, God doesn't grade on a curve: everyone is treated equally in God's courtroom.
In a system of divine absolutes; there is neither a curve nor an exception: nobody
gets any favors, nobody is special, and nobody is a protected species.

Deut 10:17 . . Jehovah shows no partiality and accepts no bribes.

Acts 10:34 . .Then Peter began to speak: I now realize how true it is that God is
impartial.

Rom 2:5-11 . . God does not show favoritism.
_
 
Perish is eternal separation from God. The righteous shall not perish because they shall be resurrected and united with Christ. This is talking about resurrection like Christ. The unrighteous on the other hand don't have that, they will die again in the second death. As for John's words, those who do not believe is condemned ALREADY, they are on the broad way toward this fate (Matt. 7:13). That is your misunderstanding.
But the doctrine of hell is not eternal separation from God. It's eternal torment. Of course the wicked will be separated from God, they won't exist. So they'll be separated from everything. There's a huge difference between not existing and being eternally tormented.
 
You construct your whole belief with a play on the word aion. You overlook many scriptures, fire un quenched, beast and satan tormented day and night. As was the case last time we discussed, you are too hard headed to budge. I tried to appeal to your common sense but it seems pointless with you. Somehow you think ''Accept me or die'' is a statement from a good God, unless it is that you teach He is not good...?

Aion = In early Greek αἰών‎ means 'life' (often in the sense of 'vital force'), 'whole lifetime', 'generation'. It was perhaps through application to the kosmos, the lifetime of which is never-ending, that the word acquired the sense of eternity.

All the translations wrote ''eternal torment''. But you and a select few have the correct translation, seriously?
Hardheaded? I gave you the words of Jesus and the apostles, all of which spoke of the end of the aion. I asked you how something that ends can be eternal. You did not answer. You didn't address any of the passages or arguments I made. You simply side stepping them. Claiming I'm hardheaded doesn't prove your point. If you have a valid case make it as I have done. I've addressed each passage you've given me.

Aion does not mean. Please show me any grammar that says such. Aion means age. The translators of the Septuagint chose aion for Olam when they translated the Hebrew Old Testment into Greek about 300-250 BC. Olam has to do with time and direction. It has nothing to do with life.

How about we get serious and start looking at the Scriptures? Please explain how aion can mean eternal when Jesus and the apostles say it ends. Jesus spoke of an aion to come. If aion means eternal how can there be one to come if this one doesn't end?

You gave several passages from Revelation, which is a book filled with symbolism. You didn't explain any of the passages you simply posted them and it appears you take them literally. Tell me, if Satan, the beast, and the false prophet burn for eternity, how does that prove that men will burn for eternity? It's a non sequitur. You posted about those who worship the beast. I showed you from the context that those people were alive, not dead. I showed you that what is burning in the 'fire that I'd not quenched' is dead bodies, not living ghosts or spirits. It's bodies. I pointed out that the word quench means to put out, not go. How can the fore burn forever when Jeremiah says that this place I'll be made holy to the Lord?

As I said, I've been through all of these passages. They don't prove eternal torment. If you set aside you theology and just let the Bible speak you'll see that. The problem is that we've been taught to proof text. Let's make a doctrine and jump all over the Bible finding passages we think will support the doctrine. It's probably the most common method Christians use . It's wrong! It doesn't take anything into consideration. Things like, context. I can see this is what is happening here because the passages aren't addressing the subject when they're looked at in context.

I'm more than willing to have the discussion if you're willing to approach it with intellectual honesty. If we're going to actually engage the Scriptures and not side step every passage that doesn't fit our theology.

So, instead of telling me how I'm wrong, why don't you tell why you're right?
 
The rich man spoken of in Luke 16:19-31 addressed Abraham as "father" and he in
turn addressed the man as "son" which suggests they are very distantly related as
grandfather/grandson. (cf. Luke 16:29. Moses and the Prophets came along
several centuries after Abraham's passing.)

I have two grandsons. I'm not sure how well I will cope should either of them end
up in the wrong place.
_
 
But the doctrine of hell is not eternal separation from God. It's eternal torment. Of course the wicked will be separated from God, they won't exist. So they'll be separated from everything. There's a huge difference between not existing and being eternally tormented.
That's annihilationism, totally unbiblical.

 
That's annihilationism, totally unbiblical.

Can you prove it? It's easy to say. Posting an article from Got Questions doesn't cut it. That's probably the worst website there is for Christian doctrine. There's enough error on that site sink a ship.

The first paragraph shows a clear lack of understanding of what a man is. This is clearly defined in Genesis 2:7. In the second paragraph he states the logical fallacy of Begging the Question by using his premise to prove his conclusion. As I said, the site is laced with error. I always encourage people to look elsewhere for reliable information.

Annihilation is what the Bible teaches. That's why I'm able to lay out a case from Scripture. The eternal torment side can only proof text. Once it's been proven that aion is wrongly translated, which I've done, the entire eternal torment doctrine falls apart. It requires that the wicked have eternal life, yet Scripture tells us that man is not immortal and nowhere in Scripture is eternal life promised to the wicked. Thus, the wicked cannot live forever, thus they cannot be tormented forever. It is Eternal Torment that is unbiblical. Like so many other doctrines it's support by a handful of proof texts. Csn you show one place in Scripture that tells us the wages of sin is eternal torlent.

Also, please explain how I'm misunderstanding Psalm 37. How am I misunderstanding, the wicked shall perish?
 
The law of God says: Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, burning for burning, hand for
hand, foot for foot, wound for wound, and stripe for stripe.

Where does that leave people like Ted Kaczynski who killed and/or maimed 26
people with homemade bombs; or Stephen Paddock who indiscriminately sprayed a
music concert in Las Vegas with a rifle equipped with a bump stock resulting in 471
dead and/or wounded; and the numerous serial killers that are in and out of the
news from time to time? How are those murderers supposed to balance the scales
of justice for all the illegal deaths they've caused?

Well; the fact of the matter is: they can't balance the scales because they simply
don't' have enough lives of their own with which to pay for their victims' lives.

This makes me suspect that suffering in the afterlife isn't uniform, i.e. there's one
Hell, but its circumstances may be something akin to the nine levels of Inferno in
Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy.
_
 
Can you prove it? It's easy to say. Posting an article from Got Questions doesn't cut it. That's probably the worst website there is for Christian doctrine. There's enough error on that site sink a ship.

The first paragraph shows a clear lack of understanding of what a man is. This is clearly defined in Genesis 2:7. In the second paragraph he states the logical fallacy of Begging the Question by using his premise to prove his conclusion. As I said, the site is laced with error. I always encourage people to look elsewhere for reliable information.

Annihilation is what the Bible teaches. That's why I'm able to lay out a case from Scripture. The eternal torment side can only proof text. Once it's been proven that aion is wrongly translated, which I've done, the entire eternal torment doctrine falls apart. It requires that the wicked have eternal life, yet Scripture tells us that man is not immortal and nowhere in Scripture is eternal life promised to the wicked. Thus, the wicked cannot live forever, thus they cannot be tormented forever. It is Eternal Torment that is unbiblical. Like so many other doctrines it's support by a handful of proof texts. Csn you show one place in Scripture that tells us the wages of sin is eternal torlent.

Also, please explain how I'm misunderstanding Psalm 37. How am I misunderstanding, the wicked shall perish?
Got Questions may not be perfect, but it's a much more reliable source than you, a random guy on a forum defending a heresy. I can effortlessly pluck out another piece:


In Yeshua's own words in Mark 9:47-48, the Lake of Fire is definitely eternal, as "where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched", that was a quote from Isa. 66:24. Annihilation is based on materialism, it often stems from a belief that an omnipotent, omniscient, loving God could not possibly allow eternal punishment for the sins of man. Yeshua warned about this eternal punishment more than kingdom of heaven, that actually becomes a stumbling block that leads to rejection of Yeshua, but it's the truth, even though it might hurt. God's way is not man's way.

As for "perish", I have explained before that it means no resurrection for the wicked, their physical life is all that is, they fully embrace annihilationism, 'cause once they're done in, it's over, they have no afterlife in new glorious bodies in the millennial kingdom reigning with Christ. If that's what you're into and you'd life to join them, suit yourself.
 
Can you prove it? It's easy to say. Posting an article from Got Questions doesn't cut it. That's probably the worst website there is for Christian doctrine. There's enough error on that site sink a ship.

The first paragraph shows a clear lack of understanding of what a man is. This is clearly defined in Genesis 2:7. In the second paragraph he states the logical fallacy of Begging the Question by using his premise to prove his conclusion. As I said, the site is laced with error. I always encourage people to look elsewhere for reliable information.

Annihilation is what the Bible teaches. That's why I'm able to lay out a case from Scripture. The eternal torment side can only proof text. Once it's been proven that aion is wrongly translated, which I've done, the entire eternal torment doctrine falls apart. It requires that the wicked have eternal life, yet Scripture tells us that man is not immortal and nowhere in Scripture is eternal life promised to the wicked. Thus, the wicked cannot live forever, thus they cannot be tormented forever. It is Eternal Torment that is unbiblical. Like so many other doctrines it's support by a handful of proof texts. Csn you show one place in Scripture that tells us the wages of sin is eternal torlent.

Also, please explain how I'm misunderstanding Psalm 37. How am I misunderstanding, the wicked shall perish?
And last, I suggest using more specific terms instead of that double hockey sticks for the purpose of clarification, either Hades - or Lake of Fire. Yeshua went down to the former for two days, Satan heading toward the latter for eons. Otherwise, as KingJ said, it's just a word game, and I have no more interest in playing.
 
And last, I suggest using more specific terms instead of that double hockey sticks for the purpose of clarification, either Hades - or Lake of Fire. Yeshua went down to the former for two days, Satan heading toward the latter for eons. Otherwise, as KingJ said, it's just a word game, and I have no more interest in playing.
I've already suggested we do away with the word hell completely. It's not found in Scripture. Having said that the Lake of Fire, aka Gehenna, does not burn eternally. Jeremiah prophesied of a time when it would again be made holy to the Lord.
 
Got Questions may not be perfect, but it's a much more reliable source than you, a random guy on a forum defending a heresy. I can effortlessly pluck out another piece:


In Yeshua's own words in Mark 9:47-48, the Lake of Fire is definitely eternal, as "where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched", that was a quote from Isa. 66:24. Annihilation is based on materialism, it often stems from a belief that an omnipotent, omniscient, loving God could not possibly allow eternal punishment for the sins of man. Yeshua warned about this eternal punishment more than kingdom of heaven, that actually becomes a stumbling block that leads to rejection of Yeshua, but it's the truth, even though it might hurt. God's way is not man's way.

As for "perish", I have explained before that it means no resurrection for the wicked, their physical life is all that is, they fully embrace annihilationism, 'cause once they're done in, it's over, they have no afterlife in new glorious bodies in the millennial kingdom reigning with Christ. If that's what you're into and you'd life to join them, suit yourself.
It's not that Got Questions isnt perfect. It's that they're flat wrong on a lot of topics. But you don't know me. And, you don't know the people at Got Questions. So, you're not really In a position to say unless of course you can make a case from Scripure. You've yet to do so. Anyone can say, "you're wrong" Proving it from Scripture is another story. As for the second article,

"In my opinion, their theology misses three points from a Biblical Christian Worldview.

  1. Mankind is made up of BOTH the physical and the spiritual."

"What the writer is missing in this analogy is that mankind is made up of two basic parts, the temporal (physical) and the eternal (spiritual). For some theologians, the “spiritual” can be further broken down into the “spirit” and the “soul” of man."


Two problems right off the bat. First, he's giving his opinion. The second is that he assumes mankind is made of physical and spiritual. He has man as physical and Spiritual. However, that's not what we find in Scripture. Gen 2:7 gives us the creation of man. God formed man from the dust of the earth. There you have it, man is made of dust, the elements of the earth. Moses then tells us that God breathed the breath or spirit of life into man and man became a living soul. What we have here is a man made of dust. He is then infused with something of God Himself the breath or spirit of life. These two combine to form a living soul. So a soul requires a body. The spirit is that of God, not man. So, the author comes to the table with the wrong presuppositions and doesn't have a Biblical view of what a man is. He holds the Greek or Gnostic view of man.

So, if you'd like to make a case and show why Annihilationism isn't Biblical I'm all ears. As I said, it's eternal torment that isn't Biblical.

Also, again, please explain how I'm misunderstanding Psalm 37. How am I misunderstanding the, wicked shall perish?
 
Back
Top