I agree with RJ's take on this...God is referring to habitual sin, the lifestyle of sin...a Christian can sin, and some more often than others, although I firmly believe it is possible not to. Many times I have found it necessary to fall at the feet of my Saviour and repent and weep for my selfishness that has caused me over my lifetime no end of trouble. Ego, pride, self, all have led me to sin in some way or other...but like Paul in Romans 7 I thank God for His power and grace to deliver....I can confidently and joyfully and gratefully say that I am completely free from every habitual sin. No addictions, no habits, no continuing problems that I need to daily re-confess over and over again.
Following up to my previous post on love and the law ....here are some more scripture connecting the two....
".....Love is the fulfilling of the law". Romans 13:10
1 John 4:7 ¶ Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God.
8 He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
9 In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him.
10 Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.
11 Beloved, if God so loved us, we ought also to love one another.
12 No man hath seen God at any time. If we love one another, God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us.
13 Hereby know we that we dwell in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit.
14 ¶ And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world.
15 Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God.
16 And we have known and believed the love that God hath to us. God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him.
17 ¶ Herein is our love made perfect, that we may have boldness in the day of judgment: because as he is, so are we in this world.
18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.
19 We love him, because he first loved us.
20 If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
21 And this commandment have we from him, That he who loveth God love his brother also.
1 ¶ Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him.
2 By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments.
3 For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.......
......1 John 5:17 All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death.
18 ¶ We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not.
19 And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness.
20 And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.
21 Little children, keep yourselves from idols.......
DHC, you have often opined that the covenants of the Bible are separate and that Gentiles are only bound by the new. Please find below an excerpt from an article on the covenants which I believe is quite enlightening.
"The gospel and law belong together. In their Anchor Bible Dictionary article on the covenant, George Mendenhall and Gary Herion refer to the Ancient Near Eastern suzerainty treaties (as in ancient Hittite culture), which include a prologue stating what the Sovereign had done for a vassal, and the “reciprocity” of the vassal in grateful obedience to some stipulations. Then a little later they point out the following about the Ten Commandments:
“The Ten Words are not commands, nor are they couched in command (i.e., imperative) language. They are simple future indicative verbs that indicate the future action that is the expected consequence of the preceding prologue: ‘I am Yahweh your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt . . . (and therefore) you will have no other gods before me.’”......."
(DHC, I have often said that the commandments are in fact promises of God to empower us to obey. 'You will not commit adultery 'etc... And why won't I commit adultery? Because I am in a saving relationship with Jesus...I am abiding in the vine...His Holy Spirit dwells within me and I find it offensive and distasteful to even contemplate adultery. That loving relationship fulfills the law. And this excerpt reflects this. And not just under the new covenant, but it was so under the old as well!)
....."Sinai was not a contract but a covenant. It was not an external agreement but a relationship. Far from being a formal document (with potential to legalism), Sinai was a covenant of love (which is true of God’s everlasting covenant in its unfolding through various covenants). We would expect this from a God of love (1 John 4:8). God invited His people, weary and worn from Egyptian slavery, to come to Him in just as warm and loving embrace as Christ’s later invitation: “‘Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest’” (Matt. 11:28). He offered them the same relationship in the Sinai covenant as He offers in the gospel. For in both God longs to be their God (with all that brings) and for them to be His special, precious people “‘who love me and keep my commandments’” (Ex. 20:6). To disconnect the law at Sinai from the deliverance in the Red Sea overlooks the introduction to the Ten Commandments, in which covenant God says He delivered them through the Red Sea (Ex. 20:1, 2).
The gospel was present in the Old Testament. That’s why the great heroes of faith are recorded in Hebrews 11. They had a faith-heart relationship with Christ rather than a works orientation with the law. They had discernment, because “Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see. This is what the ancients were commended for” (Heb. 11:1, 2). These persons of faith included all the prophets (vs. 32). This spiritual heart-relationship with God was available to Israel during its desert wandering. " (excerpt from God's Everlasting Covenant by Norman Gulley.) I can PM a link to full article to anyone interested.
So to claim that those who believe obedience to God's commandments are automatically 'judaisers' or 'legalists' is missing the whole purpose of the covenant.
The reason Jesus died...the reason God brought the Israelites out of Egypt...the reason God brings people out from under the bondage of sin...
is not to free them from their obligation to obey His commandments, but to empower them to obey His commandments....
through faith in His promises, all ten of them.
Hello Brakelite.
DHC, you have often opined that the covenants of the Bible are separate and that Gentiles are only bound by the new. Please find below an excerpt from an article on the covenants which I believe is quite enlightening.
Yes Brakelite, I do make a fuss about the covenants because the Bible uses the term repeatedly.
God speaks to mankind within the framework of specific covenants, I am happy to see that you
are recognising these partitions within the scripture.
“The Ten Words are not commands, nor are they couched in command (i.e., imperative) language. They are simple future indicative verbs that indicate the future action that is the expected consequence of the preceding prologue: ‘I am Yahweh your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt . . . (and therefore) you will have no other gods before me.’”......."
Here we differ in the strongest way Brakelite. The covenant that God established at Mt Sinai
with Israel was a terrifying covenant. Lightening and thunder, the Israelites could not bear to listen
to God speaking, they were filled with dread. Rightly so, for the Israelite nation was eventually
demolished under the judgement of God. Israel was hardened to the Gospel itself and became
the greatest enemies of the apostles. One would never sign up to the old covenant if one knew
what the covenant implied.
(DHC, I have often said that the commandments are in fact promises of God to empower us to obey.
'You will not commit adultery 'etc... And why won't I commit adultery? Because I am in a saving relationship
with Jesus...I am abiding in the vine...His Holy Spirit dwells within me and I find it offensive and distasteful
to even contemplate adultery. That loving relationship fulfills the law. And this excerpt reflects this. And not
just under the new covenant, but it was so under the old as well!)
Commandments are not promises and they do not empower obedience. Rather the opposite Brakelite,
the commandments condemn, they tell you in no uncertain terms what your problem really is.
Commandments bring the knowledge of sin but provide no escape from the stranglehold of sin.
You may try not to steal but you will only discover no matter how hard you try you will fail.
....."Sinai was not a contract but a covenant. It was not an external agreement but a relationship.
Far from being a formal document (with potential to legalism),
Mt Sinai was a legal contract between physical Israel and God. The proclamation by God of
the commandments was legislation, Brakelite. As soon as God announced the terms of the
agreement and the Israelites consented, law came into existence. That is what 'law' means
Brakelite, ratified legislation! Commandments are law, law is legislation, law is enforced.
It was a formal and legal agreement between God and the nation of Israel. To say otherwise
is just not the truth Brakelite. A covenant is a legal agreement.
A commandment is precisely a law, there is no seperating the terminology. Death was the
penalty, the soul that sins will die under the law. I do disagree that the old covenant was
not a formal document. What the old covenant was above everything else was a divine
legal agreement between Israel and God. Written law is precisely what the old covenant
was Brakelite, from the start to the finish is pure legal documentation.
God invited His people, weary and worn from Egyptian slavery, to come to Him in just as warm and
loving embrace as Christ’s later invitation: “‘Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and
I will give you rest’” (Matt 11:28).
The scripture states the contrary Brakelite, God slaughtered the Israelites in the desert.
God delivered the law which could not be obeyed even by the most zealous person. The
whole purpose of the law was to expose sin, without the law we are oblivious to our condition.
Anybody who meditated on the law would quickly utter
'blessed is the man whose sin God
will not take into account'. Abraham was reckoned righteous before circumcision and before
the law came into being. Abraham was granted righteousness by God and not by what he did.
Christ's invitation was to those who were weary of their own flesh and their inability to obey
the law. Do you pray like this Brakelite, "God why can't everyone just be like me! I fast twice
a week, tithe regularly, never miss church on Saturday. I have no addictions that I am aware
of and I just love the ten commandments." Or is your prayer like this, "God forgive me for I
am a sinner." One person can really see what the problem is within. Whereas the other is blind
to the true state of their flesh. We only have the righteousness of Christ and we are living in a
state of forgiveness.
He offered them the same relationship in the Sinai covenant as He offers in the gospel. For in both
God longs to be their God (with all that brings) and for them to be His special, precious people “‘who
love me and keep my commandments’” (Ex 20:6). To disconnect the law at Sinai from the deliverance
in the Red Sea overlooks the introduction to the Ten Commandments, in which covenant God says
He delivered them through the Red Sea (Ex 20:1, 2).
Negative Brakelite, the New Covenant is free and by Grace, the Old Covenant was oppressive
slavery with no deliverance. Yes, God did deliver Israel from Egyptian slavery but delivered
them into legal bondage. God told Moses that they would not obey Him before God gave
the Israelites the law. God already knew of course that the nation of Israel would fail.
God has given not only Israel over to disobedience but all of mankind. Israel stands as a
testimony to the utter futility of the flesh against the power of sin. This is one of the great
lessons of the law, we are not able to obey the law. Any attempt to obey written law is a
work of the flesh, you can only bear the fruit of the spirit. All is from above and is only
available through the pure and simple devotion to Jesus Christ.
The gospel was present in the Old Testament.
Negative again Brakelite, the 'promise' of the Gospel was evident in the law and the prophets.
It was a future event that promised deliverance, one that God would furnish for mankind.
That is why the folk in the old testament looked forward to the promise as they did not
have the reality of the Gospel insitu. “Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain
of what we do not see." They hoped that God would deliver them as they had not experienced
the reality of the Gospel. They expected the messiah to arrive at sometime in the future.